Author Topic: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ  (Read 2918 times)

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« on: January 03, 2007, 12:19:21 PM »
link: http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009473

1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE

What the Congress Can Do for America
Let them say of these next two years: We used our time well.

BY GEORGE W. BUSH
Wednesday, January 3, 2007 12:01 a.m.

Tomorrow, members of the 110th Congress will take their oaths of office here in Washington. I will have the privilege of working with them for the next two years--one quarter of my presidency, plenty of time to accomplish important things for the American people.
Together, we have a chance to serve the American people by solving the complex problems that many don't expect us to tackle, let alone solve, in the partisan environment of today's Washington. To do that, however, we can't play politics as usual. Democrats will control the House and Senate, and therefore we share the responsibility for what we achieve.

In the days and weeks since the November elections, I have been encouraged by the productive meetings I've had with many of the new leaders in Congress from both parties. I am hopeful we can find common ground without compromising our principles.

I believe we share many of the same goals for the people we serve--and with good will and hard effort, we can find practical ways to advance the American Dream and keep our nation safe.

My principles are no secret. I have campaigned on them in my races for governor and in two presidential contests, and I have worked hard during my presidency to translate these principles into sound policy.

I believe that when America is willing to use her influence abroad, the American people are safer and the world is more secure. I believe that wealth does not come from government. It comes from the hard work of America's workers, entrepreneurs and small businesses. I believe government closest to the people is more responsive and accountable. I believe government plays an important role in helping those who can't help themselves. Yet we must always remember that when people are hurting, they need a caring person, not a government bureaucracy.

These are all common-sense principles, and they provide the basis for how I will approach governing with the new Congress. We've proved it can be done: When our nation was attacked, Republicans and Democrats came together to pass the Patriot Act and reform our intelligence agencies. When our economy was struggling, we worked together to pass tax relief that has helped our economy grow, create jobs, and raise the standard of living for the American people. When we saw that our public schools were failing our children, we came together to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, insisting on high standards, accountability and better options for parents.

The outcome of the elections has changed the balance of power in Congress, yet the priorities for keeping our country safe and prosperous go beyond party labels. Our priorities begin with defeating the terrorists who killed thousands of innocent Americans on September 11, 2001--and who are working hard to attack us again. These terrorists are part of a broader extremist movement that is now doing everything it can to defeat us in Iraq.

In the days ahead, I will be addressing our nation about a new strategy to help the Iraqi people gain control of the security situation and hasten the day when the Iraqi government gains full control over its affairs. Ultimately, Iraqis must resolve the most pressing issues facing them. We can't do it for them.

But we can help Iraq defeat the extremists inside and outside of Iraq--and we can help provide the necessary breathing space for this young government to meet its responsibilities. If democracy fails and the extremists prevail in Iraq, America's enemies will be stronger, more lethal, and emboldened by our defeat. Leaders in both parties understand the stakes in this struggle. We now have the opportunity to build a bipartisan consensus to fight and win the war.

America's priorities also include keeping our economy strong. The elections have not reversed the laws of economics. It is a fact that economies do best when you reward hard work by allowing people to keep more of what they have earned. And we have seen that businesses can expand and hire more workers when they have more money to invest--and since August 2003, America's employers have added more than seven million new jobs.

It is also a fact that our tax cuts have fueled robust economic growth and record revenues. Because revenues have grown and we've done a better job of holding the line on domestic spending, we met our goal of cutting the deficit in half three years ahead of schedule. By continuing these policies, we can balance the federal budget by 2012 while funding our priorities and making the tax cuts permanent. In early February, I will submit a budget that does exactly that. The bottom line is tax relief and spending restraint are good for the American worker, good for the American taxpayer, and good for the federal budget. Now is not the time to raise taxes on the American people.

By balancing the budget through pro-growth economic policies and spending restraint, we are better positioned to tackle the longer term fiscal challenge facing our country: reforming entitlements--Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid--so future generations can benefit from these vital programs without bankrupting our country.

One important message I took away from the election is that people want to end the secretive process by which Washington insiders are able to slip into legislation billions of dollars of pork-barrel projects that have never been reviewed or voted on by Congress. I'm glad Senator Robert Byrd and Congressman Dave Obey--the Democrats who will lead the appropriations process in the new Congress--heard that message, too, and have indicated they will refrain from including additional earmarks in the continuing resolution for this fiscal year.

But we can and should do more. It's time Congress give the president a line-item veto. And today I will announce my own proposal to end this dead-of-the-night process and substantially cut the earmarks passed each year.

The strength of our economy also requires us to address some of the biggest issues facing the American people--greater energy security, comprehensive immigration reform, and affordable health care. While progress has been made in each of these areas, we must do more. I look forward to working with Congress on these difficult issues.

