Did you read the post above yours?
Do you read at all?
Or just shout insults cause i touched a nerve?
Or are you still pissed about the top english restaraunt serving french food?
Do you know the definition of terrorism?
Section 1. -
(1) In this Act "terrorism" means the use or threat of action where-
(a) the action falls within subsection (2),
(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and
(c)
the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause. (2) Action falls within this subsection if it-
(a) involves serious violence against a person,
(b) involves serious damage to property,
(c) endangers a person's life, other than that of the person committing the action,
(d) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or
(e) is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.
(3) The use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1)(b) is satisfied.
when you say:
Exception to the rule. What they wanted wasn't really religious, it was indipendance, from England.
You suggest acts of terrorism must be religous. I say no based on the definition define in the terroism act.
Becuase terrorism isn't classified as solely for the purpose of advancing a religous doctrine it (Islam) is not the source of Terrorism. Didn't Enlgand invent the "english language" ? Because being from there i would think you'd have a better grasp of it.
