Author Topic: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.  (Read 77608 times)

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #126 on: March 01, 2022, 12:46:31 PM »
  The History of the Olympic Barbell
   by Conor Heffernan
FEBRUARY 12, 2018
FILED UNDER:
RESOURCES
Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 13.41.28.png
A friend of mine recently made a very serious and from my perspective funny discovery. Having spent months training in a University gym replete with shiny new barbells, he decided to join me in my own gym for a catch up and quick training session. Ever the opportunist, he decided it was ‘Chest Day’ and first up was the Bench Press.

Engaging in some light hearted, at least he thought it was light hearted, joking we began loading up the plates. As his outbursts began to reach a crescendo, I made my way to the water fountain for some peace of mind. Hearing a squeal I turned around to see my friend pinned under the bar at a weight he assured me was ‘nothing.’ Thankfully his pride was the only thing injured and next time round he had me spotting him. The result? Still nothing.


Despite getting angrier and angrier my friend couldn’t move the weight. A weight he’d worked on for weeks in his own gym. A few days later he realised what had happened. His swanky new gym…well the barbells there weighed 15kg, the bar we were using was 25kg before adding weight. Now the point of this story is not to deter you from training with friends, which admittedly is always hit or miss, but rather to reinforce the importance of standardised weights.

This was a problem facing Olympic weightlifters in the early twentieth-century.

Olympic Weightlifting

Previously on this site, we’ve discussed the earlier iterations of Olympic weightlifting. In 1896, lifters contented themselves with dumbbells, the same was true in 1904. Similarly while a weightlifting competition emerged in London in the early 1890s, it wasn’t until the 1920s that we began to see lifts that were truly recognisable to what is performed today.

In the 1920, Games, which took place in Antwerp, Belgium, competitors were assessed in both one hand and two handed lifts. The latter being a two handed clean and jerk. The following games in 1924 saw the addition of a two handed snatch and a two handed press. Incidentally if anyone is interested in the history of the military press at the Olympics, John Fair’s article on the subject is just a joy to read.

This move towards two handed lifts was accompanied by the growing importance of weight lifting amongst the general populace. The 1920 games saw weightlifting as an Olympic event in its own right and with fourteen nations competing, the future seemed bright.

 

There was one small issue to contend with. Like my earnest friend discussed earlier, lifters across the globe were training with different barbells and prior to that dumbbells. It was proving difficult to train ‘in match conditions’ as it were as the standardised Olympic Barbell was proving hard to find, imitate and use. It’s at this point that our story really begins.

Enter the Olympic Barbell

Borrowing heavily from Jan Todd’s article on the subject, this website has examined the history of the barbell more generally but without delving into great detail. Having spent the better part of the day exploring the Olympic barbell, it’s possible to get a little more from the story at my own expense.

Previously I tracked the history of the Olympic Barbell to 1920s Germany but in light of more research it seems we can go back a little further. The late Mark Koyda’s thesis on weightlifting (I’d love to provide a link but I’m afraid it’s behind a paywall) had this to say about the Olympic Barbell’s origins

In 1908, German Franz Veltum produced a disc barbell. The prototypical “Olympic” revolving barbell with bearings was designed by Veltum and produced by the Berg company in 1910

Other sources link the Berg company’s production to the 1920s. For reasons which we will go into, I believe Koyda’s assertion was correct.

Similar to Elieko, the Berg company did not begin as a weightlifting manufacturer. The company was created in 1860 as an iron foundry and specialized with parts for bridge construction, iron constructions and the production of stable mechanisms. It was Wilhelm Berg who shifted the company’s focus towards sporting devices in the early twentieth-century, a decision that later earned him the title of ‘Father of the German Sports Industry’ (this information comes from the excellent Ironhistory website – if you’re not a member yet get over there!).

Soon after the Berg company began producing their barbell others took notice. A recent search through Alan Calvert’s Strength magazine from 1916 revealed Olympic barbells one the right hand side of the photograph. It is for this reason Koyda’s work seems closest to the truth.

