« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: whos bigger?  (Read 12253 times)

HERACLES

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3025
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #25 on: May 07, 2006, 11:58:33 AM »
detail, details, detail...

Check out Ronnies back in the rear double bicep- check out his hammies/and glutes compared to ruhl. Ronnie is more refined, and slightly bigger than ruhl. Ruhl does give Ronnie a run for his money in the mass department..but we all know on stage its the quality mass that wins.
Logged

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20507
  • Biscuit
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #26 on: May 07, 2006, 12:00:35 PM »
Great pics. Cool comparison shots. Thanks. Oh, Coleman is bigger, but not by that much.
Logged
a

FreakBB7243

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 403
  • Getbig!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #27 on: May 07, 2006, 12:05:07 PM »
Coleman owns him in every pose!  Im a bigger fan of Ruhl than Coleman but there is no comparison in terms of size and sym! Cormier does look out of place with those two monsters!  :o
Logged

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #28 on: May 07, 2006, 12:19:01 PM »
Those pics show why nobody in history can match Ronnie for size and shape.  He truly is in a class by himself.  Ruhl would dwarf Dorian or Haney.  Ronnie is bigger and harder with better shape.  Only guy on the horizon with the genetics to potentially match up well is Martinez and possibly Cutler if his back gets harder.  Overall, though, it is a moot point about who will win the Mr. Olympia every year.
Logged

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #29 on: May 07, 2006, 12:22:59 PM »
Ruhl is bigger of the two if comparing overall size & muscularity
Logged

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2006, 12:34:26 PM »
Cormier looks better then both in those pics (way more detail and just straight up better aesthetics) and got 2nd. Ruhl got 5th in that show anyway, pics from the 04 olympia would be better.
Logged
I

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #31 on: May 07, 2006, 12:35:57 PM »
Quote from: the shadow on May 07, 2006, 06:01:58 AM
wow...the back double biceps....damn look at ruhls back......... :o
ruhl is spanked from the back
Logged

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #32 on: May 07, 2006, 12:56:41 PM »
Quote from: gtbro1 on May 07, 2006, 06:48:09 AM
Ruhl is just goofy looking I think...he is huge,but goofy looking.

He is always smiling and enjoying himself. I like that.
Logged
The House that Ruth built

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #33 on: May 07, 2006, 01:32:34 PM »
Ronnie is signifinatly leaner + fuller on most bodyparts + clean of synthol abuse = quite alot more lean muscle on him.

In back thickness alone Coleman got like twice the muscle mass on Ruhl,and the back is a huge muscle thats lots of mass and weight.

BTW Ruhl synthol abuse including the back is obvious and disgusting,in some shots you can actualy see the lumps in the upper part of his lats.So sadly he dosent deserve much credit for improving his back size wise.

All that being sad, Ruhl is a beast and a damn good BB.  RUUUHHLL :D
Logged

thisiskeith12

  • Guest
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #34 on: May 07, 2006, 01:33:57 PM »
Ruhl still lacks back.  :'(
Logged

bailey

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Getbig!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #35 on: May 07, 2006, 01:45:46 PM »
C'mon You have got to be kidding. These are supposed to be the best in the world. Does Ruhl even diet for a show !! Super soft and fat is what i see. He looks like complete shit. I'm looking at each picture and reading all the positive comments about him, and i cannot believe what im reading. Your average NPC competitor has better conditioning.
And that's not overstating It. Ron detroys him !!! What are you people looking at. Sure he maybe the same size ( weight wise ) which is what this thread is about. 285 lbs of blubber and synthol is not as impressive as 285 lbs of hard ripped muscle regardless of who has better abs. Look at ruhl from the back. Are you telling me that's what 16 weeks of dieting accomplished for him. What a joke !!! And I like Ruhl. Just not a fan of his physique. Mark my words. Ruhl will never do any better than he has.
Logged

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #36 on: May 07, 2006, 01:54:25 PM »
cormeir is getting dwarfed next to those 2 beast
Logged
R

ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7083
  • Getbig!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #37 on: May 07, 2006, 01:55:46 PM »
Quote from: bailey on May 07, 2006, 01:45:46 PM
C'mon You have got to be kidding. These are supposed to be the best in the world. Does Ruhl even diet for a show !! Super soft and fat is what i see. He looks like complete shit. I'm looking at each picture and reading all the positive comments about him, and i cannot believe what im reading. Your average NPC competitor has better conditioning.
And that's not overstating It. Ron detroys him !!! What are you people looking at. Sure he maybe the same size ( weight wise ) which is what this thread is about. 285 lbs of blubber and synthol is not as impressive as 285 lbs of hard ripped muscle regardless of who has better abs. Look at ruhl from the back. Are you telling me that's what 16 weeks of dieting accomplished for him. What a joke !!! And I like Ruhl. Just not a fan of his physique. Mark my words. Ruhl will never do any better than he has.
My thoughts exactly! All I think of when I see Ruhl is SOFT!No cuts anywhere,hes a fridge.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #38 on: May 07, 2006, 05:19:07 PM »
One thing amazes me when I see these shots:







look how much bigger Ronnie's thighs are compared to Ruhl's. Unreal, In some of those shots they look to be as big around as Chris's waist, easily :o
Had to be a record for size. And they were damn cut too, esp. from the side.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Dnizneer

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
  • Meat
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #39 on: May 07, 2006, 05:27:45 PM »
Quote from: freeagain on May 07, 2006, 05:59:21 AM
ruhl got better pecs n abs .. but ronnie has him on everythin else imagineable!


