Author Topic: Terminator Genisys (Read 9626 times)

El Diablo Blanco · « **Reply #75 on:** July 06, 2015, 12:34:59 PM »

Quote from: lastrep on July 06, 2015, 12:16:49 PM

$120 Million world-wide weekend sales.. Arnold and the Terminator series is doing just fine folks.. Will easily break 350 Million and do more.

No way. Expect a big drop off. Probably struggle to break $30 million world wide next week.

HTexan · « **Reply #76 on:** July 06, 2015, 12:43:19 PM »

Quote from: Kwon_2 on July 06, 2015, 12:34:58 PM

Yes, people are so worried about how much T5 will make...

They definitly won't be going broke.

They green lighted the next 2 already

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #77 on:** July 06, 2015, 01:13:36 PM »

Quote from: HTexan on July 06, 2015, 12:43:19 PM

They green lighted the next 2 already

There we go

Hulkotron · « **Reply #78 on:** July 06, 2015, 01:14:50 PM »

Quote from: Nails on July 06, 2015, 10:10:10 AM

i still watch all of arnold movies , the expendables , Escape Plan , Sabotage , i enjoyed them all, i think Maggie is coming out tomorrow on Redbox (rental movie kiosk machine) , check that out this week also

I enjoyed Escape Plan.

hench · « **Reply #79 on:** July 06, 2015, 01:25:48 PM »

not a chance, 30 mil crazy low

Quote from: El Diablo Blanco on July 06, 2015, 12:34:59 PM

No way. Expect a big drop off. Probably struggle to break $30 million world wide next week.

falco · « **Reply #80 on:** July 06, 2015, 01:39:00 PM »

Talking about horrid CGI, anyone here saw the 80's movie The Thing and felt disappointed with the 2011 remake?

El Diablo Blanco · « **Reply #81 on:** July 06, 2015, 02:10:27 PM »

Quote from: hench on July 06, 2015, 01:25:48 PM

not a chance, 30 mil crazy low

This movie has been advertised like crazy. They probably spent more on promoting this flick than what opening weekend will pull.

oldschoolfan · « **Reply #82 on:** July 06, 2015, 05:38:49 PM »

Quote from: falco on July 06, 2015, 01:39:00 PM

Talking about horrid CGI, anyone here saw the 80's movie The Thing and felt disappointed with the 2011 remake?

yes it was horrible buddy , to much cgi, ruined the movie,

Yamcha · « **Reply #83 on:** July 07, 2015, 04:47:04 AM »

Earl1972 · « **Reply #84 on:** July 08, 2015, 11:55:00 AM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on July 05, 2015, 05:27:35 PM

Ok just saw it....the actress playing Sarah Connor was all wrong (too young/too chubby) here is the thing tho.... Arnold isn't going to be with us forever (to
Me Arnold is "bodybuilding") so I would go see this movie regardless(yes it was cheesy/hokey and confusing with all the jumping to the future/the past etc) what it was however was a non stop carnival ride of a movie, a must see for bodybuilding and Terminator fans! Go see it

sarah in the the original terminator was supposed to be 19, kyle reese 24

though linda hamilton was actually 26 and michael biehn was 28

E

TuHolmes · « **Reply #85 on:** July 08, 2015, 12:16:24 PM »

Quote from: hench on July 06, 2015, 01:25:48 PM

not a chance, 30 mil crazy low

It hasn't hit in China and a few other large countries:

Currently:

Total Lifetime Grosses
Domestic:    $45,896,305     34.9%
+ Foreign:    $85,500,000     65.1%
= Worldwide:    $131,396,305

HTexan · « **Reply #86 on:** July 08, 2015, 01:58:00 PM »

Quote from: TuHolmes on July 08, 2015, 12:16:24 PM

It hasn't hit in China and a few other large countries:

Currently:

Total Lifetime Grosses
Domestic:    $45,896,305     34.9%
+ Foreign:    $85,500,000     65.1%
= Worldwide:    $131,396,305

155 million budget, so movie should break even before it hits blu ray/itunes

Earl1972 · « **Reply #87 on:** July 08, 2015, 07:15:41 PM »

Quote from: TuHolmes on July 08, 2015, 12:16:24 PM

It hasn't hit in China and a few other large countries:

Currently:

Total Lifetime Grosses
Domestic:    $45,896,305     34.9%
+ Foreign:    $85,500,000     65.1%
= Worldwide:    $131,396,305

yeah i don't understand why everybody is calling it a failure, it's been out for 1 week today

E

gmflex · « **Reply #88 on:** July 08, 2015, 07:24:11 PM »

Quote from: El Diablo Blanco on July 06, 2015, 12:34:59 PM

No way. Expect a big drop off. Probably struggle to break $30 million world wide next week.

