Author Topic: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You  (Read 65328 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #51 on: November 19, 2014, 09:49:24 AM »
sickening.   libs/rinos. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #52 on: November 19, 2014, 09:54:58 AM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/20/us/politics/obamacare-unlikely-for-undocumented-immigrants.html?_r=0



Yeah whatever - ofagget - even middle class people cant afford obamacare - you think illegals are going to pay for it?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #53 on: November 19, 2014, 09:56:51 AM »
amnesty = 5 million more people on obamacare.  And probably 4+ million of them voting Dem in 2016, let's be honest there.

RINOs, why the fck don't you impeach?   Seriously, there is no "undo" once these illegal alien criminals are given green card, you know that, right?   Repubs sure as shit won't benefit in elections.   Obama is less than HALFWAY done with this term - plenty of time.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63765
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #54 on: November 19, 2014, 09:59:43 AM »
The Emperor of the United States will be acting soon. 

Report: Obama to Announce Immigration Order Friday in Las Vegas
Wednesday, 19 Nov 2014

With reports indicating that President Barack Obama could issue his executive order on immigration on Friday, Republicans have been lining up a response strategy while activists are managing their expectations.

CNBC, citing sources, said Obama would lay out his immigration plan during the visit. He also could give an outline of the order on Thursday and add details in Las Vegas on Friday, the network said.

Under the executive action plan, Obama would ease immigration rules on millions of undocumented immigrants, a source familiar with White House deliberations, has told Reuters.

The order, which will set up a showdown between the White House and Republicans in Congress, would give relief from deportation to millions of undocumented immigrants who are parents of U.S. citizens or of permanent legal residents, according to the source, who asked not to be identified.

According to Politico, congressional leaders and potential Republican presidential candidates are preparing legislation and arguments to deploy an effective public offensive, while attempting to avoid turning off Hispanic voters.

Former, and possibly future, presidential candidate Rick Santorum said the party should focus on the negative economic impact of a policy that could give as many as five million illegal immigrants access to work permits.

"Is this a constitutional crisis? Yes," the former Pennsylvania senator told Politico. "But we have to put it in terms of … what it means to average working Americans. At a time when the economy is struggling and wages are stagnant, you're dumping 5 million people into the workforce."

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, also a potential 2016 contender, has said the GOP should emphasize that unilateral action ignores the will of the people who voted against the Democrats in the midterm elections.

"The American people overwhelmingly rejected his policies all across the country," Jindal told Politico. "In previous cycles, he said elections have consequences. Talk about arrogance."

The Republican National Committee will likely focus on the contradictory messages the president has made about the scope of his authority to act in changing immigration law.

"We don’t know how far he'll go," RNC spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski, told Politico.

"But we do know it's always been about politics and we're going to make sure Americans know that Obama himself said the action he's contemplating 'would be very difficult to defend legally' just two years ago."

It was not yet clear which parents of citizens or permanent residents would be included, the source said, and the Obama administration had been looking at options including those parents who have been living in the United States for five years or 10 years.

The reported trip would come after a top Obama aide is scheduled to meet with Senate Democrats on Thursday. White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, who is likely to be pressed on the immigration issue in the closed-door luncheon.

Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have been urging Obama to move quickly on immigration. Some have pointed to his failure to take executive action on the issue as costing Democrats votes in this month's congressional elections and setting up a Republicans sweep of congressional election earlier this month.

Obama has warned Republicans in Congress that he would act unilaterally if they continue to block comprehensive immigration legislation.

But, Congressional lawmakers, meanwhile, are considering piecemeal legislation to try to demonstrate that the party has its own strategic plan beyond simple opposition to the president's, Politico reported.

One bill could focus on border security while another could center on expanding the number of high-tech visas. Other measures could try to defund the president's proposals or require Obama to enforce existing immigration laws.

Appearing on Newsmax TV on Monday, former U.S. attorney general Alberto Gonzales urged the president to engage Congress in hammering out an immigration deal instead of just issuing his own executive order.

"Even assuming that in fact he has the authority I don't think it's the right thing to do at this juncture," Gonzales said on "The Steve Malzberg Show."

"It's a temporary solution to a very serious problem. It makes it more difficult to get comprehensive immigration reform in the future going forward."

Story continues below video.

Meanwhile, immigration rights activists are trying to manage their expectations about the scope of the president's plans after administration officials began prepping them in calls on Tuesday, The Hill reported.

