Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Pet Board => Topic started by: jmt1 on August 25, 2007, 10:08:46 PM

Title: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: jmt1 on August 25, 2007, 10:08:46 PM
what do people here think?  should ex fighting dog mean a automatic death sentence?

i realize that their would be some major issues and concerns in placing ex fighting dogs up for adoption but i do think they deserve a second chance at life.  once these dogs are rescued and if they pass temperament testing why not give them that chance?  even after everything these dogs have gone through most of them are still very people friendly and could make someone a great family pet. just becuase a dog was used for fighting does not mean they are dangerous or unstable.  of course these dogs couldnt be adopted out to just anyone. owners would need to be heavily screened.  it would have to be someone who has no other pets and someone who is familiar with the breed/apbt's. if suitable homes can be found they should be given a chance. i think it actually comes down to being able to find capable owners rather than a problem with the dog itself.
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Geo on August 25, 2007, 10:18:00 PM
hell yes ya put them down,you gonna trust a pit that's been trained to attack and lock on around your family ? your kids ? and how humane is it to leave them in a cage for the rest of their lives ?
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: jmt1 on August 25, 2007, 10:30:35 PM
hell yes ya put them down,you gonna trust a pit that's been trained to attack and lock on around your family ? your kids ? and how humane is it to leave them in a cage for the rest of their lives ?

huh ??? 

the fact is that most of these pits are still people friendly and are capable of making a great family pet.  dog aggression does not mean human aggression.
i said in my post if these dogs are put through temperament testing, food aggression, behavioral problems, ect, and pass that they should be given that chance.

Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: freespirit on August 26, 2007, 02:14:31 AM
huh ??? 

the fact is that most of these pits are still people friendly and are capable of making a great family pet.  dog aggression does not mean human aggression.
i said in my post if these dogs are put through temperament testing, food aggression, behavioral problems, ect, and pass that they should be given that chance.



If I had kids I certainly wouldn't trust a dog like that in my house, even after some sort of test.
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Vet on August 26, 2007, 11:34:14 AM
If I had kids I certainly wouldn't trust a dog like that in my house, even after some sort of test.

The problem  with placing dogs like this isn't necessarily the dogs, but finding responsible owners.  They are dogs that often require a great deal of retraning/rehabilitation (what ever you want to call it). They typically need to be placed in single dog (no more than 2 dog) households.  It can be really, really intense rehabilitating a former fighting dog.   

Can it be done?  Absolutely, there are many well documented cases of dogs that have been fought going on to be loving family pets.  The right owners just have to be found for the dogs.  Unfortunately finding the right owners is sometimes easier said than done, so euthanasia becomes an option.   I DO NOT THINK these dogs should be adopted out to just anyone who wants one and potential adoptors need to be screened extensively with followup and support.  This requires manpower and money that most counties won't devote.   
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: jmt1 on August 26, 2007, 03:59:29 PM
The Fate of Michael Vick's Dogs
A statement from Best Friends

posted by Kate Schnepel, Best Friends Staff

There has been much speculation as to what will happen to the 49 dogs seized from Michael Vick's property. Representatives from both PETA and the Humane Society of the United States have stated numerous times in the press that they feel the only responsible choice is to euthanize all of the dogs. Sadly, this is often the fate for any dog or puppy taken from a property where dog fighting is suspected to have occurred. The dogs are often killed without having had the opportunity to be temperament tested or evaluated – even puppies are destroyed as soon as they’re released through the courts.

It appears that, for now, the dogs from Michael Vick's property have been granted a reprieve. Late this afternoon, Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson gave custody of the dogs to the U.S. Marshals Service. Judge Hudson's order instructed the Marshals Service to use "whatever means appropriate to protect and maintain" the dogs. What's next for the dogs is not yet known.

