Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on April 22, 2024, 07:38:01 PM
-
Supporting documents in the link
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cover-up-exposed-judge-cannon-unmasks-redacted-documents/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cover-up-exposed-judge-cannon-unmasks-redacted-documents
-
Supporting documents in the link
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cover-up-exposed-judge-cannon-unmasks-redacted-documents/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cover-up-exposed-judge-cannon-unmasks-redacted-documents
Arrest your opposition, Nazi/Commie style you say??
They are that sacred I guess.... LOL
Libz are Phagz.
Caulk-guzzling glory hole semen champs..
-
Left wing whack jobs on here avoiding this like the plague lol
-
Left wing whack jobs on here avoiding this like the plague lol
I'd fuck Judge Cannon. There. I said it.
-
Left wing whack jobs on here avoiding this like the plague lol
I actually spent 30 minutes researching the claim. Other than Gateway Pundit not a single news organization I found covered it in that way. Which tells me it is likely bogus. So I spent time reading the unredacted posts, which I am 100% sure you didn't and found nothing to match the headlines. The real reason I didn't "touch it" was because we have all pretty much agreed you are operating on limited brain capacity and it would be like challenging a special olympics participant. I hope this clears up your lack of response from the left, and mostly the right. The news stories I was able to find addressing the unredacted documents didn't bode so well for Trump. For example, one of his close associates.. (Operating off memory here but I think they identified him as person 16) warned Trump two years earlier to return all the documents, don't mess around as he could face serious consequences later. Of course he ignored his friends advice and is in fact facing serious consequences. Anything in your report about that? Probably not. So don't feel bad no one is touching this. You've been warned 100 times about posting fraudulent Gateway pundit links, but it's beyond your limited capacity to adjust your behavior, almost like you HAVE to watch Judge Wapner at a certain time, only the savant part is missing in your equation.
-
I'd fuck Judge Cannon. There. I said it.
Lmao
-
Lmao
cool response... ;D but;;;;
-
I actually spent 30 minutes researching the claim. Other than Gateway Pundit not a single news organization I found covered it in that way. Which tells me it is likely bogus. So I spent time reading the unredacted posts, which I am 100% sure you didn't and found nothing to match the headlines. The real reason I didn't "touch it" was because we have all pretty much agreed you are operating on limited brain capacity and it would be like challenging a special olympics participant. I hope this clears up your lack of response from the left, and mostly the right. The news stories I was able to find addressing the unredacted documents didn't bode so well for Trump. For example, one of his close associates.. (Operating off memory here but I think they identified him as person 16) warned Trump two years earlier to return all the documents, don't mess around as he could face serious consequences later. Of course he ignored his friends advice and is in fact facing serious consequences. Anything in your report about that? Probably not. So don't feel bad no one is touching this. You've been warned 100 times about posting fraudulent Gateway pundit links, but it's beyond your limited capacity to adjust your behavior, almost like you HAVE to watch Judge Wapner at a certain time, only the savant part is missing in your equation.
I don't believe you did any "research," much less 30 minutes. That's laughable. And, as usual, you are completely full of it. You bank on people not actually following up on the things you say. Every time I'm bored enough to actually try confirm what you say, it turns out to be false or misleading.
So I clicked on the link and read the story. It essentially just quotes investigative reporter Julie Kelly. She goes through and quotes the redacted and unredacted portions of the documents. Her comments are verified by the documents themselves. In other words, there is nothing "bogus" about the story. Anyone actually looking at Julie Kelly's feed and comments can see that.
Why do you lie so much?
-
I actually spent 30 minutes researching the claim. Other than Gateway Pundit not a single news organization I found covered it in that way. Which tells me it is likely bogus. So I spent time reading the unredacted posts, which I am 100% sure you didn't and found nothing to match the headlines. The real reason I didn't "touch it" was because we have all pretty much agreed you are operating on limited brain capacity and it would be like challenging a special olympics participant. I hope this clears up your lack of response from the left, and mostly the right. The news stories I was able to find addressing the unredacted documents didn't bode so well for Trump. For example, one of his close associates.. (Operating off memory here but I think they identified him as person 16) warned Trump two years earlier to return all the documents, don't mess around as he could face serious consequences later. Of course he ignored his friends advice and is in fact facing serious consequences. Anything in your report about that? Probably not. So don't feel bad no one is touching this. You've been warned 100 times about posting fraudulent Gateway pundit links, but it's beyond your limited capacity to adjust your behavior, almost like you HAVE to watch Judge Wapner at a certain time, only the savant part is missing in your equation.
