Trump Facebook ban upheld

[Straw Man]

I know our resident Trumptards would like me to ignore any negative news about THE TRAITOR so you idiots can just pretend this is a positive story

It actually really is a positive story for the majority of people in this country

[Coach is Back!]

Are we supposed to be surprised? All leftists.

You always try to exploit the obvious 😂

[Grape Ape]

Nobody should applaud the banning of free speech.

[monsterman500]

I know our resident Trumptards would like me to ignore any negative news about THE TRAITOR so you idiots can just pretend this is a positive story

It actually really is a positive story for the majority of people in this country

you should never have been born. I guess your Pa shot in the wrong hole.
your mother was no doubt a whore.

[Coach is Back!]

Nobody should applaud the banning of free speech.

Let’s not forget who started this thread....a communist

[Coach is Back!]

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/05/06/facebook-supreme-court-packed-with-anti-trump-progressive-figures/

https://www.oversightboard.com/news/announcing-the-first-members-of-the-oversight-board/

It’s not like Trump is in panic mode. His new site is allowed to share to FB and Twitter

[Straw Man]

Nobody should applaud the banning of free speech.

no one is banning his speech

he can say whatever he wants on plenty of other platforms or on many many media outlets

no one has a Constitutional right to access to Facebook or Twitter or any other social media platform

they are allowed to make rules of conduct and ban those that don't follow the rule

You know this

[Straw Man]

you should never have been born. I guess your Pa shot in the wrong hole.
your mother was no doubt a whore.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=323616.0

[Grape Ape]

no one is banning his speech

he can say whatever he wants on plenty of other platforms or on many many media outlets

no one has a Constitutional right to access to Facebook or Twitter or any other social media platform

they are allowed to make rules of conduct and ban those that don't follow the rule

You know this

I do know this.

However, I believe big tech is a bigger potential problem than whoever is in the White House, and I don't like platforms having that type of power.

Regardless of political affiliation, this should be a concern.

[Straw Man]

I do know this.

However, I believe big tech is a bigger potential problem than whoever is in the White House, and I don't like platforms having that type of power.

Regardless of political affiliation, this should be a concern.

All platforms have the right to set limits on the conduct of their customers

This goes for virtually all businesses and not just online platforms

Even this site occassionally enforces it's own code of conduct

[Soul Crusher]

I know our resident Trumptards would like me to ignore any negative news about THE TRAITOR so you idiots can just pretend this is a positive story

It actually really is a positive story for the majority of people in this country

How is this a positive story? 

[Straw Man]

How is this a positive story?

read my second sentence and see if you can crack the mystery

[Grape Ape]

All platforms have the right to set limits on the conduct of their customers

This goes for virtually all businesses and not just online platforms

Even this site occassionally enforces it's own code of conduct

Yes, but then situations arise like before the election where they banned the NY Post and The Admin's press secretary over a story the presumed to be misinformation, but was actually true.

They can therefore manipulate content based on a loosely defined set of criteria that can be morphed to fit their agenda.

I think there's merit into considering them publishers instead of platform for this, and increasing their liability potential.

[Coach is Back!]

no one is banning his speech

he can say whatever he wants on plenty of other platforms or on many many media outlets

no one has a Constitutional right to access to Facebook or Twitter or any other social media platform

they are allowed to make rules of conduct and ban those that don't follow the rule

You know this

This is exactly why Republicans are pushing to reform Sec 230. Before Biden was elected this was a bipartisan issue, now that it’s basically only conservatives getting banned (including myself on Twitter even with my measly 7k followers) they’re acting as an editorial board and not really a social media platform....this is where the First Amendment would enter.

[Straw Man]

Yes, but then situations arise like before the election where they banned the NY Post and The Admin's press secretary over a story the presumed to be misinformation, but was actually true.

They can therefore manipulate content based on a loosely defined set of criteria that can be morphed to fit their agenda.

I think there's merit into considering them publishers instead of platform for this, and increasing their liability potential.

Conservatives like to complain about things that they imagine that don't actually happen ...like voter fraud and facebook censoring conservatives

https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/10/two-new-studies-show-again-that-facebook-doesnt-censor-conservatives/

[Straw Man]

This is exactly why Republicans are pushing to reform Sec 230. Before Biden was elected this was a bipartisan issue, now that it’s basically only conservatives getting banned (including myself on Twitter even with my measly 7k followers) they’re acting as an editorial board and not really a social media platform....this is where the First Amendment would enter.

what rule did you break that got you banned from Twitter

be honest

[Coach is Back!]

what rule did you break that got you banned from Twitter

be honest

I honestly don’t know and no explanation was given. This was probably 2 years ago and I never went back.

[Grape Ape]

Conservatives like to complain about things that they imagine that don't actually happen ...like voter fraud and facebook censoring conservatives

https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/10/two-new-studies-show-again-that-facebook-doesnt-censor-conservatives/

I am an independent with certain conservative, and certain liberal values.

And I posted an example of something that did actually happen.

[Straw Man]

I honestly don’t know and no explanation was given. This was probably 2 years ago and I never went back.

were you warned

btw - I still don't know why anyone has Twitter.

[Grape Ape]

were you warned

btw - I still don't know why anyone has Twitter.

Legit answer - it's good for pro sports info and exercise stuff.

Lots of good info on diet and such....good community for people who want to lift as they get older.

Can share some good folks to follow if you want.

[residue]

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/05/06/facebook-supreme-court-packed-with-anti-trump-progressive-figures/

https://www.oversightboard.com/news/announcing-the-first-members-of-the-oversight-board/

It’s not like Trump is in panic mode. His new site is allowed to share to FB and Twitter

why does he want to share to twitter and fb, isnt it just full of commies anyway?

[Straw Man]

Yes, but then situations arise like before the election where they banned the NY Post and The Admin's press secretary over a story the presumed to be misinformation, but was actually true.

They can therefore manipulate content based on a loosely defined set of criteria that can be morphed to fit their agenda.

I think there's merit into considering them publishers instead of platform for this, and increasing their liability potential.

what was the story and are they still banned?

[IRON CROSS]

Posting pics/videos of ISIS heads cutting  was okay by Facebook community standards ................

[Grape Ape]

what was the story and are they still banned?

I believe you would know it was the Biden laptop story.

And, they are not still banned.

But they were up until the election happened, which is all that mattered in that context.

[chaos]

Nobody should applaud the banning of free speech.

LIBERALS don't care about free speech unless it affects them.