Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: ieffinhatecardio on November 27, 2006, 03:51:06 PM

Title: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on November 27, 2006, 03:51:06 PM
Apparently this redneck singer Troy Lee Gentry killed a bear in an enclosed 3 acre preserve and then lied about it saying it was killed in the wild. He even had the kill videotaped.

What the hell is the point of killing a bear that is caged in by an electric fence? How is that fun? This moron is the perfect example of how I just don't understand hunting for sport. It makes no sense to me.

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20061127/D8LLMG0G1.html (http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20061127/D8LLMG0G1.html)
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: OzmO on November 27, 2006, 04:49:41 PM
I've never understood why it's impressive to kill anything with a gun.

You always hear about how this guy shot an elk, or a bear or what ever.

 I'm not knocking hunters, but it would be far more impressive to kill a bear with a knife or something.

Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Always Sore on November 27, 2006, 04:55:32 PM
Its much more fun to stalk humans...:)

Really I only support hunters that are taking down the deer population for food for there familys. Hunting should never be a sport unless you arm the opponents.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 27, 2006, 05:25:13 PM
My grandpa killed several Bengal tigers in 70's. That was real hunting where you actually stalk and track the animal. Hunting as done by those stupidass rednecks is a fucking joke where they set the animal up to get killed.  ::)

Bears aren't huge in numbers, so this guy should be thrown into prison.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on November 27, 2006, 05:26:49 PM
This bear was in a 3 acre enclosure with an electrified fence running around the property. The bear was caged in, how is that hunting? This redneck might as well throw some fish into a 5 gallon bucket and drop a fishing line into the bucket and call that fishing.  ::)

Stooges with guns is never a good thing.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: gtbro1 on November 27, 2006, 05:39:46 PM


 , but it would be far more impressive to kill a bear with a knife or something.



hahahaha yes it would.  :D  If you can jump on a bear and kill it with a knife you are a bad dude. I agree with the fact that hunting for anything other than food is uncalled for.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 27, 2006, 05:44:23 PM
f**k a knife. How about that redneck try to tackle that bear with his own hands? Didn't the article say he killed the bear with a bow n arrow?
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Dos Equis on November 27, 2006, 06:05:44 PM
I've never understood why it's impressive to kill anything with a gun.

You always hear about how this guy shot an elk, or a bear or what ever.

 I'm not knocking hunters, but it would be far more impressive to kill a bear with a knife or something.



I agree.  How about this:  one of my former coworkers goes duck hunting in Canada.  He uses a mechanical duck that swims and quacks in the water to lure ducks from the air.  Like shooting fish in a barrel IMO. 
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: gordiano on November 27, 2006, 09:50:43 PM
I've never understood why it's impressive to kill anything with a gun.

You always hear about how this guy shot an elk, or a bear or what ever.

 I'm not knocking hunters, but it would be far more impressive to kill a bear with a knife or something.



No shit..............it's not like the animals had a gun to shoot back........then it would be interesting.........fuck ing hillbillies.....
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Bigger Business on November 27, 2006, 10:06:16 PM
as gay as hunting
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Eyeball Chambers on November 27, 2006, 11:52:40 PM
Gayer than an over night Hunting trip with Derek Anthony and True Adonis.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: onlyme on November 28, 2006, 12:39:13 AM
I have never agreed with hunting.  I have no respect for anyone who hunts and does it with a gun or even a bow.  Most of these guys hide in trees, or dig themselves a hole and hide.  They shoot from a 100 years or more away sometimes.  What kind of skill does it take.  Some of these guys even use tripods and laser sightings.  Be a fucking man and take on the animal one on one with your bare hands.  You are a chicken killing an animal with a gun.  Weak people do that.  Gives them the illusion they have power.  When in reality they have nothing without the gun.  Go ahead go hunt like they did back in the stone age.  Do it with your hands or make a spear.  That is hunting.  That would make you a real man.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: gordiano on November 28, 2006, 12:41:22 AM
I have never agreed with hunting.  I have no respect for anyone who hunts and does it with a gun or even a bow.  Most of these guys hide in trees, or dig themselves a hole and hide.  They shoot from a 100 years or more away sometimes.  What kind of skill does it take.  Some of these guys even use tripods and laser sightings.  Be a fucking man and take on the animal one on one with your bare hands.  You are a chicken killing an animal with a gun.  Weak people do that.  Gives them the illusion they have power.  When in reality they have nothing without the gun.  Go ahead go hunt like they did back in the stone age.  Do it with your hands or make a spear.  That is hunting.  That would make you a real man.

