I was checking if wikipedia included ngo-funded replacement immigration in its invasion definition when I saw their leftist inclusion of the word "nativism"(see below).
Why wouldn't the native people want to promote their own interests over immigrants?? If you look at the wikipedia definition below of "immigrant invasion" and "nativism", the word "nativism" should stand out as a weapon to be used against the native people of a country.
By creating the word "nativism", they invented a term for people who are interested in their own country's interests over other country's interests. Like "famism", a made up term for this example, they'd use for people who care about their own family's well being more than a neighbor's family. With an opposition word like "nativism", they can better fight against it. Caring for your own family is normal, something that "just is", so they would make prioritizing your family's interests above other family's seem like a choice among many by creating an opposition word to counter "family". Similarly, the word "cis", "a person whose gender identity is the same as their sex assigned at birth", is a real opposition word created to promote the idea that the sexes 'male' and 'female' were not something normal that "just is", but rather a choice. "Cis" would then be only one among an infinite number of "gender identities", another term used to oppose the normalcy of being born male or female. Words like "nativism" and "cis" should seen for what they are and vehemently rejected.
Immigrant invasion—or similar phrases that imply that "immigrants are invading the homeland", is a rhetoric that is used by those who favor nativist politics.
Nativism is the political policy of promoting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants, including the support of immigration-restriction measures.
Rhetoric: language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.
