Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: AlliedPowers on December 18, 2006, 09:54:44 PM
-
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/181206Boston.htm
-
What was that 300 people?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH
Don't more show up for aliens and area 51 marches?
-
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/181206Boston.htm
lol!
-
What was that 300 people?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH
Don't more show up for aliens and area 51 marches?
lol!!!
-
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/181206Boston.htm
LMAO!!! i cant get over that video, what a complete joke. those morons need to be rounded up and executed. complete discrace to this country.
-
What's shocking is the size of the march considering all the propaganda you spew about it being such a BIG movement that's gaining momentum.
-
I know. Their audacity in using their First Amendment rights to ask for a second investigation.
shocking.
lol! the sheeple of the 9/11 'truth' movement, want an investigation that says 9/11 was an inside job. not a second investigation.
-
Does every person who believes abortion is murder, gather at rallies?
Does every person who believes the war is wrong, join the rallies?
No.
NO, but the size of any rally is indictative and telling of the size of any movement. And the Aliens at Roswell movement is larger that the 9/11 inside movement.
nice try anyways :P
-
Does every person who believes abortion is murder, gather at rallies?
Does every person who believes the war is wrong, join the rallies?
No.
36 million people across the globe protested the iraq war, in one day. you have 5-100 people at your little 9/11 'truth' rallies.
-
O.K. I watched the clip. I agree it is a complete joke. And Ozmo I think your estimate of 300 people is quite generous. :) Reminds me of the clip someone posted a little while ago about Triumph the insult comic dog where he attended a Star Wars "convention." Looks like the same kind of people.
-
O.K. I watched the clip. I agree it is a complete joke. And Ozmo I think you're estimate of 300 people is quite generous. :) Reminds me of the clip someone posted a little while ago about Triumph the insult comic dog where he attended a Star Wars "convention." Looks like the same kind of people.
What can i say? It's the holidays!
That Triumph clip was one the of the funniest things ever!
You can find it on Popoholic
-
I certainly HOPE it wasn't an inside job, although the lies which were allowed under oath point to at least some level of complicity or cover up.
the 911 truthers plan on marching to the white house lawn on sept 11, 2007. Perhaps they will have a decent turnout.
Initially i would say anything under 50k would be a bust if this is a national movement.
But that's just my first thought.
A million would be telling.
-
I'm sure they could get hundreds for a march on Washington. Fifty thousand? I doubt that. A million? Not a chance.
-
I'm sure they could get hundreds for a march on Washington. Fifty thousand? I doubt that. A million? Not a chance.
I'm a positive thinker. ;)
-
I'm a positive thinker. ;)
Me too. :)
-
I don't think a million people would march there. They couldn't get a true million for other marches when they've tried, with far more general and accepted reasons for being there.
I think any number is telling. It would take some serious courage. Anyone who marched on the white house calling 911 an inside job, that is taking some seriously fucking risk. Essentially standing at the president's front door and calling him a killer. Shit. That's a huge statement. WOuld take some seriously conviction to do such a thing.
-
.
I think any number is telling.
Telling of what? If it's small it tells everyone that very few people believe the 9/11 CT and vise versa
It would take some serious courage. Anyone who marched on the white house calling 911 an inside job, that is taking some seriously fucking risk. Essentially standing at the president's front door and calling him a killer. Shit. That's a huge statement. WOuld take some seriously conviction to do such a thing.
You are being overly dramatic. People have marched with similar intentions of calling a president of the USA a killer many other times in the past.
The differnece here, is anyone of note will probably be labeled as a crack pot and risk ruining their reputation becuase they based their conclusions in circumstantial evidence, lack of experteese and vague evidence.
-
Incredible how an entire nation was convinced a plane hit the pentagon BECAUSE DONALD RUMSFELD SAID SO.
How gullible can people be? Would you trust RUmmy with your wallet for 30 seconds, much less with a plane and nealy 200 lives? These folks are not, and they want an investigation because they believe people here were in on it.
-
Telling of what? If it's small it tells everyone that very few people believe the 9/11 CT and vise versa
You are being overly dramatic. People have marched with similar intentions of calling a president of the USA a killer many other times in the past.
The differnece here, is anyone of note will probably be labeled as a crack pot and risk ruining their reputation becuase they based their conclusions in circumstantial evidence, lack of experteese and vague evidence.
This is true. I think this is the reason why it doesn't get any play in the mainstream media (except for the "Nutty Professors" segment on Hannity & Colmes).
-
This is true. I think this is the reason why it doesn't get any play in the mainstream media (except for the "Nutty Professors" segment on Hannity & Colmes).
No, the reason is that FOX news is owned by newscorp which lies in bed with many in DC.
Of course, you understand the structure and the relationships of media, govt, defense spending, and wall street, so I'll let you explain it ;)
-
Incredible how an entire nation was convinced a plane hit the pentagon BECAUSE DONALD RUMSFELD SAID SO.
How gullible can people be? Would you trust RUmmy with your wallet for 30 seconds, much less with a plane and nealy 200 lives? These folks are not, and they want an investigation because they believe people here were in on it.
Is that what you believe?
People do not belive it was a plane becase Rumfield said so.
Are your CT site running out of use-able ammo?
And in italics: more cheesy rethoric.
