Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Robert the Bruce on February 09, 2007, 01:39:12 AM

Title: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 09, 2007, 01:39:12 AM
I think Lee looked ok at the 2003 Mr O. I know he only placed 15th, but I think he looked ok  :o :o :o

And people say that was his worst appearance, well he still looks better than 90% of people who go the gym  :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: IFBBwannaB on February 09, 2007, 02:09:36 AM
I think Lee looked ok at the 2003 Mr O. I know he only placed 15th, but I think he looked ok  :o :o :o

And people say that was his worst appearance, well he still looks better than 90% of people who go the gym  :-\ :-\

LOL try 99.9999% of the people who are in any gym.He is still a pro.And Im FAR from being a Lee fan.
On an other note though,compared to pros he always suck,he should thank the judges for his placings insted of complaining like a litle bitch.

Like Ronnie say,WHY COMPLAIN?!  8)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: TheAnimal on February 09, 2007, 02:10:43 AM
hahaha, more like 99.9%, and even that is probably too low when you compare Lee to the general populace, and even then that is irrelevant.  His upper body was good at that show and his calves were huge, but his quads, hams, and glutes were all very smooth.  I think another good two weeks of dieting would have put him much higher in the ranks at that show.
So for every thousand people who go to the gym there will be one who looks better than Lee Priest?
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 09, 2007, 02:31:23 AM
I think Lee looks gorgeous  :D
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 09, 2007, 02:58:45 AM
oh dear, they ain't nice questions to ask guys  :-\
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 09, 2007, 03:11:00 AM
this is lees best pose
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: Quickerblade on February 09, 2007, 03:21:09 AM
i have nothing bad to say as i cant get my body to be any where like his
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: phyxsius on February 09, 2007, 03:23:45 AM
Lee was forced to enter the 2003 Olympia show
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 09, 2007, 04:11:11 AM
Smooth as a baby's bottom.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: OneManGang on February 09, 2007, 04:14:32 AM
I think Lee looked ok at the 2003 Mr O. I know he only placed 15th, but I think he looked ok  :o :o :o

And people say that was his worst appearance, well he still looks better than 90% of people who go the gym  :-\ :-\

Mop alert! Mop Alert!
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: the shadow on February 09, 2007, 04:16:24 AM
Mop alert! Mop Alert!
whats if robert the bruce is your father?he can your father also?? ::)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: Bluto on February 09, 2007, 04:22:39 AM
lee didnt place well because of his hair. it's that simple. if you think the judges doesnt judge the hair etc you're wrong
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: OneManGang on February 09, 2007, 04:24:56 AM
lee didnt place well because of his hair. it's that simple. if you think the judges doesnt judge the hair etc you're wrong


Exactly! If everything equal between two competitors, I would always place a person with such a mop or a mullet below a person with a normal and decent haircut
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: the shadow on February 09, 2007, 04:26:26 AM
Exactly! If everything equal between two competitors, I would always place a person with such a mop or a mullet below a person with a normal and decent haircut
what if thats not a real mullet or haird??what if its a wigg? ::)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: OneManGang on February 09, 2007, 04:29:54 AM
what if thats not a real mullet or haird??what if its a wigg? ::)

What if "wigg" only has one g, you dyslectic 85 lbs muppet
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 09, 2007, 04:32:12 AM
Hair is nothing. Dorian had a mullett and was crowned Mr. Olympia.

Hair... pfft! :)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: the shadow on February 09, 2007, 04:33:10 AM
What if "wigg" only has one g, you dyslectic 85 lbs muppet
what if that 85lbs dyslectic is you? ::)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: the shadow on February 09, 2007, 04:34:59 AM
What if "wigg" only has one g, you dyslectic 85 lbs muppet
whos the dyslectic now?? ::)..heres your retard message of the week..ahahhaah
OneManGang
Getbig I

Posts: 93


           Re: new JAY CUTLER pics at 305LBS
« Reply #9 on: Today at 04:01:28 AM »   Quote

How do you know it is his legs? It could be someone else
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: The_Punisher on February 09, 2007, 04:38:50 AM
oh damn, Somebody has a hard-on watching lee priest pics. You don't call a man gorgeous...hahaha gayer than elton john singing to his boyfriend
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Stavios on February 09, 2007, 04:54:15 AM
I remember when I read my first mag about bbing and there was a review of the 2003 O.

