Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Matt C on September 13, 2007, 05:54:16 PM

Title: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Matt C on September 13, 2007, 05:54:16 PM
Start here:

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/05omens_irvgleb63.htm (http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-1881271-10409943?url=http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/05omens_irvgleb63.htm)

If Ronnie shows up looking like that again, will he win?  Discuss.

Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: grab an umbrella on September 13, 2007, 05:55:43 PM
I hope not, you can see the problems with the left tri there already...
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 13, 2007, 05:57:36 PM
i dont give a shit about those 2 anymore.

more interested in bodybuilders who have a somewhat attainable physique..i.find those physiques more inspiring.

 i know this is something you have stated about mcgrath (altho i know its not really attainable in reality for most people lol but feels more attainable atleast)...

Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 13, 2007, 06:00:04 PM
I hope not, you can see the problems with the left tri there already...

and his latspread was not as good as before. partly due to less back mass..but also due to widening of waist (in early 2000s ronnie had a gut but small waist..nowdays he has a gut and large waist)

guess i care abit lol
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: kawaks on September 13, 2007, 06:01:14 PM
i dont give a shit about those 2 anymore.

more interested in bodybuilders who have a somewhat attainable physique..i.find those physiques more inspiring.


Both are attainable. Most guys don't train properly to get to RC/JC level of development.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2007, 06:06:11 PM
Both are attainable. Most guys don't train properly to get to RC/JC level of development.


lmfao attainable those physique represent among the rarest combos of drug receptors and pure genetics and drive and will in all of the human population , they are truly one is tens of millions who will ever pick up a barbell and become that big .
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 13, 2007, 06:06:56 PM
Both are attainable. Most guys don't train properly to get to RC/JC level of development.

bullshit. not attainable for most people. (many reasons, required drug intake is one big reason)


 ::)
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: kawaks on September 13, 2007, 06:23:30 PM
bullshit. not attainable for most people. (many reasons, required drug intake is one big reason)
 ::)

Son, most bodybuilders don't train properly. And most people don't train like JC or RC - it would literally kill them.

The drug stacks are for keeping the muscle while cutting/striating.



Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: corinth on September 13, 2007, 06:50:53 PM
All Ronnie has to do is show up the way he did last year in the Grand Prix.

He smoked the fridge there but the judges couldn't give Ronnie the win he deserved.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 13, 2007, 06:53:09 PM
Son, most bodybuilders don't train properly. And most people don't train like JC or RC - it would literally kill them.

The drug stacks are for keeping the muscle while cutting/striating.





::)
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Stavios on September 13, 2007, 06:56:06 PM
Very true !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everybody knows that Ron destroyed Jay at the Dutch GP

Yet MadMax said that Jay was dominant  ::)

Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: swilkins1984 on September 13, 2007, 07:00:12 PM
Other than 2001 and 2006 I don't think Jay was in Ronnie's class. Ronnie left the door open and at his best nobody really can touch him he is that good. 2005 was no different and Gustavo though looking at his best winning the Challenge Round still is strange to me.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 13, 2007, 07:01:40 PM
Both are attainable. Most guys don't train properly to get to RC/JC level of development.

you are telling us that Ronnie's build is attainable by most guys if they trained properly?

please, post a pic...show us the errors of our ways
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: candidate2025 on September 13, 2007, 07:12:53 PM
Both are attainable. Most guys don't train properly to get to RC/JC level of development.
:o


please shoot yourself.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: gymguy on September 13, 2007, 07:37:26 PM
All Ronnie has to do is show up the way he did last year in the Grand Prix.

He smoked the fridge there but the judges couldn't give Ronnie the win he deserved.

I AGREE.  Not sure what the judges where thinking that night.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Rampage on September 13, 2007, 08:00:58 PM
All Ronnie has to do is show up the way he did last year in the Grand Prix.

He smoked the fridge there but the judges couldn't give Ronnie the win he deserved.

dude thoose pix arent from any `06 grand prix

coleman looks to be in his prime in those shots , so it deffff aint from last years GPs

someone show the comparison of last years dutch gp pls , i believe coleman won that also

But imho , last years GPs are what truuuuuly made colemans legend flop alot , his showings at those shows wrecked him royally sad to say
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: slayer on September 13, 2007, 08:05:22 PM
jay was 255 lbs lbs at the last grand prix show ::)
jay at 280 is untouchable ;) andthe 2005 colemen would get his ass smoked this yr also!
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Palpatine Q on September 13, 2007, 08:12:03 PM

lmfao attainable those physique represent among the rarest combos of drug receptors and pure genetics and drive and will in all of the human population , they are truly one is tens of millions who will ever pick up a barbell and become that big .

