Sounds like the skeptics aren't completely ruling out that it's a real phenomenon. I guess one way to look at it is that we won't be around to see everything turn to shit if it turns out to be true, so who cares. A religious person might be thinking in another way, not sure. Even a non-religious person might think it unethical to possibly destroy the planet for our progeny. Many would also agree that cutting down all forests for profit is unethical even if it doesn't immediately kill us.
Thats kind of a selfish boomer take to have "I won't be around so what do I care"
well your bloodline will be, your kids, grandkids and so forth, or if you dont have your brother/sisters kids and their kids etc. I believe in the Hitlarian take that your blood/relatives is the most important, next to that is your peoples/ethnic kind.
Anyways I think some of the things humans do will obviously have an effect on climate. The boomer-right/right- cons will always have a polar opposite take on what the left/liberals says and always says there is no such thing as human effect on the enviroment and climate
... because it's just what they do, both sides are equally stupid in that sense tbh.
With that said, I think a lot of the MSM, especially in europe/EU is left/liberal and they quite often have an agenda. My take is that they use the "climate change" issue/thing as a tool to justify mass immigration from shit hole countries in the middle east/Africa. Like now we will have "climate refugees"
like that is the end goal of the climate change propaganda by media, and not actually what is happening with the enviroment/climate.
