Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: alexxx on March 07, 2007, 07:45:59 PM
-
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/reeves/sr33.jpg)
-
Yes.
-
Yes.
Much better
-
Yes.
Very Nice!
-
Very Nice!
i could,but i choose not to post pictures of myself ;D
bench
-
try this one... ;D ;D ;D
-
try this one... ;D ;D ;D
Bravo!! I'm in love!
-
Sure.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=129306.0;attach=144162;image)
And one more:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=129306.0;attach=144165;image)
-
Same pose NOT the same picture but better quality
-
;D
-
Same pose NOT the same picture but better quality
He has much more mass in the first one.
-
He has much more mass in the first one.
Not really he was probably the same size give or take a couple of pounds he's closer to the camera in the other one , he's like 16 or 17 in these pics
-
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/reeves/sr33.jpg)
Alexxx he was good for his time but there have been better physiques sinse then, Frank Zane had all the same traits but was a better bodybuilder
-
Another young Reeves
-
Good call, The Ugly. :)
-
Not really he was probably the same size give or take a couple of pounds he's closer to the camera in the other one , he's like 16 or 17 in these pics
Do you have pics of him in his prime?
I am guessing this is him at his best?
-
Alexxx he was good for his time but there have been better physiques sinse then, Frank Zane had all the same traits but was a better bodybuilder
No one is a better bodybuilder than Steve Reeves , no one , he accomplished so much more than everyone else with so little and he was natural !
-
Not really he was probably the same size give or take a couple of pounds he's closer to the camera in the other one , he's like 16 or 17 in these pics
WOW I am only starting to look like that now but he was like that at 16?? Insane!
-
I believe these were 1947 among his best ever !
-
29' waist at 215 pounds and 6'1" thats insane !
-
Alexxx he was good for his time but there have been better physiques sinse then, Frank Zane had all the same traits but was a better bodybuilder
hahaha Are you kidding me?
Frank Zane even with an unlimited supply of drugs could not stand beside Reeves!
-
No one is a better bodybuilder than Steve Reeves , no one , he accomplished so much more than everyone else with so little and he was natural !
i was talking about his physique not whether or not he was natural, i agree for a truly natural Bodybuilder the guy is amazing!
So this may be the best natural pic of a bodybuilder but certainly not the best pic of a bodybuilder period
-
29' waist at 215 pounds and 6'1" thats insane !
Yes I agree. Reeves was more interested in a wide frame then big muscles. I guess my only criticism is that he could have been thicker but I guess if he was that would have been too much to believe.
-
hahaha Are you kidding me?
Frank Zane even with an unlimited supply of drugs could not stand beside Reeves!
note the succulent breasts with a subtle hint of gayness............adam abelas is one pathetic POS... 8)
-
i was talking about his physique not whether or not he was natural, i agree for a truly natural Bodybuilder the guy is amazing!
So this may be the best natural pic of a bodybuilder but certainly not the best pic of a bodybuilder period
Well you have a point ! but based on what little he knew and what he had to work with and his natural structure I think its even more impressive .
-
Yes I agree. Reeves was more interested in a wide frame then big muscles. I guess my only criticism is that he could have been thicker but I guess if he was that would have been too much to believe.
He was one of the bigger guys who competed back then but I understand what you're saying he does appear thin in some poses , Grimmek and Reg Park were thicker guys but I think Reeves was simply better .
-
try this one out!!!
-
...