Agnostic, you offer excellent insight and completely unappreciated advice. Too bad this is a wasted effort on behalf of a good person who is lost in the cult of Trump. Sadly, the ‘Coach is back’ fell down the rabbit hole Trump created just for suckers like him. Wait for it! You are next in line for Coach to label a communist.
-
Agnostic, you offer excellent insight and completely unappreciated advice. Too bad this is a wasted effort on behalf of a good person who is lost in the cult of Trump. Sadly, the ‘Coach is back’ fell down the rabbit hole Trump created just for suckers like him. Wait for it! You are next in line for Coach to label a communist.
You offer great insight and completely unappreciated advice. Too bad yours is a wasted effort on behalf of a good person who is lost in the cult of Trump. Wait for it! You are next in line for Coach to label a communist. Sadly, the ‘coach is back’ is totally lost down the rabbit hole Trump created.
Yet, you guzzle caulk, and are part of the "lost cult of demtards" who advocate child-grooming, child-mutilation, cokk-sukking, pregnant men, tranniez, men in little girls locker rooms, etc.
Fukk off and die you cokk sukking douche-bag..
-
Agnostic, you offer excellent insight and completely unappreciated advice. Too bad this is a wasted effort on behalf of a good person who is lost in the cult of Trump. Sadly, the ‘Coach is back’ fell down the rabbit hole Trump created just for suckers like him. Wait for it! You are next in line for Coach to label a communist.
You offer great insight and completely unappreciated advice. Too bad yours is a wasted effort on behalf of a good person who is lost in the cult of Trump. Wait for it! You are next in line for Coach to label a communist. Sadly, the ‘coach is back’ is totally lost down the rabbit hole Trump created.
Like I’ve said before. I’m in your head as much as Trump. I’m sure you bypassed Dos’ follow up to Agnostic lying….then you backing him making you both liars
-
Funny how prime ignores Beach's post right above his when responding to Agnostic.
-
Left wing whack jobs on here avoiding this like the plague lol
Because it is a non issue really. This is not groundbreaking or anything that would not have come to light anyway. What kind of smoking gun are you trying to make it into ?
-
Like I’ve said before. I’m in your head as much as Trump. I’m sure you bypassed Dos’ follow up to Agnostic lying….then you backing him making you both liars
You may be 'in my head' but not in the way you think and certainly not in any way that affects my life in a negative way. I feel bad for you because you have lost sight of reality... and this is not only with regards to Trump, but in a much broader sense.
I guess I bypassed Dos' follow up because I do not remember any part of this situation. It is also possible I did not read either of these posts to which you refer. If Agnostic lied, I am not aware of it nor of Dos correcting him. Just because a post gets your attention, does not mean it has mine.
-
You may be 'in my head' but not in the way you think and certainly not in any way that affects my life in a negative way. I feel bad for you because you have lost sight of reality... and this is not only with regards to Trump, but in a much broader sense.
I guess I bypassed Dos' follow up because I do not remember any part of this situation. It is also possible I did not read either of these posts to which you refer. If Agnostic lied, I am not aware of it nor of Dos correcting him. Just because a post gets your attention, does not mean it has mine.
Bruh. You responded to Agnostic's post. Is it time for a MMSE? :)
-
Bruh. You responded to Agnostic's post. Is it time for a MMSE? :)
He's just playing his silly games as usual ::) Pathetic behaviour.
-
I don't believe you did any "research," much less 30 minutes. That's laughable. And, as usual, you are completely full of it. You bank on people not actually following up on the things you say. Every time I'm bored enough to actually try confirm what you say, it turns out to be false or misleading.
So I clicked on the link and read the story. It essentially just quotes investigative reporter Julie Kelly. She goes through and quotes the redacted and unredacted portions of the documents. Her comments are verified by the documents themselves. In other words, there is nothing "bogus" about the story. Anyone actually looking at Julie Kelly's feed and comments can see that.
Why do you lie so much?
I think you are focusing on Julie Kelly's interpretation rather than what the actual documents said. I read the documents without the benefit of being led to a conclusion by Julie Kelly's obviously biased conclusions. They simply aren't saying, at the very least, aren't saying anything as clear as what her conclusions or interpretations are. Her comments are embellishments of the documents themselves, not "verified" by them. Sorry, you missed again.
