Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Platz on May 05, 2007, 12:52:13 PM

Title: Arnold
Post by: Platz on May 05, 2007, 12:52:13 PM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery11/ar499.jpg)

Discuss
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Rami on May 05, 2007, 12:53:06 PM
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: nzmusclemonster on May 05, 2007, 12:53:17 PM
I believe he is doing "The Tea-pot."
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Platz on May 05, 2007, 12:54:22 PM
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.
Why?
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Rami on May 05, 2007, 01:16:24 PM
because he wasn't good enough
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: 240 is Back on May 05, 2007, 01:20:10 PM
Arnold? Definitely overlooked in bodybuilding history.  They should have made a bigger deal about this guy.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: onlyme on May 05, 2007, 01:24:22 PM
Finally a thread about Arnold.  We need one on Coleman too ::)
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: CARTEL on May 05, 2007, 01:26:59 PM
Finally a thread about Arnold.  We need one on Coleman too ::)

What about Yates? Oh it's on now!
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: phyxsius on May 05, 2007, 02:20:06 PM
Finally a thread about Arnold.  We need one on Coleman too ::)

LOL.. Not to forget Jay Cutler, Franco Columbu, Zane, etc
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Nuge on May 05, 2007, 04:21:05 PM
I believe he is doing "The Tea-pot."

LMAO!  ;D
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: donrhummy on May 05, 2007, 08:22:56 PM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery11/ar499.jpg)

Discuss

That physique is better than the current Mr. O's. If he stepped on stage like that today, he should still win. Zero progress in 33 years.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: donrhummy on May 05, 2007, 08:28:52 PM
Here they are compared.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: dragonheart on May 05, 2007, 09:35:26 PM
arnolds arms > cutler
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Eric2 on May 05, 2007, 11:58:36 PM
That physique is better than the current Mr. O's. If he stepped on stage like that today, he should still win. Zero progress in 33 years.

  While I agree with you that Arnold could and should win with this pictured physique in todays line-up. I do not agree with the zero progress in 33 years. First of all, the human body is only cabable of so much improvement in muscular mass and quality. There really are limitations to everything in life. Bodybuilding is not really a sport, more of a pagent. I do not care what anyone says or thinks about this. Therefor at a pagent natural genetics is what generally comes first then overall presentation 2nd, then talent and charisma.
    Bodybuilding has stepped up in some areas such as the leg dept. It has scaled down in the presentation dept. Too many guys look like pharmacutical blimps. No guy like this can live very long nor have a quality lifestyle. Most pro-bodybuilders are so out of shape that fucking would leave them in near cardiac arrest. Yes most current pros are out of shape. Listen to the way they talk when they are just walking around, they sound as though they just ran a 5 mile run.
   Bodybuilding has most definetly regressed.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on May 06, 2007, 01:10:13 AM
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.

You've obviously been smoking some bad crack!
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Pollux on May 06, 2007, 06:36:53 AM
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.

Way hatin'.


(http://hoodride.com/nucleus/media/206/haterade-logo.jpg)
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Dballn247 on May 06, 2007, 06:56:06 AM
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery11/ar499.jpg)

Since it hasn't been posted yet,

All Drugs!!!
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Stark on May 06, 2007, 07:20:58 AM
because he wasn't good enough

One of getbig's idiots right here folks ::)
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: donrhummy on May 06, 2007, 07:28:00 AM
  While I agree with you that Arnold could and should win with this pictured physique in todays line-up. I do not agree with the zero progress in 33 years. First of all, the human body is only cabable of so much improvement in muscular mass and quality. There really are limitations to everything in life. Bodybuilding is not really a sport, more of a pagent. I do not care what anyone says or thinks about this. Therefor at a pagent natural genetics is what generally comes first then overall presentation 2nd, then talent and charisma.
    Bodybuilding has stepped up in some areas such as the leg dept. It has scaled down in the presentation dept. Too many guys look like pharmacutical blimps. No guy like this can live very long nor have a quality lifestyle. Most pro-bodybuilders are so out of shape that fucking would leave them in near cardiac arrest. Yes most current pros are out of shape. Listen to the way they talk when they are just walking around, they sound as though they just ran a 5 mile run.
   Bodybuilding has most definetly regressed.

Wait, if it's regressed, then that's ZERO progress.  ::) So you DO agree with me.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: rjp on May 06, 2007, 08:06:10 AM
Still the best Olympia champ to combine size w/o the bloat. Shame he's hardly brought up in these "who's the best" debates. 80's bodybuilders in general were the peak of the "sport" IMO.

(http://www.onewaysystem.com/images/olimpiak_albuma/lee_haney.jpg)
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Eric2 on May 06, 2007, 10:41:01 AM
Wait, if it's regressed, then that's ZERO progress.  ::) So you DO agree with me.

   no, like I said. the human body can only go so far drugs or not. So to expect a constant state of progress is really foolish. My point with not agreeing with you was based on this as well as the fact that it has regressed. A point that which you did not make. Kinda' like that whole positive negative thing in math. Zero progress means that it is equall to what was. Regression is a negative to what was.
    Savvy?
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: bigkubby on May 06, 2007, 10:41:25 AM
Still the best Olympia champ to combine size w/o the bloat. Shame he's hardly brought up in these "who's the best" debates. 80's bodybuilders in general were the peak of the "sport" IMO.

(http://www.onewaysystem.com/images/olimpiak_albuma/lee_haney.jpg)
i know massive16 inch arms and 20 inch quads i cant beleive nobody smashed on him .
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: Stark on May 06, 2007, 11:32:07 AM
i know massive16 inch arms and 20 inch quads i cant beleive nobody smashed on him .

He looks phantastic in that picture, I wish all bodybuilders would strive a physique like that.
Title: Re: Arnold
Post by: dragonheart on May 06, 2007, 07:42:43 PM
Haney is great, I think his torso is possibly the best in bodybuilding history.  If his arms were a little bigger he would look totally unreal and have the best physique of all time imo.  Hes not mentioned very much because hes a nice guy and not very controversial