"They're setting expectations, making it clear he has the legal authority to do what he's going to do, but that he's not going beyond his authority, as some advocates would like," one source familiar with the calls told The Hill.

The White House has still not revealed any specifics of the president's planned action and White House domestic policy council director, Cecelia Munoz, said Obama was still making decisions about the content and timing of his announcement, The Hill said.

"He's going to go as far as he can under the law," Munoz told MSNBC, according to The Hill.

Sources have said Obama is expected to take actions to allow some undocumented people to live here at least temporarily without the threat of deportation and to hold jobs in the United States. Obama's executive order could also include further border security steps, they said.

Obama also is expected to stress that he wants to focus efforts on deportations of illegal residents with serious criminal backgrounds.

http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-Immigration-executive-order/2014/11/19/id/608303/#ixzz3JXRjCv7g

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #55 on: November 19, 2014, 10:11:08 AM »
I agree there are no easy answers.  I would love to send all of them (illegals) home, but I know that isn't realistic.  We don't have the resources to round them all up and deport them. 

What is the answer?  I don't really know, except I don't like the amnesty approach. 

I'd start with amending the Constitution to get rid of anchor babies.  That's more of a prospective solution, but it would probably deter a lot of them from coming here illegally. 

Your friend's situation is outrageous. 

You CAN send them home.  You don't have to round them up.  Just fine the landlords and employers who allow ilelgals.  They'll leave on their own.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63765
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #56 on: November 19, 2014, 11:29:49 AM »
You CAN send them home.  You don't have to round them up.  Just fine the landlords and employers who allow ilelgals.  They'll leave on their own.

 ::)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63765
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #57 on: November 19, 2014, 11:30:51 AM »
Obama Is Not a Monarch
The president cannot act alone; the Constitution requires compromise.
By SEN. TED CRUZ November 19, 2014

The Constitution designs a system of checks and balances for our nation, and executive amnesty for illegal immigrants unilaterally decreed from the White House would seriously undermine the rule of law.

Our founders repeatedly warned about the dangers of unlimited power within the executive branch; Congress should heed those words as the President threatens to grant amnesty to millions of people who have come to our country illegally.

To be clear, the dispute over executive amnesty is not between President Obama and Republicans in Congress; it is a dispute between President Obama and the American People. The Democrats suffered historic losses in the midterm elections largely over the prospect of the President’s executive amnesty.

President Obama was correct: His policies were on the ballot across the nation in 2014. The elections were a referendum on amnesty, and the voters soundly rejected it. There was no ambiguity.

Undeterred, President Obama appears to be going forward. It is lawless. It is unconstitutional. He is defiant and angry at the American people. If he acts by executive diktat, President Obama will not be acting as a president, he will be acting as a monarch.

Thankfully, the framers of our Constitution, wary of the dangers of monarchy, gave the Congress tools to rein in abuses of power. They believed if the President wants to change the law, he cannot act alone; he must work with Congress.

He may not get everything he wants, but the Constitution requires compromise between the branches.

A monarch, however, does not compromise. As Alexander Hamilton explains in Federalist 69, a monarch decrees, dictates, and rules through fiat power, which is what President Obama is attempting.
When the President embraces the tactics of a monarch, it becomes incumbent on Congress to wield the constitutional power it has to stop it.

Congress, representing the voice of the People, should use every tool available to prevent the President from subverting the rule of law.

When the President usurps the legislative power and defies the limits of his authority, it becomes all the more imperative for Congress to act. And Congress should use those powers given to it by the Constitution to counter a lawless executive branch—or it will lose its authority.

If the President announces executive amnesty, the new Senate Majority Leader who takes over in January should announce that the 114th Congress will not confirm a single nominee—executive or judicial—outside of vital national security positions, so long as the illegal amnesty persists.

This is a potent tool given to Congress by the Constitution explicitly to act as a check on executive power. It is a constitutional power of the Majority Leader alone, and it would serve as a significant deterrent to a lawless President.

Additionally, the new Congress should exercise the power of the purse by passing individual appropriations bills authorizing critical functions of government and attaching riders to strip the authority from the president to grant amnesty.

President Obama will no doubt threaten a shutdown—that seems to be the one card he repeatedly plays—but Congress can authorize funding for agencies of government one at a time. If the President is unwilling to accepting funding for, say, the Department of Homeland Security without his being able to unilaterally defy the law, he alone will be responsible for the consequences.

