Trump = Winning

[Dos Equis]

175.05 does not appear to be expired according the NY penal codes. It is still on the books as a misdemeanor. 175.10 is a felony.  If you know otherwise, please provide a link showing it is expired?

Article 175 - NY Penal Law [https://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article175.php]

S 175.05 Falsifying business records in the second degree.
  A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the second degree
when, with intent to defraud, he:
  1. Makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an
enterprise; or
  2. Alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true
entry in the business records of an enterprise; or
  3. Omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise
in violation of a duty to do so which he knows to be imposed upon him by
law or by the nature of his position; or
  4. Prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof
in the business records of an enterprise.
  Falsifying business records in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

S 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
  A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

Expired meaning the deadline to prosecute Trump for this misdemeanor has passed.  But go ahead and avoid the gross violation of Trump's due process rights. 

[Primemuscle]

Expired meaning the deadline to prosecute Trump for this misdemeanor has passed.  But go ahead and avoid the gross violation of Trump's due process rights.

If this is true, then the defense should point this out and request those portions of the charges be dismissed. Even if the Judge refuses, the defense should make an issue of this in closing arguments. It seems to me if this is legally supported, it should be a no-brainer.  It seems to me that somebody is missing something, here.

I have heard that the prosecution must tie these charges to another crime. This might be why NY election fraud is mentioned so often by the media.

[Dos Equis]

If this is true, then the defense should point this out and request those portions of the charges be dismissed. Even if the Judge refuses, the defense should make an issue of this in closing arguments. It seems to me if this is legally supported, it should be a no-brainer.  It seems to me that somebody is missing something, here.

I have heard that the prosecution must tie these charges to another crime. This might be why NY election fraud is mentioned so often by the media.

Yes it's true.  This case should have never been filed.  But when the left is infected with TDS, this is what you get.