I couldn't believe at the time that they said Lee was very out of shape  :o

now I see  ;D
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Weightpit on February 09, 2007, 05:17:46 AM
Lee has always been an enigma.....from the weird hairstyles, tattoos (on his face??), pretending he was superman.......it's like he constantly wanted to change his appearence all the time to satisfy some kind of complex.

This hair style at the Olympia was a complete joke....I'm guessing he knew he was off and didn't give a crap about how his hair looked. Maybe it was his way of rebelling....who the hell knows. Maybe he can come on here and explain it....

Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: ether on February 09, 2007, 06:10:27 AM
Lee's Chest and Back are always impressive.


Looks like he brought his legs up to match his arms for that show as well.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: Pollux on February 09, 2007, 06:12:50 AM
Lee was forced to enter the 2003 Olympia show

I don't believe that Lee was FORCED to do anything with his "I don't give a shit" attitude.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Weightpit on February 09, 2007, 06:19:30 AM
Lee's Chest and Back are always impressive.


Looks like he brought his legs up to match his arms for that show as well.

Chest??? What chest???
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Karl Kox on February 09, 2007, 07:13:43 AM
ya not his best showing but still looks ok
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: onlyme on February 09, 2007, 07:19:23 AM
this is lees best pose

Here is your best pose
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: IceCold on February 09, 2007, 08:01:24 AM


And people say that was his worst appearance, well he still looks better than 90% of people who go the gym  :-\ :-\

well, he still uses more drugs and steroids than 90 % of the world's population
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: DK II on February 09, 2007, 08:06:55 AM
well, he still uses more drugs and steroids than 90 % of the world's population

ahahaha, make that 99.9%!!
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: Lee_a_priest on February 09, 2007, 08:25:01 AM
well, he still uses more drugs and steroids than 90 % of the world's population

ARE YOU REALLY SURE
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................?????????????????????????
Post by: jaejonna on February 09, 2007, 08:27:11 AM
If all the pros were to stop using for a year, i would place Lee near the top of the heap.....
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: DK II on February 09, 2007, 08:38:20 AM
ARE YOU REALLY SURE

hahaahahahaaa, are you serious, Lee??

given the fact the world's population is 6.6 billion, 10% woul be 600 000 000 people. That's nearly twice the US.
Do you really believe there are so many people doing more roids than you??

Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING..........................????????????????????????
Post by: jaejonna on February 09, 2007, 08:41:43 AM
hahaahahahaaa, are you serious, Lee??

given the fact the world's population is 6.6 billion, 10% woul be 600 000 000 people. That's nearly twice the US.
Do you really believe there are so many people doing more roids than you??


i was thinking the same... i would put that number up to 98% .... there are alot of fuggin people in the world when you think about it ..
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: SWOLETRAIN on February 09, 2007, 11:02:07 AM
lee is the man.... look at the arm size!!!
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Dingleberry on February 09, 2007, 12:25:12 PM
Last thing I ever heard on Lee's drug use was something crazy (small) like 600mg deca a week, and that's it. Don't start bashing me, it's what he said. If that's true, he has the best genetics ever considering that wouldn't give most pro's even a good muscle pump.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: SWOLETRAIN on February 09, 2007, 12:47:47 PM
belive it or not there is some pro level who do not use much offseason but more towards pre contest
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Lee_a_priest on February 09, 2007, 02:56:09 PM
I HAVENT TOUCHED ANY SINCE END OF SEPTEMBER I AM STILL AROUND 245-250LBS.......AND WILL NOT GO ON TILL JULY.......WHY STAY ON IT ALL YEAR...I HAVE MET MORE AMATURES AND PEOPLE WHO DONT COMPETE AT ALL USING MORE THEN THE PROS DO...
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Blockhead on February 09, 2007, 03:03:52 PM

  I agree.