 

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 13.40.20.png
 

In 1928, Kaspar Berg introduced a new model barbell which caught the eyes of the weightlifting world primarily because of the ease with which they rotated during the lift. These bars were selected for the 1928 Olympic games in Amsterdam.   After the games, the barbells both in terms of their weight and size were then copied by the likes of York Barbell Company, the Jackson Bar- bell Company, and nearly all other twentieth-century manufacturers.

Returning to the Ironhistory website, which I really cannot praise enough, it is possible to gain some insight into what the early barbell looked like – albeit in a crude drawing

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 13.36.48.png
 

For actual images we can turn our attention to the excellent pictorial history of the 1924 and 1928 Olympics created by Frank Rothwell


 

The Berg barbell and its imitators were found in gyms around the world, only displaced in the 1960s and 1970s when the Eleiko barbell came to the fore. The history of which is available here.

As always… Happy Lifting!

 V
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #127 on: March 02, 2022, 09:19:45 AM »
 
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #128 on: March 02, 2022, 02:59:07 PM »
&t=9s
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #129 on: March 02, 2022, 03:24:39 PM »
   
&t=208s
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #130 on: March 03, 2022, 08:58:04 AM »
   
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #131 on: March 03, 2022, 12:32:17 PM »
 
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #133 on: March 04, 2022, 03:25:35 PM »
 
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #134 on: March 06, 2022, 05:35:05 AM »
 ;D
F


funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #136 on: March 06, 2022, 01:15:28 PM »
   
&t=59s   
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #137 on: March 07, 2022, 09:38:40 AM »
   
   
F

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20920
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #138 on: March 07, 2022, 04:51:06 PM »
Looks like Ronnie is in need of Some oil in his Arms .

Good to see him lifting & Enjoying himself - Man is always smiling & Happy 👍🏻

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #139 on: March 08, 2022, 05:14:54 AM »
   
&t=6s 
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #140 on: March 08, 2022, 06:04:13 AM »
 
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #141 on: March 09, 2022, 09:24:50 AM »
 
&t=308s
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #142 on: March 09, 2022, 09:44:26 AM »
   
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #143 on: March 09, 2022, 10:05:11 AM »
  Stronger Muscles in 3 Seconds a Day
Men and women who briefly contracted their arm muscles as hard as possible once daily increased their biceps strength by up to 12 percent in a month.

 Credit...Getty Images

Gretchen Reynolds
By Gretchen Reynolds

March 2, 2022
 
Could three seconds a day of resistance exercise really increase muscular strength?

That question was at the heart of a small-scale new study of almost comically brief weight training. In the study, men and women who contracted their arm muscles as hard as possible for a total of three seconds a day increased their biceps strength by as much as 12 percent after a month.

The findings add to mounting evidence that even tiny amounts of exercise — provided they are intense enough — can aid health. I have written about the unique ways in which our muscles, hearts, lungs and other body parts respond to four seconds of strenuous biking, for instance, or 10 seconds of all-out sprinting, and how such super-short workouts can trigger the biological responses that lead to better fitness.

But almost all of this research focused on aerobic exercise and usually involved interval training, a workout in which spurts of hard, fast exertion are repeated and interspersed with rest. Far less research has delved into super-brief weight training or whether a single, eyeblink-length session of intense resistance exercise might build strength or just waste valuable seconds of our lives.

So, for the new study, which was published in February in the Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, scientists led by Masatoshi Nakamura at the Niigata University of Health and Welfare in Niigata, Japan, asked 39 sedentary but otherwise healthy college students to do three seconds of weight training every day. They also recruited an additional 10 students who would not work out to serve as a control group. The exercising volunteers gathered during the workweek at the lab for strength testing and weight lifting, of a kind. They sat at a machine called an isokinetic dynamometer, which has a long lever arm that can be pushed and pulled, up or down, with varying levels of resistance, allowing researchers to precisely control people’s movements and effort.