Exactly.


Take no balls to kill an animal with a weapon.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Nordic Superman on November 28, 2006, 01:13:58 AM
I have never agreed with hunting.  I have no respect for anyone who hunts and does it with a gun or even a bow.  Most of these guys hide in trees, or dig themselves a hole and hide.  They shoot from a 100 years or more away sometimes.  What kind of skill does it take.  Some of these guys even use tripods and laser sightings.  Be a fucking man and take on the animal one on one with your bare hands.  You are a chicken killing an animal with a gun.  Weak people do that.  Gives them the illusion they have power.  When in reality they have nothing without the gun.  Go ahead go hunt like they did back in the stone age.  Do it with your hands or make a spear.  That is hunting.  That would make you a real man.

I take it by 100 years you mean 100 light years?

That's a 5.87849981 × 1014 mile distance! DAMN IMPRESSIVE IF YOU ASK ME! :o
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: mightymouse72 on November 28, 2006, 05:56:17 AM
as much as you guys don't understand hunting; it's the same as a hunter not understanding bodybuilding.  to call them names is childish.
to each his own.  hunting is necessary however. 
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Bigger Business on November 28, 2006, 06:01:35 AM
as much as you guys don't understand hunting; it's the same as a hunter not understanding bodybuilding.  to call them names is childish.
to each his own.  hunting is necessary however. 


oh dear
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 06:26:37 AM
as much as you guys don't understand hunting; it's the same as a hunter not understanding bodybuilding.  to call them names is childish.
to each his own.  hunting is necessary however. 



Hunting is "necessary" if you need food or are using every part of the animal to make things. Ninety percent of "hunters" do not. I have no problem if a hunter eats the animal he kills and is not just shooting it for a trophy.I say that with the impression the animal thast is being hunted has sufficient numbers to sustain itself in the wild.Retards hunt animals, shoot them and then hang them on there wall. Wow, how impowering ::) What are you talking about anyway? This thread is about a guy who set up a captive bear and shot it. He did it for fun. You are ob an idiot.



Ps, hunting animals with low population numbers for sport is gay. Cowards
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: buffbodz on November 28, 2006, 07:17:38 AM
Their is an island off the coast of my state called Prudence Island.  Deer must be hunted or the whole herd would starve.  They have strict limits and I know a few hunters who go, but bring back the deer for food.  I understand how this is necessary, but hunting just isn't my thing.  It's done mostly with bows and the thought of blood tracking a wounded, crying animal isn't my idea of a sport. 

What they should do with that red nick singer is put the bastard in a electric fenced in area with hungry bears and see how he feels as the hunted one, with no escape.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 07:39:32 AM
Their is an island off the coast of my state called Prudence Island.  Deer must be hunted or the whole herd would starve.  They have strict limits and I know a few hunters who go, but bring back the deer for food.  I understand how this is necessary, but hunting just isn't my thing.  It's done mostly with bows and the thought of blood tracking a wounded, crying animal isn't my idea of a sport. 

What they should do with that red nick singer is put the bastard in a electric fenced in area with hungry bears and see how he feels as the hunted one, with no escape.