Even the weinersnitzel?
Logged

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #40 on: May 07, 2006, 05:29:40 PM »
the deatil in chris' back is just sick
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #41 on: May 07, 2006, 05:45:43 PM »
Quote from: Matt C on May 07, 2006, 05:34:23 PM
Why do people still compare Coleman with Cormier?  Cormier is softer, smoother, and only has 85% of Ronnie's size at the same height, and Ronnie has about 95% of Cormier's genetic structure / proportions, even while being so much bigger and more shredded.

To me there is no comparison

correction: Ronnie's quads alone have about 85% of Chris' size


 :o 8)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #42 on: May 07, 2006, 05:49:04 PM »
Quote from: IFBBwannaB on May 07, 2006, 01:32:34 PM
Ronnie is signifinatly leaner + fuller on most bodyparts + clean of synthol abuse = quite alot more lean muscle on him.

In back thickness alone Coleman got like twice the muscle mass on Ruhl,and the back is a huge muscle thats lots of mass and weight.

BTW Ruhl synthol abuse including the back is obvious and disgusting,in some shots you can actualy see the lumps in the upper part of his lats.So sadly he dosent deserve much credit for improving his back size wise.

All that being sad, Ruhl is a beast and a damn good BB.  RUUUHHLL :D

  Synthol :-\
Logged

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #43 on: May 07, 2006, 05:52:45 PM »
Quote from: Matt C on May 07, 2006, 05:34:23 PM
Why do people still compare Coleman with Cormier?  Cormier is softer, smoother, and only has 85% of Ronnie's size at the same height, and Ronnie has about 95% of Cormier's genetic structure / proportions, even while being so much bigger and more shredded.

To me there is no comparison

Well that's cause your an idiot, first off this show was like 1-2 weeks after the olympia, cormier and ruhl were already eating offseason (cormier french fries through the whole grand prix tour and ruhl a protein bar during the posedown) while ronnie was still tightening up from the olympia (many thought he looked better then at the O). Finally cormier will always have better back detail and have the more pleasing and aesthetic yet large (250+lbs) physique :)
Logged
I

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #44 on: May 07, 2006, 05:56:30 PM »
Quote from: MikeThaMachine on May 07, 2006, 05:52:45 PM
Well that's cause your an idiot, first off this show was like 1-2 weeks after the olympia, cormier and ruhl were already eating offseason (cormier french fries through the whole grand prix tour and ruhl a protein bar during the posedown) while ronnie was still tightening up from the olympia (many thought he looked better then at the O). Finally cormier will always have better back detail and have the more pleasing and aesthetic yet large (250+lbs) physique :)

 Cormier doesn't have more back detail ::)
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #45 on: May 07, 2006, 05:57:02 PM »
Quote from: MikeThaMachine on May 07, 2006, 05:52:45 PM
Well that's cause your an idiot, first off this show was like 1-2 weeks after the olympia, cormier and ruhl were already eating offseason (cormier french fries through the whole grand prix tour and ruhl a protein bar during the posedown) while ronnie was still tightening up from the olympia (many thought he looked better then at the O). Finally cormier will always have better back detail and have the more pleasing and aesthetic yet large (250+lbs) physique :)

Cormier may have had better back detail than Ronnie at 301 pounds, but throughout most of his career, he got owned in that deparment from big ron


Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2006, 05:59:25 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on May 07, 2006, 05:57:02 PM
Cormier may have had better back detail than Ronnie at 301 pounds, but throughout most of his career, he got owned in that deparment from big ron




I wouldn't say he's getting owned in terms of back detail ::)

Where the hell is Jaejonna i need back up here :o
Logged
I

gibberj2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2921
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #47 on: May 07, 2006, 06:06:27 PM »
the question of who is bigger comes down to which competition. they alternate. sometimes one is bigger and sometimes the other is bigger. speaking of biceps, chest, shoulders and calves Ruhl is bigger. Triceps, back, thighs, Coleman. Everyone knows Ronnie wins because he has more detail. It will be interesting to see who is bigger this coming Olympia. Ruhl is doing a show one week prior to the O to qualify. I'm sure he will.
Logged

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #48 on: May 07, 2006, 06:08:37 PM »
Quote from: gibberj2 on May 07, 2006, 06:06:27 PM
the question of who is bigger comes down to which competition. they alternate. sometimes one is bigger and sometimes the other is bigger. speaking of biceps, chest, shoulders and calves Ruhl is bigger. Triceps, back, thighs, Coleman. Everyone knows Ronnie wins because he has more detail. It will be interesting to see who is bigger this coming Olympia. Ruhl is doing a show one week prior to the O to qualify. I'm sure he will.

but what we really wanna know is ........... who wud win at table tennis?

please discuss
Logged

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #49 on: May 07, 2006, 06:09:54 PM »
Quote from: gibberj2 on May 07, 2006, 06:06:27 PM
the question of who is bigger comes down to which competition. they alternate. sometimes one is bigger and sometimes the other is bigger. speaking of biceps, chest, shoulders and calves Ruhl is bigger. Triceps, back, thighs, Coleman. Everyone knows Ronnie wins because he has more detail. It will be interesting to see who is bigger this coming Olympia. Ruhl is doing a show one week prior to the O to qualify. I'm sure he will.

   synthol ::)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »