Author Topic: 2 (ok, maybe 3) women accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior (Read 21529 times)

blacken700 · « **Reply #50 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:37:20 AM »

you know when 333386 knows he's wrong because the subject changes

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #51 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:37:57 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:37:20 AM

you know when 333386 knows he's wrong because the subject changes

Yeah ok blackass.

I said i dont think this is a big deal even if true.

blacken700 · « **Reply #52 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:38:58 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 08:37:05 AM

Wrong, Blacken. This is about questionable (at best) allegations about Cain, allegedly harrassing women.

You know, that pesky INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY stuff.

Unnamed, anonymous sources allegedly from over two decades ago, cited by a left-winged rag, conveniently appearing when a conservative black man is a major player in the GOP nominee race, is HARDLY proof of guilt.

to bad that INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY stuff,never happens when you pay people off

240 is Back · « **Reply #53 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:40:26 AM »

He paid them off.

Two of them.

And he won't deny it.

And he is telling people what they can or cannot do in the bedroom. THAT is the issue with which I disagree. Fvck 20 girls a month, I don't care. But when tell us the govt should be able to legislate who can marry, what a woman can do to her body--- and your ass is paying hoes two at a time to keep their mouths shut after they say your married ass got froggy?

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test. And if he was 100% innocent, he would be instantly screaming it from the rooftops. Not ignoring the Q then REPEATING it to reporters.

blacken700 · « **Reply #54 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:46:11 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 31, 2011, 08:40:26 AM

He paid them off.

Two of them.

And he won't deny it.

And he is telling people what they can or cannot do in the bedroom. THAT is the issue with which I disagree. Fvck 20 girls a month, I don't care. But when tell us the govt should be able to legislate who can marry, what a woman can do to her body--- and your ass is paying hoes two at a time to keep their mouths shut after they say your married ass got froggy?

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test. And if he was 100% innocent, he would be instantly screaming it from the rooftops. Not ignoring the Q then REPEATING it to reporters.

spot on ,not ignoring the question,than answering it later when you can talk to your advisers and spin it the right way honest people don't work that way

MCWAY · « **Reply #55 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:47:09 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:38:58 AM

to bad that INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY stuff,never happens when you pay people off

Once again, you are dealing with allegations. Furthermore, when you bring a bogus accusation toward a senior executive, you can expect to get canned. What they probably got, if anything, was nothing more than a severance package.

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 31, 2011, 08:40:26 AM

He paid them off.

Two of them.

And he won't deny it.

And he is telling people what they can or cannot do in the bedroom. THAT is the issue with which I disagree. Fvck 20 girls a month, I don't care. But when tell us the govt should be able to legislate who can marry, what a woman can do to her body--- and your ass is paying hoes two at a time to keep their mouths shut after they say your married ass got froggy?

Sorry, doesn't pass the smell test. And if he was 100% innocent, he would be instantly screaming it from the rooftops. Not ignoring the Q then REPEATING it to reporters.

Cain HAS denied it, via his campaign manager, yesterday. And, he is slated to make a statement about this issue later today (Edit - he already has).

"I have never sexually harassed anyone," the former CEO of Godfather's Pizza told Fox News in his first major interview since Politico reported Sunday on accusations made by two women against Cain in the 1990s. Cain said Monday that the investigation surrounding those claims concluded they were "baseless."

"It is totally baseless and totally false."

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/cain-says-falsely-accused-sexual-harassment-unaware-settlement-153905666.html;_ylt=AoOBbECnOYYhlYuSHJm5VuebCMZ_;_ylu=X3oDMTFnZmkyMjJyBG1pdANCbG9nIEluZGV4IGJ5IEJsb2cEcG9zAzEwBHNlYwNNZWRpYUJsb2dJbmRleA--;_ylg=X3oDMTFpMm9iMzh1BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANibG9nBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25z;_ylv=3#more-22789

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #56 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:47:51 AM »

MCWAY · « **Reply #57 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:49:03 AM »

Cain has denied it, 240. So, now what?

blacken700 · « **Reply #58 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:51:20 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 08:49:03 AM

Cain has denied it, 240. So, now what?

not ignoring the question,than answering it later when you can talk to your advisers and spin it the right way honest people don't work that way

blacken700 · « **Reply #59 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:52:26 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on October 31, 2011, 08:47:51 AM

why don't you start a clinton tread

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #60 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:53:17 AM »

Just calling out your hypocrisy.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #61 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:56:23 AM »

If there was nothing there, why would you pay someone off?

Shit, tell them to go pound sand all day instead. If you are innocent you wouldn't need to buy their silence.

MCWAY · « **Reply #62 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:56:50 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:51:20 AM

not ignoring the question,than answering it later when you can talk to your advisers and spin it the right way honest people don't work that way

What are you talking about? You are mindlessly asserting that Cain is guilty of the allegations cited to him, with virtually NO PROOF whatosever. You don't have names; you don't have numbers; you don't have dates; you don't have JACK!!!

Again, it's "Innocent, until proven guilty". And, assuming these women were "paid off", since it appears that such didn't happen in court, that sounds like a severance package.

You falsely accuse your boss of sexual harrassment and see how long you last, at the company.

blacken700 · « **Reply #63 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:59:03 AM »

http://www.breakingeconomics.com/2011/10/geraldo-rivera-grills-herman-cains.html

MCWAY · « **Reply #64 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:59:24 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on October 31, 2011, 08:56:23 AM

If there was nothing there, why would you pay someone off?

Shit, tell them to go pound sand all day instead. If you are innocent you wouldn't need to buy their silence.

Who said Cain paid them off? Oh, anonymous, unconfirmed sources seen (to date) by ONE left-winged political news outfit.

.

As stated earlier, you falsely accuse your boss of sexual harrassment and see how long you're employed. Any "payoff" would be nothing more than a severance package.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #65 on:** October 31, 2011, 08:59:47 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on October 31, 2011, 08:56:23 AM

If there was nothing there, why would you pay someone off?

Shit, tell them to go pound sand all day instead. If you are innocent you wouldn't need to buy their silence.

Very simple - litigation costs and maybe not having insurance coverage for claims of this nature.

Back then, many carriers did not cover these types of suits and didnt even offer riders to the Gen umbrealla policies to cover employment claims of this nature.

Give the fact that litigation takes forever and costs a shit load of money, maybe both parties decided it was in their best interests to resolve this on the cheap early on.

if it were as egregious as blacken wants to claim, why settle before even a suit is filed?

He probably said some juvenile bs that these women took too seriously and cry babied to anyone who would listen.

blacken700 · « **Reply #66 on:** October 31, 2011, 09:01:59 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on October 31, 2011, 08:59:03 AM

http://www.breakingeconomics.com/2011/10/geraldo-rivera-grills-herman-cains.html

blacken700 · « **Reply #67 on:** October 31, 2011, 09:04:21 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on October 31, 2011, 08:56:50 AM

What are you talking about? You are mindlessly asserting that Cain is guilty of the allegations cited to him, with virtually NO PROOF whatosever. You don't have names; you don't have numbers; you don't have dates; you don't have JACK!!!

Again, it's "Innocent, until proven guilty". And, assuming these women were "paid off", since it appears that such didn't happen in court, that sounds like a severance package.

You falsely accuse your boss of sexual harrassment and see how long you last, at the company.

http://www.breakingeconomics.com/2011/10/geraldo-rivera-grills-herman-cains.html