Author Topic: Any morons on here still denying global warming?  (Read 7027 times)

Lartinos

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3899
  • Getbig!
Re: Any morons on here still denying global warming?
« Reply #175 on: July 04, 2026, 01:13:44 PM »
Your new name is Dr. Thread Fail.

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63317
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Any morons on here still denying global warming?
« Reply #176 on: July 04, 2026, 01:23:26 PM »
Your new name is Dr. Thread Fail.
Nurse Thread Fail. ;)
Science as a profitable business cannot be trusted to tell the truth contradicting the funding.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11931
Re: Any morons on here still denying global warming?
« Reply #177 on: July 04, 2026, 02:26:46 PM »
science is all we have to go on, that's how we figure things out. Your computer, the building you work in, the ventilation of your house, the forecast.... all science.

You are essentially saying anything that creates profits cannot be trusted. Sounding like a communist, comrade. you a commie?

tacobender

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3026
Re: Any morons on here still denying global warming?
« Reply #178 on: July 04, 2026, 03:11:31 PM »
The government controls the climate creating cancer

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27055
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Any morons on here still denying global warming?
« Reply #179 on: Today at 05:32:37 AM »
Nurse Thread Fail. ;)
Science as a profitable business cannot be trusted to tell the truth contradicting the funding.

This - those who fund the science get the answers that they want - Fact.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11931
Re: Any morons on here still denying global warming?
« Reply #180 on: Today at 10:55:52 AM »
This - those who fund the science get the answers that they want - Fact.

A basic tenet of science is reproducibility, if you make up the answers you can't redo the study as the results would be different. It's such a stupid argument. The stuff is also peer reviewed independently by peers.

Oil and gas are far richer than renewables, why the fuck would the science show what it shows if who is funding it gets to pick the outcome?