The volunteers manipulated the weighted lever with all their strength, straining and contracting their biceps to the fullest possible extent. Some of the participants slowly lifted the lever’s weight, like curling a dumbbell, producing what is called a concentric contraction, meaning the biceps shortened as they worked. Other volunteers slowly lowered the lever, creating a so-called eccentric contraction. You get an eccentric contraction when you lengthen a muscle, like lowering a dumbbell during a curl, and it tends to be more draining. A third group of volunteers held the lever’s weight steady in midair, fighting gravity, in a type of contraction where the muscle doesn’t change length at all.

And each of the participants did their biceps exercise for a total of three seconds.

That was it; that was their entire daily workout. They repeated this exceedingly brief exercise routine once a day, five times a week, for a month, for a grand total of 60 seconds of weight training. They did not otherwise exercise.

At the end of the month, the researchers retested everyone’s arm strength.

Those three-second sessions had changed people’s biceps. The groups either lifting or holding the weights were between 6 and 7 percent stronger. But those doing eccentric contractions, lowering the lever downward as you might ease a dumbbell away from your shoulder, showed substantially greater gains. Their biceps muscles were nearly 12 percent stronger overall.

These improvements may sound slight, but they would be biologically meaningful, especially for people new to weight training, said Ken Nosaka, a professor of exercise and sports science at Edith Cowan University in Joondalup, Australia, who collaborated on the study. “Many people do not do any resistance training,” and starting with very short workouts may be an effective way for them to begin a strength training regimen, Dr. Nosaka said. “Every muscle contraction counts” and contributes to building strength, assuming you lift a weight near the maximum you can handle and it lasts at least three seconds, he said.

 
The exercise routine is easy enough to recreate at home, Dr. Nosaka said, no dynamometer needed. Just find a dumbbell that feels heavy — you might start with a 10-pound version, for instance, if you are new to weight training. “Lift it with both hands,” Dr. Nosaka said, to start a biceps curl, then “lower it with one hand” through a count of three seconds to complete a short, sharp and draining eccentric contraction.
This approach, though, has some obvious limitations. While the volunteers in the study got stronger, they did not add muscle mass. “Strength is only one outcome” of resistance exercise, said Jonathan Little, a professor of health and exercise science at the University of British Columbia in Kelowna, who has studied brief workouts but was not involved with this experiment. More traditional weight training typically also bulks up muscles, which has additional benefits for metabolism and other aspects of health and wellness over the long term.

The study also looked only at people’s biceps. Whether other muscles, especially in the legs, would strengthen after a few intense seconds of “lifting” is uncertain. More broadly, framing exercise as something that should be dispensed with as quickly as possible could make workouts seem like just another chore and maybe easier to skip.

Dr. Nosaka said he and his colleagues plan to study whether repeating three-second contractions multiple times throughout the day increases muscle mass, as well as strength. They are also exploring how to translate this approach to the legs and other muscles.

In the meantime, he said, we should probably think of three seconds of daily strength training as the least we can do. “It is definitely better,” he said, “to do one contraction a day than nothing.”

 
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #144 on: March 09, 2022, 10:36:33 AM »
     
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #145 on: March 09, 2022, 10:37:47 AM »
   
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #146 on: March 09, 2022, 11:50:13 AM »
F

GymnJuice

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5246
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #147 on: March 09, 2022, 03:11:20 PM »
 
&t=308s

Is the water fountain still broken?  :D

The machine at 7 min, we have a similar one but the resting position is at 12 oclock instead of 6 oclock so you bring your arms downward against the resistance. I assume it's for lats? I don't use it.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #148 on: March 10, 2022, 01:10:10 PM »
   
   
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40034
  • Getbig!
Re: odds and ends [bodybuilding related.
« Reply #149 on: March 11, 2022, 04:20:19 AM »
 
   
   
F