Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Big Arms on April 18, 2024, 08:35:21 AM
-
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWgYjg8kKjhSsVrZpzRHO71fzfPc9abXAXvTJkGgWfnA&s)
-
Perfect.
For a second though I thought it was the big guy from bhanks contest
-
Amazing shot. Wish the picture was bigger.
-
Perfect.
For a second though I thought it was the big guy from bhanks contest
X 2....after all he is a carbon copy......AND HAVE YOU HEARD, HANKY BEAT HIM AND WON THE FUCKING CUP ? ;D
-
X 2....after all he is a carbon copy......AND HAVE YOU HEARD, HANKY BEAT HIM AND WON THE FUCKING CUP ? ;D
Almost like when I carried home a very large trophy a number of years ago and people were impressed when they saw it next to my desk at home. I was the ONLY one in my particular class! But I don’t think I ever ran around acting like I was Mr. America.
-
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWgYjg8kKjhSsVrZpzRHO71fzfPc9abXAXvTJkGgWfnA&s)
No one as good since.
-
Arnie in his prime, unmatched..
-
the G.O.A.T.
-
X 2....after all he is a carbon copy......AND HAVE YOU HEARD, HANKY BEAT HIM AND WON THE FUCKING CUP ? ;D
DESPITE the guy have veins popping out of his chest....don't you DARE forget that!!!!
-
DESPITE the guy have veins popping out of his chest....don't you DARE forget that!!!!
Opps,how I could I forget the veins! ? :D
-
Only gays use the term “stunning” to describe other men. You gay, Small Arms?
-
8)
Amazing shot. Wish the picture was bigger.
-
That, for me, was the peak of bodybuilding. All downhill from there.
-
No drugs - Reeves
Drugs - Arnold
Between those two - Arnold.
Too bad he became such a disgusting cuckold who said "Screw your freedom", he will never be forgiven for saying that which will never be forgotten. Fuck him to Hades.
-
No drugs - Reeves
Drugs - Arnold
Between those two - Arnold.
Reeves had better genetics, I think even Arnold would agree.
-
Imagine Reeves on Arnold level drugs? Reeves will always be the true GOAT. He looked amazing from age 15 till his health failed.
-
Reeves had better genetics, I think even Arnold would agree.
Define better genetics?
Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves
On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold
The stand out body parts
Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1…….. ;D
-
Define better genetics?
Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves
On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold
The stand out body parts
Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1…….. ;D
Better clavicles it all comes down to that that’s why peak Lou is better than most of them and Ruhl is underrated
-
Define better genetics?
Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves
On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold
The stand out body parts
Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1…….. ;D
Lol how can you mention standout body parts without delts and shoulders I guess you’ve a feminine build
He was taller more handsome and wider and all women pick him over Arnold (taking away the fame aspect)
-
Reeves had better genetics, I think even Arnold would agree.
Yes. But I thought it important that I be honest in that Arnold at his peak
is A L O N E. Even Coleman stated that with today's protocols Arnold would make him look like a little kid. When he turned off the juice he turned into a cuck. His choice.
But I would rather look like Steve Reeves at 21. I think Reg Park and Reeves are both true genetic marvels. I believe them both when they say they did not take steroids.
-
Lol how can you mention standout body parts without delts and shoulders I guess you’ve a feminine build
He was taller more handsome and wider and all women pick him over Arnold (taking away the fame aspect)
They were both literally the same height, Arnold at his peak was 6’1 and half, reeves around the same
I was mentioning Arnold’s arms, calves and chest over reeves , he was better in those areas
Back then even Arnold’s era, no one had the round crazy shoulders like modern bbers now
I’ll take my feminine build btw, girls love swimmers build ;D
-
Lol how can you mention standout body parts without delts and shoulders I guess you’ve a feminine build
He was taller more handsome and wider and all women pick him over Arnold (taking away the fame aspect)
Reeves stopped women in their tracks just walking around. My aunties all adored him, especially so one of them. She told me if I could like like Reeves then I would be able to land any woman. I trained like madman and would up looking more like Draper but that wasn't so bad either.
But it ain't Steve Reeves.
-
Define better genetics?
Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves
On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold
The stand out body parts
Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1…….. ;D
Better structure. Reeves had really wide clavicles and a really narrow waist & hips which Arnold did not. Reeves had a 29" waist at around the same height as Arnold and his was 34" Reeves had better balance between the muscles a true Greek Ideal , Arms , neck and calves exactly all the same size. Reeves had better symmetry all of his muscles appeared the same shape Arnold's biceps alone were different sizes and shapes. Arnold was leaner and harder but chalk that up to 30 years of trial-and-error in nutrients and technology. Reeves stands alone
-
They were both literally the same height, Arnold at his peak was 6’1 and half, reeves around the same
I was mentioning Arnold’s arms, calves and chest over reeves , he was better in those areas
Back then even Arnold’s era, no one had the round crazy shoulders like modern bbers now
I’ll take my feminine build btw, girls love swimmers build ;D
I didn’t mean to be a smart ass but you cannot disregard the fact that most people wear shirts/sweaters and slacks etc most of the year so in reality they don’t see your biceps and calves until summer and Arnold was never 6 foot 1 IMHO he was 5’11/6 tops and his delt width wasn’t BAD but his weakest point (even said himself, other than calves initially)
You can’t do much about your structure, that’s genetics. Arnold destroys reeves in an Olympia but in clothes and everyday live one will stick out much more than the other and it’s not because of his biceps or pecs
Truth be told my arms suck but shoulders are 2 feet wide and I’m 6 foot 5 and I wouldn’t trade my height for calves or biceps for my shoulder width for any money
-
:-X
-
:-X
Dafuq?
-
Dafuq?
Arnie’s got some explaining to do
-
Better structure. Reeves had really wide clavicles and a really narrow waist & hips which Arnold did not. Reeves had a 29" waist at around the same height as Arnold and his was 34" Reeves had better balance between the muscles a true Greek Ideal , Arms , neck and calves exactly all the same size. Reeves had better symmetry all of his muscles appeared the same shape Arnold's biceps alone were different sizes and shapes. Arnold was leaner and harder but chalk that up to 30 years of trial-and-error in nutrients and technology. Reeves stands alone
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=692000.0;attach=1503972;image)
In this photo, no one looks as good. The man was The Man. And still is. Reeves physique was perfect. His neck, calves and arms were 18.5" and his legs 26" and his chest 52". This is the standard of symmetry that has long been abandoned to fulfill the fetid fetishes of size queen schmoes.
Arnold is overall the best drugs or not. But Reeves is Reeves.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=692000.0;attach=1503972;image)
In this photo, no one looks as good. The man was The Man. And still is. Reeves physique was perfect. His neck, calves and arms were 18.5" and his legs 26" and his chest 52". This is the standard of symmetry that has long been abandoned to fulfill the fetid fetishes of size queen schmoes.
Arnold is overall the best drugs or not. But Reeves is Reeves.
Closest thing to perfection for a man and ahead of his time
I love Arnold and all cuckery lately aside the photo posted by the OP gimmick is outstanding. Arnold is one of the best ever. Reeves had better genetics
-
Closest thing to perfection for a man and ahead of his time
I love Arnold and all cuckery lately aside the photo posted by the OP gimmick is outstanding. Arnold is one of the best ever. Reeves had better genetics
I firmly believe that the actor Clint Walker could have been an even taller version of Reeves or close to it. He was, I think...6' 6" in height.
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/4f/a6/6b/4fa66beb6239f146b9febbea6d75b188--steve-reeves-clint-walker.jpg)
-
I firmly believe that the actor Clint Walker could have been an even taller version of Reeves or close to it. He was, I think...6' 6" in height.
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/4f/a6/6b/4fa66beb6239f146b9febbea6d75b188--steve-reeves-clint-walker.jpg)
He seemed like a real nice guy too I saw a video one of him on YouTube in his home gym I’m too stoned to find it just have a look. Great width and build also, another outlier ahead of his peers
-
He seemed like a real nice guy too I saw a video one of him on YouTube in his home gym I’m too stoned to find it just have a look. Great width and build also, another outlier ahead of his peers
Yup. A genuine man. Conservative and Christian from what I have read and heard over the years. Like Reeves, Walker was a childhood cinema/TV hero of mine.
-
I like reeves physique, balance and symmetry
But retard Louie and Arnold era was something else coming up
(https://oldschoollabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Arnold-and-Lou-Posing-2-1.jpg)
-
Yup. A genuine man. Conservative and Christian from what I have read and heard over the years. Like Reeves, Walker was a childhood cinema/TV hero of mine.
