Author Topic: Justice Neil Gorsuch Blows Up Department of Injustice’s Case Against J6 Proteste  (Read 180 times)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59704
  • It’s All Bullshit
AUDIO: Justice Neil Gorsuch Blows Up Department of Injustice’s Case Against J6 Protesters While Dunking on Biden Solicitor General During Questioning


The United States Supreme Court is holding arguments in Fischer v. US, a case that could reduce criminal charges filed against more than 350 Trump supporters who participated in the US Capitol protest on January 6, 2021.

The Department of Injustice (DOJ) is using a statute called “obstructed a Congressional proceeding” to prosecute hundreds of these protesters simply for exercising their First Amendment rights. This statute is a serious felony with the potential of 20 years behind bars.

CNN notes that this case also has implications for President Donald Trump, who was charged by corrupt special counsel Jack Smith for exercising his First Amendment rights on that fateful day.

Justice Neil Gorsuch stole the show this morning by blowing up the foundation of the DOJ’s case against the nonviolent J6 protesters. While the Trump supporters simply exercised their freedom of speech, there were leftist individuals who committed actual felonies that the Biden regime gave a complete pass to.

Gorsuch threw out several meaningful real-life incidents involving these left-wing figures, including the unlawful sit-ins during a trial (which occurred during the Brett Kavanaugh hearing in 2018), Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pulling a fire alarm to prevent a critical vote to keep the government open, hecklers during the State of the Union, and so-called “mostly peaceful” protests (BLM riots).

As Central Banks Stockpile Gold, a Christian Company Works To Help Americans Get Ahead of the “Retirement Bubble”

Gorsuch asked Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar whether those actions would qualify for 20 years in prison. Prelogar tried to spin her out of the questioning. She claimed that the DOJ would need to prove “corrupt intent” and whether these incidents qualified as a “meaningful” disruption of the proceedings.

Of course, all of these incidents recounted by Gorsuch met those qualifications, meaning the leftists, including Bowman, should have received years in prison. But Prelogar could not really answer Gorsuch’s queries unless she wanted to admit defeat.

Gorsuch was having none of Prelogar’s nonsensical spinning and pushed back. “We went around that tree yesterday,” he told her.

He then pinpointed the most asinine part of her statement. “So a mostly peaceful protest that disrupts an official proceeding for an indefinite period would not be covered?”

Prelogar responded by trying to bring up the BS “intent” excuse again before Gorsuch finally shut her down.

Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who participated in the J6 protests, is the person who brought the case to the Supreme Court. His lawyers point out Fischer spent less than four minutes inside the building and advanced fewer than 25 feet.

DOJ prosecutors argue differently, though. They claim Fischer warned his police chief that things might get violent, and he texted that protesters should drag Democrats “into the street and have a mob trial.”

A grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against Fischer in March 2021, just two months after the attack. The indictment included charges of civil disorder, assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers, as well as the obstruction charge. He faces at least 20 years in prison.

The case before the Supreme Court involves only that last charge as CNN notes.

The Gateway Pundit has extensively reported on the suffering of J6 protesters under the Biden regime. In addition to outrageous sentencing, some were assaulted by Capitol Police officers, denied medical care, and have been beaten in prison.

A ruling favoring Fischer could help right the injustices many have suffered, but the scars will remain permanent.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/audio-justice-neil-gorsuch-blows-up-department-injustices/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=audio-justice-neil-gorsuch-blows-up-department-injustices&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0BMQABpktI10ZkPYCm2HnxkQEEllBTVOvyKaOTIWFAKDDzwYu5yzWlgOClB8Akyw_aem_ASkUQegVU-zNWg9xrkLu44DMMEuTRuEeNo0RMUrJogFPlAMmJowbl7p5lflMQ9hLRAU


LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31119
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Gateway   :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Gym Rat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11954
  • Libturdz Love The Caulk
Story is on all news sites, even libturd ones, though they word things differently than the Flameway Pundit..

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59704
  • It’s All Bullshit
Justice Clarence Thomas Grills DOJ Lawyer on January 6 ‘Obstruction’ Statute That Could Torpedo Jack Smith’s DC Case Against Trump (AUDIO)

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday heard oral arguments in Fischer v. United States and at issue is statute 18 USC §1512(c)(2):

Whoever corruptly—

(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Critical Medications Every American Can Have On Hand (Including Ivermectin) – And How To Get Them Prescribed

The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on Fischer v United States this summer which means hundreds of J6 cases could be upended.

Biden’s corrupt DOJ has charged more than 300 J6ers with 18 USC §1512(c)(2). Additionally, two of the four charges against Trump in Jack Smith’s DC case are conspiracy to obstruct so the Supreme Court’s ruling could torpedo the special counsel’s case against Trump as well.

Justice Clarence Thomas grilled DOJ Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar as she droned on and on about how the government is fairly using the §1512(c)(2) statute to prosecute hundreds of J6 defendants for merely walking through the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Justice Thomas pointed out that there have been many violent protests that have interfered with proceedings (Kavanaugh hearings).

“There have been many violent protests that have interfered with proceedings. Has the government applied this provision to other protests in the past and has this been the government’s position throughout the lifespan of the statute?” Justice Thomas asked the DOJ lawyer.

Justice Thomas asked Prelogar if the government had ever used this provision for other protestors.

