Author Topic: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?  (Read 5418 times)

tomr1976

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 577
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2006, 08:14:23 AM »
used condoms with AIDS infected semen inside the dome

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #26 on: October 23, 2006, 08:46:31 AM »
smuggle gerbils up your ass ahahhahahahahahah

WiseGuy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2015
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #27 on: October 23, 2006, 08:47:05 AM »
Were is your scientific evidence to back this up?  why are you so sure about this? what are you credentials? why should we trust you on this?


translation: rico knows he juices and is worried HIS insides are melting.......


hahahaha

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #28 on: October 23, 2006, 08:51:03 AM »

I am not arguing with anyone. I would agree steriods in light doses are not going to kill you. But alot of these guys take enough to supply a small town.

Agreed. You don't need "scientific proof".

I take gear myself and I'm pretty certain it's fcuked me up - especially with mental problems such as depression and paranoia for which I now take anti-depressants for. And I've hardly taken anything - I've never used GH or diuretics so god know's what would happen to me if I overdosed on stuff like that.

I still use gear now despite those problems but I fear for these pro bodybuilders who are probably taking ten times the amount that I've taken - I pity these idiots who argue that it doesn't cause them problems just because you don't see external problems such as acne or baldness.

UpTheDosage

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 468
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #29 on: October 23, 2006, 09:41:19 AM »
.

2 dead and 2 with kidney problems out of how many bodybuilders in history?

I think I'll take my chances.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #30 on: October 23, 2006, 09:44:02 AM »
Quote
Agreed. You don't need "scientific proof".

I take gear myself and I'm pretty certain it's fcuked me up - especially with mental problems such as depression and paranoia for which I now take anti-depressants for.
Sometime still taking like this has no idea yet whether there's any lasting long-term problems. Also, some are taking a lot more than others.

body88

  • Guest
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #31 on: October 23, 2006, 02:05:06 PM »
2 dead and 2 with kidney problems out of how many bodybuilders in history?

I think I'll take my chances.

Yes, those are the only ones ::) What do you think I am going to research for 3 days? Take your chances lol. No one is stopping you. When you are 40 years old with no hair, the test levels of a 13 year old girl and kidneys on the way to failure early make sure to post some pictures of how good you looked!!!!! If you take the levels of sauce that some pro BB's take you have alot more problems than health issues.

The funny part is I know a ton of guys who juice. They will never quit either. It only gets worse the older you get. It becomes harder and harder to look good. Along with all the health issues it can cause. It is devastating mentally. You will never be as big as when you are on a cycle. Never train as intense, never make those big gains and never be as ripped and dense as when you are all sauced up. You my friend will never be able to train naturally again.

I doubt a mild cycle done responsibly would affect a person. But how many people stick to that? It is always more. Then you start hitting cycles more often. I know how it works. My training partner juices. Alot of the athletes I played sports with did at some point.  Steriods in big doses are pointless for recreational uses. I would rather worka littler harder and take much longer, but have my health in the end.   I have no problems with those who juice. They look damn good!

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #32 on: October 23, 2006, 02:11:47 PM »
Yes, those are the only ones ::) What do you think I am going to research for 3 days? Take your chances lol. No one is stopping you. When you are 40 years old with no hair, the test levels of a 13 year old girl and kidneys on the way to failure early make sure to post some pictures of how good you looked!!!!! If you take the levels of sauce that some pro BB's take you have alot more problems than health issues.

The funny part is I know a ton of guys who juice. They will never quit either. It only gets worse the older you get. It becomes harder and harder to look good. Along with all the health issues it can cause. It is devastating mentally. You will never be as big as when you are on a cycle. Never train as intense, never make those big gains and never be as ripped and dense as when you are all sauced up. You my friend will never be able to train naturally again.

I doubt a mild cycle done responsibly would affect a person. But how many people stick to that? It is always more. Then you start hitting cycles more often. I know how it works. My training partner juices. Alot of the athletes I played sports with did at some point.  Steriods are pointless for recreational uses :o
I agree. Lots deny it but thats the truth.
bodybuildersreality.com

body88

  • Guest
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #33 on: October 23, 2006, 02:13:50 PM »
I agree. Lots deny it but thats the truth.

I have no problem with guys who juice. None at all. That is their choice. Most guys who know a thing or two admit it is not the best thing for them. The guys who claim there is no effect at all are the ones I wrote that to.

I also do not think a mild cycle would harm a person. but how many people stick with mild cycles? Very few unfortunatly.

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #34 on: October 23, 2006, 02:18:07 PM »
I have no problem with guys who juice. None at all. That is their choice. Most guys who know a thing or two admit it is not the best thing for them. The guys who claim there is no effect at all are the ones I wrote that to.