Qft
Arnold days are over as the lead in a motion picture movie...

The Ugly · « **Reply #89 on:** July 08, 2015, 11:11:14 PM »

Seems everyone's more concerned about the film's success vs. whether or not it's shitty.

Teutonic Knight · « **Reply #90 on:** July 08, 2015, 11:42:34 PM »

Arnold bank account is getting bigger & bigger ...

Basile bank account :

Marty Champions · « **Reply #91 on:** July 09, 2015, 05:37:12 AM »

Cant wait for "basiles mechwarrior 2 land of dreams and machines"

smoothasf · « **Reply #92 on:** July 09, 2015, 11:55:49 AM »

It was better than all other terminators except 2. Sarah connor is hot as hell had a chub on all the way through. It was like I was cumming all the time.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #93 on:** July 09, 2015, 11:59:12 AM »

Quote from: smoothasf on July 09, 2015, 11:55:49 AM

It was better than all other terminators except 2. Sarah connor is hot as hell had a chub on all the way through. It was like I was cumming all the time.

you're crazy if you thought it was better than the original

E

Nails · « **Reply #94 on:** July 09, 2015, 01:56:58 PM »

but what i do not understand is if the CG a young arnold , why didn't they CG the punks that were at Griffith park as well? why are they different punks

did something alter their lives as well when the 1st terminator even further back in time to save young sarah ?

bradistani · « **Reply #95 on:** July 09, 2015, 02:10:01 PM »

Quote from: Nails on July 09, 2015, 01:56:58 PM

but what i do not understand is if the CG a young arnold , why didn't they CG the punks that were at Griffith park as well? why are they different punks did something alter their lives as well when the 1st terminator even further back in time to save young sarah ?

it'd look shit

it'd cost a bomb

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #96 on:** July 09, 2015, 02:11:50 PM »

Quote from: Nails on July 09, 2015, 01:56:58 PM

but what i do not understand is if the CG a young arnold , why didn't they CG the punks that were at Griffith park as well? why are they different punks did something alter their lives as well when the 1st terminator even further back in time to save young sarah ?

They are in another timeline now.

In this timeline, the punks you remember from Terminator 1 with their mohawks and trenchcoats took their studies much more seriously and became actors instead of hanging out late at night harassing people.

Punk nr 2 got a great gig playing Ian Mitchell-Smiths older brother and later on a soldier on a journey to a distant plant called LV-423, and Punk nr 3 got a very lucrative career, playing a Conqueror of Dimensions, a bodyguard to a Vampire among other roles.

A ripple in time can change alot and make waves.

Instead of punkin' around, they became respected actors at an early age.

HTexan · « **Reply #97 on:** July 09, 2015, 02:12:03 PM »

Quote from: Nails on July 09, 2015, 01:56:58 PM

but what i do not understand is if the CG a young arnold , why didn't they CG the punks that were at Griffith park as well? why are they different punks did something alter their lives as well when the 1st terminator even further back in time to save young sarah ?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Thompson

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Paxton

I'm guessing $$$$

Waller · « **Reply #98 on:** July 11, 2015, 12:28:01 PM »

Just been to see this, 1 and 2 were groundbreaking originals. If you loved them you should love where they took this one. I deliberately avoided the publicity on this, I wanted it to he as much of a surprise as possible. It was a pleasant surprise. There was a lot of rehash but they took it into new territory story wise.

I think Arnold does amazingly well in this role for a guy pushing 70.

hench · « **Reply #99 on:** July 11, 2015, 01:45:20 PM »

Arnold has been praised for stealing all his scenes, the charisma and screen presence is still there and probably always will be.
I read the script and liked what they did, so looking forward to this

Quote from: Waller on July 11, 2015, 12:28:01 PM

Just been to see this, 1 and 2 were groundbreaking originals. If you loved them you should love where they took this one. I deliberately avoided the publicity on this, I wanted it to he as much of a surprise as possible. It was a pleasant surprise. There was a lot of rehash but they took it into new territory story wise.

I think Arnold does amazingly well in this role for a guy pushing 70.