Author Topic: Lawyer Ends Up Dead After Taking On Rove  (Read 1291 times)

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31868
Lawyer Ends Up Dead After Taking On Rove
« on: December 30, 2006, 08:02:26 PM »
It’s fishy as hell.

Paul Sanford, a prominent Aptos, California, attorney, who accused Karl Rove of treason in the Plame outing case, took a leap from the Embassy Suites Hotel in Monterey Bay on Christmas Eve. Police describe it as “probable” suicide, even though it appears Sanford was not depressed.

“Friends and associates expressed disbelief at the news of Sanford’s death and that it was ruled a suicide, saying Sanford seemed happy and had made many plans for this week and in coming months. [Business associate and friend Shawn Mills] said he and Sanford recently decided to open a shared law office to serve Monterey and Santa Cruz counties, something Sanford was looking forward to doing,” reports the Monterey Herald. “Mills said he had spoken to Sanford’s wife, Paula, and that she also was in shock. He said Sanford, a father of two, was a devoted family man.” Sanford “would never have intentionally put his family through that trauma. Something’s not right, it doesn’t make sense.”

On July 25, 2005, in the James S. Brady Briefing Room at the White House, Sanford asked then press secretary Scott McClellan about Karl Rove, accused at the time by Joseph Wilson, the husband of Valerie Plame, of outing his wife as a CIA employee in retaliation for Wilson’s op-ed published in the New York Times. Wilson criticized the citation of bogus yellowcake documents used as flimsy justification for invading Iraq and murdering more than 650,000 Iraqis.

McClellan was flummoxed by Sanford’s question:

McClellan: Go ahead.

Sanford: Yes, thank you. There has been a lot of speculation concerning the meaning of the underlying statute and the grand jury investigation concerning Mr. Rove. The question is, have the legal counsel to the White House or White House staff reviewed the statute in sufficient specificity to determine whether a violation of that statute would, in effect, constitute treason?

McClellan: I think that in terms of decisions regarding the investigation, those are matters for those overseeing the investigation to decide.

Special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald, decided not to charge Rove in the case, even though the former Donald Segretti dirty trickster understudy raised enough suspicion to warrant being called before a grand jury five times. Neocon Lewis “Scooter” Libby was charged with obstruction of justice, perjury, and making false statements to the FBI. A few weeks later, on July 13, 2006, Joseph and Valerie Wilson filed a civil suit against Cheney, Libby, Rove, and other unnamed senior White House officials, for their alleged roles in the public disclosure of her classified CIA employment.

cont.... http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=701


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 58820
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Lawyer Ends Up Dead After Taking On Rove
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2006, 08:20:56 PM »
So he takes on Rove in July 2005 and takes a dive off a building in December 2006?  A little leap there (so to speak)?  I'd be more suspicious if his testimony was needed in some kind of criminal proceeding and they hadn't already taken a statement, deposition, etc.  His death may be suspicious, but linking it to criticism of Rove 18 months prior is a stretch. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 58820
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Lawyer Ends Up Dead After Taking On Rove
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2006, 08:33:50 PM »
 :-\

In 2004, Sanford appeared before the Supreme Court with Michael Newdow, an atheist who sued the Elk Grove Unified School District, claiming that the mention of God in the Pledge of Allegiance violated the First Amendment's separation of church and state.

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2006/December/28/local/stories/02local.htm