Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The Squadfather on September 30, 2007, 04:25:17 PM

Title: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: The Squadfather on September 30, 2007, 04:25:17 PM
come on, Hide at 176? Ronnie at 297? Jay at 274? Melvin at 245? i think they just asked them what they weighed and they took their word for it.
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: marcus on September 30, 2007, 04:40:20 PM
I liked how Will Harris' age was ??.
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: Meso_z on October 01, 2007, 01:55:02 AM
I liked how Will Harris' age was ??.

REALLY!!!!!!!!!!??????????

Oh boy......only a gay would "hide" his age........ ::) ::) ::)  :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: Hedgehog on October 01, 2007, 03:45:11 AM
REALLY!!!!!!!!!!??????????

Oh boy......only a gay would "hide" his age........ ::) ::) ::)  :-X :-X :-X

Didn't you know he claim to be an undead vampire?

For real.

Word is he hangs with skinny guys at horror conventions and stuff.
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: Bluto on October 01, 2007, 03:47:09 AM
they did it just so squadfather could call bullshit on their weight claims on getbig for the next 12 months to the next olympia... that should keep him busy.
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: SteelePegasus on October 01, 2007, 05:03:44 AM
Didn't you know he claim to be an undead vampire?

For real.

Word is he hangs with skinny guys at horror conventions and stuff.

I willing to bet that Matt likes horror conventions also
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: rockyfortune on October 01, 2007, 06:05:49 AM
because the webcast was probably done by a bunch of 7th graders...
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: triple_pickle on October 01, 2007, 06:37:15 AM
hahahaha, they showed freeman's weight as 295 i think, while he admitted during the webcast he dropped to 267 or something like that.
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: SteelePegasus on October 01, 2007, 06:40:32 AM
because the webcast was probably done by a bunch of 7th graders...

umm..most 7th grader these days know how to work a web cam..they wouldn't take kindly to be insulted by being associated with that broadcast
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: slaveboy1980 on October 01, 2007, 06:47:52 AM
hahahaha, they showed freeman's weight as 295 i think, while he admitted during the webcast he dropped to 267 or something like that.

yeah it was obvious he wasnt 295....he was soft and "small".

i wonder what happened to him..he bragged that he would be 290-300 onstage

when i saw the MD video of him i knew he was off...small arms and bullshit about doing 25 reps for legs with minimal weight

often high reps is just an excuse to be a pussy.

high reps with heavy (or medium) weights is good for legs. but that MD video with him working legs was a joke...

his legs probably shrunk a couple of inches last few weeks just because he was lazy and didnt do any heavy work.

watching the olympia series has highlighted something that i already knew: how much bullshit the pros talk, how ignorant they are, the amounts of psedo bullshit they believe in.

Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: Bluto on October 01, 2007, 06:49:42 AM
personally i think it was great that mr olympia was webcast for free

Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: slaveboy1980 on October 01, 2007, 06:50:18 AM
personally i think it was great that mr olympia was webcast for free



free shit is better than paid shit.

but its still shit.
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: rockyfortune on October 01, 2007, 06:51:11 AM
umm..most 7th grader these days know how to work a web cam..they wouldn't take kindly to be insulted by being associated with that broadcast



that bad?
Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: Bluto on October 01, 2007, 06:51:49 AM
free shit is better than paid shit.

but its still shit.

loaded fine for me. no slowdown. got no real complaints here

Title: Re: WHY WERE THE LISTED WEIGHTS SO OFF ON THE WEBCAST????
Post by: slaveboy1980 on October 01, 2007, 06:53:34 AM
loaded fine for me. no slowdown. got no real complaints here



im talking about the competition in itself.

its like a clear high quality picture of diareah