Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on January 02, 2007, 10:25:29 AM
-
Does a good job at "TRYING TO SHOW" wtc 7 (EDITIED FOR DUMSHITS LIKE OZMO) was a controlled demolition. If you have Dish, the documentary is on FSTV's Inn Report right now. Will be on again later today it starts about halfway through the Inn Report.
-
Does a good job at showing wtc 7 was a controlled demolition. If you have Dish, the documentary is on FSTV's Inn Report right now. Will be on again later today it starts about halfway through the Inn Report.
I might well have been. Unfortunatly, We don't have ALL the information on the subeject and the makers of that movie/doc probably don't either. To suspect it as such is practical and makes sense, to conclude it as such, based on incomplete information, is for the nut job squad.
Wasn't that place a goverment office for the FBI or something??
-
I might well have been. Unfortunatly, We don't have ALL the information on the subeject and the makers of that movie/doc probably don't either. To suspect it as such is practical and makes sense, to conclude it as such, based on incomplete information, is for the nut job squad.
Wasn't that place a government office for the FBI or something??
Stupity above and beyond... Congrats asshole... Nobody said it was the be all last word on WTC7 ::) The documentary does not either... It provides information and OPINION not available elsewhere... It does NOT breach opinion with any absolute claims. It makes valid arguments that controlled dem should have been considered by investigators. Your point suggests nothing is worth examining or considering if it doesn't prove the case with no doubt remaining is just fucking ignorant. If we went your way of doing things that would put 85% of everything on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NPR, Democracy Now and CBS off the air and not worthy of consideration because most of what they provide opinion and information on is also lacking complete data. You are now like the captain Ahab of the political forum chasing the great white conspiracy theorist. ::) Calm down and, grow the f**k up Mr Knowitall....
-
Stupity above and beyond... Congrats asshole... Nobody said it was the be all last word on WTC7 ::) The documentary does not either... It provides information and OPINION not available elsewhere... It does NOT breach opinion with any absolute claims. It makes valid arguments that controlled dem should have been considered by investigators. Your point suggests nothing is worth examining or considering if it doesn't prove the case with no doubt remaining is just fucking ignorant. If we went your way of doing things that would put 85% of everything on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NPR, Democracy Now and CBS off the air and not worthy of consideration because most of what they provide opinion and information on is also lacking complete data. You are now like the captain Ahab of the political forum chasing the great white conspiracy theorist. ::) Calm down and, grow the f**k up Mr Knowitall....
Ironically by not doing research your self you missed the fact the NIST is looking into controlled demolition of WTC 7.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm (http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm)
Triggered by damage due to the vertical failure, horizontal progression of the failure across the lower floors (in the region of floors 5 and 7 that were much thicker and more heavily reinforced than the rest of the floors) resulted in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure.
This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation. NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements.
-
joker, how many years are you going to spout that lame line until you realize they will never release that report?
Looking into it? HAHAHAHAHAH Sucker. "Yeah, we're looking into that sir." hold your breath on that one!
Ummm... There are actually updates about the WTC 7 building on the NIST web page. Until they stop updating their findings I will continue to post about it.
-
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Dec06.pdf (http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Dec06.pdf)
Spring 2007.
-
Stupity above and beyond... Congrats asshole... Nobody said it was the be all last word on WTC7 ::) The documentary does not either... It provides information and OPINION not available elsewhere... It does NOT breach opinion with any absolute claims. It makes valid arguments that controlled dem should have been considered by investigators. Your point suggests nothing is worth examining or considering if it doesn't prove the case with no doubt remaining is just fucking ignorant. If we went your way of doing things that would put 85% of everything on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, NPR, Democracy Now and CBS off the air and not worthy of consideration because most of what they provide opinion and information on is also lacking complete data. You are now like the captain Ahab of the political forum chasing the great white conspiracy theorist. ::) Calm down and, grow the f**k up Mr Knowitall....
You and 240 are funny.
All i'm sayingis that you and I don't have the info. And in all likely hood niether does that show.
Now do you believe it's prudent to make conclusion without all the possible information?
Becuase if you do then you are stupid.
-
And Berserekr before you fly off the handle again, jumping to conclusions and putting owrds in my mouth, can you answer my question about the building.
Thank you for your emotionally controlled response ;)
-
1) We don't have the info on the building because Bush classified it all under nat'l security.
2) If they did release the info, we would see it was controlled demolition.
This is why you are not taken seriously. You have made a firm assumption based on inconclusive and incomplete information.
3) Controlled demo would mean that the FBI/CIA/SecSrv/SEC and others let their building be wired
4) Suddenly it becomes an inside job with govt complicity
It may have been set up to do that years before.
6) Suddenly we realize if WTC7 was controlled demo, only a moron would believe 1 and 2 were not.
This is another reason why you are not taken seriously..... you make too many assumptions based on opinion without doing the research............... are you really interested in finding the truth
Above all, Ozmo, you're defending the story put out bya group of guys with everything to gain (war spending and domestic powers) and everything to lose (prison!) by releasing that info.
Do you really[/] think they would be honest in releasing that info?
I'm not defending anything:
All i'm sayingis that you and I don't have the info. And in all likely hood niether does that show.
Now do you believe it's prudent to make conclusion without all the possible information?
Becuase if you do then you are stupid.
-
joker, how many years are you going to spout that lame line until you realize they will never release that report?
Looking into it? HAHAHAHAHAH Sucker. "Yeah, we're looking into that sir." hold your breath on that one!
Ummm... There are actually updates about the WTC 7 building on the NIST web page. Until they stop updating their findings I will continue to post about it.
Interesting............ real facts relavent to the WTC7 question vs. conjecture/dismissal/emotional presumption
-
You and 240 are funny.
All i'm sayingis that you and I don't have the info. And in all likely hood niether does that show.
Now do you believe it's prudent to make conclusion without all the possible information?
Becuase if you do then you are stupid.
Funny, you seem to have conveniently forgot, "is for the nut job squad" in your, "all I'm saying..." The show doesn't make absolute conclusions idiot, it makes conjecutures based on observations... It is opinion... Yea, If i went into the movie and came out saying, 100% that's it I wouldn't be going to the message boards, I would be going to the courts... but I didn't do that and you relegated opinion as being only fit for "the nut job squad" because not all the data is available. ::) Again, that little idiotic way of thinking relegates most of the maintreme commentary on everything "for the nut job squad" Get it Ahab?
-
Funny, you seem to have conveniently forgot, "is for the nut job squad" in your, "all I'm saying..." The show doesn't make absolute conclusions idiot, it makes conjecutures based on observations... It is opinion... Yea, If i went into the movie and came out saying, 100% that's it I wouldn't be going to the message boards, I would be going to the courts... but I didn't do that and you relegated opinion as being only fit for "the nut job squad" because not all the data is available. ::) Again, that little idiotic way of thinking relegates most of the maintreme commentary on everything "for the nut job squad" Get it Ahab?
Does a good job at showing wtc 7 was a controlled demolition.
I didn;t watch the show, and i based my post on this statement above.
A more accurate statement would have been:
The opinion of the producers of the show is.....that wtc 7 was a controlled demolition.
So while you critisize me for not seeing that the show was a "opinion" you began by stating "the show does a good job showing wtc 7 was a controlled demolition."
But you are right..... i did make an assumptiion based on incomplete information regarding the show. Sorry, i just trusted you statement without checking first. ;) Or perhaps becuase this is wrtten text i missed your meaning.
-
I didn;t watch the show, and i based my post on this statement above.
A more accurate statement would have been:
The opinion of the producers of the show is.....that wtc 7 was a controlled demolition.
So while you critisize me for not seeing that the show was a "opinion" you began by stating "the show does a good job showing wtc 7 was a controlled demolition."
But you are right..... i did make an assumptiion based on incomplete information regarding the show. Sorry, i just trusted you statement without checking first. ;) Or perhaps because this is written text i missed your meaning.
yea, I had absolutely no fucking idea that you would take my opinion that the show did a good job of showing it was a controlled dem as a shocking fucking Washington Post front page newsflash of absolute proof 9/11 was an inside job ::) I guess I should have said, "does a good job of trying to show wtc7 was a Cont. dem" If I had known I would be accused of providing material for the nutjob squad, I would have phrased it like that. But I should have known, the way you and Beach have become obsessed with mockery that I had best be ridiculously meticulous in the way I choose to word posts in this area. ::) It's just a goddamed documentary that I feel makes several good points and observations that work toward the conclusion that wtc7 was a controlled dem. OKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK Capt. Ahab? ::)
-
It is insurance fraud among other things ;D
-
What was the original release date? ;)
You obviously didn't look at it or the WTC site.
You are fighting with your hands behind your back.
I will post the link again and maybe you should read it.
OR I guess I could make a video, then you might look at it. ;D
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Dec06.pdf (http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Dec06.pdf)
You should be happy that it is taking longer, it means they are doing more research.
-
Yes, I'll be ecstatic in 2050 when it's still not released.
Dude you need ritalin.
Things take time.
Especially well researched papers.
They are still pretty much on the revised schedule as posted after the WTC1 and WTC 2 reports.
-
Dude you need ritalin.
Things take time.
Especially well researched papers.
They are still pretty much on the revised schedule as posted after the WTC1 and WTC 2 reports.
::) oh brother...
-
::) oh brother...
Went and looked on the WTC site did you or did you even look at the pdf.
-
So the papers they released (you know, where they sold then took back the pancake collapse) -
WHy did they *rush* them out, when 3000 people died, but they are taking years and years to get us the WTC7 report, when no one died and the firefighters knew it was coming down?
Weird, eh?
PS - you are defending the devil's work mate!
FEMA and NIST are not the same departments.
NIST performed a much more rigorous investigation, and hired the experts to come up with the most probable scenerio.
NISt also removed many investigators from WTC 7 to help finish the report for WTC1 and WTC 2. The reports for WTC 7 should be available this year.
-
It seems that they are finishing up with demolition theory, this was added to the WTC faq and WTC 7 investigation in October.
It seems that they are looking into all things including thermite.
-
If I had known I would be accused of providing material for the nutjob squad, I would have phrased it like that. But I should have known, the way you and Beach have become obsessed with mockery that I had best be ridiculously meticulous in the way I choose to word posts in this area. ::)
Maybe you shouldn't be so defensive. Maybe you should try an clarify what i was saying first before you fly off the handle like some "crack head in denial".
So for some good old fashion fun in the spirit of "Spoilers from the Bay area" or "a 6 and 9 team knocks off an elite AFC playoff team out of the play offs on their home turf" let's go back and look at what i DID say intially:
I might well have been.
I meant to say "It might well have been" I can;t type to save my ass, so what can i say. I'm even worse at proof readiing.
Unfortunatly, We don't have ALL the information on the subeject and the makers of that movie/doc probably don't either.
I said this becuase your initial statement about the documentary seem to indicate they had proof or whatever.
To suspect it as such is practical and makes sense, to conclude it as such, based on incomplete information, is for the nut job squad.
Here i was talking about the makers of the documentary NOT you. get it? I can send you a singing telegram if you need further explanation. (don't get mad if they're wearing 49'er jerseys) If i wanted to call you a nut job i'd say it directly. just ask 240. (i don;t realy think he's a nut job, he's just wacked ;D and argues well)
Wasn't that place a goverment office for the FBI or something??
Becuase i respect you and your knowledge on many subjects and politics i was asking you a question.
Hopefully this clears everthhing up. Or maybe i you might be still real pissed off at Denver's loss in overtime and connect it to some rant aimed towards me.
-
The way I see it Ozmutt, you started it... Instead of asking for clarrification, you had to toss in your nutjob comment and don't think that it didn't go without notice that this was on top of days upon days of mockery on anything 9/11 ct related. Deal with my blowup and you can fully expect me to do it again if you get all knowitall anal retentive mockery on me... jerk.
-
Hopefully this clears everthhing up. Or maybe i you might be still real pissed off at Denver's loss in overtime and connect it to some rant aimed towards me.
WTF mental boy? Are you a San Fran Player ::) I made quite clear why I consider you a total assnugget. It has nothing to do with football ::) Pull your head out of your ass dipshit.
-
The way I see it Ozmutt, you started it... Instead of asking for clarrification, you had to toss in your nutjob comment and don't think that it didn't go without notice that this was on top of days upon days of mockery on anything 9/11 ct related. Deal with my blowup and you can fully expect me to do it again if you get all knowitall anal retentive mockery on me... jerk.
Dude i wasn't the one who called that reverse! And John Lynch should have been able to shread Alex Smith.
But seriously,
SORRY if i gave you the idea. I apologize. I wasn;t intending the NUT JOB comment at you. I understand now why you were mad. I understand i have been mocking 9/11 for days. It has been mainly due to the hologram theory. (honestly i don;t think it even qualifies as a theory)
Yes, i didn;t ask for clarification, but niether did you.