I agree with half of your statement.

Ronnie has one in a million genetics, Jay's genetics are nothing special. Stocky guy on tons of gear, worst Mr O in history
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on September 13, 2007, 08:14:29 PM
I agree with half of your statement.

Ronnie has one in a million genetics, Jay's genetics are nothing special. Stocky guy on tons of gear, worst Mr O in history

100% agree.  Jay has no symmetry whatsoever.  Why the powers that be chose HIM to be Ronnie's successor I have no idea...
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: tommywishbone on September 13, 2007, 08:17:42 PM
Son, most bodybuilders don't train properly. And most people don't train like JC or RC - it would literally kill them.

The drug stacks are for keeping the muscle while cutting/striating.


Good one.  ;D You had me for a minute.  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: kawaks on September 13, 2007, 08:20:46 PM
100% agree.  Jay has no symmetry whatsoever.  Why the powers that be chose HIM to be Ronnie's successor I have no idea...

Because Jay represents "a complete package" with no genetic weaknesses and he improves every year.

The rest of the guys have genetic flaws - hey, anyone seen Victor's calves? Me neither.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: kawaks on September 13, 2007, 08:23:57 PM
Good one.  ;D You had me for a minute.  ;D ;D

Son, when was the last time you repped out on 400_lbs t-bar rows ala Ronnie style?

Most bodybuilders refuse to go the distance.

Why else did business-as-usual Mr Yates raise the bar so far? Training.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: maxer on September 13, 2007, 09:17:31 PM
I agree with half of your statement.

Ronnie has one in a million genetics, Jay's genetics are nothing special. Stocky guy on tons of gear, worst Mr O in history

HAter! Jays champion....get over it!  :-*
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: jacshelb on September 13, 2007, 10:06:18 PM
Son, when was the last time you repped out on 400_lbs t-bar rows ala Ronnie style?

Most bodybuilders refuse to go the distance.

Why else did business-as-usual Mr Yates raise the bar so far? Training.

Yeah, "son."  See, you are stupid and young because someone called you son.  So, wise up.  If you just train hard, anyone can look like Ronnie Coleman!  Trust me, you don't need great genetics because genetics have nothing to do with muscle shape, amount of muscle fibers available, and ability to partition nutrients.  So, trust me.  I know what I'm talking about.  I've got a long white beard and look like father time, but like, with Ronnie's muscles or something...   ::)
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: The Coach on September 13, 2007, 10:12:16 PM
Start here:

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/05omens_irvgleb63.htm (http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-1881271-10409943?url=http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/05omens_irvgleb63.htm)

If Ronnie shows up looking like that again, will he win?  Discuss.




Hahaha, like i said in another thread...........ripped "glutes" and smooth backs......hahahahah!
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: jacshelb on September 13, 2007, 10:15:41 PM
As to the thing about genetics....  Have you seen Jay train?  I watched a back training video, and though he was working hard, he wasn't doing anything most hardcore trainers do.  He was using really crappy form on pulldowns with something like 250 lbs.  Why would that even be hard for a man his size?  I'm tiny compared to him and use about 10 lbs more with better form.  I'm sure he's doing more volume than me, but you just can't discount genetics.  Yes, he works hard.  Yes, he diets like a mad man and has amazing discipline!  Yes, he probably uses a boatload of supplements, legal and otherwise.  But, the dude looked better at 17 yrs old than most of us will after years of training.  Get real.

Consider Mike Mentzer.  The dude was 5'8"-5'9" same as Jay and competed at 225 at his biggest.  Mentzer was known for high intensity training, working to absolute failure and all that.  Why wasn't he as big as Jay is (280 ripped on stage)?  I mean, we're talking 45 lbs difference here.  The answer is: 1) no insulin or GH 2) He's not Jay, was not born to be Jay or have his potential for muscle growth.


