Yes, it makes a world of a difference. You posted a shot of Ronnie from one of his worst years and claimed that Dorian owns him. In my opinion, the pic of Ronnie I provided looks better than your abs-and-thighs pic of Dorian. That's besides the point. I'm not going to argue why I think Ronnie wins this pose b/c it simply doesn't matter. I'll even give this pose to Dorian out of curteousy. Ronnie wins the majority of the mandatories. So losing 1 pose doesn't hurt him. My point was that your pic of Dorian doesn't own a prime Ronnie in this pose.
i mainly did that bc everyone shows a pic of dorian from 94 or the 96 english grand prix. the quality of the pics isnt that good, but hulkster, pumpster, etc. show those pics vs. pics of ronnie that are digital or from the 99 grand prix where even jeff 'box' long looked amazing due to the lighting and black background.
that pic was from 99 of ronnie (with the blue shorts). isnt that ronnie's best year?
also, ronnie's shitty 4 pack makes him loose that pose to pretty much everyone. no different thant dorian, bc of his 1 arm, loosing the front double bi shot.
coleman's legs, although huge and with great sweep, look wierd. the vastus muscles are very long and think (esp. the rectus femoris) and dorian's teardrops are much thicker and better. frankly, i think yates has some of the best tear drops of all time. sometimes, it appears that's all he has as far as quads.