If you'd like blow up again feel free ;)
-
WTF mental boy? Are you a San Fran Player ::) I made quite clear why I consider you a total assnugget. It has nothing to do with football ::) Pull your head out of your ass dipshit.
Mental boy? lol
OK crack head.
-
Your chain is easier to jerk than Johnnys.
Grow up and act your age
-
Mental boy? lol
OK crack head.
Fuck you you fucking board nazi.
-
f**k you you fucking board nazi.
Yeah, ok, right.
I still realy think this is all about Denver losing.
Just admitt it.
Give me your pain.
-
You know it's pretty fucking unfathomable that anybody would have taken that I was putting forth a documentary that had indisputable proof 9/11 being an inside job. I mean, if that was remotely so, it would be major news all over. I didn't fathom anyone would take it that way. The thought hadn't even entered my mind... Real stupid of me forgetting about the board Nazi, Capt. Ahab Ozmo...
Jackass...
-
You know it's pretty fucking unfathomable that anybody would have taken that I was putting forth a documentary that had indisputable proof 9/11 being an inside job. I mean, if that was remotely so, it would be major news all over. I didn't fathom anyone would take it that way. The thought hadn't even entered my mind... Real stupid of me forgetting about the board Nazi, Capt. Ahab Ozmo...
Jackass...
I'm sure there's more, keep it going......... give me more of your pain.... com on it's ok..........every thing will alright.
-
Yeah, ok, right.
I still realy think this is all about Denver losing.
Just admitt it.
Give me your pain.
::) If I gave a shit I would point out that your record was not as good as ours, and that you barely beat us with a rookie quarterback and how pathetic it is for SF guys to point they're on the rise ::) for beating a team struggling with a major change. ::) Even we have said point blank that we're not a playoff team this year, and you're celebrating this win against the Broncos like it's a major triumph... That a major compliment that you think so highly of our team... Also asshole, look at San Frans schedule this year and compare it to ours which many have said was the second hardest schedule... Oh, yea, this is a really pathetic red herring and I will not be diverted from the point that you are a fucking board Nazi that's gone overboard in your obsession... It is you that needs to chill the fuck out... I wouldn't be melting down if you weren't acting like a complete ass for posting a documentary. ::)
-
ozmo is a classic example of someone who has been conditioned. he's trained. he has stated he believes that Bush KNEW about 9/11 (and thus facilitated mass murder), and he doesn't seem to mind. Is this the same mindset we'd see from a terrorist? Yes, it is. Could just be a coincidence though. Does this mean that OzmO secretly agreed with the attacks? It's hard to say.
Perhaps the answer lies here: Would we expect Osama bin laden to "mock 9/11" ? Yes.
Did Ozmo admit to mocking 911?
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
any minute i'm going to get accused for working for the government to stave off the 9/11 truth movement on the internet!!!!!!!
BTW i was mocking the hologram theory not 9/11 .
And yes, i do mind, very much, so before you go on your basic lame debating techniques (rotation, inaccurate facts, spin docotring, the same old rethorical questions over and over) I support a new investatgion into 9/11 for those reasons. I just don;t have much faith that in the end they will ever bring charges against BUSH for knowing.
-
::) If I gave a shit I would point out that your record was not as good as ours, and that you barely beat us with a rookie quarterback and how pathetic it is for SF guys to point they're on the rise ::) for beating a team struggling with a major change. ::) Even we have said point blank that we're not a playoff team this year, and you're celebrating this win against the Broncos like it's a major triumph... That a major compliment that you think so highly of our team... Also asshole, look at San Frans schedule this year and compare it to ours which many have said was the second hardest schedule... Oh, yea, this is a really pathetic red herring and I will not be diverted from the point that you are a fucking board Nazi that's gone overboard in your obsession... It is you that needs to chill the f**k out... I wouldn't be melting down if you weren't acting like a complete ass for posting a documentary. ::)
ahh yes............ keep it coming, keep trying to take the sting out of the loss, the sting out of over reacting to my statements about the documentary...
feels better doesn't it?
See you can do it.
You good guy and people like you.
-
That's cute Beserker, you send me a personal message calling me a prick and you block me from responding.
How old are you?
Here's what my response was:
Dude seriously now. I've to tried to explain myself. I've tried too apologize. You need to build a bridge and get over it. I'm not mad at you. I think you are a good guy who over reacts some times. That's all.
-
Why would the GOVT want to stave off the 911 truth movement? Are you implying they would benefit from a coverup and were then somehow involved? Those are some serious charges, bro.
I'm implying that there was gross incopentence and or prior knowledge that wasn;t acted on. At that point in the BUSH admin, it would been very damaging for the country and the american people would have lost massive confidence in their government's credibility. It would have been very bad. The terrorist would have scored a huge victory if this happened.
I think however it needed to happen. They needed to be exposed.
Sorry for being dumb here but what's MIHOP and LIHOP?
-
I'm not falling for the Redherring asshole... This season lost importance to me with the loss of one of our players. That hit me hard and made everything else football wise irrelivent for now. I'm consered with a lot more than our teams loss to SF and don't you dare fucking suggest I'm takeing this out on you ::) Don't even go there... It's clear you're using this loss to try to goat me into a larger meltdown... It isn't happening jackass. So lets cut the troll shit ok Ozmo ::) I'm not an internet noob.
Also, as if it shouldn't be clear as fuck, If I had information that was absolute proof, I wouldn't post it with a casual comment... I would say so point blank. That at least should have been obvious, obvious to anyone but someone suffering from gross ahabism.
-
That's cute Beserker, you send me a personal message calling me a prick and you block me from responding.
How old are you?
Here's what my response was:
Dude seriously now. I've to tried to explain myself. I've tried too apologize. You need to build a bridge and get over it. I'm not mad at you. I think you are a good guy who over reacts some times. That's all.
Well make no mistake, I'm steaming mad at you... shove your apology up your ass.
-
Well make no mistake, I'm steaming mad at you... shove your apology up your ass.
OK, i get it.
But shit, PM me your phone number, i'll call you and you can yell at me in person if you want.
You really need to calm down, this is a forum dude. This isn't that important to get that mad over.
And yes, i'm fucking needling you about Denver's loss. ;)
-
OK, i get it.
But shit, PM me your phone number, i'll call you and you can yell at me in person if you want.
You really need to calm down, this is a forum dude. This isn't that important to get that mad over.
And yes, i'm fucking needling you about Denver's loss. ;)
Real low of you considering what happened a few hours after the game. You have any idea what the mood is like around here? Nobody is thinking about the loss right now ::) nobody... I may be immature, I'll admit to that, but you're a pathetic POS.
-
Real low of you considering what happened a few hours after the game. You have any idea what the mood is like around here? Nobody is thinking about the loss right now ::) nobody... I may be immature, I'll admit to that, but you're a pathetic POS.
Sorry about that. I have a friend who i work wioth who's a big time Denver Fan. He lives in colorado springs. I talk to him dam near everyday. He's not in the same state as you are about what happen to that guy.
Becuase of that, i didn;t think you were either, even though you have the pic in your signature i figure you were just paying respect.
BTW what is a POS? (cringing for the next round attacks) :-\
-
I wonder if OzmO will condone the coverup of the shooting, as it's "bad for Denver's image".
no. (nice jab)
-
I wonder if OzmO will condone the coverup of the shooting, as it's "bad for Denver's image".
You did get that i feel we should expose it all anyway right?
-
yep.
I think that the prevalent opinion of "we must not act weak, even if it means covering up atrocities" is what makes us so hated in the world.
Suppose the US had put a few traitors on trial (like that FAA ass who destroyed evidence!) Suppose we had told the world we apologize for not finding WMD. I believe we'd be LESS likely to be hated or attacked. It's not the same dickmeasuring contest we had with the USSR. The arabs are mad we're in their house taking their oil. period. I think a few admissions of being human would give us more cred with world leaders.
Heck... imagine bush trying to sell even a completely legit proposal to world leaders right now. his cred is in the shitter.
Agreed.
Add that to the USA supporting the repressive actions of Israel. Add that to us raping third world countries of their resources and profits via the suport and maintenence of repressive governments.
That's why they hate us. they see a different world everyday from news that isn't bought and paid for like here in the USA and cannot understand why americans sit idle.
-
yep.
I think that the prevalent opinion of "we must not act weak, even if it means covering up atrocities" is what makes us so hated in the world.
