Author Topic: Bad genetics!! why??  (Read 3771 times)

aliamini

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1239
  • I'm that damn good
Bad genetics!! why??
« on: February 25, 2006, 02:35:10 AM »
A lot of people think Dorian had bad genetics … in probodybuildingweekly he said “I didn’t say I had bad genetics, I think I had pretty good genetics more muscular and less body fat than others … people say I had bad genetics”

Why people think he had bad genetics??



aliamini

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1239
  • I'm that damn good
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2006, 02:36:40 AM »
 :o



Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2006, 02:52:56 AM »

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2006, 04:26:26 AM »
Well he didn't. End of story.
Z

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2006, 06:33:33 AM »
A Mr. Olympia with good calves that are real?  I don't get it.
N

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2006, 06:57:53 AM »
who says he has bad genetics i have never heard that

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2006, 07:23:53 AM »
a lot of times big calves mean shitty thighs

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2006, 07:44:04 AM »
the only thing lacking on Dorian were his arms, very small compared to everything else, his chest could have been bigger as well.
Jaejonna rows 125!!

JamesD

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 229
  • Getbig!
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2006, 08:25:54 AM »
But there's a difference:


He HAD good genetics for building muscle, no doubt..

He did NOT have good genetics for shape, symmetry, aesthetics (ala Flex, Ray, etc).


aliamini

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1239
  • I'm that damn good
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2006, 07:44:00 AM »
But there's a difference:
He HAD good genetics for building muscle, no doubt..
He did NOT have good genetics for shape, symmetry, aesthetics (ala Flex, Ray, etc).

than why they never won

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2006, 07:45:42 AM »
than why they never won

I think they could have won if they had entered natural shows instead.

But then again, they weren't soulless cheaters.

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: Bad genetics!! why??
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2006, 07:50:44 AM »
I think they could have won if they had entered natural shows instead.
But then again, they weren't soulless cheaters.

Or they realised there is no money of fame in natural comps!