Prior to today's developments, Best Friends released the following statement regarding Vick's dogs:

Best Friends has been in discussion with both the U.S. Attorney's Office and the United States Department of Agriculture about helping to evaluate the dogs and possibly bringing some of them to our animal sanctuary in southwestern Utah. A number of organizations, including Best Friends, have offered their assistance in helping provide these dogs with the alternative of life, instead of euthanasia. Best Friends has a history of bringing all types of dogs to the sanctuary, with many of them from difficult backgrounds. We strongly feel that some of these dogs can be rehabilitated, perhaps not to the point where they could be adopted by families, but to the point where they have a chance to live a fairly normal existence without the threat of ever again being exposed to fighting

http://network.bestfriends.org/stopbsl/news/18124.html
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Geo on August 26, 2007, 04:47:04 PM


 even puppies are destroyed as soon as they’re released through the courts.



now that I have a problem with because it seems to me puppys would have a better chance at being deprogramed than older dogs
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: beatmaster on August 26, 2007, 04:53:40 PM
now that I have a problem with because it seems to me puppys would have a better chance at being deprogramed than older dogs

i agree here............. but i'll never trust an ex-fighting pit bull, those are unpredictable dogs, nice one day, nuts the other...... so, no way
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Lord Humungous on August 27, 2007, 07:43:09 AM
For the record Geo, pits cant "lock" their jaws- thats an urban legend.
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Geo on August 27, 2007, 08:23:27 AM
For the record Geo, pits cant "lock" their jaws- thats an urban legend.

what do you know about real dogs ?

you own a basset hound !

 >:(
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: knny187 on August 27, 2007, 08:51:16 AM
Well...if it can be done....I'm sure they could fill a spot in society...somewhere.

Maybe in the prison system watching the tough ghetto inmates

Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Vet on August 27, 2007, 10:32:04 AM
I would take one, if I didn't already have a housefull of dogs and the dog had a personality that matched what I look for in a dog.   Unfortunately, with the new puppy and the dogo, i don't have the time necessary to devote to this type of dog and a 4 dog household is too much for my wife and I, especially considering what this dog may require..   Again, thats the problem.  Finding good humans for the dogs. 
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Hustle Man on August 27, 2007, 11:58:00 AM
Well...if it can be done....I'm sure they could fill a spot in society...somewhere.

Maybe in the prison system watching the tough ghetto inmates



Actually there are several programs already in place providing somewhat of the reverse of what you suggested.

http://www.coyotecommunications.com/dogs/prisondogs.html

http://www.pathwaystohope.org/prison.htm

http://members.tripod.com/~prisonp/index.html


Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: jmt1 on August 27, 2007, 03:34:28 PM
I would take one, if I didn't already have a housefull of dogs and the dog had a personality that matched what I look for in a dog.   Unfortunately, with the new puppy and the dogo, i don't have the time necessary to devote to this type of dog and a 4 dog household is too much for my wife and I, especially considering what this dog may require..   Again, thats the problem.  Finding good humans for the dogs. 

i agree that it comes down to finding the right owners for the dogs.  its really a shame that so many great dogs get put down without ever having a chance.

i disagree with the comments that these dogs cant be trusted to be around people.  just because they were used as fighting dogs doesnt make them unstable. dog agression and human agression are two very different things. 
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: jmt1 on August 27, 2007, 03:41:09 PM
more on the dogs rescued from vick...

A Roswell veterinarian believes he can rehabilitate at least some of Michael Vick's pit bulls that mainstream animal-rights advocates want put to death.

And he is not alone. Pit bull experts say the dogs are getting a bad rap.

"I work with Fulton and Cobb counties and we've take in injured pit bulls all the time and we've adopted a lot of them out to good homes," said the veterinarian, Michael Good, who heads up the Homeless Pets Foundation. "It is the nature of the breed to be very loving toward people. They are a very subservient breed. They are intelligent and they respond to man's affection."

Not everyone agrees.

Some animal-rights advocates are calling for authorities to kill the dogs seized on the Atlanta Falcons quarterback's Virginia property. A spokeswoman for the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals called the dogs "ticking time bombs." Officials with the Humane Society of the United States said the animals should be put down. Last month, federal prosecutors filed court papers asking permission to condemn the 53 dogs seized in April.

Friendly temperaments

That makes sense to a lot of people — including the man who once examined the dogs and found them gentle toward people. Derrick Moore, the former animal-control officer in Surry County, Va., said the dogs allowed him to pet them when he inspected Vick's Bad Newz Kennels, which was licensed by the county. Moore said other pit bulls he seized a few years ago in a dogfighting investigation had similarly friendly temperaments but the county still put the dogs down.

"Every one of them, including the puppies, we put down," he said. "I wouldn't take a chance on adopting them out. I doubt they would hurt people but if one did bite somebody, and even if it didn't have anything to do with the way they were raised, you're still liable and people have their hands out [for money]."