I can agree with that. If there is a huge population of a particular animal and a hunter wants to take a buck then go for it. As long as he is eating the meat or using the animal for materials there should not be a huge issue about it. I personally would not do it but I can understand that.

It is the trophy bullshit I hate. Guys hunting endangered animals with ak47's and bazookas for the hell of it. Fucking cowards!
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: buffbodz on November 28, 2006, 08:22:57 AM

I can agree with that. If there is a huge population of a particular animal and a hunter wants to take a buck then go for it. As long as he is eating the meat or using the animal for materials there should not be a huge issue about it. I personally would not do it but I can understand that.

It is the trophy bullshit I hate. Guys hunting endangered animals with ak47's and bazookas for the hell of it. Fucking cowards!
The fvcked up thing is that their are a bunch of idiots that drive around at night and pop a deer when it freezes in the headlights.  Those are poachers and they use shotguns and take more than the limit.  The island has no full time cops sleeping their, so jacking is easy.  These bastards aren't hunters, just criminals who should not be allowed to hunt, never mind have guns.  Than you have these nuts who go through the woods banging pans together to scare off the deer.  It's become a war zone during hunting season.  Handicap week is even worse.  Paraplegics being driven around with guns.  DANGER
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: OzmO on November 28, 2006, 08:29:23 AM
as much as you guys don't understand hunting; it's the same as a hunter not understanding bodybuilding.  to call them names is childish.
to each his own.  hunting is necessary however. 


Exactly how is hunting necessary in this day in age?

 ::)
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: leycus 101 on November 28, 2006, 08:34:52 AM
My grandpa killed several Bengal tigers in 70's. That was real hunting where you actually stalk and track the animal. Hunting as done by those stupidass rednecks is a fucking joke where they set the animal up to get killed.  ::)

Bears aren't huge in numbers, so this guy should be thrown into prison.





kinda ironic you say the guy should be thrown in jail for killing a bear cuz
there not many left in the wild... But then again your grandpa is the reason
why tigers are about extinct in the wild now a days...
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: a_joker10 on November 28, 2006, 08:40:58 AM
Ozmo,
There are many instances where hunting is necessary.
Mainly in the controlling of wild game populations.
I live in a province of 1 million people however there are over 2 million deer. Also the elk and moose have started to migrate out of the north and are wrecking lots of farm land. Elk and moose weren't short grass prairie animals before but are now. Not to mention they kill 5 to 10 people a year in vehicle accidents and causes millions of dollars in damage.
The biggest problem is with snow geese, nobody hunts these animals so the numbers are out of control.  They are destroying whole tracks of farm land. The government has double the fall season and added a spring season, but the numbers keep growing.

The factors that control these populations aren't around any more. Most of the predators have been killed and with the change in weather patterns they haven't been dying due to weather.

Game farm hunting makes me sick, but there are many people that do it and it is a huge business in many states and provinces.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: kh300 on November 28, 2006, 09:01:25 AM
whats the difference between butchering a cow and shooting a deer?
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: mightymouse72 on November 28, 2006, 09:19:56 AM

Hunting is "necessary" if you need food or are using every part of the animal to make things. Ninety percent of "hunters" do not. I have no problem if a hunter eats the animal he kills and is not just shooting it for a trophy.I say that with the impression the animal thast is being hunted has sufficient numbers to sustain itself in the wild.Retards hunt animals, shoot them and then hang them on there wall. Wow, how impowering ::) What are you talking about anyway? This thread is about a guy who set up a captive bear and shot it. He did it for fun. You are ob an idiot.



Ps, hunting animals with low population numbers for sport is gay. Cowards


you are a certifiable dips**t.  a decent thread and you start the name calling.  you don't have a clue about hunting, what it's about and why people do it.  why don't you gain knowledge about something before you demean people that do it.  Wow, how impowering you must feel!
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on November 28, 2006, 09:27:42 AM
whats the difference between butchering a cow and shooting a deer?