I also do not think a mild cycle would harm a person. but how many people stick with mild cycles? Very few unfortunatly.
yup, lots just skip the mild ones and go straight into hard stuff. I know of one guy that trained for 2 months then started, HGH, Insulin, the whole shabang! he spent over 10 grand on stuff.
bodybuildersreality.com

dorkeroo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1403
  • I need steroids for the brain.
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #35 on: October 23, 2006, 02:19:30 PM »
I am completing a Master's of Science in Biology (mostly molecular biology), have two undergraduate degrees (one in chemistry and one in biomedical biology), have taught human anatomy and physiology at a university level and am beginning medical school next year.

I am not an authority on this subject, however, I am willing to bet I know enough to make the educated statement that too much of any "drug" is often toxic in one form or another. To assume any of these guys is healthy is like burying your head in the sand and pretending a problem doesn't exist. I agree that the diuretics have been the cause of many a competitor's problems, however, to assume that habitual, exogenous steroid use (at their level especially) is safe just because you don't see any effects is really not a good idea.

Before many of the obvious physiological problems make themselves visible to the naked eye, many diseases progress throughout the body and only in later stages does it become obvious that there is a problem. In other cases however, it can be the opposite.

Therefore, to defend the abuse of steroids that is being seen in this sport and demanding "proof" is like winning an argument by taking your toys inside. There will NOT be any published studies regarding this because the studies would be illegal and expensive. There is probably data out there, but we will never see it.

Anyways, just my two cents, however, I would tend to side with those that are coming to the conclusion that just because these men look healthy on the outside, they are likely not 100% inside. However, I do hope I am incorrect as it would be great if they were all completely healthy.

body88

  • Guest
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #36 on: October 23, 2006, 02:23:23 PM »
yup, lots just skip the mild ones and go straight into hard stuff. I know of one guy that trained for 2 months then started, HGH, Insulin, the whole shabang! he spent over 10 grand on stuff.

I was a gm in 2 nightclubs for a few years. When I was in college most stuck with test. Before I left the big thing in the club scene with all the club rats was GH. These guys do not think about the awful sides this shit presents. Lol idiots. They are going to have fun with the bone growth later on :o

legbreaker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #37 on: October 23, 2006, 02:23:42 PM »
Believe me there are plenty of side effects.  If anyone does enough GH to create acromegaly changes in the mandable and hands their heart is also effected. Way before the skull of acromegaly patients goes haywire, the heart is enlarging abnormally and way beyond control.  This causes rythm disturbances, aside from the structural changes that will literally make the patient feel as if they are sufficating.  Nothing you can do to stop this, no medication and short of removal or radiation to the Pituatary.  Gh abuse, (because that is what it is) also causes irreversable damage to the kidneys.  The hair loss and acne is a genetic thing....if your are predispossed it will accelarate or exacerbate the problem.

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #38 on: October 23, 2006, 02:26:49 PM »
I was a gm in 2 nightclubs for a few years. When I was in college most stuck with test. Before I left the big thing in the club scene with all the club rats was GH. These guys do not think about the awful sides this shit presents. Lol idiots. They are going to have fun with the bone growth later on :o
ha! no doubt! no one has patience anymore....I get guys come into my gym and tell me their life story and then ask me all sorts of questions and they all say this "I wish there was a pill i could take that just took 75lbs off me" one of them, later the same day I saw them on a picnic bench drinking from a 2L coke bottle and eating mcdonalds.
bodybuildersreality.com

body88

  • Guest
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #39 on: October 23, 2006, 02:28:46 PM »
Typical!

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #40 on: October 23, 2006, 02:45:05 PM »
Typical!
yup its sad. Everyone wants the fast way out, take an advil if you got a headache, take dbol if you can only bench 225 for 4 reps. and the lazy fat people just won't get on a treadmill and help themselves.
bodybuildersreality.com

rccs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3085
  • Alma Matter!
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #41 on: October 24, 2006, 03:05:35 AM »
I am completing a Master's of Science in Biology (mostly molecular biology), have two undergraduate degrees (one in chemistry and one in biomedical biology), have taught human anatomy and physiology at a university level and am beginning medical school next year.

I am not an authority on this subject, however, I am willing to bet I know enough to make the educated statement that too much of any "drug" is often toxic in one form or another. To assume any of these guys is healthy is like burying your head in the sand and pretending a problem doesn't exist. I agree that the diuretics have been the cause of many a competitor's problems, however, to assume that habitual, exogenous steroid use (at their level especially) is safe just because you don't see any effects is really not a good idea.

Before many of the obvious physiological problems make themselves visible to the naked eye, many diseases progress throughout the body and only in later stages does it become obvious that there is a problem. In other cases however, it can be the opposite.

Therefore, to defend the abuse of steroids that is being seen in this sport and demanding "proof" is like winning an argument by taking your toys inside. There will NOT be any published studies regarding this because the studies would be illegal and expensive. There is probably data out there, but we will never see it.