But pit bull advocates said the government is indiscriminately condemning the same dogs it is prosecuting Vick for abusing.

"They say they rescue the dogs from dogfighters and then they kill them," said Diane Jessup, a nationally recognized expert on pit bulls in Washington state who trains dogs for law enforcement. "If they are just summarily killed, it sends a message that pit bulls are expendable, which is the same message that dogfighters are sending."

On Thursday, the save-the-pit bulls arguments carried the day — at least for now. U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson ordered the U.S. Marshal service to "protect and maintain" the dogs recovered from Vick's property.

Pit bull groups have been maneuvering to get permission to evaluate and save at least some of Vick's dogs, said Donna Reynolds, executive director of Bad Rap, a California pit bull advocacy group.

"We expect to have an announcement next week," she said.

Evaluate, rehabilitate

Generally, even pit bulls that have been trained to fight have a good disposition toward people but are often a danger toward other dogs, experts say. Trainers, such as Good, Jessup and Reynolds, say they can easily identify a vicious pit bull that can't be rehabilitated. But they said Vick's dogs should be sent to organizations that will evaluate the dogs, rehabilitate the ones deemed salvageable and then screen potential owners to ensure the animals end up with the right people.

Good said he owns three pit bulls, once fighting dogs but now socialized, that have become great pets. Reynolds said she has a battle-scarred female she rescued and it doesn't attack other dogs on impulse. She keeps it out of potentially provocative situations.

"No matter what the public decides to think about Vick's dogs, I think we can learn a lot from this situation, if we can get past the stereotypes that they're ticking time bombs or fighting machines," Reynolds said. "As long as the dog is going to be well-behaved on the leash, it can go on walks. They don't have to go to the dog park. Dogs don't have to be friends."


Jessup said she was willing to evaluate Vick's dogs and retrain some for police work.

"I think it is easy to brush these dogs under the rug when there are groups out there who are willing to step up and help," she said. "If these were German shepherds, this wouldn't even be part of the discussion."
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Hedgehog on August 27, 2007, 03:45:21 PM
Well...if it can be done....I'm sure they could fill a spot in society...somewhere.

Maybe in the prison system watching the tough ghetto inmates



I agree with knny.

If it can be done. Sure.

Why breed more dogs if these dogs are available and if they can be re-trained?

But if they can't - put them away.
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Vet on August 27, 2007, 06:30:06 PM
I agree with knny.

If it can be done. Sure.

Why breed more dogs if these dogs are available and if they can be re-trained?

But if they can't - put them away.

Exactly..... the problem is finding enough of the right people and keeping the human nuts who convinced they know more than everyone else at bay.   Taking on one of these dogs will be a liability becuase if the dog bites another dog, or god forbid it bites a human, there will be a hayday with it.   You have to find the right owners....   
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Lord Humungous on August 27, 2007, 07:25:03 PM
what do you know about real dogs ?

you own a basset hound !

 >:(
Hes a beagle/basset/ somethin, somethin
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Geo on August 27, 2007, 07:46:37 PM
Hes a beagle/basset/ somethin, somethin

I read something the other day about beagles bein vicious around newborns so ya might wanna keep an eye on old O'dog
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Lord Humungous on August 28, 2007, 05:53:06 AM
I read something the other day about beagles bein vicious around newborns so ya might wanna keep an eye on old O'dog

totally blood thirsty!! Beagles are evil
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Vet on August 28, 2007, 10:03:43 AM
totally blood thirsty!! Beagles are evil

The worst animal bite my wife has ever gotten was from a beagel at the humane society.  I've got scars on my left forearm from one too.   Beagles are babies......with teeth.    :-\
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: knny187 on August 28, 2007, 11:12:20 AM
& they sure like to bark alot

 ;D
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: dizzleman06 on August 28, 2007, 02:09:13 PM
it really saddens me to think that some of these dogs could be rehabilitated and re-entered into society...  I would take one, just imagine how loving that dog would be toward you...given the fact that no one has shown it proper attention, it would think that it died and went to heaven!  You would just have to be careful of the situations that you put it in...
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: Geo on August 28, 2007, 05:02:19 PM
totally blood thirsty!! Beagles are evil

probably planning a bold assault on the baby right now
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: jmt1 on August 28, 2007, 05:10:46 PM
it really saddens me to think that some of these dogs could be rehabilitated and re-entered into society...  I would take one, just imagine how loving that dog would be toward you...given the fact that no one has shown it proper attention, it would think that it died and went to heaven!  You would just have to be careful of the situations that you put it in...