If the deer is used for food and the hunt wasn't solely for sport then in essence there is no difference.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 09:39:36 AM
Effin, for every rich idiot who hunts in a fenced preserve there are a thousand of guys who hunt fair chase and respect the environment, and their quarry. Not the least the meat helps some people feed their families in rural america.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 09:42:18 AM
I agree.  How about this:  one of my former coworkers goes duck hunting in Canada.  He uses a mechanical duck that swims and quacks in the water to lure ducks from the air.  Like shooting fish in a barrel IMO. 

Hey Beach. I duck hunt all the time. Your friend probably lost birds due to those dumb mechanical decoys. The only thing those mechanical decoys are good for is seperating money from a dumb duck hunters wallet.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 09:43:27 AM
as much as you guys don't understand hunting; it's the same as a hunter not understanding bodybuilding.  to call them names is childish.
to each his own.  hunting is necessary however. 


I agree.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 09:44:46 AM
The fvcked up thing is that their are a bunch of idiots that drive around at night and pop a deer when it freezes in the headlights. 

Buff, you are confusing hunters with POACHERS!
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 09:45:46 AM
whats the difference between butchering a cow and shooting a deer?

Nothing at all. On most small farms the cow or bull takes a bullet to the brain.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 09:47:21 AM

you are a certifiable dips**t.  a decent thread and you start the name calling.  you don't have a clue about hunting, what it's about and why people do it.  why don't you gain knowledge about something before you demean people that do it.  Wow, how impowering you must feel!
.

If you read the post you would see I said I had no problem with those who hunted to feed there family or to help curb overpopulation. I also said I have no problem with hunters who used the animal for food and to make things from the hide etc etc. My beef was with clowns who shoot animals with low population numbers then hang them on there wall as a trophy. Or "hunters" who go around with huge guns setting animals up in cages and shooting them to take a picture.


Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on November 28, 2006, 09:53:49 AM
Effin, for every rich idiot who hunts in a fenced preserve there are a thousand of guys who hunt fair chase and respect the environment, and their quarry. Not the least the meat helps some people feed their families in rural america.

I'm not denigrating hunters that eat what they kill and respect nature. I'm denigrating some pathetic moron that shot and killed a bear that he had caged in by an electric fence in what is essentially someone's backyard. I'm sure he felt like a big powerful man when he killed that bear. Must be sad to need such ridiculous validation.

That redneck country singer must be a giant asshole, his little "hunting" expedition is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard regarding hunting.

As a hunter can you explain to me what the pleasure is in killing a caged animal?
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 09:54:19 AM
I'm not denegrating hunters that eat what they kill and respect nature. I'm denegrating some pathetic moron that shot and killed a bear that he had caged in by an electric fence in what is essentially someone's backyard. I'm sure he felt like a big powerful man when he killed that bear. Must be sad to need such ridiculous validation.

That redneck country singer must be a giant asshole, his little "hunting" expedition is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard regarding hunting.

As a hunter can you explain to me what the pleasure is in killing a caged animal?




Word!
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 09:58:09 AM
I'm not denegrating hunters that eat what they kill and respect nature. I'm denegrating some pathetic moron that shot and killed a bear that he had caged in by an electric fence in what is essentially someone's backyard. I'm sure he felt like a big powerful man when he killed that bear. Must be sad to need such ridiculous validation.

That redneck country singer must be a giant asshole, his little "hunting" expedition is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard regarding hunting.

As a hunter can you explain to me what the pleasure is in killing a caged animal?

Effin, guys who really enjoy the experience of hunting. Things like camping, tracking game, calling in ducks, geese or turkey, the great taste of wild meat, being with your friends outdoors etc... We don't like these rich morons like the guy this thread about any more than you guys who don't hunt.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 10:00:18 AM
I dig the outdoors. I can see the lure of hunting. I only have beef with the guys who abuse it.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on November 28, 2006, 10:05:54 AM
Effin, guys who really enjoy the experience of hunting. Things like camping, tracking game, calling in ducks, geese or turkey, the great taste of wild meat, being with your friends outdoors etc... We don't like these rich morons like the guy this thread about any more than you guys who don't hunt.