Anyways, just my two cents, however, I would tend to side with those that are coming to the conclusion that just because these men look healthy on the outside, they are likely not 100% inside. However, I do hope I am incorrect as it would be great if they were all completely healthy.
Well, in this sport everything is done to enhance muscle development. Even if you are a "natural" bber or PLitfer you tend to use supplements, probably, I repeat, probably, they will provoque some damage to your system as well. You have to eat large amounts of protein and fats, dextrose etc, to maintain nitric balance in your blood, as you know, too much protein can also affect your liver and your kidneys! Heavy training, throughout the years damage your tendons and some of your bones... You see, this isn't actually a matter of good or bad conduct, it is a matter of choice, whether you do it or not! That is why this is not a sport for the average Joe!
S

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15225
  • "Don't Try"
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #42 on: October 24, 2006, 04:05:21 AM »
Gh abuse, (because that is what it is) also causes irreversable damage to the kidneys.  
Really? Through what mechanism? And what do you consider abuse dosages of GH? HIV+ patients get up to 18iu daily and I can't recall kidney damage being mentioned in the literature I've read.

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #43 on: October 24, 2006, 04:10:17 AM »
Jr. Yates, I don't mean to be rude, but you use, and you're here calling these other users idiots? Makes no sense.

phreak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5084
  • Food is amazing
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #44 on: October 24, 2006, 04:49:32 AM »
There will NOT be any published studies regarding this because the studies would be illegal and expensive. There is probably data out there, but we will never see it.

You can research it if it is self administered, which is almost always done way above recommended dosage.


-------
Since the abuse of androgenic-anabolic steroids (AAS) has been associated with the occurrence of serious cardiovascular disease in young athletes, we performed two studies to investigate the effects of short-term AAS administration on heart structure and function in experienced male strength athletes, with special reference to dose and duration of drug abuse. In Study 1 the effects of AAS were assessed in 17 experienced male strength athletes (age 31 +/- 7 y) who self-administered AAS for 8 or 12 - 16 weeks and in 15 non-using strength athletes (age 33 +/- 5 y) in a non-blinded design. In Study 2 the effects of administration of nandrolone decanoate (200 mg/wk i. m.) for eight weeks were investigated in 16 bodybuilders in a randomised double blind, placebo controlled design. In all subjects M-mode and two-dimensional Doppler-echocardiography were performed at baseline and after 8 weeks AAS administration. In the athletes of Study 1 who used AAS for 12 - 16 weeks a third echocardiogram was also made at the end of the AAS administration period. Echocardiographic examinations included the determination of the aortic diameter (AD), left atrium diameter (LA), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), interventricular septum thickness (IVS), posterior wall end diastolic wall thickness (PWEDWT), left ventricular mass (LVM), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), ejection fraction (EF) and right ventricular diameter (RVD). For assessment of the diastolic function measurements of E and A peak velocities and calculation of E/A ratio were used. In addition, acceleration and deceleration times of the E-top (ATM and DT, respectively) were determined. For evaluation of factors associated with stroke volume the aorta peak flow (AV) and left ventricular ejection times (LVET) were determined. In Study 1 eight weeks AAS self-administration did not result in changes of blood pressure or cardiac size and function. Additionally, duration of AAS self-administration did not have any impact on these parameters. Study 2 revealed that eight weeks administration of nandrolone decanoate did not induce significant alterations in blood pressure and heart morphology and function. Short-term administration of AAS for periods up to 16 weeks did not lead to detectable echocardiographic alterations of heart morphology and systolic and diastolic function in experienced strength athletes. The administration regimen used nor the length of AAS abuse did influence the results. Moreover, it is concluded that echocardiographic evaluation may provide incomplete assessment of the actual cardiac condition in AAS users since it is not sensitive enough to detect alterations at the cellular level. Nevertheless, from the present study no conclusions can be drawn of the cardiotoxic effects of long term AAS abuse.

PMID: 12868045

legbreaker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #45 on: October 24, 2006, 10:12:55 AM »
Really? Through what mechanism? And what do you consider abuse dosages of GH? HIV+ patients get up to 18iu daily and I can't recall kidney damage being mentioned in the literature I've read.


