911 Truth marches in Downtown Boston

[ToxicAvenger]

So why aren't CNN, Fox, CBS, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC covering this alleged 911 conspiracy (except to mock the story)? 

cause American news is not controlled..ohh no its not controlled at all 

[Dos Equis]

cause American news is not controlled..ohh no its not controlled at all 

Thanks for clearing that up.   

[OzmO]

Here we go again.... more wacked out conjecture

The first 3 days after 9/11, all reporters kept asking rumsfeld was "where is the plane? why don't we see evidence of the plane? can you show us videos of the plane?  are you sure it was a plane? where are the bodies??" I'm sure you watched CSPAN and saw this.  Rummy just stopped answering the questions and they stopped asking. 

The plane was missing.

Scores of eyewitnesses saw the plane crash into the pentagon

There was plane Debris at  the site

The news was reporting it later that morning as a plane hitting the pentagon. 

Becuase he stops answering questions doesn't mean he was lying as you are suggesting.  Rumfield probably didn't have any explanation at the time. 

So becuase he didn't answer those questions and or he didn;t have the information to answer those question at the time your glorious 9/11 CT's have surmised that he must have been lying and that a plane hadn't really hit the pentagon.

That's just plane  stupid dude. 

And anyone who stupid enough to buy into that practically will believe anything.

These were the MSM regulars- cause they knew.  And CNN's little guy asking Pataki over and over at ground zero "Sir, where did the building go?  How does a building scientifically pulverize itself? etc etc.  Pataki just kept saying "It was pulverized.  Pullll-ver-ized."  The reporter, standing at ground zero looking at 50 feet of rubble where 1100 feet of concrete and steel stood 24 hours earlier, obviously knew the shit was *absolutely impossible*, and was pushing Pataki's buttons.

Pataki was saying that becuase he didn't know what happened.  It wasn't like an 1100 story had ever been hit by a passenger plane full of jet fuel before. 

BUT NO!  because your 9/11 CT'ers just assumed he thought it was impossible there for it must have been impossible becuase someone couldn't give a accurate explanation without all the facts....  How fucking stupid is that kind of thinking?

 

Then the order came from above and it was dropped.

this one's  my personal favorate.

How do we know an order was send "from above"  Is this another one of your "documents"  that prove everything?


Com on 240

YOU are smarter than this!

But go ahead and go back to your 9/11 truth forum and get more useless ammo

[kh300]

the only argument they use for the Pentagon is that the hole wasn't big enough for the plane..when they are actually right,,but leaving out info. the damaged to the Pentagon was the length of the plane. but obviously the wings wernt strong enough to make a hole. the wings couldnt penetrate the walls of the Pentagon.. but guess what could, the fuselage. hence, why the whole isnt as big as the plane. but the same size as the fuselage.

[Delusional Liberal]

the only argument they use for the Pentagon is that the hole wasn't big enough for the plane..when they are actually right,,but leaving out info. the damaged to the Pentagon was the length of the plane. but obviously the wings wernt strong enough to make a hole. the wings couldnt penetrate the walls of the Pentagon.. but guess what could, the fuselage. hence, why the whole isnt as big as the plane. but the same size as the fuselage.

the pentagon is made out of butter

[OzmO]

can anyone tlel me why the media would completely stop reporting on bombs #2 and #3 at OK City?  They existed - we heard from many ATF and govt officials that day, and FEMA even released documents.  This showed that someone carried bombs in and set them up at the murrah building.  Since we know every minute of mcveigh's week, we know it was NOT him. 

But everyone loves the lone gunman angle...

Wow!  we've now rotated to a completely different CT!