Author Topic: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border  (Read 3333 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #25 on: July 19, 2010, 05:47:33 AM »
FBI: Man admits running sexual delivery service
Agency says workers mostly female illegal immigrants

By J.J. Stambaugh
Knoxville News Sentinel
Posted July 17, 2010 at midnight

________________________ ________________________ ________


Selvin Salvador Perdomo is accused in a federal indictment of running a massive prostitution ring from this house, at 5101 Papermill Drive in Knoxville. Perdomo rented the house from Robert Haws, a retired attorney, who said he will evict him.
 
Selvin Salvador Perdomo has been under FBI surveillance for at least a year.
 
Photo by J. Miles Cary
Buy this photo »

Carol and Helen Taylor, neighbors of Selvin Salvador Perdomo, sit Friday with their daughter, Annette Bowman. The Taylors said it was obvious Perdomo was being watched by police in the last year but that they never saw any illegal activity at the house.
Related document.FBI affidavit containing allegations against Perdomo

A 36-year-old Knoxville man arrested early this week has admitted to the FBI that he employed up to 400 female escorts who performed sex acts for cash in Knox and surrounding counties, court records show.

Selvin Salvador Perdomo, a Honduran national who is in the United States legally on a visa, ran the sexual delivery service out of a house he rented at 5101 Papermill Drive and almost exclusively employed female illegal immigrants of Hispanic descent, according to the FBI.

Perdomo took appointments through his cell phone and then drove the women to clients' homes in his red Ford Escort, records allege. In return for his services, the FBI alleges, Perdomo took half of the women's earnings.

His arrest came after at least a year of surveillance by an FBI task force that worked with the Knoxville Police Department, Knox County Sheriff's Office, Clinton Police Department and Blount County Sheriff's Office.

He is charged under a federal statute known as the Mann Act, which makes it a crime to transport people across state lines or U.S. borders for the purpose of prostitution.

Undercover agents lured him Tuesday to an apartment at 790 North Cedar Bluff Road with the promise of giving him cash in exchange for sexual favors with a prostitute identified as Catalina Flores, according to an affidavit filed by FBI Special Agent Clay Moss Anderson.

After collecting $60, Perdomo waited in the living room while Flores went into the bedroom with an undercover officer, Anderson said. When she removed her pants, the agent "gave the code word" that summoned a team of officers to take Perdomo into custody, the complaint stated.

Perdomo later admitted that he "transported illegal alien females for the purpose of engaging in illegal sex acts," records show.

"Perdomo admitted to engaging approximately ... 400 females in commercial sex acts over the past four years," Anderson said. "He said that he worked them approximately seven days a week and that almost all of the females were illegal aliens."

Flores told the agents that she lives in the Atlanta area, and Perdomo called her last week to ask if she wanted to work for him, records show. Perdomo picked her up on Monday and immediately put her to work, with sex acts quickly scheduled "for the entire week in Knoxville," the complaint stated. Flores, who had planned to return home Sunday after finishing her Knoxville appointments, wasn't charged, according to FBI Supervisory Special Agent Michael Maclean.

Perdomo's clients were almost exclusively Hispanic, and the FBI's Knoxville office became involved in the case as part of an ongoing probe into human trafficking being conducted by federal authorities in Memphis and Atlanta, he said.

The FBI had initially been told that Perdomo was using underage girls in the operation, "but we obviously didn't see that," Maclean said.

Perdomo's attorney, Tracy Jackson Smith, didn't return a phone call seeking comment. Perdomo waived a Friday detention hearing and remained jailed in Blount County.

Anderson's affidavit makes it clear that Perdomo had been under surveillance since last July. Over the past year, agents followed Perdomo and various women to mobile homes, apartments and houses in Knox, Blount, Loudon and Sevier counties, records show.

When FBI agents executed a search warrant on Perdomo's house, they found "a large quantity of condoms, lubricant, and other sex aids or supplies," along with "a yearly planner containing a log of females dating back to 2008," records show.

A young woman at Perdomo's house Friday identified herself as his stepdaughter but said she didn't want to be interviewed or photographed.

His neighbors, Carl and Helen Taylor, both 87, said that Perdomo lived at the house with his wife and children. They said that Perdomo spoke little or no English and that his wife had to translate when they hired him to mow their lawn.

While Perdomo was in many respects a good neighbor and the Taylors never saw any overtly illegal acts, it was obvious he was being watched by the police, said Carl Taylor.

"One night I went out about 10 p.m., just stretching my legs, you know, and all of a sudden there was a helicopter right above my head," he said. "That thing was whisper quiet."