i agree...although i'm not sure if rehabilatated is even the right word.  they were trained to fight other dogs and i'm not sure how sucessful someone would be if they tried to deprogram them of that.  i think that dog agression will continue to be there and even if someone tried to resocialize them to be friendly with other dogs it wouldnt be worth the risk.  the person who adopts the dog would just have to be very aware of what the dog is capable of and be careful not to put him in any situations that could lead to trouble.  
Title: Re: Ex-fighting dogs... Euthanize or give them a chance at adoption?
Post by: ~flower~ on August 28, 2007, 06:15:07 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2992065 (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2992065)

As Vick case unfolds, it's the dogs that await ultimate ruling
By Elizabeth Merrill
ESPN.com

SURRY, Va. -- Ray Lane never really saw the dogs. They'd bark and growl at night, just like the hounds he calls summa dogs, summa 'dis, summa 'dat … the mutts. They uttered no secrets.

The Surry animal shelter is a perfect place to hide federal evidence. It's a brown, drab building swallowed up by lush green trees at the bottom of a twisting gravel road. A chain-link fence about 10 feet high keeps the unsavory out. For a good piece of the summer, the orders for the garbage-truck drivers who park near the shelter were strict. Zip in to use the bathroom, then get out. Do not pet the dogs. Do not look at or talk about the dogs.

Then one day, a black Suburban and two white trucks rolled down the gravel road and whisked Michael Vick's dogs away, to another secret site, to eat and bark somewhere else.

"The government got them," says Lane, a sanitation worker who used to be Surry's animal control officer. "It's not like they were 'Men in Black' or anything. You can just tell people have a title 'bout them by the way they walk and carry themselves. They had a title to them."

It's kind of strange. Everybody knows everybody in this town where Bible passages are stamped on license plate frames and you can get fried flounder in the same place that sells gas. But nobody really knows the dogs. Collectively, they're about 50 of the best-kept secrets in the Vick dogfighting case, living, breathing, barking evidence preserved in shelters across a swath of more than 100 miles in Virginia.

   
A sliding gate and fence keep the unwanted, such as would-be thieves and the media, out of the Surry animal shelter. There are no Vick dogs at this site anymore.
Their homes are identified in federal court documents as Locations A, B, C, D, E and F; their handlers have been given strict orders not to talk. Amid the cloak-and-dagger secrecy, confusion abounds. Late last week, various media outlets reported that the case's federal judge, Henry E. Hudson, ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to take custody of the dogs. The Marshals Service says there has been no such order.

Other reports said Hudson will decide the fate of the dogs. Hudson's secretary says that's not true. The pit bulls are in the custody of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, sources with knowledge of the situation say, and will be evaluated by veterinarians and other animal experts to determine whether they can be rehabilitated and placed in other homes.

Since they are fighting dogs, bred to destroy other animals, their chances of making it are slim. Even PETA and the Humane Society of the United States have suggested that the best option is probably euthanasia. So the pit bulls wait, in 4-by-6 kennels. They're fed, watered and cared for, likely awaiting their ultimate death sentences.

"It's almost like they're in a witness protection program," says PETA spokesman Dan Shannon.

"It's very unusual. Normally you wouldn't see a case play out for this length of time. On one hand, it's unfortunate for the animals that their futures are kind of hanging in the balance for this court case. I don't know the details of where they're living, but you've got to figure this has probably been the best four months of their lives at this point."

In Surry County, a pit bull is considered a trophy among some young, single males. Gearheads have Hemis, muscleheads have pecs, and in these parts, testosterone levels can be measured by the thickness of a dog. Lane says he ran into a lot of dogs during his eight-month run as animal control officer. Chows, he hated. But he rarely met a bad pit bull.

The pit bull, advocates say, is a misunderstood animal.

The dog is banned in Miami, Denver and Ontario, Canada. Insurance companies often drop customers who own a squinted-eyed dog that even looks like a pit. But there was a time when they were Hollywood stars, when Petey was the loveable pooch on "Our Gang." Too much bad publicity, pit lovers say. Animal People, which studies dog attacks through media reports, says pit bulls and their mixes were responsible for 110 deaths from 1982 to 2006.

