Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the shadow on February 07, 2007, 12:29:13 AM

Title: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: the shadow on February 07, 2007, 12:29:13 AM
awesome comparison
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Tombo on February 07, 2007, 12:45:09 AM
A 'STFU' vs a 'GTFO'


a thrilling question, one you couldn't guess!
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: GoneAway on February 07, 2007, 12:45:19 AM
Great legs on Wheeler. For a big man, Nasser had an awesome ab/thigh.
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: rccs on February 07, 2007, 02:08:03 AM
awesome comparison
Nasser is destroying Flex!
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: GroinkTropin on February 07, 2007, 02:21:58 AM
Nasser destroyed him from the front, but his lack of back detail cost him everything. With a back like ronnies, he would have won 5 sandows.
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Petrucci on February 07, 2007, 02:42:21 AM
Nasser is owning Flex in that photo...and like someone already wrote, Nasser had a incredible midsection, unusual for a guy of his size.
 Even without a superb back, i think he should have got at least one sandow, giving the fact he dominated so many competitors from the front and side
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Royalty on February 07, 2007, 06:51:15 AM
Nasser should have easily won the 1997 Arnold Classic.

I remember after the show Nasser said flex had a neck like a boy (classic)
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: GoneAway on February 07, 2007, 07:22:11 PM
1997 Arnold Classic.
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: GoneAway on February 07, 2007, 07:23:56 PM
 :o
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Iceman1981 on February 07, 2007, 07:33:12 PM
:o

Damn, Flex just looks like a cartoon character in this shot.
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: jonsande on February 07, 2007, 07:45:48 PM
His back blows Nasser's out of the water.  No comparison.
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: pobrecito on February 07, 2007, 07:46:08 PM
Post the  98 AC pictures, Flex was much better :o
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: MRMD2003 on February 07, 2007, 08:43:29 PM
DA SHIT IS CHESS NOT CHECKERS !!!
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: ribonucleic on February 07, 2007, 08:48:59 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=125028.0;attach=140729;image)

End of discussion
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Palpatine Q on February 07, 2007, 08:57:19 PM
Nasser is bigger for sure

But Flex annhilates him in every other department, he's on another level.

Difference between a Viper and a Ferrari
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: dogbowl on February 08, 2007, 12:56:02 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=125028.0;attach=140729;image)

End of discussion

Flex wins that pose, Nasser wins all the others
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Petrucci on February 08, 2007, 02:48:43 AM
Flex wins that pose, Nasser wins all the others

thats what im seeying...Nasser is winning ALL other poses, besides back....And even in back shot, Nasser hamstrings are better, his legs are a lot bigger and one very important thing that is missing in the photo. CALVES!!!! wich flex had none....

i mean, if your back is better than anyone else, BUT all the other parts are worse, do you win even like that?
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: Pollux on February 08, 2007, 05:36:15 AM
awesome comparison

Flex Wheeler -- ALL THE WAY!!!  8)
Title: Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
Post by: the shadow on February 08, 2007, 05:49:26 AM
thats what im seeying...Nasser is winning ALL other poses, besides back....And even in back shot, Nasser hamstrings are better, his legs are a lot bigger and one very important thing that is missing in the photo. CALVES!!!! wich flex had none....

i mean, if your back is better than anyone else, BUT all the other parts are worse, do you win even like that?
yep..thats bodybuilding.the past 2 mr olympias,ronnie and yates won the olympi only because of the back and nothing else