I can respect that, thanks for the honesty. I'm glad to hear people that hunt don't agree with what that fool did.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 10:23:23 AM
I can respect that, thanks for the honesty. I'm glad to hear people that hunt don't agree with what that fool did.

Effin, most hunters are working class, solid people. Unfortunately all you hear about are the jerks like this guy. One time a guy who has a hunting and fishing show was found out to do one of these bogus caged hunts for his TV show. He had a new asshole torn in him on his forums on his web site by fellow hunters.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Dos Equis on November 28, 2006, 10:48:40 AM
Hey Beach. I duck hunt all the time. Your friend probably lost birds due to those dumb mechanical decoys. The only thing those mechanical decoys are good for is seperating money from a dumb duck hunters wallet.

lol.  Funny!   ;D  I have no idea.  I'll take your word for it. 
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: gtbro1 on November 28, 2006, 10:52:05 AM
I have never agreed with hunting.  I have no respect for anyone who hunts and does it with a gun or even a bow.  Most of these guys hide in trees, or dig themselves a hole and hide.  They shoot from a 100 years or more away sometimes.  What kind of skill does it take.  Some of these guys even use tripods and laser sightings.  Be a fucking man and take on the animal one on one with your bare hands.  You are a chicken killing an animal with a gun.  Weak people do that.  Gives them the illusion they have power.  When in reality they have nothing without the gun.  Go ahead go hunt like they did back in the stone age.  Do it with your hands or make a spear.  That is hunting.  That would make you a real man.

I once killed a deer. I just waited in the tree with a big salt block on the ground under it,waited for the deer to come up to lick the salt,then I leaped down onto it's back and wrestled it to the ground. I grabbed it's antlers and snapped it's neck.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: OzmO on November 28, 2006, 11:49:58 AM
Ozmo,
There are many instances where hunting is necessary.
Mainly in the controlling of wild game populations.
I live in a province of 1 million people however there are over 2 million deer. Also the elk and moose have started to migrate out of the north and are wrecking lots of farm land. Elk and moose weren't short grass prairie animals before but are now. Not to mention they kill 5 to 10 people a year in vehicle accidents and causes millions of dollars in damage.
The biggest problem is with snow geese, nobody hunts these animals so the numbers are out of control.  They are destroying whole tracks of farm land. The government has double the fall season and added a spring season, but the numbers keep growing.

The factors that control these populations aren't around any more. Most of the predators have been killed and with the change in weather patterns they haven't been dying due to weather.

Game farm hunting makes me sick, but there are many people that do it and it is a huge business in many states and provinces.

I hear ya.  But really, i may be wrong, but hunting in the USA is regulated to protect the population of deer. 

Your points about why in some cases hunting is needed make sense.  But overall, hunting for food, is not necessary.

My contention originally was that hunting with a gun is nothing to brag about. 
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Camel Jockey on November 28, 2006, 01:25:54 PM
whats the difference between butchering a cow and shooting a deer?

Some of these animals being shot are heavily endangered. I don't care much for deer hunting, but don't be shooting tigers, bears and elephants.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 01:31:05 PM
Some of these animals being shot are heavily endangered. I don't care much for deer hunting, but don't be shooting tigers, bears and elephants.


