Author Topic: Dugdale looked better as an amateur (Read 3749 times)

donrhummy · « **on:** February 17, 2007, 02:20:17 PM »

Dugdale looks good but he actually looked better as an amateur.

Comparisons of his back:

alexxx · « **Reply #1 on:** February 17, 2007, 02:21:28 PM »

Looks like he has had a bad burn.

YoungBlood · « **Reply #2 on:** February 17, 2007, 02:24:07 PM »

What's your criteria for saying he looks "better?" More detail, crispness?

Condor · « **Reply #3 on:** February 17, 2007, 02:25:39 PM »

his lats def look wider in the first pic.

donrhummy · « **Reply #4 on:** February 17, 2007, 02:38:05 PM »

Quote from: YoungBlood on February 17, 2007, 02:24:07 PM

What's your criteria for saying he looks "better?" More detail, crispness?

Look in that first pic. He's just as striated in the lats as in 2007 but is thicker despite not pulling his arms back like in the 2007 pic. Sure, he doesn't have as dark a tan but he's just as cut. And in the 2nd comparison you can see he's just as cut (again not as dark which brings out the cuts better) but wider/thicker, especially in the lower lats.

SS · « **Reply #5 on:** February 17, 2007, 02:39:14 PM »

maybe he needs steroids.

240 is Back · « **Reply #6 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:00:18 PM »

Quote from: superstarbillygram on February 17, 2007, 02:39:14 PM

maybe he needs steroids.

sorry, bible dudn't allow it.

swilkins1984 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:01:48 PM »

What? Dugdale clearly looks better in 2007 than 2003 in those pics IMO

Tigerman · « **Reply #8 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:05:30 PM »

In the 2007 pic he's still completing the pose. No way he looked better as an amateur.

XFACTOR · « **Reply #9 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:07:43 PM »

In the 2007 shot he has not completely extended out his lats. He look way better in 07. No comparison.

donrhummy · « **Reply #10 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:08:39 PM »

OK, here he's completed the pose. He still looks better in 2003.

The_Hammer · « **Reply #11 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:09:14 PM »

His arms look better in 2003.

XFACTOR · « **Reply #12 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:10:41 PM »

Here is a pretty good comparison. Damn bottom one showed up shitty. my bad

ribonucleic · « **Reply #13 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:14:36 PM »

Quote from: superstarbillygram on February 17, 2007, 02:39:14 PM

maybe he needs steroids.

He needs something.

PM me when he's gained 30 pound of mass, OK?

alexxx · « **Reply #14 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:15:25 PM »

Quote from: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:14:36 PM

He needs something.

PM me when he's gained 30 pound of mass, OK?

He needs to train for boybuilding.

ribonucleic · « **Reply #15 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:17:36 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:15:25 PM

He needs to train for boybuilding.

Freudian slip?

alexxx · « **Reply #16 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:21:18 PM »

Quote from: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:17:36 PM

Freudian slip?

Yeah needs to get his head on straight.

ribonucleic · « **Reply #17 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:22:23 PM »

All his Flex articles talk about how he used to train for volume until his wife pussy-whipped him into spending less time in the gym so now he does HIT.

Unless he's content to leave as small a mark on the sport as Porter Cottrell, he needs to start keeping his woman in line like a true Cubano.

alexxx · « **Reply #18 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:24:07 PM »

Quote from: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:22:23 PM

All his Flex articles talk about how he used to train for volume until his wife pussy-whipped him into spending less time in the gym so now he does HIT.

Unless he's content to leave as small a mark on the sport as Porter Cottrell, he needs to start keeping his woman in line like a true Cubano.

Oh man not another one of those. I find it hilarious how women control the lives of their husbands. I wonder who is in control at the Dugdale residence.

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #19 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:40:46 PM »

Dugdale = vastly overrated.

The only reason he's a pro is his connections and nice-guy persona

alexxx · « **Reply #20 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:41:52 PM »

Quote from: Groink on February 17, 2007, 03:40:46 PM

Dugdale = vastly overrated.

The only reason he's a pro is his connections and nice-guy persona

What about the poor caliber of proffesional bodybuilders?

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #21 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:44:05 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:41:52 PM

What about the poor caliber of proffesional bodybuilders?

70% of them are unimpressive

ManBearPig... · « **Reply #22 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:44:27 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:24:07 PM

Oh man not another one of those. I find it hilarious how women control the lives of their husbands. I wonder who is in control at the Dugdale residence.

Jesus?

alexxx · « **Reply #23 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:46:16 PM »

Quote from: Power Rod on February 17, 2007, 03:44:27 PM

Jesus?

Let us hope so.

natural al · « **Reply #24 on:** February 17, 2007, 03:47:46 PM »

Quote from: Groink on February 17, 2007, 03:40:46 PM

Dugdale = vastly overrated.

The only reason he's a pro is his connections and nice-guy persona

I'll respectfully disagree with ya on that. He's not tall but he has everything a pro "should" have. Only "poor" bodypart are his bi's, everything else is top notch, he has conditioning, no gut, symmetry, he know's how to pose, defined, seperated.....

why do you think he's overrated?