Yes, since they want equality they should be drafted.If we ever have a major war the draft will be resumed no question.
Stupid and Irrelevant since we don't have a draftBut then stupid and irrelevant is the motto of Fox News
If women can serve in combat arms positions, why can't they be drafted?
If women can serve in combat arms positions, why can't they be drafted? House Freedom Caucus calls on GOP to oppose Defense Authorization Act over female draftCaucus accused Biden administration of caring more about critical race theory and drafting women than national securityBy Jon Brown | Fox Newshttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-freedom-caucus-calls-on-gop-to-oppose-defense-authorization-act-over-female-draft
IMO, if there were a draft, no.There are badass women who serve, but the type of woman required to do that is the exception, not the norm.Drafting all women would be a colossal waste of time.
They could serve in support roles no problem.
Don't care.Basic training and everything would be a waste.Don't need the inefficiencies.
Wouldn't those women be weeded out just like men who are unable to serve, just in larger numbers?
Much larger numbers.I'd say 90%+ or more.So a waste of time, money, and effort.
I would think women would be fighting against this kind of prohibition, because it's grounded on the view that they are not qualified. Gender equity. Wait. Gender is a "social construct."
They'd change their tune quickly.
I actually want to see how women in general respond to this. Maybe the Village Idiot can provide her perspective?
Look at most males these days that are 18-25.Same deal.
Can't argue that.
Yeah. A lot more would be disqualified today than back in the 60s and 70s.
I agree with your original premise though.If we drafted 100k women and 100k men.Far more women wouldn't make the cut.It would be a disaster.I doubt this will ever happen in this age of military technology.