Jacob
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: kawaks on September 13, 2007, 10:56:58 PM
Yeah, "son."  See, you are stupid and young because someone called you son.  So, wise up.  If you just train hard, anyone can look like Ronnie Coleman!  Trust me, you don't need great genetics because genetics have nothing to do with muscle shape, amount of muscle fibers available, and ability to partition nutrients.  So, trust me.  I know what I'm talking about.  I've got a long white beard and look like father time, but like, with Ronnie's muscles or something...   ::)

C'mon son, you tellin' me you train like Coleman or Culter? NO. Do you even know what t-bar rows are? Figures.

So of course you aint gonna look like those guys.

That said, few bodybuilders train properly. ie. few replicate the intensity of Yates, Coleman or Cutler.

YOU ARE OWNED.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: willie mosconi on September 13, 2007, 11:19:58 PM
I thought it was VERY close in 2005. It could have gone either way
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Andre Nickatina on September 13, 2007, 11:49:02 PM
C'mon son, you tellin' me you train like Coleman or Culter? NO. Do you even know what t-bar rows are? Figures.

So of course you aint gonna look like those guys.

That said, few bodybuilders train properly. ie. few replicate the intensity of Yates, Coleman or Cutler.

YOU ARE OWNED.

So if Ronnie had Kris Dims bone structure he'd still be Mr O.? Didn't THINK SO.

Now you're owned. 

Owned so bad it deserves an illustration. Now quit posting. Stupid.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: kawaks on September 14, 2007, 12:18:25 AM
So if Ronnie had Kris Dims bone structure he'd still be Mr O.? Didn't THINK SO.Now you're owned.  Owned so bad it deserves an illustration. Now quit posting. Stupid.

Nonsense! If Ronnie was a shorty would he still be Mr O??? Maybe in the short-class of the 70's 80's not anymore.

Just look at what Mr Yates achieved. He never bragged about having super-human genetics for arms!

Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: MattT on September 14, 2007, 02:13:50 AM
jay was 255 lbs lbs at the last grand prix show ::)
jay at 280 is untouchable ;) andthe 2005 colemen would get his ass smoked this yr also!

Ron is twisting his back in that pose he always does that something he needs to work on. IF he would keep his back straight you would see that theres nothing wrong with his lats

Did Jay tear his right lat?  look how un even they are in this pic??

 :o
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on September 14, 2007, 02:57:26 AM
Nonsense! If Ronnie was a shorty would he still be Mr O??? Maybe in the short-class of the 70's 80's not anymore.

Just look at what Mr Yates achieved. He never bragged about having super-human genetics for arms!



I agree with you. Most people don't train hard or, which is a big one, consistently. They think they are but very very few people stick to their diet day in day out and train everything hard week in, week out. Obviously RC and JC have better genetics too but people attribute too much to drugs.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 14, 2007, 03:05:41 AM
Start here:If Ronnie shows up looking like that again, will he win?  Discuss.

  If he shows up with this combo of size, separations, striations, hardness, dryness and aesthetics, he will win with straight-firsts scores. The problem is that 9 years have passed since this pic was taken. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Bear on September 14, 2007, 03:14:39 AM
Well yes, everyone knows he can't look like that again. No-one can. But he can still look better than fridge-features. Not that I dislike Cutler but to me those Dutch GP pictures really show why Ronnie is better. Look at the rear 'relaxed' pose or whatever they call it, NO COMPARISON! Ronnie is separated, Jay IS NOT.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: webcake on September 14, 2007, 03:24:58 AM
That has to be one of the best pics of Ronnie ever taken. Now that is truly unbeatable. Look at the glute-hamstring tie in, not to mention the striations on his tris. I doubt a package as good as this one will ever be seen again, at least not for a long long time.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on September 14, 2007, 08:47:03 AM
Because Jay represents "a complete package" with no genetic weaknesses and he improves every year.

The rest of the guys have genetic flaws - hey, anyone seen Victor's calves? Me neither.