Van, The information is out there.  In reference to Aids and research the guy to look at is Dr. Coltler at St. Lukes hospital in NY.  He is the person initiating all the use and research of gh with aids patients.  Do you know that the 18 iu is no longer a daily dose?  It is 9 or 6 iu because of the side effects.  The damage to the kindneys is very well known in the legit medical field.  Inappropriate treatment with GH (abuse, I believe to be over 4 iu day, ESPECIALLY if long term) leads to severe long-term toxicity, particularly in the kidneys, with development of glomerulosclerosis (tissue scarring), kidney insufficiency.  This is one of the perfect examples of how something that is basically necessarry and beneficial can be dangerous in abuse.  The positive effects gh has on things like stroke volume, ejection fraction in the heart at a normal 25 year old IGF level becomes negative and life threatening at abusive levels.  Same with the positive effects of the collagen and elastin protiens in the skin...with abuse the skin becomes course, oily and thick.  Gh, I believe, is responsible for a lot of the kidney damage in bodybuilders today.  An old friend of mine had his very promising bb carreer cut short because of kidney damage.  Guys, DO NOT believe that the 18 iu is a NORMAL dose....IT IS NOT and no longer is even considered such among the aids population.  Over 4 iu a day long term your risking your cardiovascular and kidney health.  3 iu you can do forever and have positive effects.  Bodybuilders believe that if 18 iu is used in medicine than double that is safe....

When your brow at your eye brow becomes thickened, your mandible grows so that it appears that you have an underbite, your nose thickens, your cartilage at the throat grows so it looks like you have a double chin EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE RIPPED and your hands thicken...guess what your heart is FUCKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  If a person chose to use gh and stuck to 3 iu a day they would be fine and have positive effects.

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #46 on: October 24, 2006, 10:36:48 AM »
Jr. Yates, I don't mean to be rude, but you use, and you're here calling these other users idiots? Makes no sense.
I am not calling users idiots and I am not a user "yet", I start in December.  I am calling the ones that go to it after 2 months of training idiots. The ones that have no patience. The ones that have never seen a natural gain in their life. There is a BIG difference. I respect all "users" that have learned how to train and eat properly and have pushed their genitic potential to at least somewhat of a distance. No where did I day "anyone who uses gear is an idiot" because i would never say that.
bodybuildersreality.com

rccs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3085
  • Alma Matter!
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #47 on: October 25, 2006, 03:57:07 AM »
You can research it if it is self administered, which is almost always done way above recommended dosage.


-------
Since the abuse of androgenic-anabolic steroids (AAS) has been associated with the occurrence of serious cardiovascular disease in young athletes, we performed two studies to investigate the effects of short-term AAS administration on heart structure and function in experienced male strength athletes, with special reference to dose and duration of drug abuse. In Study 1 the effects of AAS were assessed in 17 experienced male strength athletes (age 31 +/- 7 y) who self-administered AAS for 8 or 12 - 16 weeks and in 15 non-using strength athletes (age 33 +/- 5 y) in a non-blinded design. In Study 2 the effects of administration of nandrolone decanoate (200 mg/wk i. m.) for eight weeks were investigated in 16 bodybuilders in a randomised double blind, placebo controlled design. In all subjects M-mode and two-dimensional Doppler-echocardiography were performed at baseline and after 8 weeks AAS administration. In the athletes of Study 1 who used AAS for 12 - 16 weeks a third echocardiogram was also made at the end of the AAS administration period. Echocardiographic examinations included the determination of the aortic diameter (AD), left atrium diameter (LA), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), interventricular septum thickness (IVS), posterior wall end diastolic wall thickness (PWEDWT), left ventricular mass (LVM), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), ejection fraction (EF) and right ventricular diameter (RVD). For assessment of the diastolic function measurements of E and A peak velocities and calculation of E/A ratio were used. In addition, acceleration and deceleration times of the E-top (ATM and DT, respectively) were determined. For evaluation of factors associated with stroke volume the aorta peak flow (AV) and left ventricular ejection times (LVET) were determined. In Study 1 eight weeks AAS self-administration did not result in changes of blood pressure or cardiac size and function. Additionally, duration of AAS self-administration did not have any impact on these parameters. Study 2 revealed that eight weeks administration of nandrolone decanoate did not induce significant alterations in blood pressure and heart morphology and function. Short-term administration of AAS for periods up to 16 weeks did not lead to detectable echocardiographic alterations of heart morphology and systolic and diastolic function in experienced strength athletes. The administration regimen used nor the length of AAS abuse did influence the results. Moreover, it is concluded that echocardiographic evaluation may provide incomplete assessment of the actual cardiac condition in AAS users since it is not sensitive enough to detect alterations at the cellular level. Nevertheless, from the present study no conclusions can be drawn of the cardiotoxic effects of long term AAS abuse.

PMID: 12868045
And did you reach any conclusion about liver toxicity, having as reference those dosages?
S

phreak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5084
  • Food is amazing
Re: why don't cutler,coleman, schlierkamp,etc. had obvious other side effects?
« Reply #48 on: October 25, 2006, 04:52:28 AM »
And did you reach any conclusion about liver toxicity, having as reference those dosages?
No, because I didn't look for that. Liver toxicity is a moot point for the most part: there is no point in using orals for 99.9% of steroid users.