Who is the bigger Fraud in your opinion, Brock or Kimbo?
Brock.
Kimbo wasnt coddled and handed the heavyweight title, Kimbo was expected to start at the bottom as it should be.
Brock wasnt expected to pay his dues. He went with little to no fighting experience into a hyper-competitive organization and he was given a title shot right away.
He should have never held that title, if he had to go up the ranks like everyone else, like JDS, Cain, etc, he would have NEVER had that belt.
As it was, Dana practically handed it to him.
As far as Mir and Couture, Mir is a Can and Couture was once a great fighter, but hes waaayyyyy over the hill, so trying to argue that Lesnar didnt fight cans using Couture is rediculous. It would be one thing if he was younger in his prime, but he wasnt.
Lesnar was handed opponents he could manhandle and destroy, it was a very calculated move on Dana's part to capitalize on his star power. Unfortunatley all it did now was undermine the credibility of the title IMHO. However Im sure it made Dana a ton of money so from that angle im sure Danas decision with Brock was a smart one, and Im sure Dana would have thrown Brock away without giving a damn if Brock hadnt retired.
Like Groink said, Brock is not a fighter, hes a wrestler, I have a close friend just like him, amazing wrestler, he trained MMA for a bit with me and just couldnt stand getting hit in the face, he only showed up on the days we did groundwork. He would spar as long as it was someone he could dominate, but as soon as it was someone who posed a challenge, he had no heart for fighting. He liked wrestling because he could use his size/strength and dominate most people (including me, must have tapped me a dozen times for every 1 I got him. Although he did have 75lbs on me). Exactly like Brock.
