Dude, it's a monkey fossil okay. I couldn't give a rip about the technical differences between a chimp, gorilla, monkey, ape, etc. Bottom line is it ain't a transitional fossil. I don't need to know anything about molecular genetics to understand the absence of transitional fossils. I'm in VERY good company when it comes to those who either don't believe in the evolution of species, or have significant questions about Darwin's theory.
Do you even know the difference between a "monkey" and an "ape"?
If you don't care about the "differences between a chimp, Gorilla or monkey" how can you make absurd claims about the fossils themselves?
It's like saying "Ok, That aint no Chevy! I don't know a damn thing about trucks or even what a Chevy looks like but that aint no Chevy!"
Ok,Ok...Let me get this straight...
- You don't know what the skull of a "Chimp" looks like.
- You don't know what the skull of a "Gorilla" looks like.
- You claim Chimp and Gorilla skulls look alike.
- Then you claim the Neanderthal skull is a chimp or gorilla skull despite them looking nothing alike.
Did your mommy drop you when you were a baby?