A presidential temper tantrum is not an acceptable means of discourse.

Of course, these confrontations are not desirable, and it is unbecoming for an American president to show such condescension towards the voters.

The American people, however, are not powerless. They have elected a new Congress full of members who have promised in their campaigns to stand up to this lawless President and stop the amnesty. We must honor our commitments.

If the President will not respect the people, Congress must.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/president-obama-is-not-a-monarch-113028.html#ixzz3JXorSBL8

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #61 on: November 19, 2014, 05:21:03 PM »
Posted on November 19, 2014 at 8:15:23 PM EST by PROCON

The White House is exasperated with the major broadcast networks – ABC, CBS and NBC -- for skipping out on President Barack Obama’s Thursday primetime address on his executive actions on immigration.

“In 2006, Bush gave a 17 minute speech that was televised by all three networks that was about deploying 6000 national guard troops to the border. Obama is making a 10 minute speech that will have a vastly greater impact on the issue. And none of the networks are doing it. We can’t believe they were aggrieved that we announced this on Facebook,” a senior administration official told POLITICO.

When the president wants to make a primetime address, White House officials will reach out to the big networks like ABC, NBC, and CBS, to gauge whether they would consider running the speech live before putting in a formal request for airtime.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #63 on: November 19, 2014, 06:07:46 PM »

GOP senator warns of violence after immigration order



 Susan Page, USA TODAY 5:54 p.m. EST November 19, 2014





















Sen. Tom Coburn shares that he thinks civil disobedience will happen after President Obama's expected order on immigration. Kelly Jordan, Sean Dougherty













































































































XXX _CAPDOWN COBURN_2214.JPG A USA DC

(Photo: Sean Dougherty, USA TODAY)



 3735

CONNECT

 542

TWEET

 4

LINKEDIN

 566

COMMENT


EMAIL


MORE

WASHINGTON — Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn warns there could be not only a political firestorm but acts of civil disobedience and even violence in reaction to President Obama's executive order on immigration Thursday.

"The country's going to go nuts, because they're going to see it as a move outside the authority of the president, and it's going to be a very serious situation," Coburn said on Capital Download. "You're going to see — hopefully not — but you could see instances of anarchy. ... You could see violence."

Coburn, 66, is a conservative Republican but one who has a personal relationship with Obama. They entered the Senate in the same class, elected in 2004, and the new senators from opposite ends of the political spectrum and their spouses immediately hit it off at an orientation dinner. Last year, the president wrote a tribute in Time magazine to Coburn as "someone who speaks his mind (and) sticks to his principles."

"I really like the guy," Coburn, 66, told USA TODAY's weekly video newsmaker series Wednesday. "I thought he's neat, and I think Michelle's a neat lady."






USATODAY

Capital Download - Conversations with Washington's biggest newsmakers


That history gives Coburn's stark assessment a special sting. On immigration, he accuses Obama of acting like "an autocratic leader that's going to disregard what the Constitution says and make law anyway." He says changes in immigration policy require passage by Congress, not just the president's signature — a charge the White House disputes and on which legal experts disagree.

"Instead of having the rule of law handling in our country today, now we're starting to have the rule of rulers, and that's the total antithesis of what this country was founded on," Coburn says. "Here's how people think: Well, if the law doesn't apply to the president ... then why should it apply to me?"






USA TODAY

Obama to announce immigration plan Thursday


Coburn, who also served three terms in the House of Representatives, is retiring two years before his second Senate term is up as he battles a recurrence of cancer. He has been a leading deficit hawk, nicknamed "Dr. No" for his steadfast opposition to spending and his blunt-spoken manner.

Though he says both parties deserve some of the blame for Washington's dysfunction, he argues that the president has the ability to chart a different path. Solid Republican control of Congress in the wake of this month's midterm elections could make it easier to deal with an issue such as the structural problems associated with the deficit. Making the compromises necessary for that "requires divided government," he says.

"If I were in his office, I'd say, if you want to have a successful second term, dig down, swallow your pride, get what you can get, compromise on everything you can for the best interests of the country," he says. "Bring us back together."

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #64 on: November 19, 2014, 06:19:23 PM »
Rick Perry: Texas might sue Barack Obama
The Politico ^  | November 19, 2014 | Jake Sherman

Posted on ‎11‎/‎19‎/‎2014‎ ‎7‎:‎33‎:‎32‎ ‎PM by 2ndDivisionVet

BOCA RATON, Fla. — Texas Gov. Rick Perry said the Lone Star State might sue Barack Obama’s administration over the president’s planned executive order to grant relief to as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants.

“I think that’s probably a very real possibility,” Perry said during a panel here at the Republican Governors Association’s annual meeting.

Perry, who is considering another presidential bid in 2016, said the cost of illegal immigration is “extraordinary.” He said his state spends $12 million a month on securing the border.

Perry remarked that state Attorney General Greg Abbott, who was recently elected governor, has described his current job like this: “I go to the office, I sue Obama and I go home.”














Obama is a jihadi potus

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #65 on: November 19, 2014, 06:20:33 PM »
Skip to comments.
His Own Words: Obama Said He Doesn't Have Authority For Executive Amnesty 22 Times
Townhall.com ^  | November 19, 2014 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on ‎11‎/‎19‎/‎2014‎ ‎8‎:‎09‎:‎45‎ ‎PM by Kaslin

According to a report in POLITICO, President Obama is expected to make good on his executive amnesty threat on Friday during an event in Las Vegas, despite saying repeatedly over the years that he does not have the authority to change immigration laws from the Oval Office.

House Speaker John Boehner, who warned the President shortly after the 2014 midterm elections that acting alone on immigration would "poison the well," has taken notice of Obama's past statements. After some research, his office found President Obama directly claimed 22 times he couldn't take executive action on immigration because he doesn't have the authority.

Over the weekend President Obama was questioned during an overseas trip about his change in position with executive action looming and tried to argue his position on the extent of his authority to change immigration law hasn't changed at all.

"Actually, my position hasn’t changed. When I was talking to the advocates, their interest was in me, through executive action, duplicating the legislation that was stalled in Congress," Obama told reporters.

When Obama says he was speaking with "advocates," he's referring to radio interviews on programs with open-border hosts, at La Raza events and during a number of interviews conducted by Univision and Telemundo. Here are a few examples:

October 2010: Obama on Immigration Reform "I am Not a King"

“My cabinet has been working very hard on trying to get it done, but ultimately, I think somebody said the other day, I am president, I am not king,” Obama told Univision in October 2010, when asked why he had yet to achieve comprehensive immigration reform.

March 2011: Remarks by the President Univision Townhall

"America is a nation of laws, which means I, as the President, am obligated to enforce the law. I don't have a choice about that. That's part of my job. But I can advocate for changes in the law so that we have a country that is both respectful of the law but also continues to be a great nation of immigrants. … With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed …. [W]e’ve got three branches of government. Congress passes the law. The executive branch’s job is to enforce and implement those laws. And then the judiciary has to interpret the laws. There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President.”

“I swore an oath to uphold the laws on the books …. Now, I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own. Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you. Not just on immigration reform. But that's not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That's not how our Constitution is written.”


January 2013: Pres. Obama Defends Deportation Record: ‘I’m Not A King’

“I’m not a king. My job as the head of the executive branch ultimately is to carry out the law,” Obama told Telemundo. “When it comes to enforcement of our immigration laws, we’ve got some discretion. We can prioritize what we do. But we can’t simply ignore the law.”


February 2013: Obama: ‘I Am Not a Dictator’

“I can’t do these things just by myself.” He reiterated that sentiment in a February 2013 interview with Telemundo. “I’m not a king,” he said.

FactCheck.org, The New York Times, and The Washington Post aren't buying Obama's argument and make it clear the President has in fact changed his position.


This is a flagrant untruth: “In fact, most of the questions that were posed to the president over the past several years were about the very thing that he is expected to announce within a matter of days,” reported The New York Times. “[T]he questions actually specifically addressed the sorts of actions that he is contemplating now,” The Washington Post’s Fact Checker agreed, awarding President Obama the rare “Upside-Down Pinocchio,” which signifies “a major-league flip-flop.” Even FactCheck.org piled on.

Obama's argument that his "position hasn’t changed" and that "when I was talking to the advocates, their interest was in me, through executive action, duplicating the legislation that was stalled in Congress," falls far short of explaining away his statement about a lack of authority. Not to mention, regardless of whether legislation is stalled in Congress, the President still doesn't have the authority to rewrite or issue an executive order mirroring pending legislation.

