What could have caused this hole?

[240 is Back]

thanks in advance

[240 is Back]

.

[beatmaster]

what was under that building?

i'll say not a missile!

[240 is Back]

Who knows.  Might have been one big bomb.  It's not plane debris, we see the direction it took on collapse.  The hole in WTC6 is actually BIGGER than either crater from WTC 1 or 2.


Bomb or missile, who knows.  I don't claim to know.  I'd like to hear you guys' thoughts.  Step back and look at how big this hole really is:

[240 is Back]

You know what's funny?

The people who will look at this hole (which looks like the result of a missile or explosives) and will tell us it's definitely NOT a crater from either...

...but they'll have no alternatives for what it could be.

[tu_holmes]

You know what's funny?

The people who will look at this hole (which looks like the result of a missile or explosives) and will tell us it's definitely NOT a crater from either...

...but they'll have no alternatives for what it could be.

Underground parking garage area?

Just tossing that out there.

[beatmaster]

Underground parking garage area?

Just tossing that out there.

thats what i was thinking......... or subway, then collapse........... but if the owner said bring it down... so its demolition

[tu_holmes]

thats what i was thinking......... or subway, then collapse........... but if the owner said bring it down... so its demolition

Did the subway go under there? A quick trip to the city planning office could confirm or deny that.

The plans to the building could also confirm or deny the parking garage idea.

[Mr. Intenseone]

Underground parking garage area?

Just tossing that out there.

Yep, I'll go with that. It's been about a month since I've been on this board with the exception of tossing a few things in here and there, I see there's still no shortage of conspiracy theories!

[tu_holmes]

Yep, I'll go with that. It's been about a month since I've been on this board with the exception of tossing a few things in here and there, I see there's still no shortage of conspiracy theories!

I'm ok with a conspiracy here and there... but I can't make a crater out of an underground parking area...

[240 is Back]

It's just an interesting aspect of the day that many don't know about.

Check out the marrive size of the hole from way above.  It's huge. 

[tu_holmes]

It's just an interesting aspect of the day that many don't know about.

Check out the marrive size of the hole from way above.  It's huge. 

Underground parking structures in NY are typically quite large.

Parking is hard to come by.

[OzmO]

A large chunk of the WTC's falling.

[240 is Back]

there was a crisscross of train and subway paths underneath - none hubbed at the collapse point.  

It wasn't an underground parking garage - the train and subway passed thru there meshed.

and it wasn't a collapse, as the www.wtc6.net photos show - photos from that day show it was hollowed out and they were standing on ground level afterwards.  In other words - the ground was intact - the hole was IN THE BUILDING.  So it didn't collapse into any sublevel.  

We know the hole was in the building.

We know there wasn't a collapse, there wasn't a chunk of the 1/2 towers.  

Something forced the many floors of that building OUT.  Explosives, missile, something else, I don't know.  But the contents were ejected in a perfectly uniform circle.

What came in contact with WTC6?  All we can see is that one streaking obect which comes from the sky one scond after the second plane hits the south tower.  The object strikes the north tower, and leaves a very dark smoke trail as it travels into the top of WTC6 - EXACTLY where that crater is.

Did this object cause the crater?

[tu_holmes]

there was a crisscross of train and subway paths underneath - none hubbed at the collapse point.  

It wasn't an underground parking garage - the train and subway passed thru there meshed.

and it wasn't a collapse, as the www.wtc6.net photos show - photos from that day show it was hollowed out and they were standing on ground level afterwards.  In other words - the ground was intact - the hole was IN THE BUILDING.  So it didn't collapse into any sublevel.  

We know the hole was in the building.

We know there wasn't a collapse, there wasn't a chunk of the 1/2 towers.  

Something forced the many floors of that building OUT.  Explosives, missile, something else, I don't know.  But the contents were ejected in a perfectly uniform circle.

What came in contact with WTC6?  All we can see is that one streaking obect which comes from the sky one scond after the second plane hits the south tower.  The object strikes the north tower, and leaves a very dark smoke trail as it travels into the top of WTC6 - EXACTLY where that crater is.

Did this object cause the crater?

A quick trip to the city planners office could verify all of this.

[240 is Back]

A large chunk of the WTC's falling.

I thought so too.  But the large debris fell straight down, the outward thrust of debris sent debris into the closer building on the side, the dutch bank building.  And the pics of WTC6 from that day, showed no debris from the towers in the building.  In fact, it actually looks like an ice cream scooper just took a giant scoop out of the building.  Very odd is the lack of the missing floors from WTC6, or any significant debris from WTC 1/2.  

Here is the hole - WTC6 was an eight-story building. It lost about half of its volume and there was remarkably little debris left at the bottom of building. What happened?

[240 is Back]

here are the subway and train paths

[tu_holmes]

here are the subway and train paths

What about parking?

[beatmaster]

what about underground parking..... and how deep is that hold from street level, does anyone know?

its gotta be the weight falling down on the building collapsing..... why is the first thing that comes to conspiracy theorist minds are missiles or bombs?

[240 is Back]

What about parking?

Parking below would be irrelevant, just as the trains are.

The ground was not corrupted in WTC 6, as it was in WTC 1/2.

The photos show them standing inside the building the next day, in that hole.  They're standing there.  Ground not broken.  Just 8 missing floors of govt offices, in a nice circle, gone.  Not collapsed.  Gone.  They're not there.

[240 is Back]

what about underground parking..... and how deep is that hold from street level, does anyone know?

its gotta be the weight falling down on the building collapsing..... why is the first thing that comes to conspiracy theorist minds are missiles or bombs?

Here you see what workers saw inside the building WTC6.

The ground is intact and covered with minor debris, but certainly not 8 floors worth plus debris from WTC1/2.

I don't know what to think about this.  If it's not explosives, and we know there are no WTC 1/2 pieces there, and we know nothing is underground, then... where did the building go and what caused it?

[240 is Back]

Here's a scary comparison:

WTC6 and Oklahoma City.

WTC6:



Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building:

[Eyeball Chambers]

I read somewhere that the Blueprints to all the buildings in the WTC complex aren't available to the public. 

[240 is Back]

I read somewhere that the Blueprints to all the buildings in the WTC complex aren't available to the public. 

they were classified the week after 9/11.

turns out, the 911 commission included a HOLLOW center of the building, instead of the 47 steel reinforced concrete load bearing columns.

In the 911 report, these columns don't exist.

in the videos and pictures from the 1970s, as the building was being built, they definitely exist.

[Cavalier22]

UFO's