 Lots of guys stay on year round and havent been 'off' in YEARS! Wouldn't they respond so much better if they got off for equal amount of time ON? Gives their receptors time to clean out a little.

 I know guys also who don't compete, never will compete, never even attend shows...and they use a compilation of gear, GROWTH, and slin on a regular basis. Just to look 'cool' in the bars on weekends.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: knny187 on February 09, 2007, 03:08:15 PM
Is GH & Slin being used?
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: D.L. 5 on February 09, 2007, 03:14:11 PM
I HAVENT TOUCHED ANY SINCE END OF SEPTEMBER I AM STILL AROUND 245-250LBS.......AND WILL NOT GO ON TILL JULY.......WHY STAY ON IT ALL YEAR...I HAVE MET MORE AMATURES AND PEOPLE WHO DONT COMPETE AT ALL USING MORE THEN THE PROS DO...
dont worry about it lee.

it seems there a few people who like to take shots at the pro's or undermine their success and ahrdwork by constantly refering to the gear!

keep doing ur thing lee ;)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Stavios on February 09, 2007, 06:41:15 PM
  I agree.

 Lots of guys stay on year round and havent been 'off' in YEARS! Wouldn't they respond so much better if they got off for equal amount of time ON? Gives their receptors time to clean out a little.

 I know guys also who don't compete, never will compete, never even attend shows...and they use a compilation of gear, GROWTH, and slin on a regular basis. Just to look 'cool' in the bars on weekends.

why is it ok to juice like crazy to look good 1 day per year and it isn't to look good all the time expect that you don't go onstage in a posing trunks

speak on this
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: ronian on February 09, 2007, 06:49:25 PM
I thought I remember a contest where Lee claimed he was clean for the months preceding the contest...it may have been the '03 Olympia? 
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: fitgirly on February 09, 2007, 06:51:16 PM
Anyone who can put on weight in the off season and then look the way Lee looks on stage is simply gifted, drugs or not. No amount of drugs can make a body react like his when its contest time. Thats why he's so unbelievable, genetically gifted. True, I know pros who take a ton of supps and still look like crap and never place, so hats off to Lee!  :-*I wish I had genetics that good! You know Lee doesn't bs anyone and he'd say if he's on sh*t.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Lee_a_priest on February 09, 2007, 07:00:53 PM
I thought I remember a contest where Lee claimed he was clean for the months preceding the contest...it may have been the '03 Olympia? 

96 IRONMAN I DID CLEAN........
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Ozzy on February 09, 2007, 07:02:57 PM
why is it ok to juice like crazy to look good 1 day per year and it isn't to look good all the time expect that you don't go onstage in a posing trunks

speak on this


It's called a double standard.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: ether on February 09, 2007, 07:09:49 PM
96 IRONMAN I DID CLEAN........

See Gh15 post on what these guys consider "clean"
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Livewire on February 09, 2007, 07:27:14 PM
See Gh15 post on what these guys consider "clean"

according to gh15,

clean = nasser washes his underwear before selling them


If you're entering a spring bodybuilding show, enter this one too! (http://www.getanabolics.com/contests-i-10.html)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: NPCbldr on February 09, 2007, 08:48:11 PM
WHATEVER........... HE'S AN .......
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: DK II on February 10, 2007, 01:13:30 AM
96 IRONMAN I DID CLEAN........

See Gh15 post on what these guys consider "clean"

Yes, and on a side note,

"clean" for 4 weeks before the show and 4 weeks after??

Mate, you've been doing gear for years, just forgetting a shot or when your dealer dies and you need a new one doesn't make you clean.



"Hope this helps".
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 10, 2007, 01:24:47 AM
Yes, and on a side note,

"clean" for 4 weeks before the show and 4 weeks after??

Mate, you've been doing gear for years, just forgetting a shot or when your dealer dies and you need a new one doesn't make you clean.



"Hope this helps".

hey donkey kong, lee looks absolutely stunning in those pics, so dont hate, appreciate those MASSIVE OILED MUSCLES  :o :o :o :o#

And even if you took roid, you wouldn't look 1/4 of Lee Priest

hope this helps
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: MAXX on February 10, 2007, 01:36:40 AM
96 IRONMAN I DID CLEAN........
have any pictures from that contest Lee?

would be very intresting to see
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: gtbro1 on February 10, 2007, 01:39:32 AM
96 IRONMAN I DID CLEAN........