Perdomo was growing corn, Taylor said, and he surmised that was why the helicopter was buzzing about.

"I thought they were checking to see if he was growing marijuana," he said.

Also, he said, police cars frequently drove by Perdomo's house and slowed down as if they were looking to see who was there.

Helen Taylor said it looked as though Perdomo was taking in boarders because of the number of people who seemed to be staying in the house. She also said that young women often came to the house but that there was nothing about their behavior that aroused suspicion.

"There were a lot of comings and goings," she said.

Perdomo had been renting the house from Robert Haws, a retired attorney, for several years. Haws said that Perdomo paid $650 a month, but he planned to evict him after hearing of his arrest.

"That's the end of him," Haws said. "His rear end is going out the door quick. I don't put up with that."

Haws' property manager said that Perdomo, who went by "Selvie," spoke only Spanish and paid his monthly rent in cash. Perdomo claimed to be a carpenter and, by all appearances, the family that lived there seemed fairly normal, he said.

Although a News Sentinel analysis shows that Knoxville led the state last year in the number of per capita prostitution-related arrests and citations, federal prosecutions for prostitution are rare. Most prostitution charges are misdemeanors brought in state court that typically result in a fine or a few days in jail.

J.J. Stambaugh may be reached at 865-342-6307.


________________________ ________________________ ________________


A young woman at Perdomo's house Friday identified herself as his stepdaughter but said she didn't want to be interviewed or photographed.[/color]





loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19094
  • loco like a fox
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #26 on: July 19, 2010, 07:19:01 AM »
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/17/national/main6687832.shtml

(AP)   Minutemen groups, a surge in Border Patrol agents, and a tough new immigration law aren't enough for a reputed neo-Nazi who's now leading a militia in the Arizona desert.

Jason "J.T." Ready is taking matters into his own hands, declaring war on "narco-terrorists" and keeping an eye out for illegal immigrants. So far, he says his patrols have only found a few border crossers who were given water and handed over to the Border Patrol. Once, they also found a decaying body in a wash, and alerted authorities.

But local law enforcement authorities are nervous given that Ready's group is heavily armed and identifies with the National Socialist Movement, an organization that believes only non-Jewish, white heterosexuals should be American citizens and that everyone who isn't white should leave the country "peacefully or by force."

Funny how so many people on this board seem to have no problem with this!  Hopefully they don't secretly believe the same.   ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #27 on: July 19, 2010, 07:25:52 AM »
What's worse Loco - yahoos down at the border stopping the entry of these bums, or allowing them in and then having to pay massive taxes and costs to deal with the flop houses they run, prostution rings, drug deal, smuggling, etc? 

If this govt refuses to do the job, I don't care if the Black Panthers join with the skin heads in patrolling the border with the billy clubs.   

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2010, 10:13:31 AM »
Funny how so many people on this board seem to have no problem with this!  Hopefully they don't secretly believe the same.   ::)

Regardless of agreeing with it or not, this country lets people hold beliefs like that. I don't see why it's a problem if the group is causing no trouble.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19094
  • loco like a fox
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #29 on: July 19, 2010, 01:04:26 PM »
Regardless of agreeing with it or not, this country lets people hold beliefs like that. I don't see why it's a problem if the group is causing no trouble.

I agree with your statement, but then why all the complaining about Reverend Wright being racist?  Is he causing trouble?

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2010, 01:28:24 PM »
I agree with your statement, but then why all the complaining about Reverend Wright being racist?  Is he causing trouble?

I really couldn't care less about the guy but how is people criticizing him and Obama any different than what you're doing with this guy and his group?

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19094
  • loco like a fox
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #31 on: July 19, 2010, 03:04:31 PM »
I really couldn't care less about the guy but how is people criticizing him and Obama any different than what you're doing with this guy and his group?

There is no difference.  The World Wide Web gives people the freedom to criticize whoever they want.  I for one hope people on this board do not believe that only straight, non-Jewish white people should be allowed to be American citizens.  That's disgusting!

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2010, 04:00:52 PM »
There is no difference.  The World Wide Web gives people the freedom to criticize whoever they want.  I for one hope people on this board do not believe that only straight, non-Jewish white people should be allowed to be American citizens.  That's disgusting!