-
No, the reason is that FOX news is owned by newscorp which lies in bed with many in DC.
Of course, you understand the structure and the relationships of media, govt, defense spending, and wall street, so I'll let you explain it ;)
Nah. You could maybe explain away one outlet not covering it. But when Fox, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC all refuse to cover this stuff for the most part (and ridiculing it when they do "cover it"), it's pretty apparent that they don't consider it a credible story.
-
Nah. You could maybe explain away one outlet not covering it. But when Fox, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC all refuse to cover this stuff for the most part (and ridiculing it when they do "cover it"), it's pretty apparent that they don't consider it a credible story.
All these MSM sources showed Bombs #2 and #3 being dragged from the Oklahoma city bombing. They interviewed the cops describing the size of the devices. They showed the documents showing the examination of the devices.
Then, all these MSM sources, the next day, reported there was only ONE bomb (the truck), and never mentioned #2 and #3 (clear signs McVeigh had a few buddies on the inside to move big bombs thru the front door) again.
So please don't say they don't consider stories credible, and they drop them. They reported OKC THEMSELVES, then dropped it when given the order.
-
those morons need to be rounded up and executed.
its scary how al-quedaish ya sound like.
if you were born in the middle east..you'd be a queda recruit...
-
All these MSM sources showed Bombs #2 and #3 being dragged from the Oklahoma city bombing. They interviewed the cops describing the size of the devices. They showed the documents showing the examination of the devices.
Then, all these MSM sources, the next day, reported there was only ONE bomb (the truck), and never mentioned #2 and #3 (clear signs McVeigh had a few buddies on the inside to move big bombs thru the front door) again.
So please don't say they don't consider stories credible, and they drop them. They reported OKC THEMSELVES, then dropped it when given the order.
So why aren't CNN, Fox, CBS, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC covering this alleged 911 conspiracy (except to mock the story)?
-
So why aren't CNN, Fox, CBS, ABC, NBC, and MSNBC covering this alleged 911 conspiracy (except to mock the story)?
cause American news is not controlled..ohh no its not controlled at all ::)
-
cause American news is not controlled..ohh no its not controlled at all ::)
Thanks for clearing that up. ::)
-
Here we go again.... more wacked out conjecture
The first 3 days after 9/11, all reporters kept asking rumsfeld was "where is the plane? why don't we see evidence of the plane? can you show us videos of the plane? are you sure it was a plane? where are the bodies??" I'm sure you watched CSPAN and saw this. Rummy just stopped answering the questions and they stopped asking.
The plane was missing.
Scores of eyewitnesses saw the plane crash into the pentagon
There was plane Debris at the site
The news was reporting it later that morning as a plane hitting the pentagon.
Becuase he stops answering questions doesn't mean he was lying as you are suggesting. Rumfield probably didn't have any explanation at the time.
So becuase he didn't answer those questions and or he didn;t have the information to answer those question at the time your glorious 9/11 CT's have surmised that he must have been lying and that a plane hadn't really hit the pentagon.
That's just plane ;) stupid dude.
And anyone who stupid enough to buy into that practically will believe anything.
These were the MSM regulars- cause they knew. And CNN's little guy asking Pataki over and over at ground zero "Sir, where did the building go? How does a building scientifically pulverize itself? etc etc. Pataki just kept saying "It was pulverized. Pullll-ver-ized." The reporter, standing at ground zero looking at 50 feet of rubble where 1100 feet of concrete and steel stood 24 hours earlier, obviously knew the shit was *absolutely impossible*, and was pushing Pataki's buttons.
Pataki was saying that becuase he didn't know what happened. It wasn't like an 1100 story had ever been hit by a passenger plane full of jet fuel before.
BUT NO! because your 9/11 CT'ers just assumed he thought it was impossible there for it must have been impossible becuase someone couldn't give a accurate explanation without all the facts.... How fucking stupid is that kind of thinking?
Then the order came from above and it was dropped.
this one's my personal favorate.
How do we know an order was send "from above" Is this another one of your "documents" that prove everything?
Com on 240
YOU are smarter than this!
But go ahead and go back to your 9/11 truth forum and get more useless ammo
-
the only argument they use for the Pentagon is that the hole wasn't big enough for the plane..when they are actually right,,but leaving out info. the damaged to the Pentagon was the length of the plane. but obviously the wings wernt strong enough to make a hole. the wings couldnt penetrate the walls of the Pentagon.. but guess what could, the fuselage. hence, why the whole isnt as big as the plane. but the same size as the fuselage.
-
the only argument they use for the Pentagon is that the hole wasn't big enough for the plane..when they are actually right,,but leaving out info. the damaged to the Pentagon was the length of the plane. but obviously the wings wernt strong enough to make a hole. the wings couldnt penetrate the walls of the Pentagon.. but guess what could, the fuselage. hence, why the whole isnt as big as the plane. but the same size as the fuselage.
the pentagon is made out of butter
-
can anyone tlel me why the media would completely stop reporting on bombs #2 and #3 at OK City? They existed - we heard from many ATF and govt officials that day, and FEMA even released documents. This showed that someone carried bombs in and set them up at the murrah building. Since we know every minute of mcveigh's week, we know it was NOT him.
But everyone loves the lone gunman angle...
Wow! we've now rotated to a completely different CT!