What you are saying is not correct. The unvaccinated are 200 times more likely to spread the virus.
Also, the virus has mutated. You can’t compare year over year.
Again, you can't argue with a big pharma zealot. The have very successfully preyed on people's need to feel safe.
A majority of people have a vaccine anywhere you look in the world but the case rates are the same as last year. Okay, that makes zero sense when the minority number of unvaxxed are gaining natural immunity all the while.
Gibraltar 99% plus vaxxed but cases skyrocketing...let's ignore that impossibility with a working vaccine. That is dogmatic at best.
Completely ignore people recovered with natural immunity who are not super spreader viral shedders and mutant makers like the vaxxxed are and always add those numbers in like they are sick and spreading everywhere....spreading to people that are "vaccinated"....because...uh...well, the stance makes no sense at all.
Also, in OAK's case....one of the first times I've ever seen anyone claim superior intelligence for doing what the average population did. No level of skepticism is a sign of low to average intelligence. A twisted take on virtue signalling, but under it all is a person who knows they've been had and find it hard to admit.
Faith in the vaxxxed will be tested when cases spike this winter.
