I had absolutely no idea what you were referring to and I still don't know what specifics about the story got them banned...such as if what they said was in fact false or violated some other rule (you didn't say who banned them but I assume you meand FB?)
but if they aren't banned any more then it's a non-issue
BTW - the POTUS press secretary doesn't need FB or Twitter and certainly can't claim her voice is being stilfed
She the PRESS SECRETARY. She can call a press conference any time that she wants and anything she says will be reported all over the various forms of media
This is what I could find and I have no problem with this:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/oct/14/facebook-twitter-new-york-post-hunter-biden
Both McEnany and the New York Post have a history of making false statements/publishing false stories
As recently as last week it was revealed that the NY Post published a false story about VP Harris
https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-post-reporter-resigned-says-ordered-false-story-migrant-2021-4
Yes, that is the story, but I meant Twitter.
But it does matter silencing the 4th largest newspaper in the world on one of the world's biggest platforms a week before the election.
There are polls that show that up to 35% of Biden voters never even heard of the laptop story and that 13% of that 35% would not have voted for him had they known. That changes an election.
Even Dorsey has admitted they made a mistake.
But it shows the unchecked power they have. If they can do it to the major media outlets, the President, etc, they can do it to anyone.
I know Democrats and the media are thrilled Trump is out and I get that, but they shouldn't celebrate abandoning their principles to accomplish it.
They are too many potential impacts down the road.
This should be a bipartisan issue (and it was until Trump).