How did you place in that show?
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 10, 2007, 01:40:22 AM
he placed 4th and looked incredible
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: DK II on February 10, 2007, 01:45:40 AM
hey donkey kong, lee looks absolutely stunning in those pics, so dont hate, appreciate those MASSIVE OILED MUSCLES  :o :o :o :o#

And even if you took roid, you wouldn't look 1/4 of Lee Priest

hope this helps

did i ever say i would?

1/4 of Lee priest must be those ugly tats, i can live without that.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 10, 2007, 01:47:48 AM
ugly tats  ???
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: DK II on February 10, 2007, 02:12:14 AM
ugly tats  ???

yes ugly tats.

It's nothing against Lee, but i don't like tattoos. They are stupid.

Some asian characters that read 'male power' or whatever, comic character symbols, south pacific tribe member symbols.

all ridiculous BS if you live in a modern western society.
If you have some sort of socially acceptable lifestyle (and no, professional bodybuilding is not), then tattoos are out of the question.

Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: gtbro1 on February 11, 2007, 07:29:47 PM
yes ugly tats.

It's nothing against Lee, but i don't like tattoos. They are stupid.

Some asian characters that read 'male power' or whatever, comic character symbols, south pacific tribe member symbols.

all ridiculous BS if you live in a modern western society.
If you have some sort of socially acceptable lifestyle (and no, professional bodybuilding is not), then tattoos are out of the question.



    Even though it should not effect your employment,it can and does. I work in a factory and I have seen them pass over qualified people just because the Human Resource guy goes to church and does not like the way someone looks. They won't admit that "on the record" but I have heard it straight from the man's mouth.If a factory judges you by your tats I can only imagine  how it would be in a business type setting.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Lee_a_priest on February 11, 2007, 08:19:05 PM
    Even though it should not effect your employment,it can and does. I work in a factory and I have seen them pass over qualified people just because the Human Resource guy goes to church and does not like the way someone looks. They won't admit that "on the record" but I have heard it straight from the man's mouth.If a factory judges you by your tats I can only imagine  how it would be in a business type setting.

TYPICAL FUCKIN CHURCH PERSON  JUDGING PEOPLE AS USUAL........
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: Money Man on February 11, 2007, 08:26:55 PM
But Lee you know people judge other people all the time by the way they look.And at one time in your life you hated people stareing and gawking at you.And now you have a tattoo on your face and many on your body.People are going to look at you and there going to judge you. And you might not like what they think(though I'm sure not to many people will say a thing to you about it).
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: donrhummy on February 11, 2007, 08:27:45 PM
I actually think Lee Priest was at his best at the time of this photo shoot. Not sure when it was. 95, 96?

(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/priest20.jpg)
(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/priest23.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: irocktheyellow on February 11, 2007, 10:17:05 PM
Lee,

I thought your hair looked pretty pimp at the 03' Ironman.
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: DK II on February 12, 2007, 02:26:15 AM
    Even though it should not effect your employment,it can and does. I work in a factory and I have seen them pass over qualified people just because the Human Resource guy goes to church and does not like the way someone looks. They won't admit that "on the record" but I have heard it straight from the man's mouth.If a factory judges you by your tats I can only imagine  how it would be in a business type setting.

Man has eyes and uses them.

All your friends are people who fit into your life, so if you chose someone for work you will naturally do the same.

There aren't many white collar upper grade job with tattooed hippies in there. If there where, a tattoo could guarantee a job.

It's called "society".
Title: Re: Lee Priest's WORST SHOWING?
Post by: gtbro1 on February 12, 2007, 04:12:21 AM
Man has eyes and uses them.

All your friends are people who fit into your life, so if you chose someone for work you will naturally do the same.

There aren't many white collar upper grade job with tattooed hippies in there. If there where, a tattoo could guarantee a job.

It's called "society".


Yep. I agree