Dolph Lundgren is another guy who would destroy many because of his structure alone. I got into bodybuilding because of Arnold. But when you look at him off cycle (even Ronnie I think is narrow) you understand where structure is key
-
I like reeves physique, balance and symmetry
But retard Louie and Arnold era was something else coming up
(https://oldschoollabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Arnold-and-Lou-Posing-2-1.jpg)
If Lou didn’t do the hulk he would have been unbeatable in that era. I think some WWE guys from that time could have beaten him though if they trained properly for it. Who knows
-
If Lou didn’t do the hulk he would have been unbeatable in that era. I think some WWE guys from that time could have beaten him though if they trained properly for it. Who knows
A signed photo would have been $100.
-
A signed photo would have been $100.
You joking he’d have been 500 for a handshake and 1000 for. Photo. His time is precious
-
(https://oldschoollabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Arnold-and-Lou-Posing-2-1.jpg)
Louie goes through his posing,
and you watch every pose.
You sort of help him out, easy now.
Each pose he goes through,
you're living it with him.
I mean, you just have to try
to understand what I'm trying to tell you.
That you're actually
out there with your son...
because you trained with him
and you're posing with him.
The only thing you're not doing with him...
you're not getting
the reward of the applause.
He's the one that's getting that,
and he deserves it.
And you just hope
the audience gives him more.
You wanna shout out,
''It's my son out there!
''Give him just a few more handshakes,
a few more applause. ''
And you just hope
that he's the winner, that's all.
A few more handshakes? Matty, what the fuck are you talking about!?
-
No one as good since.
Agreed perfection.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=692000.0;attach=1503972;image)
In this photo, no one looks as good. The man was The Man. And still is. Reeves physique was perfect. His neck, calves and arms were 18.5" and his legs 26" and his chest 52". This is the standard of symmetry that has long been abandoned to fulfill the fetid fetishes of size queen schmoes.
Arnold is overall the best drugs or not. But Reeves is Reeves.
(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51q4341D5uL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg)
In this photo Reeves is basically standing relaxed. No angles, no lighting tricks, no "signature poses" or any other optical illusion techniques. And he fails to impress. Looks like a landscaper, fit and toned no doubt. But to compare him in any way shape or form to Arnold schwarzenegger? No way.
-
(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51q4341D5uL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg)
In this photo Reeves is basically standing relaxed. No angles, no lighting tricks, no "signature poses" or any other optical illusion techniques. And he fails to impress. Looks like a landscaper, fit and toned no doubt. But to compare him in any way shape or form to Arnold schwarzenegger? No way.
Your logic is flawed like your small arms and shitty threads. Your proof is one picture from a film 11 years after his bodybuilding career? Thats like comparing Arnold standing relaxed from Terminator 2 with Jay Cutler from 2009.
-
In this photo Reeves is basically standing relaxed. No angles, no lighting tricks, no "signature poses" or any other optical illusion techniques. And he fails to impress. Looks like a landscaper, fit and toned no doubt. But to compare him in any way shape or form to Arnold schwarzenegger? No way.
When he was acting he was 190lbs down 25lbs from when he competed at 215lbs.
-
Arnold looked like nothing when natty.
On drugs he looked like a big hunka man. (No homo).
Arnold went on steroids at age 16.
Reeves may have used test at some point, probably during his movie career.
It's unknown how the drugs of Arnold's day would affect Reeves. He might not have reacted as well as Arnold.
Natty Reeves destroys natty Arnold.
Natty John Grimek destroys natty Arnold and even natty Reeves.
Reeves competed late 1940s to 1950, early 20s age. Only a few contests.
His movie career as Hercules came almost a decade later in 1958.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Reeves#
"he reigned as Mr. America of 1947, Mr. World of 1948, and Mr. Universe of 1950"
-
Arnold looked like nothing when natty.
On drugs he looked like a big hunka man. (No homo).
Arnold went on steroids at age 16.
Reeves may have used test at some point, probably during his movie career.
It's unknown how the drugs of Arnold's day would affect Reeves. He might not have reacted as well as Arnold.
Natty Reeves destroys natty Arnold.
Natty John Grimek destroys natty Arnold and even natty Reeves.
Peculiar writing style. The double spacing. I notice some of the "other members" do the same.
-
Peculiar writing style. The double spacing. I notice of the other "members" do the same.
Arnold looked like nothing when natty.
On drugs he looked like a big hunka man. (No homo).
Arnold went on steroids at age 16.
Reeves may have used test at some point, probably during his movie career.
It's unknown how the drugs of Arnold's day would affect Reeves. He might not have reacted as well as Arnold.
Natty Reeves destroys natty Arnold.
Natty John Grimek destroys natty Arnold and even natty Reeves.
Reeves competed late 1940s to 1950, early 20s age. Only a few contests.
His movie career as Hercules came almost a decade later in 1958.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Reeves#
"he reigned as Mr. America of 1947, Mr. World of 1948, and Mr. Universe of 1950"
>
Which is easier to read do you think?
I never thought about it.
-
bottom photo reeves at 43 in the movie long ride from hell.
-
Arnolds physical dimensions are unmatched. To think he was just like 24 in that pic.
With all the limitations that bodybuilding had 50 plus damn years ago …. Arnold by his mid 20s stopped improving his physique and wanted to move to something bigger and better,
Goes to show you he is by far the bodybuilder with the biggest potential ever.
-
(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51q4341D5uL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg)
In this photo Reeves is basically standing relaxed. No angles, no lighting tricks, no "signature poses" or any other optical illusion techniques. And he fails to impress. Looks like a landscaper, fit and toned no doubt. But to compare him in any way shape or form to Arnold schwarzenegger? No way.
He was finished with competing when that picture was taken. No, he wasn't in his top shape but even being in Europe on set for months he looked amazing.
-
He was finished with competing when that picture was taken. No, he wasn't in his top shape but even being in Europe on set for months he looked amazing.
You can try to explain away his small physique all you want. Makes no difference. Reeves reminds me alot of Frank Zane: Swimmer's Build that disappears when he puts a shirt on.
-
(https://image-cdn.essentiallysports.com/wp-content/uploads/1080x1080-93.jpg?width=600)
-
You can try to explain away his small physique all you want. Makes no difference. Reeves reminds me alot of Frank Zane: Swimmer's Build that disappears when he puts a shirt on.
Reeves inspired men to train. Arnold inspired boys to take drugs.
-
Reeves inspired men to train. Arnold inspired boys to take drugs.
Meaningless statement.
-
Meaningless statement.
The truth is often referred to that by those who are wrong. Arnold is still the greatest overall but Reeves is unquestionably Reeves, a Man that inspired young boys and young men to become better Men through exercise. Arnold inspired boys to take drugs because they could never approach what Arnold did without them. This is fact.
And I am correct. Again.
-
The truth is often referred to that by those who are wrong. Arnold is still the greatest overall but Reeves is unquestionably Reeves, a Man that inspired young boys and young men to become better Men through exercise. Arnold inspired boys to take drugs because they could never approach what Arnold did without them. This is fact.
And I am correct. Again.
Not a "fact". It's an assertion lacking any research, evidence or statistics.
-
Arnold looked like nothing when natty.
On drugs he looked like a big hunka man. (No homo).
Arnold went on steroids at age 16.
Reeves may have used test at some point, probably during his movie career.
It's unknown how the drugs of Arnold's day would affect Reeves. He might not have reacted as well as Arnold.
Natty Reeves destroys natty Arnold.
Natty John Grimek destroys natty Arnold and even natty Reeves.
Reeves competed late 1940s to 1950, early 20s age. Only a few contests.
His movie career as Hercules came almost a decade later in 1958.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Reeves#
"he reigned as Mr. America of 1947, Mr. World of 1948, and Mr. Universe of 1950"
JCG probably had better longevity in top form and was more athletic than the other two icons.
-
JCG probably had better longevity in top form and was more athletic than the other two icons.
Imagine having cannons like that in the 50s? Lord have mercy!
-
Reeves inspired men to train. Arnold inspired boys to take drugs.
This,
Arnold was unimpressive off the juice. Reeves was a literal Hercules as a natural.
As Reeves put it plainly...."if you need steroids to build muscle due to a lack of male hormones take up something else.....like ping pong. "
This is literally why Arnold is a phaggot liberal twat since his heart surgeries coming off the steroids he is now at homo levels of test
-
Not a "fact". It's an assertion lacking any research, evidence or statistics.
He is right though. Can't state the truth any better than he did with his statement.
-
8)
I ran a deepfake on his face to bring up more details. Is that Ken Waller and Frank Zane in the mirror behind? Larry Scott's poster is on the wall. I tried to deepfake the other three faces but the AI screwed it up. I also ran an AI variation on this photo and while it all has more detail it changes the body too much to where Arnold's lats, pecs, biceps, and legs are not the same. Close but not quite. I am going to play around with this more. In Hollywood movies then make it seem like you can easily enhance photos like these. Not with current models. Somebody will have to train a stable diffusion model on thousands of Arnold photos / poses. And then we can talk about upscaling these images properly.
-
This,
Arnold was unimpressive off the juice. Reeves was a literal Hercules as a natural.
As Reeves put it plainly...."if you need steroids to build muscle due to a lack of male hormones take up something else.....like ping pong. "
This is literally why Arnold is a phaggot liberal twat since his heart surgeries coming off the steroids he is now at homo levels of test
It would have been interesting to see what Reeves would have looked like on the same drugs as Arnold and the same training and diet. Perhaps he would have overtrained or needed different foods. But still curious. Arnold was great because of his lines and aesthetics. He was not the biggest guy around or most defined. But the total package is what made him the best. He had the kind of body that most people wanted.
-
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWgYjg8kKjhSsVrZpzRHO71fzfPc9abXAXvTJkGgWfnA&s)
Here are two AI variations of that Arnold image, but I used a higher resolution image than the one you posted.
I used Fooocus, dynavisionXL, sd_xl_offset w/ 0.1 weight, and prompt: big muscles.
-
Here's a Fooocus screenshot:
https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus
https://civitai.com/models/122606/dynavision-xl-all-in-one-stylized-3d-sfw-and-nsfw-output-no-refiner-needed
-
More settings here. Setting the seed to zero makes it match the photo more. A higher denoising strength of "Vary" will also change the result more. I used 0.5. 0.2 would match the photo even more.
-
Here I used a "Vary" denoise strength of 0.35 to increase the resemblance to the original photos. Notice the changes in the mirror.
-
Here the "Vary" strength is -1 (screenshots show 1, but I think I had it on -1 when they were generated). It completely changes the image. I have it set to generate two images in a batch. You can set it to 4 or more and each one will be a variation. The face in these results look like "Reacher". BTW, with all the other Fooocus images I ran an additional deepfake of Arnold to replace the face. You can also add Arnold Schwarzenegger as a prompt and it will generate a version of his face.
-
Looks like 1 or -1 for "Vary" strength completely changes it, with comparable modifications. In these photos I added Arnold's name in the prompt. I can run these through a deepfake to make the faces look more like him.
-
Ai is for homos
-
Ai is for homos
There's lot of poon AI, poonhead. Time to ungayh the thread?
-
Looks like 1 or -1 for "Vary" strength completely changes it, with comparable modifications. In these photos I added Arnold's name in the prompt. I can run these through a deepfake to make the faces look more like him.
Looking Gunterish 2002.
-
Looking Gunterish 2002.
The AI model I used might have referenced Gunther photos. AI models are trained on photos. The checkpoint files are typically around 6 GB or so in size. You could train a model just on bridges, Ferraris, etc. One AI model could not encompass everything we have in real life. The file would be too huge.
An AI model trained only on Arnold photos would really be useful to update older photos with minimal changes to the physique. Unless they come out with a general purpose AI model that can upscale and remove all the noise and add missing details without changing the overall shape of the body.
I've tried a few upscaling software and they have their limitations. Remini is amazing when it comes to upscaling faces, but it sucks with bodies and everything else. At least last time I tested it. I read that My Heritage Photo Enhancer is also great for upscaling photos and adding missing details. I have not tried it myself.
Here's a My Heritage example. Remini can achieve about the same results.
(https://blog.myheritage.com/wp-content/uploads/features-1.png)
https://blog.myheritage.com/2020/06/myheritage-photo-enhancer-goes-viral-one-million-photos-already-enhanced/
Gigapixel is not as great for faces, better with bodies. But not as amazing as Remini / My Heritage are with faces.
-
▫️