Prelogar broke her back trying to explain to the Supreme Court why leftist protestors weren’t prosecuted as January 6 defendants were.

Special Counsel Jack Smith suggested he will ignore the Supreme Court if it reverses the obstruction statute this summer.

Jack Smith suggested he will find a workaround if the Supreme Court reverses two of the charges against Trump.

Smith claims the ‘obstruction’ charges will still stand against Trump because the alternative electoral certificates represent “documents” that were fraudulently used in an “official proceeding.”

These papers weren’t even sent or signed by Trump!

Jack Smith isn’t the only one who is threatening to circumvent the Supreme Court.

Last month US Attorney from DC Matthew Graves fired a warning shot to the US Supreme Court – and J6ers serving time for 18 USC §1512(c)(2), the ‘obstruction’ statute pending before SCOTUS.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/clarence-thomas-grills-doj-lawyer-january-6-obstruction/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=clarence-thomas-grills-doj-lawyer-january-6-obstruction&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0BMQABprMP31KfkDtp-FyvY0NWGk3ZvhJmAMktG5eff9pM-oRuGU0fLJ8lSNXn_w_aem_ASmz1g-vz4FbBv0YS5Y3GOiWbtLjQPTwliIuIitNd5XcWlr9pCDP25j4Joh7u_pnd-k




Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59704
  • It’s All Bullshit
Story is on all news sites, even libturd ones, though they word things differently than the Flameway Pundit..

I guess he missed the word “Audio” from the proceeding itself

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31119
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Story is on all news sites, even libturd ones, though they word things differently than the Flameway Pundit..

I am sure they do.

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
  • a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden
AUDIO: Justice Neil Gorsuch Blows Up Department of Injustice’s Case Against J6 Protesters While Dunking on Biden Solicitor General During Questioning


The United States Supreme Court is holding arguments in Fischer v. US, a case that could reduce criminal charges filed against more than 350 Trump supporters who participated in the US Capitol protest on January 6, 2021.

The Department of Injustice (DOJ) is using a statute called “obstructed a Congressional proceeding” to prosecute hundreds of these protesters simply for exercising their First Amendment rights. This statute is a serious felony with the potential of 20 years behind bars.

CNN notes that this case also has implications for President Donald Trump, who was charged by corrupt special counsel Jack Smith for exercising his First Amendment rights on that fateful day.

Justice Neil Gorsuch stole the show this morning by blowing up the foundation of the DOJ’s case against the nonviolent J6 protesters. While the Trump supporters simply exercised their freedom of speech, there were leftist individuals who committed actual felonies that the Biden regime gave a complete pass to.

Gorsuch threw out several meaningful real-life incidents involving these left-wing figures, including the unlawful sit-ins during a trial (which occurred during the Brett Kavanaugh hearing in 2018), Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pulling a fire alarm to prevent a critical vote to keep the government open, hecklers during the State of the Union, and so-called “mostly peaceful” protests (BLM riots).

As Central Banks Stockpile Gold, a Christian Company Works To Help Americans Get Ahead of the “Retirement Bubble”

Gorsuch asked Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar whether those actions would qualify for 20 years in prison. Prelogar tried to spin her out of the questioning. She claimed that the DOJ would need to prove “corrupt intent” and whether these incidents qualified as a “meaningful” disruption of the proceedings.

Of course, all of these incidents recounted by Gorsuch met those qualifications, meaning the leftists, including Bowman, should have received years in prison. But Prelogar could not really answer Gorsuch’s queries unless she wanted to admit defeat.

Gorsuch was having none of Prelogar’s nonsensical spinning and pushed back. “We went around that tree yesterday,” he told her.

He then pinpointed the most asinine part of her statement. “So a mostly peaceful protest that disrupts an official proceeding for an indefinite period would not be covered?”

Prelogar responded by trying to bring up the BS “intent” excuse again before Gorsuch finally shut her down.

Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who participated in the J6 protests, is the person who brought the case to the Supreme Court. His lawyers point out Fischer spent less than four minutes inside the building and advanced fewer than 25 feet.

DOJ prosecutors argue differently, though. They claim Fischer warned his police chief that things might get violent, and he texted that protesters should drag Democrats “into the street and have a mob trial.”

A grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against Fischer in March 2021, just two months after the attack. The indictment included charges of civil disorder, assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers, as well as the obstruction charge. He faces at least 20 years in prison.

The case before the Supreme Court involves only that last charge as CNN notes.

The Gateway Pundit has extensively reported on the suffering of J6 protesters under the Biden regime. In addition to outrageous sentencing, some were assaulted by Capitol Police officers, denied medical care, and have been beaten in prison.

A ruling favoring Fischer could help right the injustices many have suffered, but the scars will remain permanent.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/audio-justice-neil-gorsuch-blows-up-department-injustices/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=audio-justice-neil-gorsuch-blows-up-department-injustices&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0BMQABpktI10ZkPYCm2HnxkQEEllBTVOvyKaOTIWFAKDDzwYu5yzWlgOClB8Akyw_aem_ASkUQegVU-zNWg9xrkLu44DMMEuTRuEeNo0RMUrJogFPlAMmJowbl7p5lflMQ9hLRAU

Gorsuch drills deeper than an oil rig.  ;D