How do you think Jay has the "complete package"?  Not ragging on Jay because I've heard he's a good guy, but come on he looks like a block, as wide as he is thick.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: natural al on September 14, 2007, 08:54:01 AM
I still think Jay is gonna win, Jay's not gonna get much bigger than he was last year, I think he knows that.  Jay's pretty smart, he's always improving on areas that he needs to improve upon.  Jay might be blocky but he can make up for that if he brings in a tight, defined midsection.  Ronnie can get very lean but the problem I have with him is even when he is very, very lean he shows virtually no refinement in the abdominal region, he's got a 4 pack at best and has virtually no seratus or intercostals cause everything is so distended in that area.  there's some pics over at BB.com of Jay from just the other day and his legs are looking great, awsome striations on his outer quads.  All things being equal and if both guys come in at thier alltime best jay can't touch Ronnie but I don't think Ronnie can do tha anymore and that's gonna be his downfall.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Kegdrainer on September 14, 2007, 09:35:32 AM
ronnie is going downhill...his body, freakish as it may be, is getting worse, not better.  the quality and hardness of his muscle mass is going to decline continually..  he should crossover and compete in the masters division to guarantee himself a win at the O
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Matt C on September 14, 2007, 09:48:30 AM
ronnie is going downhill...his body, freakish as it may be, is getting worse, not better.  the quality and hardness of his muscle mass is going to decline continually..  he should crossover and compete in the masters division to guarantee himself a win at the O


I would say if nothing else, his hardness IS improving.  I think he can use that to his advantage.  He will have the most muscle density of anyone on stage, along the lines of what Rich Gaspari had in his early twenties.  Like Chris Dickerson said "You had to be 40 to look like that and even at 40 you didn't look like that (Gaspari)."  Although Ronnie at 43 is definitely closing in on the ability to replicate Gaspari's hardness.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: jacshelb on September 14, 2007, 10:36:22 AM
C'mon son, you tellin' me you train like Coleman or Culter? NO. Do you even know what t-bar rows are? Figures.

So of course you aint gonna look like those guys.

That said, few bodybuilders train properly. ie. few replicate the intensity of Yates, Coleman or Cutler.

YOU ARE OWNED.

Ok, you win.  Dad.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 14, 2007, 01:48:01 PM
(http://www.gabriellereillyweekly.com/gabrielle_reilly/fitness/fitness_health_diet_gabrielle_reilly/jay_cutler2.jpg)

I almost barf everytime I see Jay's horrible genetics. Truly a physique anyone can attain with enough drugs.  ::)

( On a side note, there is something a little creepy about that photo :o )
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: corinth on September 14, 2007, 01:58:32 PM
(http://www.gabriellereillyweekly.com/gabrielle_reilly/fitness/fitness_health_diet_gabrielle_reilly/jay_cutler2.jpg)

I almost barf everytime I see Jay's horrible genetics. Truly a physique anyone can attain with enough drugs.  ::)

( On a side note, there is something a little creepy about that photo :o )

That photo is an Arian wet dream.


It's also about 4 hat sizes ago for the fridge.


Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: musclehedz on September 14, 2007, 02:03:09 PM
That photo is an Arian wet dream.


It's also about 4 hat sizes ago for the fridge.




A true ubermensch.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Spicy Shushi on September 14, 2007, 02:35:00 PM
jay was 255 lbs lbs at the last grand prix show ::)
jay at 280 is untouchable ;) andthe 2005 colemen would get his ass smoked this yr also!

Get your eyes checked. Ronnie SMOKED Jay at the last Grand Prix show and if they both showed up like that (or if the 2005 Coleman showed up) AND they judged it fairly, Ronnie gets straight ones.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: dearth on September 14, 2007, 02:43:40 PM
Ron is twisting his back in that pose he always does that something he needs to work on. IF he would keep his back straight you would see that theres nothing wrong with his lats

Did Jay tear his right lat?  look how un even they are in this pic??

 :o

MAtt t get your eyes of will harris cock, and look at the picture properly.

Ronnie has the torn lat, not cutler.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 14, 2007, 03:32:10 PM
Here's Jay last week:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=167629.0;attach=194461;image)

Condition looks very impressive. Still too close to call IMHO.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: WOOO on September 14, 2007, 03:36:02 PM
ron can do it... he is a machine...

he will make this last olympia count
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 14, 2007, 04:11:12 PM
Son, most bodybuilders don't train properly. And most people don't train like JC or RC - it would literally kill them.

The drug stacks are for keeping the muscle while cutting/striating.





 ;D... you obviously have alot to learn.
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 14, 2007, 05:12:05 PM
;D... you obviously have alot to learn.

Yeah, this guy is a real winner.  ;D
Title: Re: Ronnie VS. Jay in 2005.
Post by: cswol on September 15, 2007, 08:02:38 PM
atleast someone can realize and point out that ronnie won the gp shows in europe last year.