Getbig Main Boards > Gossip & Opinions
Hyprocrital FLEX mag, Team Flex: BITE MY BALLS
bic_staedtler:
....Me?...Romano?....I'm touched. I used to read MD for a few years, but gave up on it. I'll flip through it in Chapters though.
Oliver Klaushof:
--- Quote from: suckmymuscle on February 22, 2006, 09:18:20 PM --- Yes, FLEX's "holier than thou" attitude is very annoying. Also, I'm tired of Peter McGough, insulting their readers every month, with his editorials about how bodybuilding success is all about genes and not drugs ::). Sure, very few people would ever look like Dorian or Ronnie, irespective of the amount of drugs they take. Fine! This does not change the fact, though, that Ronnie an Dorian would carry some 70 or 80 lbs less mass, if they were completely clean. While their flow and taper of muscle is the result of their genes-and some of their mass, too-, most of their monstrous mass is IMPOSSIBLE to be achieved, without anabolics of all kinds. Sorry, but there are no genes that can make a man carry 100 lbs more of lean mass than the average man! No gene would allow for such an incredible degree of protein synthesis! >:(
SUCKMYMUSCLE
--- End quote ---
Couldn't have said it better. It's simple and I don't know why people argue about it. Maybe they are just thick? Drugs have a bigger impact than genetics. Genetics only comes into play when you have two people taking equally insane amounts of drugs.
bigdumbbell:
nobody believes the garbage they print as truth.
Croatch:
--- Quote ---Yes, FLEX's "holier than thou" attitude is very annoying. Also, I'm tired of Peter McGough, insulting their readers every month, with his editorials about how bodybuilding success is all about genes and not drugs . Sure, very few people would ever look like Dorian or Ronnie, irespective of the amount of drugs they take. Fine! This does not change the fact, though, that Ronnie an Dorian would carry some 70 or 80 lbs less mass, if they were completely clean. While their flow and taper of muscle is the result of their genes-and some of their mass, too-, most of their monstrous mass is IMPOSSIBLE to be achieved, without anabolics of all kinds. Sorry, but there are no genes that can make a man carry 100 lbs more of lean mass than the average man! No gene would allow for such an incredible degree of protein synthesis!
--- End quote ---
Agreed. The sport is a combination of gh/igf/gear. My problem with it is you take a set of twins:
(A) takes gh/igf/gear, trains kind of hard...but not really, diet is ok...nothing crazy, does recreational drugs.
(B) takes glutamine, breaks his ass in the gym, diet is on point year round, clean lifestyle.
I would put my money on A to have better gains. And that's the sad fact about bodybuilding. You don't need to do much other than have a mediocre regiment, while ingesting a ton of shit to see results. That's the beauty of music, there are NO shortcuts.
The Parrot
hillbilly:
--- Quote from: Croatch on February 25, 2006, 06:32:13 PM ---Agreed. The sport is a combination of gh/igf/gear. My problem with it is you take a set of twins:
(A) takes gh/igf/gear, trains kind of hard...but not really, diet is ok...nothing crazy, does recreational drugs.
(B) takes glutamine, breaks his ass in the gym, diet is on point year round, clean lifestyle.
I would put my money on A to have better gains. And that's the sad fact about bodybuilding. You don't need to do much other than have a mediocre regiment, while ingesting a ton of shit to see results. That's the beauty of music, there are NO shortcuts.
The Parrot
--- End quote ---
ok 'A' may make more gains but alot of guys on gear train just as hard as any nat! harder even becus quicker recovery allows them to!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version