Our Founders believed in the wisdom of the American people to choose their leaders and provided for the concept of divided and effective government. The majority party in Congress gets to pass the bills it wants. The minority party, especially where the margins are close, has a strong say in the form bills take. And the Constitution leaves it to the president to use his judgment whether they should be signed into law.
That gives us a clear challenge and an opportunity. If the Congress chooses to pass bills that are simply political statements, they will have chosen stalemate. If a different approach is taken, the next two years can be fruitful ones for our nation. We can show the American people that Republicans and Democrats can come together to find ways to help make America a more secure, prosperous and hopeful society. And we will show our enemies that the open debate they believe is a fatal weakness is the great strength that has allowed democracies to flourish and succeed.

To the new members of the 110th Congress, I offer my welcome--and my congratulations. The American people have entrusted us with public office at a momentous time for our nation. Let them say of these next two years: We used our time well.

Mr. Bush is the president of the United States.


Copyright © 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PRINT WINDOW    CLOSE WINDOW



OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2007, 12:46:06 PM »
How can he say anything but "I got us into two wars we're losing, I let 9/11 happen, I anally violated the constitution, and I made Beach Bum all warm and creamy, for the last 6 years"?

He can say that becuase cheney was giving him a hummer when he wrote it.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2007, 12:53:13 PM »
He can say that becuase cheney was giving him a hummer when he wrote it.

I like how he's still tying Iraq to 9-11.  Also the idea that they've cut the deficit is a joke.  It might technically be true but the fucking Iraq war is off the balance sheet and doesn't even count in the total.
The criticism of pork barrell spending is a joke.  The Republican controlled 109th congress inserted 6073 earmarks in 2006 and 15,877 in 2005.   Why didn't he mention this in the last two years? ....etc...


Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2007, 12:55:06 PM »
yea because the republican congress used their time so well ::)  Now he wants to work with dems ::)  As long as they'll be a rubber stamp for him just like the republican congress was.  Impeach this idiot... nothing could be better for the country than sending a message that another president lying to take us into war will not be tolerated.  The next time, it could be global thermal nuclear war the lies get us into... no more Bushes... no more neocons...

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2007, 12:55:30 PM »

I believe that when America is willing to use her influence abroad, the American people are safer and the world is more secure. I believe that wealth does not come from government. It comes from the hard work of America's workers, entrepreneurs and small businesses. I believe government closest to the people is more responsive and accountable. I believe government plays an important role in helping those who can't help themselves. Yet we must always remember that when people are hurting, they need a caring person, not a government bureaucracy.

These are all common-sense principles, and they provide the basis for how I will approach governing with the new Congress.

These are indeed common-sense principles, which explains why some liberals do not comprehend them, particularly those who believe raising taxes is the only way to balance the budget and/or spur economic growth.  

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2007, 12:59:44 PM »
These are indeed common-sense principles, which explains why some liberals do not comprehend them, particularly those who believe raising taxes is the only way to balance the budget and/or spur economic growth.  

Clinton raised taxes and created a federal surplus and the Fed even stopped issuing 30 year debt (re-instated under Bush).  It's never just a simple answer.  BTW - I'm not fan of Clinton either.  I think  NAFTA was a horrible thing for this country.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2007, 01:05:58 PM »
Clinton raised taxes and created a federal surplus and the Fed even stopped issuing 30 year debt (re-instated under Bush).  It's never just a simple answer.  BTW - I'm not fan of Clinton either.  I think  NAFTA was a horrible thing for this country.

Clinton and a Republican Congress balanced the budget in spite of, not because of, tax increases.  (I voted for him twice BTW.)  There is never a simple answer when it comes to our federal government, but to say the only way to save our economy is to raise taxes is just wrongheaded and part of firmly entrenched liberal ideology.  One of the first things Democrats want to do is increase spending, which they'll likely only accomplish by reaching deeper into my pocket.   

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2007, 01:16:36 PM »
Clinton and a Republican Congress balanced the budget in spite of, not because of, tax increases.  (I voted for him twice BTW.)  There is never a simple answer when it comes to our federal government, but to say the only way to save our economy is to raise taxes is just wrongheaded and part of firmly entrenched liberal ideology.  One of the first things Democrats want to do is increase spending, which they'll likely only accomplish by reaching deeper into my pocket.   

Well we do have this little thing over in Iraq to pay for and you've got two choice either raise revenue or cut expenditures.   Neo-Cons would love to cut expenditures because that's a basic tenet of their agenda.  Grover Norquist is quoted as saying "my goal is to cut the government in half in twenty five years - to get it down the size where we can drown it in a bathtub".   That's the basic plan - cut the tax revenue on the corporations and uber rich (Bush base - the haves and the have mores) and reduce all goverment services as much as possible to pay for the loss in revenue.    The middle class gets screwed.   I've got some work to do but I'll find the government data on the tax cuts and post later.  BTW - the line about Democrats increasing spend (tax and spend) is a bit out of date.   The Republican are new world champions of spending.

