« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: IM HGH?  (Read 875 times)

kwri298

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
  • Getbig!
IM HGH?
« on: April 18, 2008, 06:53:20 AM »
In MD awhile it said that one study showed that HGH administered IM was about twice as effective.  Any thoughts?
Logged

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15147
  • "Don't Try"
Re: IM HGH?
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2008, 07:07:17 AM »
I doubt it was twice as "effective". Twice as effective for what exactly? I believe it gives higher peak levels though. Whether that is good or not is up for debate. Do you have the mag, what reference do they give for the effectiveness claim?
Logged

Overload

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7464
  • KO Artist
Re: IM HGH?
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2008, 07:28:52 AM »
That's a new "claim".

I know plenty of guys who shoot either Sub or IM and they can't tell a difference.

8)
Logged

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: IM HGH?
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2008, 06:08:15 PM »
The only difference is absorption rate, Subq is a little slower over time, IM is faster absorption.  And it's really irrelevant for our purposes.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »