Author Topic: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)  (Read 152147 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Former Detroit mayor indicted on 19 fraud, tax charges
By the CNN Wire Staff
June 23, 2010

(CNN) -- Former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick was indicted Wednesday on 19 counts of federal fraud and tax charges, according to the U.S. attorney's office in the Eastern District of Michigan.

The charges against him include 10 counts of mail fraud, three counts of wire fraud, five counts of filing a false tax return and one count of tax evasion, according to U.S. District Court spokesman Rod Hanson.

If he is convicted, each fraud count would carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000, while each tax count would carry a maximum sentence of up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000, the U.S. attorney's office said.

The charges stem from an alleged scheme in which Kilpatrick used donations to his Kilpatrick Civic Fund -- a tax-exempt social welfare organization -- to pay for such personal expenses as yoga and golf lessons, and campaign expenses in his 2001 and 2005 bids for mayor, according to the indictment.

Kilpatrick had claimed the fund would go toward community services and voter registration information, the indictment says.

Kilpatrick, 40, is currently serving five years in prison for violating probation in a 2008 case against him. That case involved two felony counts of obstruction of justice stemming from Kilpatrick's efforts to cover up an extramarital affair.

He also pleaded no contest to charges of assaulting a police officer attempting to serve a subpoena on a Kilpatrick friend in the case.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/06/23/michigan.kilpatrick.indicted/index.html?hpt=T2

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Ex-Clinton fundraiser gets 12 years in prison
45 mins ago



NEW YORK – A wealthy Manhattan investment banker who was once a top fundraiser for Hillary Rodham Clinton and other big-name Democrats has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for bank fraud.

Hassan Nemazee (hah-SAHN' nah-MAH'-zee) was sentenced Thursday in federal court in Manhattan.

He had reached a plea deal in March. He has admitted to three counts of bank fraud and one count of wire fraud.

Prosecutors say he forged signatures and concocted bogus account statements to conceal a scam in which he was using proceeds from new loans to pay off older ones.

Nemazee had been the national finance chairman of Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign. He also raised money for President Barack Obama and other prominent Democrats.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
July 22, 2010
Rangel Charged With Ethics Violations
A House investigative panel on Thursday announced multiple ethics charges against Rep. Charles Rangel.

The announcement means the case will go on trial before a separate ethics committee, which will decide whether the alleged violations are backed up by the evidence.

Rangel, a New York Democrat, said he looks forward to the trial. He said Thursday that he's been asking for the opportunity to explain himself to his constituents for two years.

Rangel was chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee until he stepped down in March following criticism from the ethics committee regarding a separate case.

The announcement Thursday did not specify which alleged violations would be considered during the trial. The panel has focused on several issues, including Rangel's use of four rent-controlled apartments in New York City and his use of official stationery to raise money for a center bearing his name at City College of New York.

The timing of the announcement ensures that a public airing of Rangel's ethical woes will stretch into the fall campaign, and Republicans are certain to make it an issue as they try to capture majority control of the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi had once promised to "drain the swamp" of ethical misdeeds by lawmakers in arguing that Democrats should be in charge.

Responding to the charges, Rangel said in a statement, "I was notified today, two years after I requested an investigation, that the Ethics Committee will refer the allegations reviewed by an investigations subcommittee to a subcommittee that will review the facts. I am pleased that, at long last, sunshine will pierce the cloud of serious allegations that have been raised against me in the media."

Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said, "The action today would indicate that the independent, bipartisan ethics committee process is moving forward."

Rangel led the tax-writing Ways and Means panel until he stepped aside last March after the ethics committee criticized him in a separate case -- finding that he should have known corporate money was paying for his trips to two Caribbean conferences.

Officials said that in the current case, the committee and Rangel's attorney tried unsuccessfully to negotiate a settlement. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private discussions. A settlement would have required Rangel to agree that he violated ethics rules.

The investigation of Rangel has focused on:

--His use of official stationery to raise money for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College of New York.

--Whether he had the Ways and Means Committee consider legislation that would benefit donors to the Rangel Center at the same time the congressman solicited donations or pledges.

--Preservation of a tax shelter for an oil drilling company, Nabors Industries, which has a chief executive who donated money to the center while Rangel's committee considered the loophole legislation.

--Use of four rent-controlled apartment units in New York City, when the city's rent stabilization program is supposed to apply to one's primary residence. This raises the question of how all the units could be primary residences. One was a campaign office, raising a separate question of whether the rent break was an improper gift.

--Whether Rangel, as required, publicly reported information on the financing and rental of his ownership interest in a unit within the Punta Cana Yacht Club in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Rangel also had to pay back taxes on the rental income.

--Whether he intentionally failed to report -- when required -- hundreds of thousands of dollars or more in assets. The amended disclosure reports added a credit union IRA, mutual fund accounts and stock.

Rangel had hoped to regain his chairmanship, but the allegations make that virtually impossible this year.

He announced a bid for a 21st term recently, days before his 80th birthday. One of his Sept. 14 primary opponents is Adam Clayton Powell IV, son of the former congressman whom Rangel defeated in 1970.

While the case will generate unfavorable headlines for Rangel, it may have little effect in his congressional district, New York's famed Harlem, where the congressman has been a political leader for decades and is known by older constituents as a Korean War hero.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/07/22/rangel-charged-with-ethics-violations/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Ethics panel charges Rangel with conduct discrediting the House
By the CNN Wire Staff
July 29, 2010

Washington (CNN) -- The House ethics committee on Thursday accused veteran Rep. Charles Rangel of 13 violations of House rules involving alleged financial wrongdoing and harming the credibility of Congress.

"Credibility is what's at stake here; the very credibility of the House itself before the American people," said Rep. Mike McCaul, the ranking Republican on a subcommittee that will hold a trial-like hearing on the charges against Rangel.

McCaul spoke at the subcommittee's first meeting, which heard the charges against Rangel, a 20-term Democrat from New York running for re-election this year. Rangel was not required to attend and did not show up.

According to committee documents, Rangel earlier filed a motion to dismiss the allegations against him that was denied.

Rangel said this week that his lawyers were in talks with committee lawyers on a possible deal to avoid the public hearing on his alleged violations. When Thursday's hearing was delayed for 55 minutes with no explanation, rumors of an imminent agreement quickly spread.

However, the panel gathered and held the hearing, which included the first public announcement of the specific committee charges against Rangel. It remained unclear whether a settlement avoiding the spectacle of a trial hearing was possible.

According to the charges, Rangel allegedly failed to report more than $600,000 on financial disclosure reports and improperly solicited funds for the construction of a center bearing his name at the City College of New York.

The committee also alleged that Rangel improperly used a rent-subsidized apartment as a campaign office for over a decade and failed to pay taxes on a home in the Dominican Republic.

Rangel "argues that errors on his personal taxes do not implicate discharge of his official responsibilities," committee investigators concluded in response to Rangel's request to have the charges dismissed. He "appears to be operating under the erroneous belief that the only conduct subject to discipline is conduct directly related to the discharge of his official responsibilities."

An investigative subcommittee report on Rangel's dealings, available on the committee's Web site, detailed a lengthy series of meetings the congressman held with business leaders to raise funds for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Policy at the City College. His repeated attempts to woo potential donors violated the House's solicitation and gift ban, the report said.

Among other things, the report stated that Rangel met with a lobbyist for insurance giant AIG in April 2008 with the objective to "close" a $10 million "gift for the Rangel Center."

At the meeting, "AIG raised concerns about a potential donation, including the potential headline risk," the report stated. But Rangel pushed ahead, asking "AIG, at least twice, what was necessary to get this done."

During the period of time that Rangel was seeking donations from AIG, according to committee investigators, the company was lobbying the House on several tax and trade issues -- matters over which Rangel exercised considerable influence.

The congressman's "acceptance of favors and benefits from donors to the Rangel Center ... might be construed by reasonable persons as influencing the performance of his governmental duties," the report concluded.

It stated that the "accumulation of (Rangel's) actions reflected poorly on the institution of the House and, thereby, brought discredit to the House."

McCaul said the allegations against Rangel, if proven, would violate "the most fundamental code of conduct" for House members.

Rep. Gene Green of Texas, a Democrat who led a two-year ethics subcommittee investigation of Rangel, said it was a difficult job.

"The task is even more difficult when the subject has befriended and mentored so many new members, and I'm one of them," Green said.

Another ethics committee member, Republican Rep. Jo Bonner of Alabama, said "this is truly a sad day where no one, regardless of their partisan stripes, should rejoice."

Rangel temporarily stepped down as Ways and Means Committee chairman earlier this year following the announcement of an ethics investigation of several allegations, including failure to pay taxes on the Dominican Republic residence.

The House ethics committee previously admonished Rangel for violating rules on receiving gifts. Specifically, the committee found that Rangel violated House gift rules by accepting reimbursement payments for travel to conferences in the Caribbean in 2007 and 2008.

Rangel, whose autobiography that discusses his Korean War experience is titled "And I Haven't Had a Bad Day Since," told reporters earlier Thursday that "I have to reassess that (statement)" in light of the pending hearing.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday -- in response to a question about Rangel -- that there must be "accountability" and "transparency" in cases of ethical transgressions.

"Holding a high ethical standard is a serious responsibility ... and a top priority" for the House Democratic leadership, she said. In terms of political fallout from cases such as Rangel's, "the chips will fall where they may," she said.

Congressional Democrats have reportedly expressed concern that an extended public airing of the charges against Rangel could damage the party's prospects in the November midterm elections.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/29/rangel.ethics/index.html?hpt=T1

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Ethics Panel: Charges Filed Against Rep. Waters
Published August 02, 2010 | Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- A House investigative panel has charged California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters with violating ethics rules.

Waters, a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, would face a trial in the fall unless she negotiates a settlement.

If the case goes to trial, Democrats would have the political headache of two ethics trials -- one for Waters and another for Rep. Charles Rangel of New York.

The specific charges against Waters were not made public in the announcement Monday from the House ethics committee.

Waters has been under investigation for a possible conflict of interest involving her assistance to a bank that was seeking federal aid. Her husband owned stock in the bank and had served on its board.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/02/ethics-panel-charges-filed-rep-waters/

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Magliocchetti Case Involving Late Dem Draws Less Coverage Than Abramoff Scandal
Published August 07, 2010 | FoxNews.com


In this April 16, 2008, file photo, Rep. John Murtha speaks in Washington. (AP Photo)
The financial scandal that dogged Rep. John Murtha until his death in February has reached a climatic point following the arrest Thursday of a former aide to the Pennsylvania Democrat. But as the case sparks comparisons to the infamous Jack Abramoff scandal, the story has yet to generate as much attention.

Paul Magliocchetti, the owner of a now-closed lobbying firm that represented defense clients, was arrested Thursday on charges of making hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal campaign contributions.

The charges against Magliocchetti, brought in federal court in Alexandria, Va., included making false statements to the Federal Election Commission.

But the coverage of Magliocchetti has drawn scant media coverage. By comparison, the Abramoff scandal, which involved Republican lawmakers, captured national attention.

Tim Graham, director of media analysis for the Media Research Center, noted that the Washington Post ran a front page story Friday on the Magliocchetti, but he slammed the broadcast news stations and newsweeklies for not offering as much prominent coverage.


YOU MIGHT ALSO BE
INTERESTED IN
HP CEO Hurd Resigns After Sexual Harassment Investigation
Cruise Prices Near Record Lows Again
What to Expect if Bush Tax Cuts Expire
Is Montana Fishburne's Porn Video Kim Kardashian's Fault?
Conn. Warehouse Gunman Told 911: I 'Handled the Problem' at 'Racist Place'
"They're not going to do anything that would put a Democratic member of Congress on the cover of a magazine," he said. "They run in a pack and the pack isn't mindless. They have a narrative they want and they're going to stick to it."

Abramoff was sentenced in 2006 to nearly six years for a fraudulent Florida casino deal and got a four-year sentence in 2008 for conspiring to defraud the U.S., corrupting public officials and defrauding his clients in a separate case.

Even Abamoff's release from prison in June has generated more media coverage. Abramoff landed a job at Tov Pizza, a kosher pizzeria in Baltimore soon after his release.

Graham said "it's very easy for a partisan media" to largely ignore the Magliocchetti case.

"Too difficult. Congressman dead. No one cares," he said. But he added "there's elements that could make a compelling television news story but they just don't want to do it."

As part of his plea deal, Abramoff cooperated in a long-running Justice Department investigation that led to the convictions of former Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, former Deputy Interior Secretary J. Steven Griles and several top Capitol Hill aides.

Although he has expressed remorse, Abramoff also cooperated with the author of a 2008 book, "The Perfect Villain: John McCain and the Demonization of Lobbyist Jack Abramoff," in which he blamed Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., for making him the fall guy.

He is the subject of a documentary film, "Casino Jack," released this year. A fictionalized version, "Casino Jack and the United States of Money," starring Kevin Spacey, is in the works.

The charges against Magliocchetti also are filled with juicy details.

Magliocchetti's PMA Group in Washington's Virginia suburbs was shuttered last year after the FBI raided its offices. The Justice Department and House investigative committees conducted separate investigations of the PMA donations, but no action has been taken against lawmakers.

The federal indictment unsealed Thursday said Magliocchetti orchestrated the scheme to enrich himself and his firm by increasing PMA's influence, power and prestige -- among clients and elected officials.

The federal campaign organizations that received these funds were unaware of Magliocchetti's alleged scheme, the indictment said.

The Federal Election Campaign Act limits the amounts individuals can contribute to campaigns and political campaign committees. It prohibits corporations from making contributions, either directly or through officers of the corporation.

To evade the limits on individual contributions and the outright ban on corporate donations, the indictment alleges, Magliocchetti caused straw donors to make contributions to scores of federal campaign committees.

The money actually came from Magliocchetti or PMA, rather than the named donor. The people masquerading as donors either received the money in advance or were reimbursed by Magliocchetti, the indictment said.

The Office of Congressional Ethics, an investigative panel of non-lawmakers created by Congress, turned over evidence to the Justice Department on PMA-related contributions earlier this year.

The Justice Department has investigated members of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee who received a flood of campaign money over the years from the lobbying firm and its defense contractor clients. The subcommittee had been chaired by Murtha, D-Pa., who died in February.

The House ethics committee has already concluded that lawmakers who received PMA money did not violate any congressional standards of conduct.

The 11-count indictment charged Magliocchetti with four counts of making illegal campaign contributions in the name of another; four counts of making illegal campaign contributions from a corporation; and three counts of causing federal campaigns to unwittingly make false statements in their public reports.

The story could still ignite a political firestorm if Magliocchetti decides to cooperate with the Justice Department instead of battling it out in court.Then the probe could spill over onto Capitol Hill.

For now, prosecutors have only the cooperation of Magliocchetti's son Mark, who pleaded guilty in the same investigation on the same day his father was indicted.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/07/magliocchetti-case-involving-late-dem-draws-coverage-abramoff-scandal/?test=latestnews

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Waters hit with three counts by House ethics panel
By Alan Silverleib, CNN
August 9, 2010

Washington (CNN) -- The House ethics committee released a report Monday detailing three counts against Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California.
The report details alleged violations of House rules tied to the 10-term congresswoman's attempt to seek federal assistance for a bank with financial ties to her husband.

The committee rejected Water's request for the charges to be dismissed.

The 71-year-old Waters said Friday that she is pushing the ethics panel to set a trial date before the midterm elections in November.

Waters, a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, helped arrange a meeting in September 2008 between Massachusetts-based OneUnited Bank and Treasury Department officials, according to ethics investigators.

OneUnited Bank ultimately received $12 million in bailout funds.

According to the report, Waters' husband owned almost 4,000 shares of OneUnited stock at the time of the meeting. The shares declined in value from more than $350,000 in June to $175,000 at the end of September -- the height of the Wall Street financial crisis.

Waters' husband was one of the bank's board members from 2004 to 2008.

Waters, according to a separate preliminary report, called then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson "and requested that Treasury Department officials meet with representatives from the National Bankers Association," an organization representing more than 100 minority-owned banks.
"A meeting was in fact granted, however, the discussion at the meeting focused on a single bank -- OneUnited. Rep. Waters' husband had been a board member of the bank from 2004 to 2008 and, at the time of the meeting, was a stock holder of the bank."

The report states that Waters approached Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts, to say that she was "in a predicament because her husband had been involved in the bank, but 'OneUnited people' were coming to her for help."

Waters, "according to (Frank) ... knew she should say no, but it bothered her. It was clear to (Frank) that this was a 'conflict of interest problem.'"

Frank's advice to Waters, the report states, was to 'stay out of it.'"

The report released Monday stated that Waters "agreed to refrain from advocating on behalf of OneUnited," but failed to instruct her chief of staff, Mikael Moore, from doing so.

Following the September 9 meeting between Treasury and National Bankers Association officials, Moore "was actively involved in assisting OneUnited representatives with their request for capital from Treasury and crafting legislation to authorize Treasury to grant the request" for financial assistance.

"Reasonable" people could construe Moore's "continued involvement in assisting OneUnited as the dispensing of special favors or privileges to OneUnited," the report concluded.

Waters is the second high-ranking Democrat now facing a public ethics trial this fall. New York Rep. Charlie Rangel, the former chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, has been accused of 13 violations of House rules involving alleged financial wrongdoing and harming the credibility of Congress.

Both trials could take place in September -- only a few weeks before the midterm elections. The prospect of inquiries into two high-profile Democrats has compounded the fears of congressional Democrats nervous about their prospects in November.

The growing likelihood of trials for Waters and Rangel also adds the explosive element of race to the political equation. Both representatives are leaders of the Congressional Black Caucus, and OneUnited Bank is one of the largest minority-owned banks in America.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/09/waters.charges/index.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
I think it's time we find out who Maxine Waters really is.  How prophetic was she?  lol



Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Blagojevich Verdict: Guilty Of Lying To Feds, Mistrial On Remaining 23 Counts
MICHAEL TARM and DON BABWIN | 08/17/10   

CHICAGO — A federal jury deadlocked Tuesday on all but one of 24 charges against former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, including the most explosive of all – that he tried to sell an appointment to President Barack Obama's old Senate seat. Blagojevich was convicted on a single count of lying to federal agents, one of the least serious charges.

Prosecutors pledged to retry the case as soon as possible.

"This jury shows you that the government threw everything but the kitchen sink at me," Blagojevich said later outside court. "They could not prove I did anything wrong – except for one nebulous charge from five years ago."

Blagojevich – known for his showmanlike, over-the-top personality – showed no emotion as the verdict was read. Before jurors came in, he sat with his hands folded, looking down and picking nervously at his fingernails. He and his lawyer said they would appeal the conviction.

The verdict came on the 14th day of deliberations, ending an 11-week trial during which a foul-mouthed Blagojevich was heard on secret FBI wiretap tapes saying the power to name a senator was "(expletive) golden" and that he wasn't going to give up "for (expletive) nothing."

The count on which Blagojevich was convicted included accusations that he lied to federal agents when he said he did not track campaign contributions and kept a "firewall" between political campaigns and government work. It carries a sentence of up to five years in prison. Some of the more serious charges, such as racketeering, carried up to a 20-year penalty.

Blagojevich vowed to appeal the single conviction and declared that he was a victim of persecution by the federal government. He told reporters that he wants the "people of Illinois to know that I did not lie to the FBI."

It had been clear jurors were struggling with the case. Last week, they told Zagel they had reached a unanimous decision on just two counts and had not even considered 11 others. There was no immediate explanation about whether they later disagreed.

Jurors appeared more haggard Tuesday than during the trial. As they filed into the courtroom, many appeared nervous, some looking down at the floor as Zagel read the verdict form to himself, then passed it to a bailiff. They had asked earlier Tuesday for advice on filling out their verdict forms and a copy of the oath they took before deliberating.

The jurors did not remain at the courthouse to explain their decisions.

"They're going home," said Joel Daly, a spokesman for Zagel. "A lot would like to talk to media folks, but they are plain tired."

After the verdict was read, defense attorney Sam Adam Jr. rubbed his own forehead and mouth, appearing to shake his head in disgust. The former governor's wife, Patti Blagojevich, leaned over in her chair, shaking her head.

The former governor's brother and co-defendant, Robert Blagojevich, said the jury's conclusion showed he's been "an innocent target of the federal government" all along.

"I feel strong. I feel confident. I don't feel in any way deterred. I've done nothing wrong," he told reporters at the courthouse. "I've got ultimate confidence in my acquittal."

Defense attorneys had argued that Blagojevich was a big talker, but never committed a crime. They took a huge gamble by deciding not to call any witnesses – including Blagojevich, who had repeatedly promised to take the stand.

"The jury agreed that the government did not prove its case," the former governor said.

Throughout most of the trial, the 53-year-old Blagojevich, a perpetual campaigner and recent reality TV star, seemed cheerful. He often glided through the courthouse smiling and chatting with passers-by.

His demeanor was in contrast to his older brother, a Nashville, Tenn. businessman, who was often subdued and walked to court alone.

By all accounts, the brothers were close growing up and Rod Blagojevich wrote fondly of Robert in his 2009 book, "The Governor." But Robert Blagojevich's attorney said the two drifted apart as they got older.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald was in the main courtroom for the verdict for the first time since the trial began. He sat at the end of a spectator's bench near a wall on the opposite side of the room from Blagojevich, his hands folded across court documents. He looked on blank-faced as the verdict was read. His team of young prosecutors reflected the same mood, also looking on impassively.

Some observers said the government will come back with a tougher case next time.

"And the government has the resources to keep trying until they get a conviction – and they probably will," said Phil Turner, a former federal prosecutor. "And Blagojevich is running out of resources. It is a war of attrition the government can win."

While the verdict isn't a clear victory for the defense, Turner says it is a slap in the face to Fitzgerald and his team.

Turner pointed to the U.S. attorney's statement from the day Blagojevich was arrested, when he said prosecutors had stopped a "political corruption crime spree."

"This is clear defeat for prosecutors," Turner said. "The jurors' message to Fitzgerald is – this was exaggeration and overstatement."

Turner said Fitzgerald's mistake was shutting down the covert investigation in 2008 and arresting Blagojevich – before whatever alleged schemes played out.

"Had they let things proceed, this could have been an open and shut case," he said.

As he left the courthouse, Blagojevich got a huge round of applause from the courthouse crowd.

Leota Johnson, 72, of Chicago, chanted "Rod is free!" Johnson said she supports Blago because she isn't convinced he did anything wrong and that pay-for-play is Chicago politics as usual.

During the trial, prosecutors relied heavily on the FBI wiretaps, in which Blagojevich spewed profanity, speculated about getting a Cabinet job in exchange for the Senate appointment. Several witnesses also testified that they felt pressured to donate money to Blagojevich's campaign in exchange for favorable state action.

Blagojevich's trial was another chapter in Illinois' history of crooked politics. His predecessor, George Ryan, was convicted of racketeering in 2006 and is serving a 6 1/2 year-sentence.

Some had feared that the trial could harm Democrats as the party geared up for tough elections this fall.

Blagojevich's attorneys had plastered Washington and Illinois with subpoenas – including White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – but by the end of the trial, none of them had testified, sparing Democrats any potentially embarrassing testimony.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/17/blagojevich-verdict-guilt_n_685481.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Blago Found Guilty of Lying to the Feds; Mistrial to Be Declared on Other 23 Counts
Published August 17, 2010
FoxNews.com

One juror.

That was all it took to keep a jury from convicting former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich of trying to sell the Senate seat formerly held by President Obama, according to another juror in Blagojevich's federal corruption trial.

Instead, Blagojevich was found guilty Tuesday of just one lesser count of lying to federal agents, as jurors deadlocked on the 23 other counts against him, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial on those charges.

Blagojevich showed no emotion as the verdict was read, neither smiling nor grimacing. But afterward, he cast the outcome as a victory and vowed to appeal the one guilty verdict.

"I want the people of Illinois to know I did not lie to the FBI," Blagojevich told reporters. "I told the truth from the very beginning. This is a persecution."

After Judge James B. Zagel said he plans to call a mistrial on the remaining counts, federal prosecutors said they would retry Blagojevich "as quickly as possible."

Zagel set a hearing for Aug. 26 to decide the manner and timing of the retrial. He also said Blagojevich's bond will stay the same.

News broke later Tuesday that there was just one holdout juror blocking a conviction on the charge of trying to sell the Senate seat. The jury deadlocked 11-1 on that charge, according to another juror, Erik Sarnello of Itasca, Ill.

Sarnello, 21, said the holdout, a woman, "just didn't see what we all saw." He said the counts around the Senate seat were "the most obvious."

Blagojevich faces up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 for lying to agents investigating the corruption allegations. Jurors unanimously agreed that Blagojevich provided two false statements -- one in which he said he tried to maintain a firewall between politics and government, the other in which he said he does not track or want to know who contributes to him or how much they are contributing to him.

Robert Blagojevich, who faced four charges in the case -- the jury deadlocked on all four -- said he felt bad for his brother. But he said he wasn't sure whether he could afford to endure another trial.

"I have lived through the most surreal experience anyone could live through," he told reporters. "I have felt like this has been a slow bleed from the beginning, both financially, emotionally, and otherwise. But I can tell you I feel strong, I feel confident and I don't feel in any way deterred in my ability to articulate my innocence."

Jurors deliberated for 14 days, sending four notes with questions that gave early indication that that they could not reach consensus on all counts.

"Say a prayer for us," Rod Blagojevich said as he walked into the courtroom Tuesday holding wife Patti's hand.

Before jurors came in, a somber-looking Blagojevich sat with his hands folded, looking down, picking nervously at his fingernails. After the verdict was read, defense attorney Sam Adam Jr. rubbed his own forehead and mouth, appearing to shake his head in disgust.

Patti Blagojevich showed more emotion throughout. Right after the verdict was read, she leaned over in her chair, shaking her head.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/17/attorney-lawyers-blago-case-summoned-court/?test=latestnews

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
I hope this narcissist goes to prison . . . where he won't have access to a microphone. 

Ex-Gov. Blagojevich appears at Chicago Comic Con

ROSEMONT, Ill. (AP) — Former Ill. Gov. Rod Blagojevich compared himself to a superhero as he stood alongside folks dressed as Superman and Batman at the Chicago Comic Con.

Blagojevich said Saturday at the show in suburban Chicago that he draws inspiration from the superheros as he faces his own battles.

He charged $80 for each photo taken with him and $50 for autographs.

Some fans said Blagojevich earned the money and that he needs it because he isn't working.

While touring the floor, Blagojevich picked up a red "Batphone" and joked that he was calling his lawyer.

A federal jury convicted Blagojevich this week of lying to the FBI but deadlocked on 23 other charges. Prosecutors plan to retry him.

Actors William Shatner and Adam West are also at the Comic Con.

http://hosted2-1.ap.org/HIHON/229cea0feec5482f81543bdaad3ec66c/Article_2010-08-21-US-Blagojevich-Comic-Con/id-402a7a806d72445db3e20cea5ce6a16a

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #111 on: September 04, 2010, 10:15:15 AM »
Rangel spends $111,000 on legal fees in 2 months

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal campaign finance report shows embattled New York Rep. Charles Rangel has spent more than $111,000 on legal bills since July.

A House ethics panel has charged the Harlem Democrat with 13 violations, including using a rent controlled Manhattan apartment as a campaign office and failing to pay taxes on a rental property in the Dominican Republic.

Rangel has vowed to fight the charges. He's expected to face a House trial in the fall.

The New York Daily News reported that the congressman's latest campaign filing Friday shows he's spent more than $1.8 million on legal fees related to the case. He's paying much of the money out of his campaign account.

Rangel is running for a 20th term in the House and faces several challengers in the Sept. 14 Democratic primary.

http://hosted2-1.ap.org/HIHON/229cea0feec5482f81543bdaad3ec66c/Article_2010-09-04-US-Rangel-Legal-Fees/id-024e5e834313457a980815c0cd074d14

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #112 on: September 22, 2010, 12:23:30 PM »
Like father, like son.   :-\

Rep. Jackson 'deeply sorry,' admits 'social acquaintance'
Posted: September 21st, 2010

(CNN) – A Chicago businessman told federal investigators that Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. asked him to pay for a Washington, D.C. restaurant hostess to fly between Washington and Chicago multiple times, the Chicago Sun-Times reported Tuesday.

Jackson told the paper he was "deeply sorry" that he had "disappointed some supporters," in a written statement.

"The reference to a social acquaintance is a private and personal matter between me and my wife that was handled some time ago. I ask that you respect our privacy," Jackson said in his statement.

Jackson's wife also appealed for privacy in a statement to the Chicago Tribune.


"Today's disclosure, one that my family and I have been privately addressing for several months, is a very private, painful and unfortunate situation. Therefore, I would hope that the public will respect our ongoing personal handling and healing from this matter," Sandi Jackson said.

If Nayak did pay for flights at the request of the Jackson, it may be considered a violation of the House gift ban, which forbids members of Congress from receiving gifts valued over $50.

The Sun-Times also reported that Raghuveer Nayak told the F.B.I. that Jackson asked him fundraise $6 million for former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich in exchange for an appointment to the Senate seat vacated by President Barack Obama.

In the written statement to the Sun-Times, Jackson dismissed the allegations.

"The allegations about fund-raising and the Senate seat are not new. I've already talked with the authorities about these claims, told them they were false, and no charges have been brought against me. The very idea of raising millions of dollars for a campaign other than my own is preposterous. My interest in the Senate seat was based on years of public service, which I am proud of, not some improper scheme with anyone," the statement said.

A House ethics panel said it would investigate Rep. Jackson last year for allegedly launching a "public campaign" to be appointed to the Senate seat. The investigation was deferred at the request of the Justice Department because of the criminal indictment against Blagojevich. In August, the former governor was convicted of lying to federal agents on one of 24 counts brought against him by the government.

Jackson's office has not responded to requests from CNN for comment.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/21/rep-jackson-deeply-sorry-admits-social-acquaintance/#more-123888

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Subpoenas issued in John Edwards' investigation
By the CNN Wire Staff
October 7, 2010 T

(CNN) -- A "sizable" number of subpoenas have been issued in the investigation of former Sen. John Edwards, his attorney said.

Wade Smith, the attorney, said Wednesday he did not know who asked for the subpoenas or who was summoned. However, Smith said he maintained Edwards is innocent and said they welcome the government scrutiny.

A North Carolina federal grand jury has been investigating payments the former senator's campaign and supporters made to Rielle Hunter, his mistress who also worked as a videographer for his campaign.

As Edwards campaigned for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, allegations began to surface that he had an affair with Hunter as well as he was the father of Hunter's young child.

Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, became legally separated after the scandal.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/10/07/north.carolina.edwards.subpoenas/index.html?hpt=T1

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Quote
nowBuzz up!FDA withdraws controversial approval of knee implant
Friday, October 15, 2010
BY KATHLEEN LYNN
The Record
STAFF WRITER


________________________ ________________________



HACKENSACK — The Food and Drug Administration is withdrawing its approval of a knee implant created by ReGen Biologics Inc. of Hackensack, a year after saying the approval had been influenced by four members of New Jersey's congressional delegation.
The Menaflex device, which was approved in December 2008, "should not have been cleared for marketing in the United States," the FDA said in a statement Thursday. The device was designed to help repair knee cartilage called the meniscus.

ReGen's CEO, Gerald E. Bisbee Jr., said in a statement that the financially troubled, 20-year-old company "is currently weighing its options."

"The product has been approved and in use successfully in Europe for nearly 10 years with approximately 3,000 patients, and there has never been a safety issue associated with the device," Bisbee's statement said.

The FDA said Thursday that patients who have had the device implanted probably would not need to have it removed because it is absorbed and replaced with new tissue. The FDA advised patients to consult their doctors.

In a review last spring, an FDA panel called the product "reasonably safe" but said there was not enough evidence to say it's effective.

In its statement Thursday, the FDA said Menaflex should not have been given a "fast-track" approval based on the performance of similar devices, because there are too many differences between the products.

Menaflex was designed to provide a scaffold to encourage the growth of new tissue after the meniscus is torn, a common injury.

Menaflex, which sold for about $1,600 per unit, is one of two ReGen products. The other is a suturing device used with Menaflex.

In the past, ReGen accused the FDA of treating it unfairly and said that it turned to the congressional delegation only after becoming frustrated with the FDA review process. ReGen gave a total of $28,000 to U.S. Sens. Bob Menendez and Frank Lautenberg and Reps.
Steve Rothman and Frank Pallone in 2007 and 2008.

The FDA said in September 2009 that its decision to approve the Menaflex was influenced by pressure from the four officials. It also said that a former head of the agency, Andrew von Eschenbach, became involved in details usually left to the scientific staff, allegedly in response to the congressional pressure. Von Eschenbach denied acting improperly.

It was the first time that the agency had publicly questioned its own approval process or admitted to political influence.

At the time, all four Democratic lawmakers denied pressuring the agency, saying that they had only requested fair treatment for ReGen.
Rothman issued a statement Thursday criticizing the FDA, which he said "has mismanaged this issue and this product from the very beginning."

"It's unfortunate that a product that could have helped thousands of Americans each year is no longer available on the market," Rothman said. "This product could have saved people pain, recovery time and health care costs."

ReGen's stock, which trades over the counter, closed Thursday unchanged, at 17 cents.

E-mail: lynn@northjersey.com


________________________ ________________________ _____

Yeah - I got illegals all over the nabe I want booted out.  How much is it going to cost me to get my Dem congressscum to get off their asses to take action on it? 




Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #115 on: November 11, 2010, 08:06:15 AM »
Eliot Spitzer's Favorite Hooker Wasn't Ashley Dupre, New Movie Says
By Hollie McKay
Published November 10, 2010 | FoxNews.com

Ashley Dupre may be Eliot Spitzer's most famous hooker, but she wasn't his favorite.

That is just one of the revelations in Oscar-winning filmmaker Alex Gibney’s new documentary “Client Nine: The Rise & Fall of Eliot Spitzer,” which explores the events surrounding his scandalous hookups with prostitutes and subsequent resignation from the New York governorship.

According to the film, Ashley Dupre’s highly publicized “relationship” with Eliot Spitzer was actually nothing more than a two-hour rendezvous in a D.C hotel room.

His real “connection,” if you will, was with another escort who calls herself  “Angelina,” who Spitzer saw repeatedly. Angelina agreed to talk to Gibney for her documentary provided he did not disclose her real identity. So Gibney hired an actress to tell her story direct from interview transcripts.

“Angelina is very proud of what she does. She thinks it’s a calling, and but at the same time there are people in her life that don’t know what she does and so she wants to keep it under that radar,” Gibney told Pop Tarts. “I found her to be a very engaging, intriguing character, she was very smart and funny, very self assured.”

“Client Nine” also features extensive interviews with Spitzer himself, who talks candidly about his political success and reputation as the “Sheriff of Wall Street,” and a little less candidly about his infidelity and his straying ways.

“I spent a lot of time having to ask him difficult questions and a lot of questions he was only too delighted to answer, stuff about the political economy, and how a citizen is being cheated by being in more powerful forces. Over time you see different sides of somebody,” Gibney said. “But his eyes betray a certain amount of emotion, you can see his eyes tear at certain times and you can see his eyes narrow and get vicious and angry.  At the end he is finally saying ‘’Look, I brought myself down, shame on me.’ I give him a lot of credit for sitting there and taking it and wrestling with his discomfort, and I think his remorse is sincere.”

At the heart of Gibney's film is the idea that Eliot Spitzer was a do-gooder genius who worked tirelessly as New York’s Attorney General to bring down Wall Street criminals, only to be brought down by personal failings and powerful enemies.

“I was intrigued by the rather vicious irony of the scandal, the ‘Dudley Do-right’ having done wrong. And I was intrigued by the timing; everything going down just as Wall Street was collapsing,” Gibney said. “Audiences have been surprised about how different the story was than how they thought it had been. They are surprised sometimes about how they feel some sympathy for Eliot, but they are also so critical of him.”

“Client Nine” features extensive interviews with the likes of Home Depot co-founder and former Director of the NY Stock exchange Kenneth Langone, former Chairman and CEO of AIG Hank Greenberg, and long-standing Republican Majority Leader of the New York Senate Joseph Bruno, who became Spitzer’s political rival.

“(Many of them) were dancing on his grave,” Gibney said. “The degree of anger and animosity toward him was so extreme that they wanted to let it out."

The media screening room audience certainly seemed engrossed in Spitzer’s tumultuous journey, with many cheering at the end as the film displayed the recent criminal convictions and financial ruin that impacted Spitzer’s enemies – the ones that were portrayed as having possibly conspired to “get him.”

However, it seems the rest of America may not be so willing to forgive the “Love Gov."

Spitzer debuted his CNN show “Parker Spitzer” last month to a viewership of 454,000, and last week drew only 381,000. In comparison, Campbell Brown (who Spitzer and Parker replaced) drew in 1.3 million viewers on her premiere two years ago. Brown parted ways with the CNN program earlier this year with the complaint that her ratings were not sufficient.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/11/10/eliot-spitzers-favorite-hooker-wasnt-ashley-dupre-new-movie-says/?test=faces

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #116 on: November 13, 2010, 06:09:25 AM »
Maryland official, wife hid money as FBI approached, affidavit says
By Terry Frieden, CNN
November 12, 2010

Washington (CNN) -- Panicked as the FBI closed in Friday morning, Prince Georges County Executive Jack Johnson and his wife Leslie raced to find a $100,000 check for an alleged kickback and flush it down the toilet.

With agents knocking at the door, Leslie Johnson stuffed nearly $80,000 in her bra.

The dramatic end to an alleged years-long kickback scheme is outlined in detail in an affidavit written by FBI investigator Wendy Munoz, whose team was monitoring wiretaps.

Johnson, who has served as the executive of Prince Georges County since 2002, was taken into custody along with his wife.

The Johnsons made a first appearance in federal court late Friday in Greenbelt, Maryland, just outside Washington.

They were both charged with tampering with evidence and destruction of records. U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein stressed the investigation is continuing.

The Johnsons were released on their own recognizance, but Jack Johnson will be required to wear a monitoring device. He presumably will be allowed to continue serving out the last weeks of his expiring term as county executive if he chooses. The judge, however, ordered him not to attempt to destroy any evidence.

Jack Johnson had been the Prince Georges County prosecutor prior to his eight years as executive.

Leslie Johnson was just recently elected to the nine-member Prince Georges County Council.

The ten-page affidavit says the FBI began investigating Johnson in 2006 when it learned that certain real estate developers were paying Johnson for contracts. That led to a "a series of authorizations for the interception of wire communications."

The frantic end began early Friday when Johnson allegedly received a $15,000 payoff, and the FBI suddenly barged into the room to demand an explanation.

Johnson told them the cash was for a party marking the end of his tenure as county executive. He also claimed he had no dealings with the developer who was with him.

The FBI says Johnson made a series of false statements. The agents let him go but then eavesdropped on a series of frantic phone calls between Jack and Leslie Johnson as Jack Johnson and the FBI headed for the Johnsons' Mitchellville, Maryland, home.

"Two women (agents) are at the door," Leslie told her husband.

"Don't answer it," Jack said. He told her to run upstairs to their bedroom and go to "my drawer."

"You will see a check in there that [an unidentified developer] wrote to me," he said.

The affidavit says when Leslie found the check Jack told her to tear it up. "Do you want me to put it down the toilet?" she asked. Jack Johnson replied, "Yes, flush that." The agents monitoring the phone calls heard a flushing sound.

Leslie Johnson grabbed cash from the bedroom and also ran to the basement and grabbed more cash. "Put in your bra and walk out or something, I don't know what to do, Jack said.

"I have it in my bra," his wife replied.

"FBI agents then searched the person of Leslie Johnson incident to her arrest and recovered $79,600 in U.S. currency from her underwear," the affidavit says.

The wild ending may end up costing the Johnsons. The FBI says there is probable cause to believe that the pair "tampered with ... evidence and engaged in destruction, alteration, and falsification of records in a federal investigation."

The FBI document does not say how much money Johnson may have received in kickbacks or bribes. It does say at least some of the funds involved were targeted from an $80 million dollar budget to programs supported by federal grants such as those from Department of Housing and Community Development.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/11/12/maryland.official.custody/index.html?iref=NS1

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #117 on: November 13, 2010, 02:33:23 PM »
Jack Johnson Hid $80k In Wife's Bra As FBI Listened In
BRIAN WITTE | 11/12/10 11:38 PM |
 

Prince George's County Executive Jack Johnson, 61, right, speaks to the media with his lawyer Brian McDaniel, left, outside U.S. District Court, Friday, Nov. 12, 2010, in Greenbelt, Md. Johnson and his wife Leslie were arrested by federal law enforcement agents and charged with witness tampering and destruction of records. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) Get Politics Alerts   

Email Comments 1,025 ANNAPOLIS, Md. — A married pair of top officials in a Maryland county is accused of tampering with evidence after FBI agents said they recorded the husband telling his wife to flush a $100,000 check from a real estate developer down the toilet and to stuff almost $80,000 in cash in her underwear.

Prince George's County Executive Jack Johnson, whose second term expires next month, and his wife, Leslie, who was recently elected to the County Council, were charged with witness and evidence tampering and destruction, alteration and falsification of records in a federal investigation.

The charges grew out of a 5-year-old investigation into allegations of real estate developers in the county offering rewards to county officials in exchange for personal and business favors.

In an affidavit filed in federal court, FBI agents wrote that they recorded a mobile phone conversation between the Johnsons after agents went knocking on their door.

After Johnson told his wife, "Don't answer it," he instructed her over the phone to go upstairs to their bedroom and destroy the check, the affidavit said.

"Tear it up! That is the only thing you have to do," Johnson told his wife, according to the affidavit.

Leslie Johnson then could be heard asking her husband, "Do you want me to put it down the toilet?"

The county executive responded, "Yes, flush that," according to the affidavit, which noted that monitoring agents heard a flushing sound in the background.

Johnson then told his wife to put cash in her underwear, according to the affidavit. After FBI agents entered the home, they searched Leslie Johnson and recovered $79,600 from her underwear.

Story continues below
AdvertisementThe Johnsons were arrested at home and released later on personal recognizance. Jack Johnson was placed on home detention with electronic monitoring. They both face a maximum of 20 years in prison.

Jack Johnson swore his innocence after being released: "To all the citizens of Prince George's County, you know me. I've served you long and I've served you well and most of you know me well. I cannot go into these allegations because my lawyers will kill me if I do. I'm innocent of these charges. I just can't wait for the facts to come out. When they come out, I am absolutely convinced that we will be vindicated."

Roland Patterson, Leslie Johnson's attorney, said she is asking for prayers and support "through the ordeal of fighting to disprove the allegations that are pending against her now."

U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein said authorities have tapped Jack Johnson's phone since January 2010. Prosecutors expect more charges to be filed and more people to be charged.

Jack Johnson, 61, has been county executive since 2002; his term ends in three weeks. The Democrat was the county state's attorney for eight years before that. Born in Charleston, S.C., Johnson attended Benedict College and got his law degree from Howard University, where his wife was also a law student.

Leslie Johnson, 58, worked for the District of Columbia government for nearly three decades before running for a seat on the council. She has been honored for her work in education and for a program she co-founded that provides support for women in jail. The couple has three children.

Prince George's County borders Washington D.C. and is the wealthiest county in the U.S. with an African-American majority.

___

Associated Press writers Sarah Brumfield in Greenbelt and Jessica Gresko in Washington contributed to this story.


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #118 on: November 16, 2010, 05:39:20 PM »
House panel finds Rangel guilty of ethics violations
By the CNN Wire Staff
November 16, 2010

Washington (CNN) -- A House ethics subcommittee found longtime Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel guilty Tuesday on multiple violations of House rules.

The subcommittee, according to California Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren, the ethics committee chairwoman, found "clear and convincing" evidence of guilt on 11 of 12 counts, including failing to pay taxes on a home in the Dominican Republic, misuse of a rent-controlled apartment for political purposes and improper use of government mail service and letterhead.
The veteran New York congressman was cleared of a charge relating to an alleged violation of the House gift ban.

Rangel had been facing 13 charges; the committee combined two of them.

The full ethics committee -- known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct -- will now recommend a punishment for Rangel to the House of Representatives. The penalty can can range from a fine to expulsion. Most observers believe Rangel is likely to be reprimanded but not expelled.

R. Blake Chisam, the committee's chief counsel, told subcommittee members in a trial hearing Monday that there was no proof of corruption or evidence Rangel was trying "to personally enrich himself." But, Chisam said, Rangel "quite frankly was overzealous" in many instances and "at least sloppy in his personal finances."

Before Chisam spoke, Rangel walked out of the trial, complaining he has not had sufficient time to hire a new legal team to respond to the ethics violation charges.

The subcommittee rejected Rangel's request to delay the hearing until a new defense team was assembled.

Rangel told the subcommittee members he has already spent $2 million defending himself from the charges and has been advised the trial could cost him another $1 million.

He complained that he was not being given enough time to raise funds to hire new lawyers because the committee was rushing to complete its work before the conclusion of the current lame-duck Congress.

Rangel's original defense team left him in September.

"How can anyone have confidence in the decision of the Ethics Subcommittee when I was deprived of due process rights, right to counsel and was not even in the room?" Rangel asked in a statement released shortly after the subcommittee's ruling.

"I can only hope that the full Committee will treat me more fairly, and take into account my entire 40 years of service to the Congress before making any decisions on sanctions."

Rangel added that he was "compelled to state again the unfairness of its continuation without affording me the opportunity to obtain legal counsel as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution."

Lofgren said Monday it was Rangel's responsibility to assemble his legal team. She also noted that Rangel had received advice numerous times from the committee on how to raise funds for his defense.

Several subcommittee members, however, blasted Zuckerman Spaeder, the law firm originally representing Rangel.

It is "fundamentally unfair" for lawyers to abandon a client on the eve of a trial, said North Carolina Democratic Rep. G.K. Butterfield, a former trial judge. "That would not have happened in my courtroom."

Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vermont, expressed his "astonishment at Zuckerman Spaeder for taking the money ... and then kicking their client to the side of the road when it came time for the actual hearing."

In a statement issued in response to the criticism, a spokeswoman for the firm said it "did not seek to terminate the relationship [with Rangel] and explored every alternative to remain as his counsel consistent with House ethics rules prohibiting members from accepting pro bono legal services."

Numerous House Republicans -- as well as some House Democrats -- have called for Rangel to resign because of the alleged ethics violations. Rangel has said he has made mistakes.

Republicans on Tuesday were quick to characterize the ruling as an indictment of the Democrats' stewardship of the House.
The ruling "is the nail in the coffin of what Nancy Pelosi promised would be the 'most ethical congress in history,'" National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Ken Spain said. "The arrogance of power that defined the Democrats reign over the House of Representatives was overwhelmingly rejected on November 2, and today's ruling is further proof that the American people were right."

Rangel, who was first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1970, was forced to step down as chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee because of the allegations against him.

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California is also scheduled to have an adjudication hearing with the House ethics committee this month, on November 29. Waters has denied the allegations against her, which include steering federal bailout money to Massachusetts-based OneUnited Bank -- in which her husband had a financial stake.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/11/16/rangel.ethics.hearing/index.html?hpt=T2

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #119 on: November 19, 2010, 04:04:38 PM »
House ethics committee votes for censure of N.Y. Democrat
By the CNN Wire Staff
November 18, 2010

Washington (CNN) -- The House ethics committee voted 9-1 on Thursday to recommend censure for Rep. Charles Rangel, D-New York, in response to multiple rules violations committed by the 20-term congressman.

Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat and the committee's co-chairwoman, announced the recommendation around 6 p.m. Thursday, after a day of sometimes charged and emotional comments regarding how to penalize Rangel. She said that, in addition to the censure, Rangel would have to pay restitution for any unpaid taxes and report back to the committee.

Rangel's office refused to comment after the announcement, beyond saying in a statement, "the final decision on sanctions for violations of the House rules will be made by the full House of Representatives."

On Tuesday, an ethics subcommittee found "clear and convincing" evidence of Rangel's guilt on 11 counts, including failing to pay taxes on a home in the Dominican Republic, misuse of a rent-controlled apartment for political purposes, and improper use of his office to raise funds for a public policy center named for him.

The 80-year-old Rangel, re-elected earlier this month, was cleared of a charge relating to an alleged violation of the House gift ban. He had previously been forced to step down as head of the Ways and Means Committee because of the allegations against him.

Speaking earlier Thursday to the committee's five Democrats and five Republicans, Rangel pleaded for "a drop of fairness and mercy," in part out of recognition of his lengthy public service.

In a statement later in the day, but before the censure vote came down, the Harlem congressman apologized "for the embarassment" he'd brought upon the House and asked to be judged based "on my entire record as a soldier and a dedicated public servant -- not by my mistakes."
"My actions may have been sloppy, or even stupid, but never corrupt," he said in the statement.

At Thursday's hearing to decide Rangel's punishment, the committee's chief counsel R. Blake Chisam called disciplinary action "necessary" and recommended censure.

"This is about the institution [of the House] and the ultimate test for the institution is whether members behave creditably," he said.

More serious than a reprimand and less so than an explusion, congressional censures carry no explicit penalties beyond a public admonition. The last time members of the House of Representatives were censure was in 1983, when Gerry Studds, D-Massachusetts, and Dan Crane, R-Illinois, were so punished. It generally requires a representative to stand on the floor of the House while being rebuked.

One of the Democrats -- North Carolina Rep. G.K. Butterfield -- said he disagreed with Chisam's censure recommendation.

"Censure is extreme," Butterfield said. "The evidence does not suggest corruption." Rangel has had "a distinguished career," he added.

Top Republicans, including incoming Republican speaker John Boehner, appeared to be less sympathetic. Numerous House Republicans -- as well as some House Democrats -- have called for Rangel to resign because of the ethics violations.

"It is painful for me to say this to a man I personally respect, but Mr. Rangel can no longer blame anyone but himself for the position he now finds himself in," said Alabama Rep. Jo Bonner, the ranking committee Republican. "Mr. Rangel should only look into the mirror if he wants to know who to blame."

At Thursday's hearing, Rangel said he understood that public officials "have a higher responsibility than most Americans to obey the rules, because we write them."

"There can be no excuse for my acts of omission," he said. "I've failed in carrying out my responsibilities. I made numerous mistakes."
But, Rangel argued, "corruption and personal enrichment are certainly not part of my mistakes and the [ethics committee's] chief counsel made that abundantly clear. And that was the point I was always trying to make."

"The ethics committee has not met its burden of proof in presenting clear and convincing evidence that Charlie Rangel has deviated from his sense of duty to this body and this great country," he contended.

Rangel was accompanied to the hearing by Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia Democrat and fellow civil rights movement veteran. Lewis said that while he didn't know all the facts of the case, he could testify that Rangel is committed, hardworking, and patriotic.

"Charlie Rangel is a good and decent man," Lewis said, calling him "a champion for those left out and behind." "I think I know his heart."

Rangel complained to subcommittee members Monday -- and reiterated Thursday -- that he was not given enough time to raise funds to hire new lawyers because the committee was rushing to finish its work before the current lame-duck Congress ends. His original defense team left him in September.

Lofgren, the ethics committee chairwoman, said it was Rangel's responsibility to assemble his legal team. She also noted that Rangel had received advice numerous times from the committee on how to raise funds for his defense.

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California is also scheduled to have an adjudication hearing with the House ethics committee this month, on November 29. Waters has denied the allegations against her, which include steering federal bailout money to Massachusetts-based OneUnited Bank, in which her husband had a financial stake.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/11/18/rangel.ethics.hearing/index.html?hpt=Sbin

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #120 on: November 19, 2010, 04:14:10 PM »
 
LARRY MARGASAK | 11/19/10 05:47 PM | 

Read More: Maxine Waters, Maxine Waters Ethics, Maxine Waters Ethics Hearing, Maxine Waters Scandal, Los Angeles News





WASHINGTON — The House ethics trial of Rep. Maxine Waters was postponed Friday after investigators discovered an e-mail that could affect charges that she improperly tried to help a bank in which her husband owns stock.

The e-mail, obtained by The Associated Press, is inconclusive on whether Waters, D-Calif., was trying to get favored treatment for OneUnited Bank. It shows that Waters, a senior member of the Financial Services Committee, closely watched the drafting of sections of bank bailout legislation that would have benefited the bank.

Waters has contended that her efforts were aimed at dozens of small and minority-owned institutions rather than OneUnited. The trial was scheduled for Nov. 29, but the House ethics committee postponed it indefinitely.

Waters' husband Sidney Williams is an investor in OneUnited. The committee, in charging Waters with ethical wrongdoing last June, said Williams' investment was worth more than $351,000 on June 20, 2008. It had dwindled to $175,000 by Sept. 30, 2008. If OneUnited had not received federal financial help, the charges said, the investment would have become worthless.

The bank eventually did receive $12 million in federal bailout money in December 2008, some three months after Waters asked Treasury officials to meet with an association of minority-owned banks that included OneUnited. However, Waters and Treasury officials said the congresswoman had nothing to do with the bailout decision.

The e-mail that sent the case back to investigators was written by Waters' chief of staff Mikael Moore on Sept. 28, 2008 to staff members of the Financial Services Committee.

Moore, who also is Waters' grandson, wrote that the congresswoman was "under the explicit impression" that provisions affecting small and minority-owned banks were still in the massive 2008 bill to bail out financial institutions.

"If there is any material or technical changes to the language as last agreed upon, please alert me as soon as possible so that Rep. Waters has an opportunity to weigh in," Moore wrote.

One of the provisions – which became law – was to give consideration in the bailout bill to institutions with less than $1 billion in assets that served low, moderate or underserved communities – and lost capital due to losing investments in mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

OneUnited fit that category. It's not clear how many others banks also would have benefited.

Waters has been pressing for a trial and has vigorously protested the charges. She did so again Friday.

"The (ethics) committee's decision to cancel the hearing and put it off indefinitely demonstrates that the committee does not have a strong case and would not be able to prove any violation has occurred," she said in a statement.

Waters faces three charges: violating a rule requiring lawmakers' conduct to reflect creditably on the House; violating the spirit and letter of a rule prohibiting receipt of benefits by exerting improper influence; and violating a government code of conduct that prohibits dispensing or receiving special favors.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #121 on: November 24, 2010, 09:51:21 AM »
Former Obama campaign advisor arrested for soliciting sex from minor

By Eric W. Dolan
Wednesday, November 24th, 2010 -- 10:39 am


________________________ ________________________ _______________


Rep. Steve Rothman (D-NJ) fired his chief of staff Robert Decheine Tuesday after his arrest last week on a charge of soliciting sex from a minor.

Forty-eight-year old Decheine, who was a senior adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign in 2008, was arrested in Gaithersburg, Maryland last Friday during a police sting.


He was released after posting a $15,000 bond.

The Gaithersburg Police Department said it caught eleven people in a sting targeting people interested in sex with minors.

All eleven suspects were charged with a felony count of sexual solicitation of a minor and face ten years in prison or a fine of $25,000 if convicted.

The Gaithersburg police placed ads on a website while an undercover officer communicated through phone and text messages with "johns" who responded to the ad.

"During the communication, an exchange of services or expectations was made," a police news release said.

"Congressman Rothman considers this alleged criminal act to be shocking, appalling and indefensible," Aaron Keyak, a spokesman for Rep. Rothman, said. "As a parent, he understands the vital importance of protecting our children from predators."

Rothman said his staff will cooperate with investigators.

Decheine ran Rothman's Washington and New Jersey offices since 2003. He also advised Rothman during his election campaign.

Decheine had previously worked for Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), according to The Record newspaper.

Decheine told the newspaper he had no comment.


 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   
 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #122 on: November 24, 2010, 10:02:35 AM »
BUSTED: Congressman Caught On Video Reading Playboy On An Airplane (Conyers)
The Business Insider ^ | 11/24/10 | Joe Weisenthal |




Not that there's anything wrong with it, but some mild embarrassment for Michigan Rep. John Conyers, who was secretly caught reading Playboy on a plane. (Video via Detroit News and Sal Armuk)






(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #123 on: December 04, 2010, 06:54:21 AM »
House censures Rangel
December 02, 2010|By the CNN Wire Staff

Rep. Charlie Rangel has asked supporters to urge lawmakers to oppose the censure resolution.
The House of Representatives censured veteran New York Rep. Charlie Rangel on Thursday -- a stunning downfall for a man once considered one of the most powerful members of Congress.

The 333-79 vote required Rangel to stand in the well of the House as a formal censure resolution was read aloud by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California.

The House ethics committee recently recently found the 20-term Harlem Democrat guilty on 11 counts of violating House rules, including failing to pay taxes on a vacation home in the Dominican Republic and improperly using his office to raise money for an educational center bearing his name.

On November 18, the committee voted 9-1 to recommend that the House censure Rangel and that he pay restitution for any unpaid taxes. The committee's rules require that its report be presented to the House for a vote.

"It is painful to sit in judgment of our colleague" but the punishment is appropriate, said California Rep. Zoe Lofgren, the Democratic head of the ethics committee.

"While I feel for [Rangel] as a human being, I feel more strongly that a public office is a public trust," said Texas GOP Michael McCaul, also a member of the ethics committee.

Addressing the House, Rangel admitted he had made "serious mistakes," but asked for a lighter penalty than censure, which is the most serious punishment the House can impose short of expulsion.

"I brought it on myself, but I still believe that this body has to be guided by fairness," he said. "Nobody has ever suffered the humiliation of a censure when the record is abundantly clear [that there is] no evidence at all of corruption."

Rangel, a former chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, insisted he never used his office for "self-enrichment."

After being censured, Rangel ripped the decision to impose censure as a "very, very, very political vote." But "at long last this two-year nightmare is over," he said.

Several congressmen publicly backed Rangel's assertion that the censure penalty was too severe.

"Charlie Rangel is a friend and colleague. We disagree on virtually every issue," New York GOP Rep. Peter King said shortly before the vote. But I've never heard "anyone question Charlie's integrity" or seen him treat anyone with disrespect.

There is no proof of activity involving "moral turpitude" or "criminal intent," said Rep. John Tanner, D-Tennessee.

Rangel, a senior member of the Congressional Black Caucus, became the twenty-third House member in history to be censured. Nine others have been reprimanded.

The last House members to be censured prior to Rangel were Reps. Gerry Studds, D-Massachusetts, and Daniel Crane, R-Illinois, in 1983. Both men were found guilty of sexual misconduct with House pages.

http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-02/politics/rangel.vote_1_censure-harlem-democrat-house-members?_s=PM:POLITICS

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63786
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft (and other Democrat Misdeeds)
« Reply #124 on: December 04, 2010, 06:56:02 AM »
4 relatives of Edwards donor visit NC grand jury
(AP) – 17 hours ago

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Relatives of a wealthy donor who gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to former presidential candidate John Edwards were subpoenaed to appear Friday before a federal grand jury investigating his campaign finances.
Alexander Forger, the New York-based attorney for Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, told The Associated Press that Mellon's son, two grandsons and one of the grandson's wives were at the federal courthouse in Raleigh. Forger did not know whether they had actually testified. Mellon, who turned 100 in August, was not there.

Grand jurors have been looking into Edwards' campaign finances for more than a year. The former Democratic senator ran for president in 2004 and 2008.

Earlier this year, former aide Andrew Young claimed in a tell-all book that he and Edwards agreed in 2007 to ask Mellon for money and use it to keep Edwards mistress Rielle Hunter happy so she would not go public with their relationship. Forger has said Mellon made a personal gift, filed proper tax paperwork and had no idea how the money would be used.

Hunter gave birth to a child that Edwards later acknowledged he had fathered. Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, have since separated.

Young has said he helped take care of Hunter near the end of Edwards' 2008 presidential campaign and for months afterward. He said he received hundreds of thousands of dollars in support from Mellon, a philanthropist and widow of banking heir Paul Mellon, and from Edwards campaign finance manager Fred Baron, who died last year.

Through the corporate entity that holds her assets, Bunny Mellon gave at least $495,000 to a labor-backed campaign group that ran ads for Edwards' campaign. She also gave to the Edwards campaign directly.

Forger said Friday he didn't think testimony by her relatives would be useful to prosecutors.

Forger said he believes "they know nothing about the Edwards campaign. They only know that their mother and grandmother was supporting him, as was the entire local community."

Mellon lives in northern Virginia and has been interviewed twice there by federal prosecutors and agents, according to Forger.

Edwards has said previously he is confident no campaign funds were used improperly.

Forger said the subpoenas were issued to Mellon's son, Stacy Lloyd III; his two sons, Stacy Lloyd IV and Thomas Lloyd; and Rickie Lloyd, Thomas Lloyd's wife.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gQFIQ3XQ5MWsVTreZgGudFxkBqrQ?docId=085af303c33047a0a74e3a38c9995747