-
I'd fuck Judge Cannon. There. I said it.
sure lurkingforBoys pedo gimmick ::)
-
I think you are focusing on Julie Kelly's interpretation rather than what the actual documents said. I read the documents without the benefit of being led to a conclusion by Julie Kelly's obviously biased conclusions. They simply aren't saying, at the very least, aren't saying anything as clear as what her conclusions or interpretations are. Her comments are embellishments of the documents themselves, not "verified" by them. Sorry, you missed again.
I'm focusing on what you said, which is an outright lie:
I actually spent 30 minutes researching the claim. Other than Gateway Pundit not a single news organization I found covered it in that way. Which tells me it is likely bogus. So I spent time reading the unredacted posts, which I am 100% sure you didn't and found nothing to match the headlines.
The link to the story accurately summarizes what Julie Kelly said, and what Julie Kelly said is supported by the redacted and unredacted documents. Just take the L. You got caught lying, again.
Here are a few examples:
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
Apr 22
Biden Dept of Energy also involved in the cover up.
DOE discovered after Smith handed down his indictment that Trump had an active security clearance--so they retroactively terminated it.
Redacted:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLyzF14XIAAaD8T?format=png&name=360x360)
Unredacted:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLyzIR6XsAARuYl?format=png&name=360x360)
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
Now you know why the insiders like Andrew Weissmann and Barb McQuade are desperate to get rid of Judge Cannon. Without her courage on this matter, incriminating evidence of Biden's WH and DOJ running the investigative show behind the scenes would be buried maybe forever.
DOJ told NARA what to do to cover their tracks.
Redacted:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLytbtFXkAAAJzn?format=png&name=360x360)
Unredacted:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLyteydXgAErsQG?format=jpg&name=small)
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
Outrageous lies by Joe Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and DOJ/Jack Smith about "independence" from investigations into Trump.
The Biden White House and DOJ wew intimately involved in developing a criminal case against Trump for records mismanagement--it appears the first go-around related to alleged "destruction" of government papers.
Contrary to public and legal assertions, NARA was working with DOJ/White House to craft a criminal referral by Sept. 2021--FIVE MONTHS before the "official" referral by NARA to DOJ in Feb 2022.
(Govt redactions on left, newly unredacted filing on right.)
Redacted:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLyrWBUXQAEhsk3?format=png&name=360x360)
Unredacted:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLyrYJQWoAAeR86?format=jpg&name=360x360)
Everything she said is backed up by the documents she posted. How embarrassing for you.
-
Bruh. You responded to Agnostic's post. Is it time for a MMSE? :)
Check again. Time for a MMSE? :)
Hint, click on my response post, and you will see I was responding to Coach, who also referred to Agnostic.
-
He's just playing his silly games as usual ::) Pathetic behaviour.
Mind your own business and you might avoid looking like a fool.
-
cool response... ;D but;;;;
Ag why are you lying ?
I read through the link its there in black & white .
Come on everyone knows its a political witch hunt hatchet job to get Donald
Its very troubling to see this happening in American politics.
Really The Dummycraps have had to sink so low. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
-
Check again. Time for a MMSE? :)
Hint, click on my response post, and you will see I was responding to Coach, who also referred to Agnostic.
??? You quoted Agnostic's post and responded to it. Then you claimed you didn't read Agnostic's post.
-
??? You quoted Agnostic's post and responded to it. Then you claimed you didn't read Agnostic's post.
You are right, I did respond to Agnostic's post so I must have read it. I said that "It is also possible I did not read either of these posts to which you refer." Saying this means it is possible I did read one or both of them. I have not read yours. Clear as mud, huh?
Not to be rude, but I do not read your every post. Even if I do, I sometimes don't read your entire post.
-
You are right, I did respond to Agnostic's post so I must have read it. I said that "It is also possible I did not read either of these posts to which you refer." Saying this means it is possible I did read one or both of them. I have not read yours. Clear as mud, huh?
Not to be rude, but I do not read your every post. Even if I do, I sometimes don't read your entire post.
Not rude at all. I honestly don't care. I don't read every thread or every post in every thread. And there are specific posts I try and avoid because they are stupid, I feel dumber after reading them, and I need to conserve what little brain power I have.
-
sure lurkingforBoys pedo gimmick ::)
Sold your vespa for internet minutes. Cool.
-
Sold your vespa for internet minutes. Cool.
Hahahahahahaha.
-
Not rude at all. I honestly don't care. I don't read every thread or every post in every thread. And there are specific posts I try and avoid because they are stupid, I feel dumber after reading them, and I need to conserve what little brain power I have.
Same here!