Yesterday ABC's Jon Karl asked White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest if President Obama still doesn't view himself as the "emperor" of the United States as he refuses to work with Congress on illegal immigration reform. From MRC:

ABC’s Jon Karl Grills W.H. About Obama’s Flip-Flop On Immigration Plans



“Does the President still stand by what he said last year when he said, ‘I am not the emperor of the United States; my job is to execute laws that are passed.’ Is that still operative?” asked Jonathan Karl, reporter for ABC, during Tuesday’s White House press briefing.

“Absolutely,” replied White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest.

“Not a king either?” asked Karl, to audience chuckles.

“That’s right,” said Earnest flatly.

There are a few explanations for President Obama moving forward to change illegal immigration law despite his own statements and objections from Congress and even liberal attorneys like Jonathan Turley. The first is that the President is an ideologue with nothing to lose politically at this point. Obama isn't up for re-election, he only has two years left and Democrats just lost in huge numbers at every level of government across the country. There's no longer anything to save. Obama is interested in his legacy with the Left, not with the country as a whole. Second, the President is interested in fighting with Republicans, not working with them, and his latest move on illegal immigration proves it. The President is essentially daring Republicans to look at ways to address executive action and is hoping to get impeachment on the table in order to suck up all of the media oxygen and hysteria for the remainder of his term. Further, Obama knows if Republicans choose to address his executive action through the courts, he'll be out of office before the legal fight is over. Obama doesn't have much, if anything to lose and has made it clear he doesn't care much about the constitutionality of what he's about to do, despite claiming his coming action doesn't fall within his constitutional authority over the past six years.

Conn has your rundown on what Republicans will do after Obama goes through with executive action on Friday.

I'll leave you with this:




Yikes RT @mmurraypolitics: Tease from our new NBC/WSJ poll: 48% oppose Obama taking executive action on immigration, while 38% support it— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) November 19, 2014











FUBO!!!!! 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #66 on: November 19, 2014, 06:27:51 PM »
Don't Be Fooled -- Obama Thinks He's an Emperor
Rush Limbaugh.com ^  | November 19, 2014 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on ‎11‎/‎19‎/‎2014‎ ‎7‎:‎50‎:‎58‎ ‎PM by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT



RUSH: Here is Obama, February 14, 2013, fireside hangout...



This was on Google+. He's talking with a bunch of different citizens including authors, engineers, bloggers. An LGBT and immigration activist, Jackie Guerrido, wanted to know why Obama just doesn't do amnesty. Why are you deporting people? What do you mean? Why don't you let people of color into this country? Why don't you shape up? "What I'd like to know is what you're going to do now until the time immigration reform is passed to ensure that more people are not being deported and families aren't being broken apart."



OBAMA: This is something that I've struggled with throughout my presidency. The problem is that, y'know, I'm the president of the United States. I'm not, eh, uhhh, the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed. And Congress right now has not changed what I consider to be a broken immigration system.



RUSH: So he was telling people a year ago, "Hey, chill! I'm not an emperor. I can't do it." What he didn't say was, "I don't care about any of that. The only thing stopping me is there's an election coming up, and, when the election's over, that's when I'll do it. But I'm not gonna do it before that because that will hurt my party and maybe me." He should have just told them to be patient and wait until after the election, because he doesn't believe he's not an emperor.



He is an emperor, and he's gonna prove it.



BREAK TRANSCRIPT



RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, I know there are all kinds of examples of Obama telling audiences that he's not an emperor, that he's not a dictator, that he can't just universally implement or write a law. There are all kinds of examples. We've played them on the program. He said that to a Spanish-language television network. He was just buying time.



For those of you who think that, "Hey, this is a gotcha! We can show Obama lied. Get that audio where Obama said he's not a dictator. Now he's doing it. He lied!" That isn't gonna change anything. Obama knows everything he's doing. He knows who he lies to, he knows why he lies, and he knows he's going to get away with it. He knows he's not gonna be called on it.



He already won the Liar of the Year Award and he got a Nobel Peace Prize for lying about doing some things with people. You're not gonna stop Obama by pointing out his hypocrisy, and you're not gonna change people's minds about him. It's fun to do, don't misunderstand, you all already know. The point is much larger than Obama is a hypocrite. He is exactly what he claims that he is not.



He knows the American people are not ready for a dictator or an authoritarian or a statist. He knows the American people wouldn't support that. That's why he's gotta lie. That's why he's gotta claim, "Oh, Reagan did it," as though that clears the decks. That gives him permission to do whatever he wants to do, because Reagan was beloved. Reagan was respected. Reagan did have integrity.



