Getbig Main Boards > Politics and Political Issues Board

Serious Answer only: Please define "Conspiracy Theory".

<< < (6/6)

Cavalier22:
wouldnt it be much easier for whomever was behind it to just crash a plane into it, just like the twin towers?  or were they making it as complicated as possible to make it harder for the general public to listen to CT'ers?

240 is Back:

--- Quote from: Cavalier22 on December 11, 2006, 03:20:15 PM ---wouldnt it be much easier for whomever was behind it to just crash a plane into it, just like the twin towers?  or were they making it as complicated as possible to make it harder for the general public to listen to CT'ers?

--- End quote ---

Cavalier,

The plane angle is nearly impossible, even for a computer to achieve.  The Flight Data Recorder tells us the plane only dropped as low as 180 feet.  it's never been explained why it didn't say "2 feet" like the 911 COmmission report says.

I like science.  Show us a flight data recorder that says 180 feet, then tell us the plane was 18 inches off the Earth? Huh?

Show us the approach path at 530 mph, and tell us that even though it was just 3 feet above cars on the highway, none of them were flipped over by the incredibly huge jet engines at full blast? Huh?

Facts are facts.  One real piece of evidence - video, or debris, would sell it.  Instead, we get "witness statements", many of which happen to be people employed by USA today at strategic locations - i mean, they all had identical stories including same keywords, stationed at one-block intervals, it's almost comical how that one worked out.

Show us some evidence.  The FDR box says 180 feet at impact.  Huh?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page