Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: theworm on May 15, 2007, 05:06:47 PM
-
How come smaller "symetrical" physiques such as Dexter's are winning shows like the Arnold,
but bigger, even more symetrical guys like Wolf are losing 2nd tier shows?
-
Because the IFBB is a fucking joke.
-
Dexter would have won that show dieting 6 weeks.
-
Three weeks tops.
-
Ever seen Dexter's gut?
He ain't been "symetrical" in a long time.
-
Dex's conditioning is better
-
G4P
-
What you guys did not know:
In reality, the IFBB is the biggest underground cage fighting association in the world. Bodybuilding is just to fool the masses. (haha, masses ::) ). These pros are super mega hardcore underground cage fighters, and all IFBB competitions are fought out beforehand in an underground cage. ::)
That's the reason you cannot know who will win.
-
Because the IFBB is a fucking joke.
ding ding ding.... we have a winner! the placing are already decided before the show! ;D
-
I think at this point Dexter is more complete and has really maxed his bodies potential say for a maybe 5 lbs but thats being picky. Wolf is over 6' and needs 15-20lbs more and equal or better conditioning which is alot more improvements to make than Dexter. Like at the Arnold I don't think Wolf could have taken down any of the Top 5 at his present level and Dex did.
-
Dex is more complete.
Wolf needs to slowly fill out the frame. in 2 years you can bring this subject up again...maybe even less than 2 years, and Dennis might be the main man...
But Wolf is still making progress...not at his full potential yet
-
Dexter is one of the top 5 bodybuilders in the world right now.
Wolf may possibly crack the top 10 at the Olympia this year but he's still got a couple of areas to bring up.
Wolf will be a serious threat to win the Olympia in 2 years. He is the future.
-
Dude he is still symmetrical. Maybe his gut is not aesthetic but it still looks the same on both sides, making it symmetrical.
so you're saying as long as a gut is symmetrical that theres no problem? ::)
last time i checked, judges werent looking for muscularity, or symmetry in a gut.
-
How come smaller "symetrical" physiques such as Dexter's are winning shows like the Arnold,
but bigger, even more symetrical guys like Wolf are losing 2nd tier shows?
Wolf maybe bigger, but he is NOT more symmetrical. As a matter of fact his calfs suck terribly and his long torso almost disconnects his lower body from his upper. I am not impressed with him...
-
No once again you stupid shit, im saying that goatboy doesnt know what symmetrical means. Are you retarded?
read your own post and stop sniffing glue...
u refered to Dex's "gut" as SYMMETRICAL.
stupid shit....lol ::) please kid, you're one to be calling names.
-
Yes because it is. Does it look like his stomach is uneven to you? Having a gut does not mean that you're not symmetrical. MAYBE YOU SHOULD LOOK UP THE FOLLOWING WORDS: SYMMETRICAL AND IRONY. RETARD. Dont you have a bodybuilding show to diet for ? ::)
Yes perfect symmetry, i mean unsymmetrical gut.
(http://www.strongman.pl/zdjecia/news_290_02.jpg)
You seem to be missing the point.
You say GUT.
not abs.
fact is, if he HAS A GUT, what the fuck matters if it's symmetrical?
its like saying Ronnie has a tumor on his quad, but atleast its symmetrical. ::)
point is, if he HAS A GUT, there's no further discussion.
you should not have a gut on stage. end of story.
even if it is the most balanced gut in the world, it's still a gut, and there's nothing you can say to make that a "positive". you're not supposed to have a protruding stomach in the first place.
understand?
show to diet for? no i don't right now, but even fully dieted you'd only weigh as much as my lower body. ;D so what's ur point.
-
silly american in need of an english lesson.... our backward freind must be mistaking symetry with aesthetics..two totaly different meanings, a gut can be symetrical but can not be asthetically pleasing
hope this helps!