Too many bad owners, says John Goodwin, deputy manager of the Animal Cruelty Campaign for the Humane Society of the United States. He's been on raids when bloodied pit bulls licked his hand as they were being carted away. He's also seen what dogs can do to other four-legged creatures.

"I would say pit bulls are people dogs," Goodwin says. "They are generally very loyal dogs that want to please the person they're with.

   Vick dog
This dog, according to the Humane Society of the United States, was seized from Michael Vick's property.
"The problem is that some people exploit that and have the dogs please them by fighting them to death."

The Humane Society estimates there are 40,000 professional dogfighters in this country.

Game-bred pit bulls, Goodwin says, fare the worst at shelters because they are high-energy, athletic animals that need attention and exercise. Their owners train them on tread mills and teach them to be killing machines. Shelter life is a completely different world. In Surry, there are 14 cages, seven on each side, with a drain in the middle. Most cages are no bigger than a walk-in closet. Because of staffing issues in small-town shelters, some of the dogs might not get walked. This can result in "cage rage," in which the dog jumps up and down and paces in its tiny quarters.

Some gnaw the plastic off air kennels, which are used to hold the dogs while their runs are cleaned. Some chew so hard that their gums bleed and their teeth break.

"It's a miserable life," Goodwin says. "They're anxious to get out and run and burn off some of that energy.

"It's unfortunate because they're dammed if they do and they're dammed if they don't."

When Vick's dogs were viewed by the Humane Society, a few people noted that some of the dogs were very friendly, and a couple of others were kind of scary. Animal experts say most game-bred dogs aren't inclined to attack people. They just want to maul the animals in the cages next to them.

And therein lies the dilemma, why some of the most hard-core animal advocates are recommending that the dogs be euthanized. One leap over a fence could lead to the death of a neighbor's beagle or cocker spaniel. That's just the way the dog was bred.

"I have never met a pit bull on a dogfighting raid that I didn't like," Goodwin says. "I regret the euthanasia angle to this. … [But] you can't let these dogs socialize with other animals, and keeping them in some kind of solitary confinement for all their lives isn't suitable."

A woman in Georgia has filed a civil action against the United States government for the dogs. She lists the defendants as "approximately 53 bulldogs." She wants them to be spared, to have their teeth removed, then adopted out into society. If nobody wants them, Bernadette Allen says she'll shelter all of the dogs herself on her five-acre property outside of Atlanta.

"I want to be heard on the matter," Allen says. "I don't normally get involved in stuff like this. But I think these dogs are entitled to a chance."

Had Vick assaulted his girlfriend or punched out a teammate, critics say, he wouldn't have drawn near the public ire as he has for being involved in dogfighting. Maybe that's how much Americans revere their pets. Cat lovers may spend thousands of dollars on veterinarian bills; some dog ladies plunk down more on gourmet dog food than they do for their own dinner tables.

Pro athletes are not immune to this four-legged fixation. When cornerback Eric Warfield played for the Kansas City Chiefs, he lugged his prized Chihuahua around in a $1,500 Louis Vuitton bag and lavished it with a $6,000 necklace. Michael Bosilevac, a veterinarian who used to treat the pets of some Milwaukee Brewers players, says a player once had his initials engraved into his dog's gold teeth.

A few miles from the courthouse in Richmond where Vick will enter his plea on Monday, Jeremy Harrington plays with his puppy named Boca at Barker Park. Like many pet owners, he's torn over what should happen to the dogs confiscated on Vick's property. He doesn't think the public fixation with them is all that strange.

"If you do anything to another person, that person could've provoked you, but it's obviously never right to hit somebody," Harrington says. "A dog would never do anything to provoke it. It's an innocent thing."

Ray Lane never much liked being the animal control officer. When the job opened up a few years back, he was driving a garbage truck. The guy who used to be Surry's animal control officer doubled as the sanitation director. Lane would just take care of the animals. How hard, he figured, could that be?

"You know how taxpayers can get," he says. "You're not moving fast enough, you can't get there fast enough. …

"It's the country, you know what I'm saying? People are pretty much friendly, but if you're a person like me who grew up around here, everybody knows you. It got to the point where some people would come to my house or call to my house just because they knew me since I was a little boy to come get a dog or they got a cat scratchin' at their door. I said, 'This is too much for me.'"