Suppose the US had put a few traitors on trial (like that FAA ass who destroyed evidence!) Suppose we had told the world we apologize for not finding WMD. I believe we'd be LESS likely to be hated or attacked. It's not the same dickmeasuring contest we had with the USSR. The arabs are mad we're in their house taking their oil. period. I think a few admissions of being human would give us more cred with world leaders.
Heck... imagine bush trying to sell even a completely legit proposal to world leaders right now. his cred is in the shitter.
Once again America isn't taking their oil. Iraq actually imported more oil then they sold.
Why let facts get in the way of fiction.
-
Didn't they import it because the US blockaded them from selling theirs? LOL...
Dude, yes or no: Does Iraq have $3 trillion in oil under it?
Dude, yes or no: Is the US putting in an oil pipleline?
Yes and No.
Iraq has the second largest proved oil reserves, Iraq owns the pipeline as well as the oil.
Plus most oil is shipped.
-
I'm starting to agree with you on more and more topics.
I believe you're a hologram of the real OzmO.
lol
You and i probably agree on quite a few things save the 9/11 inside job part.
-
a_joker,
why did the US invade Iraq?
I have told you at least a hundred times, because Iraq disobeyed numerous UN resolutions, if oil was what they were after, they could have just skimmed from the oil for food program like everyone else.
-
I have told you at least a hundred times, because Iraq disobeyed numerous UN resolutions, if oil was what they were after, they could have just skimmed from the oil for food program like everyone else.
::) first class fool...
-
::) first class fool...
Yep unbiased.
Just because I don't agree with you, 240, and Ozmo, doesn't make me a fool.
Name calling is weak.
-
Yep unbiased.
Just because I don't agree with you, 240, and Ozmo, doesn't make me a fool.
Name calling is weak.
You're crying because I called you a fool? Oh brother, go find another board, getbig is obviously not for you...
-
You're crying because I called you a fool? Oh brother, go find another board, getbig is obviously not for you...
Weak people attack character and makes your argument pointless.
It is called Ad Hominem
Both you and 240 rely on this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem)
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person", "argument against the man") is a logical fallacy consisting of replying to an argument by attacking or appealing to the person making the argument, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument. It is most commonly used to refer specifically to the ad hominem abusive, or argumentum ad personam, which consists of criticizing or personally attacking an argument's proponent in an attempt to discredit that argument.
Other common subtypes of the ad hominem include the ad hominem circumstantial, or ad hominem circumstantiae, an attack which is directed at the circumstances or situation of the arguer; and the ad hominem tu quoque, which objects to an argument by characterizing the arguer as being guilty of the same thing that he is arguing against.
-
Joker, stop being a crybaby... It has no place on getbig. Being called a fool is hardly reason to go searching wiki ::)
-
:P
-
You obviously didn't look at it or the WTC site.
You are fighting with your hands behind your back.
I will post the link again and maybe you should read it.
OR I guess I could make a video, then you might look at it. ;D
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Dec06.pdf (http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Dec06.pdf)
You should be happy that it is taking longer, it means they are doing more research.
and you acctually accept that as the facts behind building 7? man i could have wrote that shit up myself just give me a pot of coffee and a little time to dream something up
-
yeah, they blame the fuel tank, but the windows of the building weren't even blown out. Small fires followed by a controlled demolition. period.
Have you seen the REAR view of the WTC7 collapse? It'll make you laugh out loud that some believe it was fire: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8403741864603265979&q=wtc7+new&hl=en
Interestingly enough the haven't blamed anything yet, because the report isn't finished.
Just like before, you have no idea what you are talking about.
You guys are on witch hunt, yet you cant even understand the difference between what is fact, what is plausible and what is a lie.
-
will you 911 nuts just shut up already? if you didnt die, why would you care anyway? i dont live in new york, it doesn't affect me, so what's it matter anyway? give it up already.
-
will you 911 nuts just shut up already? if you didnt die, why would you care anyway? i dont live in new york, it doesn't affect me, so what's it matter anyway? give it up already.
Ok, I'll do that. I was waiting someone like you to come and set me straight. Wow, powerful argument... There's no denying your profound wisdom.
-
will you 911 nuts just shut up already? if you didnt die, why would you care anyway? i dont live in new york, it doesn't affect me, so what's it matter anyway? give it up already.
thats one of the most ignorant statements iv ever seen posted...just because you didnt die you shouldnt care?and you are only affected if you lived in newyork?man that just proves you cant fix stupid.