Because Republican judge/court refusing to hear a case doesn't address any of the complaints, and isn't an exoneration. A thorough audit would be.
Yes, there will always be a faction of folks who are going to believe what they want regardless. But I know many, professional, well adjusted, normal, productive people who feel something appears off. It's easy to try to paint everyone with a broad brush who has questions on election integrity, but it's just not the case.
And, given the way the left acted in 2016, the right having a similar reaction in 2020 should have been expected, and it's hypocritical of those who look down at them. History shows they'd probably be acting worse.
Off topic, but the fact that the "republican" supreme court didn't rule along party lines makes all the incessant crybabies on the left look even more foolish in the way they behaved during the last few appointments.
I think we all hope ( or should hope) that party affiliation when it comes to the supreme court shouldn't be a factor but the fear is, that it will. I've been impressed with some judges, as well as some Republican congresspeople that come to a conclusion based on what is right, not what a particular party backs.
To your point about a court "refusing to hear a case"... to the layman it appears they just closed their eyes and ears to the "evidence" but I hope you at least know its not the same thing. The information was reviewed.... it just failed to meet the bar required to get a hearing... That is not the same as they just didn't care or listen, it really just means again in layman's terms that the evidence brought forth by the Trump clan sucked so much it didn't warrant attention.
