I didn't see your other posts on these crashes. Post some links to info (not photos) and I'll really try to understand what you're trying to tell me
The 9/11 CT'ers contention is that hole was too small for the plane and no debris where phographed that they have access to.
So becuase of that they say it was a missle.
The photos i posted with links to the actuall news stories (not some over dramatic youtube amature documentary) tell fo a C-130 carching into an apartment building.
Each photo has a link to the original news storyNotice the building is very much still intact?
Notice you can't see the plane?
Now watcht the video of the f-4 phantom crashing into the concrete wall.
Combine that with scores of eye witnesses who saw the plane and wittnesses who saw the plane hit the pentagon.
Or listin to a crack pot general and get manipulated by 240 persuasive questions casting doubt.
They go something like this: Pretend for a moment the conspracy is a "bumble bee flying"
How could a creature fly with wings that small and a body that big? Look at all the birds you see every day...do any of them have wings that small?
How coudl a bee fly with a body that bumpy? Look at how aerodynamic a eagle's body is?
It's impossible for this bee to fly so it must not really be flying but instead it's a figment of our imagination planted in our brains by the government?
Do you at least believe the govenrment is capable of doing something like this in the past? I need to know what i'm dealing with. You see what i'm getting at here?