I don't think too many people besides the usual gimmicks looking to stir shit up feel that way. In the amnesty threads you'll see that most people who are against amnesty have no problem with legal immigration. In-fact, I think most are quite welcoming of hard-working, educated, Indians, Asians and the like.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19094
  • loco like a fox
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #33 on: July 19, 2010, 05:35:58 PM »
 :)


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #34 on: July 19, 2010, 06:37:17 PM »
Loius CK is f'ng hilsrious

btw - it's not really a suprise that neo-nazi groups are patrollign the border

they were tied to the guy who helped write the bill

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #35 on: July 19, 2010, 07:22:53 PM »
Loius CK is f'ng hilsrious

btw - it's not really a suprise that neo-nazi groups are patrollign the border

they were tied to the guy who helped write the bill
LOL thats like saying

its not really suprising that the black panther guy got off easy

the guy who appointed the AG sat in rev wrights church...

 ::)

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #36 on: July 19, 2010, 08:15:50 PM »
LOL thats like saying

its not really suprising that the black panther guy got off easy

the guy who appointed the AG sat in rev wrights church...

 ::)

yet another swing and a miss

the black panthers had nothing to do with Obama

It was Bush's DoJ that decided not to prosecute

I can't even find a thread of correlation between Wright and Holder


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #37 on: July 19, 2010, 08:24:07 PM »
the black panthers had nothing to do with Obama

It was Bush's DoJ that decided not to prosecute


I've shit all over obama for his DoJ not prosecuting this 2008 crime.

But is what you say true?  Bush's people decided not to pursue this?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #38 on: July 19, 2010, 08:35:37 PM »

I've shit all over obama for his DoJ not prosecuting this 2008 crime.

But is what you say true?  Bush's people decided not to pursue this?

easily verifiable on the interweb

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007070020

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&year=2010&base_name=when_was_the_new_black_panther


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #39 on: July 19, 2010, 08:41:49 PM »
easily verifiable on the interweb

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007070020

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&year=2010&base_name=when_was_the_new_black_panther


This means that the case was downgraded to a civil case 11 days before Obama was inaugurated, 26 days before Eric Holder became attorney general

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!  I had no idea.

Holy shit... 333386, what say you?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #40 on: July 20, 2010, 04:38:44 AM »

This means that the case was downgraded to a civil case 11 days before Obama was inaugurated, 26 days before Eric Holder became attorney general

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!  I had no idea.

Holy shit... 333386, what say you?

And?  They got a default judgement against the guy and then decided to drop the case afterwards.   

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #41 on: July 20, 2010, 07:33:46 AM »
And?  They got a default judgement against the guy and then decided to drop the case afterwards.   

So, it was downgraded to a civil case by the Bush DoJ and then dismissed because of the profound lack of evidence of any voter intimidation.   

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&year=2010&base_name=a_clarification_on_the_nbpp_ca

Quote
A Clarification on the NBPP Case.

As I've explained before, Section 11(b) cases, which are rare, are generally reserved for extensive voter-suppression schemes, which the two men standing outside the Philadelphia polling station did not amount to. The legal standard for proving Section 11(b) cases in the past has been extremely high, which is both why they're rare and why Section 11(b) complaints are generally filed in order to prevent large-scale voter suppression campaigns.


The original complaint in the NBPP case alleged that the behavior of the men outside the polling station was part of a larger scheme to disenfranchise white voters ("Prior to the election, Defendant New Black Panther Party For Self-Defense made statements and posted notice that over 300 members of the New Black Panther Party For Self-Defense would be deployed at polling locations during voting on November 4th 2008 throughout the United States"). But there's no evidence that's the case -- no voters in Philadelphia or elsewhere came forward to say they had been intimidated. One of them actually had a poll watching certificate, and the remarks from the NBPP leader state the obvious -- that the NBPP thought they were protecting blacks from being disenfranchised by whites. Basically what you have -- to the extent that you have anything -- is a conspiracy to wear black clothing outside of polling stations as part of a fringe group, which career attorneys at the Department of Justice weren't comfortable prosecuting as a violation of the Voting Rights Act.
If any of this is familiar, it's because we're down the ACORN rabbit hole again; despite the Government Accountability Office being unable to find a single instance in which a voter registered by ACORN cast a fraudulent ballot, the idea that the group regularly stole elections is an article of conservative faith. So with the NBPP case, with its allegation of a widespread voter-intimidation scheme that included no actual intimidated voters. Adding to the absurdity of all this is that had the case been pursued, the likely outcome would have been that instead of King Samir Shabazz -- who was brandishing a baton -- getting a slap on the wrist, the other members of the NBPP would have gotten the same slap on the wrist. The stakes here are incredibly low, which is probably one of the reasons the higher-ups in the division didn't think the case was worth pursuing.

A final point, and this is why the politicization of the Bush years is so relevant. The Washington Times has sought to portray the NBPP case as a matter of career attorneys being overruled on a legit case by political appointees -- a reversal of the charges made about the Voting Section during the Bush administration. Of the four names of Civil Rights Division attorneys on the original NBPP complaint, all have significant ties to the right or to the politicized leadership under Bush: J. Christian Adams worked for the National Republican Lawyers Association, as did Grace Chung Becker, whose nomination by the Bush administration for Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights was blocked because of her support for restrictive voter ID laws that disenfranchise minorities; Robert Popper previously worked on opposing minority voting districts; and Christopher Coates, who underwent a political conversion while at the DoJ and ended up being what Bradley Schlozman referred to as "a true member of the team" at a time when the Bush administration was conducting a purge of the liberals in the Civil Rights Division.

Whether one perceives as legitimate the "whistle-blowing" element to this case depends in part on the perceived neutrality of the players -- from the supposedly "bipartisan" but functionally conservative U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, to the staff members who filed the case. Describing these people as "career attorneys" is meant to suggest their decisions were apolitical when in fact they were all people who were hired or whose stock rose during an era of politicization.


btw -one of the guys standing in front of the polling staction actually had a poll watching certificate watching isseud by the Philadelphia County Board of Elections and he didn't have a billy club

IMO - both of these guys are almost certainly racist   (having been previously recorded at a different time making racist comments) but there was no actual proof of voter suppression

http://www.mainjustice.com/2009/12/23/the-black-panther-case-a-legacy-of-politicized-hiring/

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #42 on: July 20, 2010, 07:36:28 AM »
What was in his hand Straw?  To me is looks like a pipe or a bat.




Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #43 on: July 20, 2010, 07:46:15 AM »
What was in his hand Straw?  To me is looks like a pipe or a bat.





dude - you didn't look at anything I wrote or any of the links did you?

the guy with night stick was King Samir Shabazz and cops escorted him off the premises

the other guys name is Jerry Jackson and he is the one who actually had the poll watching certificate (and no baton that I can see) and he remained

BTW - both guys seem to be rasicst  (based on prior remarks that they made) but then that is not really a suprise considering they are in the Blank Panthers

The salient point being that there was no actual voter suppression

Another interesting point is how this actually became a story

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #44 on: July 20, 2010, 07:49:22 AM »
Straw - i have worked elections since 2000 doing voter fraud and election monitoring in my attorney capacity.  This is a big no no and actual supression of actual votes is not the standard. 

The standing within 100 feet of a polling place like this with weapons is not allowed plain and simple.     

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #45 on: July 20, 2010, 08:11:12 AM »
Straw - i have worked elections since 2000 doing voter fraud and election monitoring in my attorney capacity.  This is a big no no and actual supression of actual votes is not the standard.  

The standing within 100 feet of a polling place like this with weapons is not allowed plain and simple.      

and I assume that's why the guy with the weapon was soon gone

there were no complaints and no actual evidence of any suppression and their claim for being there was to monitor suppression of black voters (which there were allegations of in prior elections).

again - from my link which you didn't bother to read:

Quote
Section 11(b) cases, which are rare, are generally reserved for extensive voter-suppression schemes, which the two men standing outside the Philadelphia polling station did not amount to. The legal standard for proving Section 11(b) cases in the past has been extremely high, which is both why they're rare and why Section 11(b) complaints are generally filed in order to prevent large-scale voter suppression campaigns.


again - I'm not condoning the acion of these guys but there seems to be nothing here but for some reason the right wing can't stop talking about it.   The real story is how Bush political appointees ginned this is up and fed it to the media and the right winger just gobble it up and bounce it around the echo chamber without even bothering to learn the facts

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #46 on: July 20, 2010, 09:41:48 AM »
So why didn't Bush prosecute this guy?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #47 on: July 20, 2010, 09:44:21 AM »
So why didn't Bush prosecute this guy?

They got default judgement against the guy when he failed to show up to court.  Did you watch ANY of the clips for the attorneys who handled this/  Of course not, because it doesnt comport with your kneepadding and spin. 

   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #48 on: July 20, 2010, 09:51:19 AM »
why didn't bush pursue this as a criminal case?  why give the guy a fine?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39482
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Neo-Nazi Group Patrolling Ariz. Border
« Reply #49 on: July 20, 2010, 09:56:21 AM »
why didn't bush pursue this as a criminal case?  why give the guy a fine?
\

Because this is not a murder case and most of these things are handled with civil fines and injunctions like they got against the guy. 

if the guy assaulted a voter or destroyed a voting booth, they might have, but from the video, criminal charges seem too much IMHO, especially if it was a first offense and the guy maybe was ignorant of the law.