Getbig Main Boards > Politics and Political Issues Board

More Liberal Censorship

<< < (132/142) > >>

Dos Equis:
Hilarious that youtube permanently bans Bongino after he quit their platform.  This is how you fight these unAmerican fascists.  Respect.

YouTube Permanently Bans Dan Bongino for Going Against COVID Narrative
by Matt Palumbo
Posted: January 26, 2022
https://bongino.com/youtube-permanently-bans-dan-bongino-for-going-against-covid-narrative/

https://rumble.com/vtcr8u-dan-bongino-why-im-leaving-youtube.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab&fbclid=IwAR2tg-o_1pu19qRtcejvWssaZaR26-qsVezn5BNkxdSYYn9gQHVXWeXU_Fg

illuminati:

--- Quote from: Dos Equis on January 27, 2022, 12:00:35 PM ---Hilarious that youtube permanently bans Bongino after he quit their platform.  This is how you fight these unAmerican fascists.  Respect.

YouTube Permanently Bans Dan Bongino for Going Against COVID Narrative
by Matt Palumbo
Posted: January 26, 2022
https://bongino.com/youtube-permanently-bans-dan-bongino-for-going-against-covid-narrative/

https://rumble.com/vtcr8u-dan-bongino-why-im-leaving-youtube.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab&fbclid=IwAR2tg-o_1pu19qRtcejvWssaZaR26-qsVezn5BNkxdSYYn9gQHVXWeXU_Fg

--- End quote ---

Some very sinister stuff going on - yet the scared sheep like are totally oblivious to it all
Since when was it wrong to ask Questions ???  Since the Advent of China Virus only one opinion. View & thought process is Allowed for those Behind this Deceit,.

Dos Equis:

--- Quote from: illuminati on January 27, 2022, 12:07:30 PM ---Some very sinister stuff going on - yet the scared sheep like are totally oblivious to it all
Since when was it wrong to ask Questions ???  Since the Advent of China Virus only one opinion. View & thought process is Allowed for those Behind this Deceit,.

--- End quote ---

I think sinister is a good word to describe what is happening. 

Soul Crusher:
Barry Manilow Joins Neil Young in Laughable Spotify Battle Over Joe Rogan Podcast
PJ Media ^ | 1/28/2022 | Cameron Arcand
Posted on 1/28/2022, 12:53:46 PM by Signalman

Barry Manilow is joining rock singer Neil Young in threatening to ditch Spotify over their decision to continue giving Joe Rogan’s podcast a platform despite alleged COVID-19 misinformation.

Young started another stereotypical left-wing movement against dissenting opinions when he referred to the music streaming platform as a “very damaging force via its public misinformation and lies about COVID” in a statement posted to his website.

For the record, his website was so outdated it’s called Neil Young Archives, and I was not even able to copy and paste the above quote because of its outdated technology.

“They can have Rogan or Young. Not both,” he declared, according to the BBC.

So, to nobody’s surprise, Spotify sided with their money-maker Rogan and Young’s music is now off the service.

“We want all the world’s music and audio content to be available to Spotify users. With that comes great responsibility in balancing both safety for listeners and freedom for creators. We have detailed content policies in place and we’ve removed over 20,000 podcast episodes related to Covid since the start of the pandemic,” Spotify said in response, according to The New York Times. “We regret Neil’s decision to remove his music from Spotify but hope to welcome him back soon.”

Barry Manilow, the “Copacabana” singer, is now following suit, which has earned him both praise and mockery on social media.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

Soul Crusher:
Skip to comments.

The Pressure Campaign on Spotify to Remove Joe Rogan Reveals the Religion of Liberals: Censorship
Glenn Greenwald is on Substack ^ | January 29, 2022 | Glenn Greenwald
Posted on 1/30/2022, 1:18:33 PM by American Number 181269513

American liberals are obsessed with finding ways to silence and censor their adversaries. Every week, if not every day, they have new targets they want de-platformed, banned, silenced, and otherwise prevented from speaking or being heard (by "liberals,” I mean the term of self-description used by the dominant wing of the Democratic Party).

For years, their preferred censorship tactic was to expand and distort the concept of "hate speech” to mean "views that make us uncomfortable,” and then demand that such “hateful” views be prohibited on that basis. For that reason, it is now common to hear Democrats assert, falsely, that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech does not protect “hate speech." Their political culture has long inculcated them to believe that they can comfortably silence whatever views they arbitrarily place into this category without being guilty of censorship.

Constitutional illiteracy to the side, the “hate speech” framework for justifying censorship is now insufficient because liberals are eager to silence a much broader range of voices than those they can credibly accuse of being hateful. That is why the newest, and now most popular, censorship framework is to claim that their targets are guilty of spreading “misinformation” or “disinformation.” These terms, by design, have no clear or concise meaning. Like the term “terrorism,” it is their elasticity that makes them so useful.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version