The man who works in the drab brown building now is James Smith, a young, religious sort who doesn't swear and used to work in a child detention center. If Jamey could handle those kids, Lane says, he could certainly handle the public, the feds, and even Michael Vick's dogs.

The sign on the shelter says "open" on Friday afternoon, but the door is locked and Smith doesn't answer. He says he's busy. Dogs are barking in the background. He says he won't tamper with a federal investigation, even though the dogs were taken away more than two weeks ago. He's grown tired of the media bothering him. He says they should cover Surry's football team, which should be pretty good this fall.

Privately, in the shelters that still house Vick dogs, some workers have grown attached to them and struggle with the idea of keeping the animals alive on doggie death row.

In general, the average shelter worker has a shelf life of about five years, says Richard Samuels, an animal control officer who's president of the Virginia Animal Fighting Task Force. When dealing with game-bred dogs, they still nurse the animals, feed them and even pet them. They take them for walks on their own lunch breaks.

"They do get attached to them," he says. "It's like having your pet every day, you just don't take him home. … And then you have to put him to sleep.

"Mentally, it's very stressful. Some days you win, and some days you lose."

Veterinarians say putting a dog to sleep is painless. Forty seconds, and a dog the size of a pit bull is gone. In some clinics, dogs are given an overdose of Phenobarbital, an anticonvulsant for humans. It sedates them, then stops the heart.

Sometimes pet owners want to be there. When they can't handle it, they call Karen Cohen, a certified animal chaplain in Virginia, one of the first in the country. She does pet memorial services and counsels grieving owners.

She's been thinking about the Vick dogs, praying for them and nearly offered her services to the U.S. Attorney's office. Then she thought of all the people who are already involved, the feds and the shelter workers, and decided she didn't want to "muddy the waters."

"I feel compassion for both the perpetrator and the dogs," Cohen says. "There must be something, I feel, a disconnect somewhere for Mr. Vick to have treated animals this way, though it is not uncommon for people to think animals don't have feelings like we do.

"I think every living thing has a soul. I think it's pretty egocentric for the human animal to think we're that much better than other life forms."

It is Thursday, and judgment day has supposedly come for Vick's dogs. Local TV stations carry a story saying this is the last day for the public to claim the animals, and that the clock is ticking. The forfeiture notice is a formality, really, something the U.S. Attorney's office is required to run in the newspaper for seized property, whether it's guns, drugs or dogs.

   
The City of Suffolk animal control building, where five of the dogs were kept. The federal government calls this Location C.
The deadline comes and goes and all is quiet for the dogs. About a 40-minute drive from Vick's house on Moonlight Road, where they were seized, a sign with a fluffy kitten on it twists outside the Chesapeake animal shelter. The sign says welcome, but a woman in a uniform inside quickly stiffens. She says no one in the shelter will talk about the dogs.

Down the road in Suffolk, where a mom and her kids are dropping off a hamperful of stray kittens, they're issuing the same no comments. This is how serious they are about dog leaks -- an animal group snapped pictures of the dogs, gave them to a few media outlets and caught heat for it.

There are at least two reasons for the deep secrecy. The dogs are considered federal evidence. The dogs came from a successful kennel and are considered valuable to other dogfighters or would-be thieves.

So in a move befitting dogs that don't like each other, they were scattered in shelters over at least six towns, according to federal court records. Thirteen pit bulls were taken to Surry, but according to court records, two of them died. The remaining 11 were moved to Hanover County. Another 19 pit bulls were put in a shelter in Sussex County. Ten were taken to Chesapeake, three were taken to Virginia Beach, five to Suffolk and one to Hopewell. One dog, a Presa Canario, was returned to its owner on Aug. 13. Approximately 12 other dogs were seized from the Vick residence. Some are believed to be beagles, and animal activists hope they are adoptable. It's unclear why Vick had them.

Sources with knowledge of the situation say the dogs are still alive, and it could be weeks before their fates are decided. Lane, who's standing outside the animal shelter on a hot afternoon as the flies buzz by, never got to talk to Smith about whether he was sad or relieved when the dogs were taken. That's classified, too.

But in a two-man operation with 14 kennels, a town of stray dogs and 11 precious pieces of federal evidence, Lane assumes Smith was relieved.

"Those dogs were pretty much like babies when they were here," he says. "I know they were treated like babies. Just because of the case. You've got to [keep] evidence up. What good is dead evidence?"