This is a long post, but worth reading for anyone still buying in to the COVID fear narrative. As the months and years pass, the extent to which we were lied to about the nature of COVID as a threat will become undeniable. Sadly, in the event of a more deadly pandemic taking place, especially any time soon, I don't see people believing the experts next time, due to all the wolf-crying that happened with this one. Alas...there is a price to pay for lying.
I know Math isn't a strong point for getbiggers, but the vaccines were reported to have around 90% efficacy. That means 1 in 10 can still get infected.
Cruises usually have 100s of passengers and a lot of old people who happen to be the most susceptible to infection even after vaccination. So having only 2 people test positive for the virus and be asymptomatic shows better than expected results for the vaccination programme.
Trust getbig to post an article that's actually validates the vaccination programme and then celebrate it as some kinda failure.
That's possible. I'd have to get all the numbers and do the math.
I seem to recall reading that the Phizer gene therapy agent "vaccine" is 95% effective. That may not seem like a big difference, but it does change the math from 1 in 10 vaccinated people still getting the virus, to 1 in 20. That makes a difference when dealing with small numbers.
It's also possible that the "positive" test results for COVID using the PCR test are inaccurate at a very high rate, given that Dr. Kary Mullis, the biochemist and inventor of the PCR test himself - who invented the test in 1983, and won the 1993 Nobel Prize in CHEMISTRY [not in medicine] for doing so - said the test should not be used to test for viral infections:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zbU7X38zfwsYThe purpose of the PCR test is to amplify very small molecules, to make them measurable/readable to scientists and anyone else who needs to analyze small samples of genetic material that were impossible to read using methods used prior to the invention of PCR [polymerase chain reaction].
If you have ONE molecule of COVID in your body, and the PCR test amplifies that molecule in size by a factor of one billion, what you end up getting is a person who isn't even sick, who now goes in the COVID statistics as a "positive" case - this is why the mainstream media and Big Tech went from scaremongering about a pandemic, to scaremongering a "case-demic", with continual talk about thousands of "cases" of people who don't have any symptoms at all. This also drove the nonsense about "asymptotic carriers"; these were people who literally had no symptoms at all, who tested "positive" for COVID using the far too sensitive PCR test, which are literally 1,000 times more sensitive than needed to determine if someone is actually sick in any meaningful way, depending on the number of cycle thresholds used in the test [as opposed to being in the same room as someone with COVID at one point, and having a COVID molecule, or a handful of COVID molecules, in their body doing absolutely nothing to them]. If you amplify one molecule by over a BILLION times, you end up with masses of "positive" tests that mean absolutely nothing in practical terms.
Don't trust me - trust the Nobel Prize winning biochemist Kary Mullis who invented the PCR test:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wOSeTz57xrCFhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reactionPolymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a method widely used to rapidly make millions to billions of copies (complete copies or partial copies) of a specific DNA sample, allowing scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it (or a part of it) to a large enough amount to study in detail.
^ Does that sound like an appropriate MEDICAL method to test for a virus?
The purpose of the PCR test is to amplify the size of genetic material, in cases where genetic material is limited, and is needed for analysis by more than one party, or needed to be retested at future times when technology improves, allowing for cold cases to be solved. An example would be to solve a homicide where only one drop of blood was found at the scene [the 1985 murder of Diana Robertson in Tacoma, Washington comes to mind].
It's convenient that the PCR tests were used fraudulently to drive this massively overhyped pandemic starting two months after PCR test creator Dr. Kary Mullis died in August of 2019.
Since you are quick to insult the intelligence of Getbiggers and call into question their mathematics ability, my question for you is: why are you speaking positively of a gene therapy agent for a virus that over 99.95% of the global population survived?
>99.95%That, and the global population went UP by 120 MILLION people in the past 18 months.
Generally speaking, do you apply that same level of concern you have for COVID to equally low-risk illnesses or events in your life? Do you drive a car? If so, why?
Forgive me if I'm assuming you are concerned about COVID more than you actually are. I'm just responding on the basis that you called Getbiggers unintelligent, presumably based on vaccine hesitancy, when COVID itself is such a non-threat that I am completely convinced that had the entire world done nothing, and not been psychologically terrorized by media about COVID being an existential threat, that we would not have even noticed a virus at all.
Can you sincerely tell me that you noticed a "pandemic" in the past 15 months, if not for business closures [100,000 small and medium-sized businesses in the USA, now permanently, due to bankruptcy caused by these measures], lockdowns, curfews, and the wearing of masks by most of the population by people who weren't even sick?
The average age of a COVID death in Canada is 82.5. in the USA, it is even older. 94% of people who died of COVID had 2-3 separate underlying health conditions, and the average lifespan lost by a person who died of COVID is around 22 months, according to life insurance actuarial tables.
Is this what you would call a concerning pandemic? Because if the global population keeps rising, I think we could eventually deal with a pandemic which is 100 times as lethal.
With all this being said, I'll leave you with this question:
If we just went through a lethal pandemic...don't you think ANYONE would have noticed it?
And don't tell me that you know one 75-year-old who lives across the country who died of COVID. Elderly and sick people die. Dying
with a virus in your body and dying
of a virus are not the same thing.
