From the 96 Olympia. Yates matching NASA pound for pound on muscle size and pwning him on conditioning, quality and forearm size. Where is the difference here in arm size that NASA's trunk sniffers so often talk about? BTW, I bet the trunk sniffers really dig NASA's ghetto booty and short legs. LOL
By 1994, Nasser had some Serious gunz
By 1994, Nasser had some Serious synthol gunz
yeah, not everyone was born with brains..
Ronnie did not have huge hams. What the hell are you looking at? You cannot tell ham size by looking at a rear double bi or rear lat. From the side he didn't have much of a drop in his ham (like Tom Prince or even Kai Greene). Ronnie certainly had sliced ripped hams though.
Ronnie's hams from the side were seperated as hell and did hang very low when he hit the pose correct from the waist down.
Yes, Nasser's arms were bigger than Dorian's. Trying to argue otherwise is just plain stupid.
I think the only time Ronnies thighs may have been outmassed on stage were in 2002 by Gunter, and 2004 by Ruhl
not in 2004 by Ruhl.sorry. ronnie's were by far the biggest on stage that year, probably everthey make 300 pound gunter's quads literally look like toothpics:
Ruhl looked better on the challenge round most muscular too.
no he didn't. thats why he lost the pose.ruhl's mm was always a step below ronnie's. especially with no tris.
Still as smooth as hell in the side triceps pose. This is how it should look. He looks like turd compared to this. Oh, and the front double biceps is flawless here too.
I laugh at how the nuthuggers love to say that had dorian not retired, he would have kept winning.yeah sure:
that was not from the olympia....you find the worst pics
you come up with the worst excuses.
Hulkster, I am on your side when it comes to Ronnie vs Jay. No way, no how is Jason Cutler worthy of even being compared to Ronnie in his 98' Olympia shape. It is blasphemy. Both Dorian and Ronnie are on a league leaps and bounds beyond Gay Gutler.SUCKMYMUSCLE
I would agree