I agree. These people who go on safaris shooting freaking rhinos suck to.  I love it, drive around until they see a rhino standing in the bush. Get it all pissed of then shoot it from 200 yeards away with a surface to air missle. Cut the poor bastard up and throw all its guts in the bushes. Take the head home and put it on a mantle ::)


I have no problem with recreational hunting if a population can withstand it. Or if the hunter eats all the meat and uses the carcase to make things. It is these people who hunt endangered animals or set them up that piss me off.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: leycus 101 on November 28, 2006, 01:37:57 PM
Some of these animals being shot are heavily endangered. I don't care much for deer hunting, but don't be shooting tigers, bears and elephants.




didnt u say your grandfather hunter tigers??? Probably contributed to the
decline of tigers.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 03:46:08 PM
Some of these animals being shot are heavily endangered. I don't care much for deer hunting, but don't be shooting tigers, bears and elephants.

No endangered animals are legally hunted in the USA.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 03:47:05 PM


As a hunter can you explain to me what the pleasure is in killing a caged animal?

None if you are a normal human being.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: bmacsys on November 28, 2006, 03:49:20 PM
lol.  Funny!   ;D  I have no idea.  I'll take your word for it. 

One time a friend of mine brought his goofy toy decoys. My other friend and I just rolled our eyes. The stupid mechanical decoys rolled upside down and sank!
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Dos Equis on November 28, 2006, 04:22:03 PM
One time a friend of mine brought his goofy toy decoys. My other friend and I just rolled our eyes. The stupid mechanical decoys rolled upside down and sank!

 ;D
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on November 28, 2006, 04:28:40 PM
Apparently this redneck singer Troy Lee Gentry killed a bear in an enclosed 3 acre preserve and then lied about it saying it was killed in the wild. He even had the kill videotaped.

What the hell is the point of killing a bear that is caged in by an electric fence? How is that fun? This moron is the perfect example of how I just don't understand hunting for sport. It makes no sense to me.

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20061127/D8LLMG0G1.html (http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20061127/D8LLMG0G1.html)
hunters are fucking pussies. anyone hunting should be fair game as well. if they want to feel like big tough men with their guns killing things, then ship their asses to the frontlines somewhere... not so cool when YOUR the game, is it assholes.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Dos Equis on November 28, 2006, 04:43:28 PM
Ever see "Surviving the Game"?  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0111323/
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 06:10:58 PM
Hey jacob!!


Yeah Clarence?


Look at tha new gun I dun got fo huntin elk!!!!



Thas a nice dag gum gun there Jacob!!!



Heeee haw, lets mosey own down tha pettin zoo and bag us some bucks!!!







(http://wmilitary.neurok.ru/tunguska/panzir3.jpg)



JK JK JK JK
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: gtbro1 on November 28, 2006, 08:12:57 PM
Hey jacob!!


Yeah Clarence?


Look at tha new gun I dun got fo huntin elk!!!!



Thas a nice dag gum gun there Jacob!!!



Heeee haw, lets mosey own down tha pettin zoo and bag us some bucks!!!







(http://wmilitary.neurok.ru/tunguska/panzir3.jpg)



JK JK JK JK

   Body, are you suggesting that most hunters are "Less than sophisticated" ?
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: body88 on November 28, 2006, 08:24:42 PM
I would never dream of it!!!!!! Just look at this candid photo from a recent siberian tiger hunt in Russia.

(http://www.biblehelp.org/images/missile%20launcher%201.jpg)












 ;)
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: Al-Gebra on November 28, 2006, 08:27:47 PM
1. I love animals.

2.  I love hunting too.
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: brianX on November 28, 2006, 10:24:05 PM
hunters are fucking pussies. anyone hunting should be fair game as well. if they want to feel like big tough men with their guns killing things, then ship their asses to the frontlines somewhere... not so cool when YOUR the game, is it assholes.

That's funny. The most decorated American soldiers from WWI and WWII were both hunters. The most celebrated sniper in history was also a hunter. Somehow this isn't consistent with hunters being a bunch of "pussies". ::)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audie_Murphy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_York
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Grigoryevich_Zaitsev
Title: Re: More proof that I'll never understand hunting for sport.
Post by: gtbro1 on November 28, 2006, 10:30:18 PM

   You're not a REAL hunter unless you drink the blood of your first kill.