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2007, 01:24:05 PM »
$100 someone wrote that for him...

he wrote it..pffft.. ::)
carpe` vaginum!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2007, 01:25:29 PM »
Well we do have this little thing over in Iraq to pay for and you've got two choice either raise revenue or cut expenditures.   Neo-Cons would love to cut expenditures because that's a basic tenet of their agenda.  Grover Norquist is quoted as saying "my goal is to cut the government in half in twenty five years - to get it down the size where we can drown it in a bathtub".   That's the basic plan - cut the tax revenue on the corporations and uber rich (Bush base - the haves and the have mores) and reduce all goverment services as much as possible to pay for the loss in revenue.    The middle class gets screwed.   I've got some work to do but I'll find the government data on the tax cuts and post later.  BTW - the line about Democrats increasing spend (tax and spend) is a bit out of date.   The Republican are new world champions of spending.

We should definitely try and reduce the size of government at the federal and state levels.  I'd like to see Republicans and Democrats put their heads together on this issue, but I doubt it will happen.  What I suspect will happen is precisely what Pelosi has indicated:  a concerted effort to spend more money so they can pander to voters in 08.  

And the middle class doesn't get screwed on taxes, because the lion's share is paid by "the rich."  But that's another topic.   :)  

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2007, 01:32:09 PM »
We should definitely try and reduce the size of government at the federal and state levels.  I'd like to see Republicans and Democrats put their heads together on this issue, but I doubt it will happen.  What I suspect will happen is precisely what Pelosi has indicated:  a concerted effort to spend more money so they can pander to voters in 08.  

And the middle class doesn't get screwed on taxes, because the lion's share is paid by "the rich."  But that's another topic.   :)  

I didn't say the middle class get's screwed on taxes.  They get screwed on the loss of government services (of which they are the primary beneficiary).  Without having the data in front of me I'd  guess that the middle class (and this includes people making 6 figures in most cases) pay a larger % of their income in taxes than do the rich.  I could be wrong but I don't think so because I recall finding this info before.  I do have have go create some income myself today so I can't find it now

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2007, 01:37:22 PM »
I didn't say the middle class get's screwed on taxes.  They get screwed on the loss of government services (of which they are the primary beneficiary).  Without having the data in front of me I'd  guess that the middle class (and this includes people making 6 figures in most cases) pay a larger % of their income in taxes than do the rich.  I could be wrong but I don't think so because I recall finding this info before.  I do have have go create some income myself today so I can't find it now

Actually, I retract part of my statement.  Everyone who pays taxes in this country is overtaxed.  So from that standpoint the middle class is getting screwed.  I'll read whatever you want to share on the tax issue, but my (current) belief is the more you make, the more you pay.  That has been my experience.  Uncle Sam kills me.  I absolutely HATE paying taxes.  But I won't get started on that rant. 

Go make some money.   :) 

luike101

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2007, 02:33:41 PM »
Beach bum I agree with you for a change.  It is true that the more you make the more you pay in taxes.  The trick is finding and using things that are legal write offs, thats what seperates guys who make the same amount at the top of the food chain.  You and I could both take home 500,000 after taxes are taken the first time but if I have a kick ass accountant and you have a mediocre one, in the end with my records of write offs is on point and every little detail is kept record of You know that I will make more for the fiscal yr.  Now if you are getting a lot of write offs every year you will get audited, but if you are honest and informed on what is legal you can tell them to fudge off.  If you are lying it will catch up to you because our gov would never lie so we shouldnt either.  I dont make that much but I have an uncle who makes 2.3 mill and they audited him and he had everything organized, they replied thanks for your business. ;)                                                         RIP TO A GOOD PERSON AND A SUPERSTAR ON THE RISE  DARRENT YOU ARE IN A BETTER PLACE   GOD WILLTAKE CARE OF YOU NOW               AMERICANS IT IS TIME WE STOP KILLING EACH OTHER, THERE ARE TO MANY OTHERS THAT ARE TRYING , AN ARGUEMENT OR WHAT THE FUCK EVER IS SO WORTH RUINING SO MANY OTHER  PEOPLES LIVES!!!!!!!!  GET IT TOGETHER AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TO LATE!!!!!!!       [JEALOUSY AND ENVY] GET OFF YOUR FAT ASSES AND WORK FOR IT         VERY SAD              HE HAD HEART AND HE WAS GONNA BE GREAT TO WATCH FOR YEARS       SHANNAHAN SAID HE NEVER WAS NOT SMILING  :)     YEA THOSE ARE THE TYPES WE DONT NEED AROUND ??? :'(

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2007, 03:09:11 PM »
I have an excellent accountant and I get plenty of write-offs, but I still pay too much. 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2007, 07:46:42 PM »
$100 someone wrote that for him...

he wrote it..pffft.. ::)

wrote it?

I seriously doubt he even read it.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: George Bush "wrote" an editorial that appears in today's WSJ
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2007, 07:54:19 PM »
He said today he still hasn't watched the saddam hanging.

for some reason I think the saddam execution is some kind of neocon snuff film