Reagan was universally loved and respected, and that's why Obama and the Democrats cite him whenever they need credibility on something. Even his supporters know what he's gotta do. They know he's gotta lie and why he's gotta lie. But, as I say, there are countless examples of Obama... See, he knows what he's doing. He knows he's violating the Constitution -- and he's happy to do it, by the way.

END

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #67 on: November 19, 2014, 09:26:53 PM »
the POTUS is just a puppet doing the owners of this country's bidding....

you really think he gives a crap about amnesty or anything else??

the owners of this country, the owners of the world want what they want.... and GET what they want PERIOD

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #68 on: November 19, 2014, 09:48:23 PM »
Michael Steele slaps his GOP team on immigration: 'Get a grip'

Former Republican Party Chairman Michael Steele ripped his party for pushing back hard on President Obama’s immigration plans with a firm demand that they “get a grip.” Appearing on MSNBC, he said he would advise the GOP to work with the previously passed Senate comprehensive immigration reform bill. “Get a grip, because you’re sounding tone deaf here as I think the president is as well but we can talk about that in a moment. Number two, you have the solution already in front of you – the Senate in a bipartisan effort passed an immigration bill...

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #69 on: November 19, 2014, 09:53:42 PM »
NBC poll: Executive amnesty is… pretty unpopular with just about everybody


On Monday, USA Today released a poll that might have buoyed the spirits of those who support President Barack Obama’s planned executive order which will enact portions of the Senate’s failed immigration reform bill. That survey found that an executive order was only slightly unpopular, with 46 percent disapproving and 42 percent approving.

Today, it seems that poll may have given Democrats false hope. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey released on Wednesday revealed that an immigration executive order from Obama would not be that popular at all, even with the demographics the president surely hoped to please.

NBC/WSJ found that only 38 percent of the public are happy with the president’s planned immigration order, while a full 48 percent disapprove. 11 percent of Republicans approve of the move and 37 percent of self-described independents agree. Shockingly, only 63 percent of Democrats in that survey expressed support for an executive order.

Even more surprisingly, that poll found that immigration reform via executive order is not especially popular with even Hispanic voters. Just 43 percent of Hispanics polled support an executive action creating legal status for millions of illegal immigrants while 37 percent disapprove.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #70 on: November 20, 2014, 07:09:53 AM »
POLL: Just 38% Of Americans Want Obama To Take Executive Action On Immigration
Business Insider ^  | 11/19/14 | Hunter Walker

Posted on ‎11‎/‎20‎/‎2014‎ ‎9‎:‎52‎:‎08‎ ‎AM by SoFloFreeper

An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released Wednesday found 48% of Americans don't want President Barack Obama to take executive action on immigration. According to the poll, 38% would support executive action from the president and 14% have no opinion or are unsure....


(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #71 on: November 20, 2014, 08:20:19 AM »
Coincidence? Obama to Announce Executive Amnesty on National Revolution Day in Mexico
Gateway Pundit ^  | November 20, 2014 | Jim Hoft

Posted on ‎11‎/‎20‎/‎2014‎ ‎10‎:‎49‎:‎04‎ ‎AM by Cincinatus' Wife

Obama will announce his Executive Amnesty Plan tonight.

Today is National Revolution Day in Mexico–

The Mexican Revolution, began on November 20, 1910, and continued for a decade. The United States, Mexico’s northern neighbor, was significantly affected by the human dislocation that resulted: if someone did not want to fight, the only alternative was to leave the country—and over 890,000 Mexicans did just that by legally emigrating during the second decade of the 20th century.

The Obama administration and minions in the media insist President Reagan also used executive amnesty to allow illegals in the country.

As Rush Limbaugh explained, “This is a bald-faced flat-out lie.”


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #72 on: November 20, 2014, 08:35:56 AM »
I'm seeing "Happy Amnesty Day" on social media.

Disgusting that people from both sides let obama stay in office this long.

Start Impeachment earlier this year and Obama doesn't pull this crap.  Everything he does now is only because moderate repubs let him stay in office.  they own it.   Even libs like Lawrence odonnell say this amnesty is illegal as shit. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Amnesty Coming to a Town Near You
« Reply #74 on: November 20, 2014, 08:43:08 AM »
The networks dissed reagan too, on some speeches he wanted to give the nation after midterms.