I actually spent 30 minutes researching the claim. Other than Gateway Pundit not a single news organization I found covered it in that way. Which tells me it is likely bogus. So I spent time reading the unredacted posts, which I am 100% sure you didn't and found nothing to match the headlines. The real reason I didn't "touch it" was because we have all pretty much agreed you are operating on limited brain capacity and it would be like challenging a special olympics participant. I hope this clears up your lack of response from the left, and mostly the right. The news stories I was able to find addressing the unredacted documents didn't bode so well for Trump. For example, one of his close associates.. (Operating off memory here but I think they identified him as person 16) warned Trump two years earlier to return all the documents, don't mess around as he could face serious consequences later. Of course he ignored his friends advice and is in fact facing serious consequences. Anything in your report about that? Probably not. So don't feel bad no one is touching this. You've been warned 100 times about posting fraudulent Gateway pundit links, but it's beyond your limited capacity to adjust your behavior, almost like you HAVE to watch Judge Wapner at a certain time, only the savant part is missing in your equation.
I don't believe you did any "research," much less 30 minutes. That's laughable. And, as usual, you are completely full of it. You bank on people not actually following up on the things you say. Every time I'm bored enough to actually try confirm what you say, it turns out to be false or misleading.
So I clicked on the link and read the story. It essentially just quotes investigative reporter Julie Kelly. She goes through and quotes the redacted and unredacted portions of the documents. Her comments are verified by the documents themselves. In other words, there is nothing "bogus" about the story. Anyone actually looking at Julie Kelly's feed and comments can see that.
Why do you lie so much?
