I can easily handle the moral obligation of farms but he is a hypocrite himself as he eats at KFC. The problem with VG is that a lot of things he has said is a contridiction. Not only that, i allowed him to pick the subjects and he picked the ones that he's used in other debates so its easy for me to watch his old debates and have an expectation of his answers. Either way, it will be good fun
You won't win the debate through appeals to hypocrisy, though. You should concede that one might
theoretically be able to build the same amount of muscle on a vegan diet as they would on an omnivorous one. However, being a vegan is impractical and expensive in real life, and it is better for the environment and people in general to eat meat, as livelihoods depend on animals and many of the world's poorest people would suffer without livestock.
Ground this in a moral contractualist framework, acknowledge the possibility of
indirect duties to animals, but then quickly dismiss it on the grounds that animal lovers are GAY, sentimental, have hideous-looking wives, and shove things up their ASSES on camera for money. Cue in air-horn sound effects and canned applause followed by you quickly logging off after shouting 'Worldstar! Worldstar!'
You've got this, Vince.
